More Formally: Rediscovering the Missing Link between Formal Organization and Informal Social Structure

References

• Ahuja G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. doi: 10.2307/2667105 Google Scholar
• Ahuja G., Soda G., Zaheer A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434–448. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0695 Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. (1976). Resource dependence and interorganizational relations local employment service offices and social services sector organizations. Administration & Society, 7(4), 419–454. doi: 10.1177/009539977600700402 Google Scholar
• Aldrich H., Herker D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217–230.Link , Google Scholar
• Allen T. J., Cohen S. I. (1969). Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 12–19. doi: 10.2307/2391357 Google Scholar
• Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102–1119. Google Scholar
• Balogun J., Johnson G. (2005). From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1573–1601. doi: 10.1177/0170840605054624 Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108. doi: 10.2307/2392767 Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61–103. doi: 10.2307/2393551 Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. (1996). Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 404–441. doi: 10.2307/2393937 Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Kunda G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76–95. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122 Google Scholar
• Barnard C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
• Battilana J., Casciaro T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0891Link , Google Scholar
• Baum J. A., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8 Google Scholar
• Baum J. A., McEvily B., Rowley T. J. (2012). Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organization Science, 23(2), 529–546. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0566 Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162 Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428 Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375–395. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2 Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 327–343. doi: 10.2307/256204Link , Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817. doi: 10.2307/20159624Link , Google Scholar
• Brewer W. F., Nakamura G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In Wyer R. S.Srull T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Briscoe F., Tsai W. (2011). Overcoming relational inertia how organizational members respond to acquisition events in a law firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 408–440. doi: 10.1177/0001839211432540 Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock. Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365. doi: 10.2307/2393923 Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. (2002). The social capital of structural holes. In Guillén M. F. (Ed.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field (pp. 148–190). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. doi: 10.1086/421787 Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. (2007). Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 119–148. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24162082Link , Google Scholar
• Castilla E. J., Benard S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–676. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543 Google Scholar
• Cattani G., Ferriani S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0350 Google Scholar
• Child J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1177/003803857200600101 Google Scholar
• Chua R. Y. J., Ingram P., Morris M. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition-and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 436–452. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625956Link , Google Scholar
• Cobb A. T. (1980). Informal influence in the formal organization: Perceived sources or power among work unit peers. Academy of Management Journal, 23(1), 155–161. doi: 10.2307/255503Link , Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553 Google Scholar
• Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119–135. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.2.119 Google Scholar
• Cross R., Cummings J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937. doi: 10.2307/20159632Link , Google Scholar
• Crozier M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N., Cross R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25(3), 197–210. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00049-7 Google Scholar
• Dahlander L., McFarland D. A. (2013). Ties that last tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 69–110. doi: 10.1177/0001839212474272 Google Scholar
• Dokko G., Kane A., Tortoriello M. (2013). One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies. doi:10.1177/0170840613508397 Google Scholar
• Dokko G., Rosenkopf L. (2010). Social capital for hire? Mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organization Science, 21(3), 677–695. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0470 Google Scholar
• Donaldson L. (1995). American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation (Vol. 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 Google Scholar
• Drazin R., Van de Ven A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514–539. doi: 10.2307/2392695 Google Scholar
• Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems. In C. W. Churchman & M. Verhulst (Eds.), Management sciences, models and techniques (Vol. 2, pp. 83–97). London: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar
• Everett M. G., Borgatti S. P. (1999). The centrality of groups and classes. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(3), 181–201. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1999.9990219 Google Scholar
• Feld S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1015–1035. doi: 10.1086/227352 Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475. Google Scholar
• Ford R. C., Randolph W. A. (1992). Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 267–294. doi: 10.1177/014920639201800204 Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing. Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36. doi: 10.1287/inte.4.3.28 Google Scholar
• Galunic C., Ertug G., Gargiulo M. (2012). The positive externalities of social capital: Benefiting from senior brokers. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1213–1231. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0827Link , Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M., Ertug G., Galunic C. (2009). The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 299–333. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.299 Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469 Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311 Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nohria N.Eccles R. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 25–26). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
• Greve H. R., Mitsuhashi H., Baum J. A. (2013). Greener pastures: Outside options and strategic alliance withdrawal. Organization Science, 24(1), 79–98. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0733 Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203–215. Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Puranam P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0421 Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations (pp. 30–61). New York: Random House. Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. doi: 10.2307/2667032 Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771 Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Mors M. L., Løvås B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–793. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803922Link , Google Scholar
• Hargadon A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41–85. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24003-4 Google Scholar
• Ho V. T., Levesque L. L. (2005). With a little help from my friends (and substitutes): Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organization Science, 16(3), 275–289. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0121 Google Scholar
• Homans G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt. Google Scholar
• Ibarra H., Andrews S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277–303. doi: 10.2307/2393414 Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16(4), 359–371. Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Morris M. W. (2007). Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the “life of the party”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 558–585. doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.4.558 Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Roberts P. W. (2000). Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 387–423. doi: 10.1086/316965 Google Scholar
• Janis I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
• Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 56–71. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.09.002 Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M. (1979). Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, 57(4), 65–75. Google Scholar
• Katz D., Kahn R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Kilduff M., Brass D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 317–357. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2010.494827Link , Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum A. M. (2012). Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(3), 407–452. doi: 10.1177/0001839212461141 Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum A. M., Stuart T. E., Tushman M. L. (2013). Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24(5), 1316–1336. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0804 Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. (1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Computational Organization Theory, 89(112), 123–140. Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Hanson J. R. (1993). Informal networks. Harvard Business Review, 71(1993), 104–111. Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Stern R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123–140. doi: 10.2307/2786835 Google Scholar
• Labianca G., Brass D. J., Gray B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55–67. doi: 10.2307/256897Link , Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–47. doi: 10.2307/2391211 Google Scholar
• Lee J. (2010). Heterogeneity, brokerage, and innovative performance: Endogenous formation of collaborative inventor networks. Organization Science, 21(4), 804–822. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0488 Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136 Google Scholar
• Lewis K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519–1533. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257 Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R., Miller J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181–199. doi: 10.2307/2392493 Google Scholar
• Lomi, A., Lusher, D., Pattison, P. E., & Robins, G. (2013). The focused organization of advice relations: A study in boundary crossing. Organization Science. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0850 Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634436Link , Google Scholar
• Mahmood I. P., Zhu H., Zajac E. J. (2011). Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 820–848. doi: 10.1002/smj.911 Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Mayo E. (2003). The human problems of an industrial civilization (Vol. 6). London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1133–1156. Google Scholar
• McEvily B., Jaffee J., Tortoriello M. (2012). Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organization Science, 23(2), 547–563. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0633 Google Scholar
• McFadyen M. A., Cannella A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735–746. doi: 10.2307/20159615Link , Google Scholar
• McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 Google Scholar
• Menon T., Pfeffer J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science, 49(4), 497–513. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.497.14422 Google Scholar
• Merton R. K. (1976). Sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550 Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C., Meyer A. D., Coleman H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 179–208. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F Google Scholar
• Miller D. (1988). Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280–308. doi: 10.2307/256549Link , Google Scholar
• Miller D. (1992). The generic strategy trap. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(1), 37–41. doi: 10.1108/eb039467 Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161–1183. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161 Google Scholar
• Mizruchi M. S., Stearns L. B., Fleischer A. (2011). Getting a bonus: Social networks, performance, and reward among commercial bankers. Organization Science, 22(1), 42–59. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0516 Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks (pp. 141–223). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Eisenberg E. M. (1987). Emergent communication networks. In Jablin F.Putnam L. L.Roberts K.Porter L. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 304–342). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Montgomery J. D. (1992). Job search and network composition: Implications of the strength-of-weak-ties hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 57, 586–596. doi: 10.2307/2095914 Google Scholar
• Mors M. L. (2010). Innovation in a global consulting firm: When the problem is too much diversity. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 841–872. Google Scholar
• Nadler D., Tushman M. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm—the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0093 Google Scholar
• Nobel R., Birkinshaw J. (1998). Innovation in multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in international R & D operations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 479–496. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<479::AID-SMJ954>3.0.CO;2-U Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Eccles R. C. (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130. Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0054 Google Scholar
• Pastor J. C., Meindl J. R., Mayo M. C. (2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 410–420. doi: 10.2307/3069355Link , Google Scholar
• Perretti F., Negro G. (2006). Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 759–777. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083032Link , Google Scholar
• Perrow C. (1986). Economic theories of organization. Theory and Society, 15(1), 11–45. doi: 10.1007/BF00156926 Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785503Link , Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829–872. doi: 10.1086/230091 Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60. doi: 10.1086/323038 Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Baron J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693. doi: 10.2307/2657354 Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145. doi: 10.2307/2393988 Google Scholar
• Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R. (1969). An empirical taxonomy of structures of work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 115–126. doi: 10.2307/2391367 Google Scholar
• Rank O. N., Robins G. L., Pattison P. E. (2010). Structural logic of intra-organizational networks. Organization Science, 21(3), 745–764. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0450 Google Scholar
• Reagans, R. (2005). Preferences, identity, and competition: Predicting tie strength from demographic data. Management Science, 51(9), 1374–1383. Google Scholar
• Reagans R. (2011). Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organization Science, 22(4), 835–849. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0587 Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267. doi: 10.2307/3556658 Google Scholar
• Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502–517. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637 Google Scholar
• Reif W. E., Monczka R. M., Newstrom J. W. (1973). Perceptions of the formal and the informal organizations: Objective measurement through the semantic differential technique. Academy of Management Journal, 16(3), 389–403. doi: 10.2307/255000Link , Google Scholar
• Roberson Q. M., Williamson I. O. (2012). Justice in self-managing teams: The role of social networks in the emergence of procedural justice climates. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 685–701. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0491Link , Google Scholar
• Rodan S., Galunic C. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541–562. doi: 10.1002/smj.398 Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306. doi: 10.1002/smj.160 Google Scholar
• Salancik G. R. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 345–349. doi: 10.2307/2393642 Google Scholar
• Salk J. E., Brannen M. Y. (2000). National culture, networks, and individual influence in a multinational management team. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 191–202. doi: 10.2307/1556376Link , Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. (2005). Strategic management of technological innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Google Scholar
• Schulte M., Cohen N. A., Klein K. J. (2012). The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organization Science, 23(2), 564–581. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0582 Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Shipilov A. V. (2006). Network strategies and performance of Canadian investment banks. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 590–604. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794676Link , Google Scholar
• Shipilov A. V., Li S. X. (2008). Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes’ influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 73–108. doi: 10.2189/asqu.53.1.73 Google Scholar
• Shrader C. B., Lincoln J. R., Hoffman A. N. (1989). The network structures of organizations: Effects of task contingencies and distributional form. Human Relations, 42(1), 43–66. doi: 10.1177/001872678904200103 Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. (1947/1976). Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Boston, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• Singh J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349 Google Scholar
• Smith-Doerr, L., & Powell, W. W. (2005). Networks and economic life. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 379–402). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893–906. doi: 10.2307/20159629Link , Google Scholar
• Soda G., Zaheer A. (2012). A network perspective on organizational architecture: Performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 751–771. doi: 10.1002/smj.1966 Google Scholar
• Sosa M. E. (2011). Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0519 Google Scholar
• Sparrowe R. T., Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Kraimer M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–325. doi: 10.2307/3069458Link , Google Scholar
• Stieglitz N., Heine K. (2007). Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1002/smj.565 Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A. L. (2001). When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Sytch M., Tatarynowicz A., Gulati R. (2012). Toward a theory of extended contact: The incentives and opportunities for bridging across network communities. Organization Science, 23(6), 1658–1681. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0712 Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic basis of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Tichy N. M., Tushman M. L., Fombrun C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507–519.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M., Krackhardt D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 167–181. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037420Link , Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M., Reagans R., McEvily B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(4), 1024–1039. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0688 Google Scholar
• Tsai W. (2000). The formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925–939. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<925::AID-SMJ129>3.0.CO;2-I Google Scholar
• Tsai W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. doi: 10.2307/3069443Link , Google Scholar
• Tsai W. (2002). Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 Google Scholar
• Tsai W., Ghoshal S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. doi: 10.2307/257085Link , Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 587–605. doi: 10.2307/2392402 Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Scanlan T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289–305. doi: 10.2307/255842Link , Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4), 605–621. doi: 10.2307/255641 Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Ganco M., Hinings C. R. (2013). Returning to the Frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393–440. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.774981Link , Google Scholar
• Vissa B., Chacar A. S. (2009). Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1179–1191. doi: 10.1002/smj.785 Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Mullen G.Goethals G. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–205). New York: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar
• Whittington K. B., Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 90–122. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.90 Google Scholar
• Wong S. S., Boh W. F. (2010). Leveraging the ties of others to build a reputation for trustworthiness among peers. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 129–148. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037265Link , Google Scholar
• Woodward J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Zaltman G., Duncan R., Holbek J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Zenger T. R., Lazzarini S. G., Poppo L. (2002). Informal and formal organization in new institutional economics. Advances in Strategic Management, 19, 277–305. doi: 10.1016/S0742-3322(02)19009-7 Google Scholar