The concept of imprinting has attracted considerable interest in numerous fields—including organizational ecology, institutional theory, network analysis, and career research—and has been applied at several levels of analysis, from the industry to the individual. This article offers a critical review of this rich yet disparate literature and guides research toward a multilevel theory of imprinting. We start with a definition that captures the general features of imprinting across levels of analysis but is precise enough to remain distinct from seemingly similar concepts, such as path dependence and cohort effects. We then provide a framework to order and unite the splintered field of imprinting research at different levels of analysis. In doing so, we identify economic, technological, institutional, and individual influences that lead to imprints at the level of (a) organizational collectives, (b) single organizations, (c) organizational building blocks, and (d) individuals. Building on this framework, we develop a general model that points to major avenues for future research and charts new directions toward a multilevel theory of imprinting. This theory provides a distinct lens for organizational research that takes history seriously.

References

  • Ahuja G., Soda G., Zaheer A. 2012. The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2): 434–448. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0695) Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H., Ruef M. 2006. Organizations evolving, 2, London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Arthur W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394): 116–131. (doi:10.2307/2234208) Google Scholar
  • Arthur W. B. 1990. Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, 262(February): 92–99. (doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0290-92) Google Scholar
  • Ashforth B. K., Saks A. M. 1996. Socialization tactics: Longitudinal effects on newcomer adjustment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 149–178. (doi:10.2307/256634)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay, P., Liu, C.C., & Stuart, T.E. (2011). Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs (Working Paper). Cambridge: Harvard University. Google Scholar
  • Bamford C. E., Dean T. J., McDougall P. P. 2000. An examination of the impact of initial founding conditions and decisions upon the performance of new bank start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3): 253–277. (doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00011-1) Google Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Bielby W. 1980. Bringing the firms back in: Stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. American Sociological Review, 45: 737–765. (doi:10.2307/2094893) Google Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Burton M. D., Hannan M. T. 1999. Engineering bureaucracy: The genesis of formal policies, positions, and structures in high-technology firms. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1): 1–41. (doi:10.1093/jleo/15.1.1) Google Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Hannan M. T., Burton M. D. 1999. Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations. American Sociological Review, 64: 527–547. (doi:10.2307/2657254) Google Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Newman A. E. 1990. For what it's worth: Organizations, occupations, and the value of work done by women and nonwhites. American Sociological Review, 55: 155–175. (doi:10.2307/2095624) Google Scholar
  • Battilana J. 2006. Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5): 653–676. (doi:10.1177/1350508406067008) Google Scholar
  • Battilana J., Leca B., Boxenbaum E. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3: 65–107. (doi:10.1080/19416520903053598)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A.C., Shipilov A. 2006. “Ecological approaches to organizations”. In Sage handbook for organization studies, Edited by: Clegg S.Hardy C.Laurence T.North W. 55–110. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A.C., Silverman B. S. 2001. “Complexity, attractors and path dependence and creation in technological evolution”. In Path as process, Edited by: Garud R.Karnoe P. 169–209. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • Beatty R. P., Zajac E. J. 1994. Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2): 313–335. (doi:10.2307/2393238) Google Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Phillips D. J. 2005. Interorganizational determinants of promotion: Client leadership and the attainment of women attorneys. American Sociological Review, 70(4): 678–701. (doi:10.1177/000312240507000407) Google Scholar
  • Boeker W. 1988. “Organizational origins: Entreprenurial and environmental imprinting at time of founding”. In Ecological models of organizations, Edited by: Carroll G. R. 33–51. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar
  • Boeker W. 1989a. Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3): 489–515. (doi:10.2307/256432)AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W. 1989b. The development and institutionalization of subunit power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3): 388–410. (doi:10.2307/2393150) Google Scholar
  • Breen R., Jonsson J. O. 2000. Analyzing educational careers: A multinomial transition model. American Sociological Review, 65(5): 754–772. (doi:10.2307/2657545) Google Scholar
  • Briscoe F., Kellogg K. C. 2011. The initial assignment effect: Local employer practices and positive career outcomes for work-family program users. American Sociological Review, 76(2): 291–319. (doi:10.1177/0003122411401250) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Burton D. M., Sørensen J. B., Beckman C. M. 2002. Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 19: 229–262. (doi:10.1016/S0733-558X(02)19007-0) Google Scholar
  • Burton M. D., Beckman C. M. 2007. Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. American Sociological Review, 72(2): 239–266. (doi:10.1177/000312240707200206) Google Scholar
  • Calori R., Lubatkin M., Very P., Veiga J. F. 1997. Modelling the origins of nationally-bound administrative heritages: A historical institutional analysis of French and British firms. Organization Science, 8(6): 681–696. (doi:10.1287/orsc.8.6.681) Google Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T. 1989. Density dependence in the evolution of populations of newspaper organizations. American Sociological Review, 54(4): 524–541. (doi:10.2307/2095875) Google Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T. 2004. The demography of corporations and industries, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Swaminathan A. 2000. Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(3): 715–762. (doi:10.1086/318962) Google Scholar
  • Castilla E. J. 2008. Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6): 1479–1526. (doi:10.1086/588738) Google Scholar
  • Chandler A. D. 1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Chatterjee A., Hambrick D. C. 2007. It's all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3): 351–386. Google Scholar
  • Chernow R. 1998. Titan: The life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr, New York: Random House. Google Scholar
  • Child J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6: 2–21. Google Scholar
  • Clemens E. S. 2002. “13. Invention, innovation, proliferation: Explaining organizational genesis and change”. In Social structure and organizations revisited (Research in the sociology of organizations), Edited by: Lounsbury M.Ventresca M. J. Vol. 19, 397–411. Amsterdam: JAI. Google Scholar
  • Cohen L. E. 2012. Assembling jobs: A model of how tasks are bundled into and across jobs. Organization Science, published online April 3, 2012, doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0737 Google Scholar
  • Cooper D. J., Hinings B., Greenwood R., Brown J. L. 1996. Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: The case of Canadian law firms. Organization Studies, 17(4): 623–647. (doi:10.1177/017084069601700404) Google Scholar
  • Cooper D. J., Rose T., Greenwood R., Hinings B. 2000. “History and contingency in international accounting firms”. In Globalization of services: Some implications for theory and practice, Edited by: Aharoni Y.Nachum L. 93–124. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Dahl M. S., Dezső C. L., Ross D. G. 2012. Fatherhood and managerial style: How a male CEO's children affect the wages of his employees. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(4): 669–693. (doi:10.1177/0001839212466521) Google Scholar
  • David P. A. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2): 332–337. Google Scholar
  • David P. A. 1994. Why are institutions the “carriers of history”?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2): 205–220. (doi:10.1016/0954-349X(94)90002-7) Google Scholar
  • Dew N., Sarasvathy S. D., Venkataraman S. 2004. The economic implications of exaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(1): 69–84. (doi:10.1007/s00191-003-0180-x) Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160. (doi:10.2307/2095101) Google Scholar
  • Dimov D., de Holan P. M., Milanovy H. 2012. Learning patterns in venture capital investing in new industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6): 1389–1426. (doi:10.1093/icc/dts010) Google Scholar
  • DiPrete T. A., Eirich G. M. 2006. Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1): 271–297. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127) Google Scholar
  • DiRenzo G. J. 1977. Socialization, personality, and social systems. Annual Review of Sociology, 3(1): 261–295. (doi:10.1146/annurev.so.03.080177.001401) Google Scholar
  • Djelic M.-L., Ainamo A. 2005. “The telecom industry as cultural industry? The transposition of fashion logics into the field of mobile telephony”. In Transformation in cultural industries (Research in the sociology of organizations), Edited by: Jones C.Thornton P. H. Vol. 23, 45–80. Amsterdam: JAI. Google Scholar
  • Dobbin F. R. 1993. The social construction of the great depression: Industrial policy during the 1930s in the United States, Britain, and France. Theory and Society, 22(1): 1–56. (doi:10.1007/BF00993447) Google Scholar
  • Dobbin F. R. 1994. Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the railway age, New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Dobrev S. D., Gotsopoulos A. 2010. Legitimacy vacuum, structural imprinting, and the first mover disadvantage. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5): 1153–1174. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533229)AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Dokko G., Wilk S. L., Rothbard N. P. 2009. Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organization Science, 20(1): 51–68. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0357) Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. 1990. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3): 504–529. (doi:10.2307/2393315) Google Scholar
  • Elder G. H. 1974. Children of the great depression: Social change in life experience, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Fallows J. M. 2012. China airborne, 1, New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar
  • Fan C. C. 1995. Of belts and ladders: State policy and uneven regional development in post-Mao China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(3): 421–449. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01807.x) Google Scholar
  • Ferriani S., Garnsey E., Lorenzoni G. 2012. Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: The process of reimprinting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4): 1011–1048. (doi:10.1093/icc/dts001) Google Scholar
  • Flanagan C. 1999. Early socialisation: Sociability and attachment, London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Garud R., Karnøe P. 2001. “Path creation as a process of mindful deviation”. In Path dependence and creation, Edited by: Garud R.Karnøe P. 1–40. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Gieryn T. F. 2000. A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1): 463–496. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463) Google Scholar
  • Glynn M. A., Raffaelli R. 2010. Uncovering mechanisms of theory development in an academic field: Lessons from leadership research. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1): 359–401. (doi:10.1080/19416520.2010.495530)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gould S. J. 1980. The Panda's thumb, 1, New York: Norton. Google Scholar
  • Gould S. J. 1991. Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3): 43–65. (doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01822.x) Google Scholar
  • Gould S. J., Vrba E. S. 1982. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1): 4–15. Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Díaz A. M., Li S. X., Lorente J. C. 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2): 521–539. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0453) Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1022–1054. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micelotta E. R., Lounsbury M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 317–371. (doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590299)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R., Rao H. 2012. Echoes of the past: Organizational foundings as sources of an institutional legacy of mutualism. American Journal of Sociology, 118(3): 635–675. (doi:10.1086/667721) Google Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Lee L.-E., Nanda A. 2008. Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Science, 54(7): 1213–1230. (doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.0809) Google Scholar
  • Guillén M. F. 1994. Models of management: Work, authority, and organization in a comparative perspective, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Gulati R., Westphal J. D. 1999. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3): 473–506. (doi:10.2307/2666959) Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. 1989. Guest editor's introduction: Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1): 5–15. (doi:10.1002/smj.4250100703) Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Burton M. D., Baron J. N. 1996. Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high technology firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(2): 503–536. (doi:10.1093/icc/5.2.503) Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5): 929–964. (doi:10.1086/226424) Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2): 149–164. (doi:10.2307/2095567) Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. 1989. Organizational ecology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Harrison J. R., Torres D. L., Kukalis S. 1988. The changing of the guard: Turnover and structural change in the top-management positions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2): 211–232. (doi:10.2307/2393056) Google Scholar
  • Haveman H. A., Rao H. 1997. Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. The American Journal of Sociology, 102(6): 1606–1651. (doi:10.1086/231128) Google Scholar
  • Haveman H. A., Rao H., Paruchuri S. 2007. The winds of change: The progressive movement and the bureaucratization of thrift. American Sociological Review, 72(1): 117–142. (doi:10.1177/000312240707200106) Google Scholar
  • Heinroth O. 1911. “Beiträge zur Ethologie, namentlich der Ethologie und Psychologie der Anatiden”. In Verhandlungen des V. Internationalen Ornithologen-Kongresses in Berlin, 30. Mai bis 4. Juni 1910, Edited by: Schalow H. 589–702. Berlin: Deutsche Ornithologische Gesellschaft. Google Scholar
  • Hess E. H. 1959. Imprinting. Science, 130(3368): 133–141. (doi:10.1126/science.130.3368.133) Google Scholar
  • Higgins M. C. 2005. Career imprints: Creating leaders across an industry, 1, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  • Hsu D. H., Kenney M. 2005. Organizing venture capital: The rise and demise of American research & development corporation, 1946–1973. Industrial & Corporate Change, 14(4): 579–616. (doi:10.1093/icc/dth064) Google Scholar
  • Ibarra H. 1999. Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4): 764–791. (doi:10.2307/2667055) Google Scholar
  • Immelmann K. 1975. Ecological significance of imprinting and early learning. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 6: 15–37. (doi:10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.000311) Google Scholar
  • Inglehart R., Baker W. E. 2000. Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1): 19–51. (doi:10.2307/2657288) Google Scholar
  • Jepperson R. 1991. “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism”. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Edited by: Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. 143–163. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Johnson V. 2007. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1): 97–127. (doi:10.1086/517899) Google Scholar
  • Johnson V. 2008. Backstage at the revolution: How the Royal Paris Opera survived the end of the old regime, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Jones G., Khanna T. 2006. Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4): 453–468. (doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400198) Google Scholar
  • Joshi A., Dencker J. C., Franz G., Martocchio J. J. 2010. Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 392–414. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2010.51141800)AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk A. 2009. Inside or outside: The social mechanisms of entrepreneurships choices. Evidence from the mutual fund industry, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Google Scholar
  • Kalev A., Dobbin F., Kelly E. 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71: 589–617. (doi:10.1177/000312240607100404) Google Scholar
  • Kieser A. 1994. Why organization theory needs historical analyses—and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5(4): 608–620. (doi:10.1287/orsc.5.4.608) Google Scholar
  • Kimberly J. R. 1975. Environmental constraints and organizational structure: A comparative analysis of rehabilitation organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20: 1–9. (doi:10.2307/2392119) Google Scholar
  • Kimberly J. R. 1979. Issues in the creation of organizations: Initiation, innovation, and institutionalization. The Academy of Management Journal, 22(3): 437–457. (doi:10.2307/255737)AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Kimberly J. R., Bouchikhi H. 1995. The dynamics of organizational development and change: How the past shapes the present and constrains the future. Organization Science, 6(1): 9–18. (doi:10.1287/orsc.6.1.9) Google Scholar
  • Kogut B. 1993. “Learning, or the importance of being inert: Country imprinting and international competition”. In Organization theory and the multinational corporation, Edited by: Ghoshal S.Westney E. 136–154. New York: St Martin's Press. Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. 2000. Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two Zeiss companies. American Sociological Review, 65(2): 169–190. (doi:10.2307/2657436) Google Scholar
  • Kriauciunas A., Kale P. 2006. The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: A study of firms in Lithuania. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 659–679. (doi:10.1002/smj.537) Google Scholar
  • Leblebici H., Salancik G. R., Copay A., King T. 1991. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3): 333–363. (doi:10.2307/2393200) Google Scholar
  • Lin L.-W. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in China: Window dressing or structural change?. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28(1): 64–100. Google Scholar
  • Lorenz K. 1935. Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Der Artgenosse als auslösendes Moment sozialer Verhaltensweisen. Journal für Ornithologie, 83: 137–413. (doi:10.1007/BF01905355) Google Scholar
  • Lorenz K. 1937. On the formation of the concept of instinct. Natural Sciences, 25(19): 289–300. Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M. 2002. Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 255–266. (doi:10.2307/3069295)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M. 2007. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 289–307. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634436)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. 2002. “Social structures and organizations revisited”. In Research in the sociology of organizations, Edited by: Lounsbury M.Ventresca M. Vol. 19, 3–26. New York: JAI/Elsevier. Google Scholar
  • Mahoney J. 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4): 507–548. (doi:10.1023/A:1007113830879) Google Scholar
  • Malmendier U., Nagel S. 2011. Depression babies: Do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1): 373–416. (doi:10.1093/qje/qjq004) Google Scholar
  • Marquis C. 2003. The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 655–689. (doi:10.2307/3556640) Google Scholar
  • Marquis C., Battilana J. 2009. Acting globally but thinking locally? The influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29: 283–302. (doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.001) Google Scholar
  • Marquis C., Davis G. F., Glynn M. A. 2013. Golfing alone? Corporations, elites and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities. Organization Science, 24(1): 39–57. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0717) Google Scholar
  • Marquis C., Huang Z. 2010. Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the U.S. commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1441–1473. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318393)AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science (forthcoming). Google Scholar
  • Mayo A. J., Nohria N. 2005. In their time: The greatest business leaders of the twentieth century, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
  • McEvily B., Jaffee J., Tortoriello M. 2012. Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organization Science, 23(2): 547–563. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0633) Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363. (doi:10.1086/226550) Google Scholar
  • Meyer M. W., Brown M. C. 1977. The process of bureaucratization. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 364–385. (doi:10.1086/226551) Google Scholar
  • Miles W. E., Snow C. C., Pfeffer J. 1974. Organization-environment: Concepts and issues. Industrial Relations, 13(3): 244–264. Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S. 1991. Organizational evolution and the social ecology of jobs. American Sociological Review, 56(6): 772–785. (doi:10.2307/2096255) Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S., Stearns L. B. 2001. Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making. American Sociological Review, 66: 647–671. (doi:10.2307/3088952) Google Scholar
  • Nasaw D. 2006. Andrew Carnegie, New York: Penguin Press. Google Scholar
  • North D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • O'Mahony S., Ferraro F. 2007. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 1079–1106. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.27169153)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O'Mahony S., Lakhani K. R. 2011. “Organizations in the shadow of communities”. In Communities and organizations (Research in the sociology of organizations), Edited by: Marquis C.Lounsbury M.Greenwood R. Vol. 33, 3–36. Bingley: Emerald Group. Google Scholar
  • Pache A.-C., Santos F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 455–476. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Page S. E. 2006. Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(1): 87–115. (doi:10.1561/100.00000006) Google Scholar
  • Palmer D., Barber B. M. 2001. Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1): 87–120. (doi:10.2307/2667126) Google Scholar
  • Peng Y. 2004. Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China's transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5): 1045–1074. (doi:10.1086/382347) Google Scholar
  • Pennings J. M. 1980. “Environmental influences on the creation process”. In The organizational life cycle, Edited by: Kimberly J. R.Miles R. H. 134–160. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  • Perrow C. 1984. Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies, New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
  • Perrow C. 1999. Organizing to reduce the vulnerabilities of complexity. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 7(3): 150–155. (doi:10.1111/1468-5973.00108) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
  • Phillips D. J. 2005. Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender inequality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 440–472. (doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.440) Google Scholar
  • Portes A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1–24. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1) Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W. 1991. “Expanding the scope of institutional analysis”. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Edited by: Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. 183–203. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Rao H., Monin P., Durand R. 2003. Institutional change in Toque ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4): 795–843. (doi:10.1086/367917) Google Scholar
  • Raynard M., Lounsbury M., Greenwood R. 2013. “Legacies of logics: Sources of community variation in CSR implementation in China”. In Research in the sociology of organizations: Institutional logics in action Edited by: Lounsbury M.Boxenbaum E. (pp. forthcoming). Bingley: Emerald Group Google Scholar
  • Rosenbaum J. E. 1979. Tournament mobility: Career patterns in a corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2): 220–241. (doi:10.2307/2392495) Google Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6): 751–766. (doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026) Google Scholar
  • Rosow I. 1978. What is a cohort and why?. Human Development, 21: 65–75. (doi:10.1159/000271575) Google Scholar
  • Ruef M. 2002. “6. Unpacking the liability of aging: Toward a socially-embedded account of organizational disbanding”. In Social structure and organizations revisited (research in the sociology of organizations), Edited by: Lounsbury M.Ventresca M. J. Vol. 19, 195–228. Amsterdam: JAI. Google Scholar
  • Ryder N. B. 1965. The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6): 843–861. (doi:10.2307/2090964) Google Scholar
  • Schein E. H. 1971. The individual, the organization, and the career: A conceptual scheme. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4): 401–426. (doi:10.1177/002188637100700401) Google Scholar
  • Schneiberg M. 2002. “Organizational heterogeneity and the production of new forms: Politics, social movements and mutual companies in American fire insurance, 1900–1930”. In Research in the sociology of organizations, Edited by: Lounsbury M.Ventresca M. Vol. 19, 39–89. Amsterdam: JAI. Google Scholar
  • Schoar, A., & Zuo, L. (2011). Shaped by booms and busts: How the economy impacts CEO careers and management style (Working Paper). National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests, 3, Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Selznick P. 1957. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation, New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
  • Shinkle G. A., Kriauciunas A. P. 2012. The impact of current and founding institutions on strength of competitive aspirations in transition economies. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4): 448–458. (doi:10.1002/smj.1946) Google Scholar
  • Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. 2004. Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 893–906. (doi:10.2307/20159629)AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. 2004. The organizational demography of racial employment segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 110(3): 626–671. (doi:10.1086/426464) Google Scholar
  • Spalding, D.A. (1873 [1902]). Instinct. With original observations on young animals. Popular Science Monthly, June, 126–142. Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L. 1965. “Social structure and organizations”. In Handbook of organizations, Edited by: March J. G. 142–193. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
  • Sullivan, B.N., Tang, Y., & Marquis, C. (2013). Persistently learning: How small-world network imprints and organizational adaptation affect firm performance (Working Paper). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. Google Scholar
  • Swaminathan A. 1996. Environmental conditions at founding and organizational mortality: A trial-by-fire model. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1350–1377. (doi:10.2307/257002)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sydow J., Schreyögg G., Koch J. 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4): 689–709. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2009.44885978)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tilcsik A. 2010. From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1474–1498. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318905)AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Tilcsik A. 2012. Remembrance of things past: Individual imprinting in organizations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Google Scholar
  • Tucker D. J., Singh J. V., Meinhard A. G. 1990. “Founding characteristics, imprinting and organizational change”. In Organizational evolution: New directions, Edited by: Singh J. V. 182–200. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Romanelli E. 1985. “Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation”. In Research in organizational behavior, Edited by: Cummings L. L.Staw B. M. Vol. 7, 171–222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
  • Üsdiken B., Kieser A. 2004. Introduction: History in organisation studies. Business History, 46(3): 321–330. (doi:10.1080/0007679042000219166) Google Scholar
  • Van Maanen J., Schein E. H. 1979. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in organizational behavior, 1(1): 209–264. Google Scholar
  • Vergne J.-P., Durand R. 2010. The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4): 736–759. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00913.x) Google Scholar
  • Walsh J. P. 1988. Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 173–183. (doi:10.1002/smj.4250090207) Google Scholar
  • Westphal J. D., Zajac E. J. 2001. Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2): 202–228. (doi:10.2307/2667086) Google Scholar
  • Xiao Z., Tsui A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 1–31. Google Scholar
  • Zald M. N. 1990. “History, sociology, and theories of organization”. In Institutions in American society, Edited by: Jackson J. E. 81–108. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
  • Zaring O., Eriksson C. M. 2009. The dynamics of rapid industrial growth: Evidence from Sweden's information technology industry, 1990–2004. Industrial & Corporate Change, 18(3): 507–528. (doi:10.1093/icc/dtp010) Google Scholar
  • Zyglidopoulos S. 1999. Initial environmental conditions and technological change. Journal of Management Studies, 36(2): 241–262. (doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00135) Google Scholar