Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises

References

• Adler P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215–234. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117 Google Scholar
• Albert S., Adams E. (2002). The hybrid identity of law firms. In Soenen G.Moingeon B. (Eds.), Corporate and organizational identities: Integrating strategy, marketing, communication and organizational perspective (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Albert S., Whetten D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295. Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. E., Fiol C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.Link , Google Scholar
• Alvord S. H., Brown L. D., Letts C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–282. doi: 10.1177/0021886304266847 Google Scholar
• Anheier H. K. (2000). Managing non-profit organisations: Towards a new approach. Civil Society Working Papers, Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics. Google Scholar
• Anheier H. K., Salamon L. M. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar
• Arellano-Gault D., Demortain D., Rouillard C., Thoenig J.-C. (2013). Bringing public organization and organizing back in. Organization Studies, 34, 145–167. doi: 10.1177/0170840612473538 Google Scholar
• Arnold M. L. (1997). Natural hybridization and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Austin J., Bermudez W., Escobar G. (1999). IPODERAC. Harvard Business School Case 399–016. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Google Scholar
• Austin J., Leonard H. (2008). Can the virtuous mouse and the wealthy elephant live happily ever after? California Management Review, 51(1), 77–102. doi: 10.2307/41166469 Google Scholar
• Austin J., Stevenson H., Wei-Skillern J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), 1–22. Google Scholar
• Battilana J., D'Aunno T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In Lawrence T. B.Suddaby R.Leca B. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. Google Scholar
• Battilana J., Dorado S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1419–1440. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391Link , Google Scholar
• Battilana J., Lee M., Walker J., Dorsey C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 51–55. Google Scholar
• Battilana J., Sengul M., Pache A.-C., Model J. (2013). Keeping a foot in both camps: Understanding the drivers of social performance in hybrid organizations. Unpublished Working Paper, Harvard Business School. Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner A. (2002). The shifting boundaries of the mixed economy and the future of the nonprofit sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73, 5–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-8292.00184 Google Scholar
• Besharov M. L. (2013). The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0761Link , Google Scholar
• Besharov M. L., Smith W. K. (in press). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review. Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S., Korschun D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37–44. Google Scholar
• Billis D. (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Binder A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547–571. doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Bovais H. (2012). The foundations and processes of organizational integration: The French retail banking of Crédit Agricole (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Paris Dauphine, Paris. Google Scholar
• Boyd B. (2009). Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing. Google Scholar
• Brakman Reiser D. (2013). Theorizing forms for social enterprise. Emory Law Review, 62: 681–739. Google Scholar
• Brandsen T., Karre M. (2011). Hybrid organizations: No cause for concern? Journal of Public Administration, 34, 827–836. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2011.605090 Google Scholar
• Bugg-Levine A., Emerson J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
• Canales R. (2014). Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organization Science, 25(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0831 Google Scholar
• Carrick-Cagna A. M., Santos F. (2009). Kiva versus MYC4: Business model innovation in social lending. INSEAD Case 06/2009-5595. Fontainebleau, France: INSEAD. Google Scholar
• Carroll A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business School Society, 38(3), 268–295. doi: 10.1177/000765039903800303 Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• Chen K., O'Mahony S., Besharov M. L. (2014). The selective synthesis of competing logics. Working Paper. Google Scholar
• Chetkovich C., Frumkin P. (2003). Balancing margin and mission. Administration & Society, 35(5), 564–596. doi: 10.1177/0095399703256162 Google Scholar
• Christen R. P., Drake D. (2002). Commercialization: The new reality of microfinance. In Drake D.Rhyne E. (Eds.), The commercialization of microfinance, balancing business and development (pp. 2–22). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press. Google Scholar
• Cooney K. (2011). An exploratory study of social purpose business models in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 185–196. doi: 10.1177/0899764009351591 Google Scholar
• Corley K., Harquail C. V., Pratt M. G., Glynn M. A., Fiol C. M., Hatch M. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 85–99. doi: 10.1177/1056492605285930 Google Scholar
• Cornforth C. (2004). Governance & participation development toolkit. Manchester: Co-Operatives UK. Google Scholar
• Creed W. E. D., Dejordy R., Lok J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336–1364. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318357Link , Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business. Google Scholar
• Dacin M. T., Dacin P. A., Tracey P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0620 Google Scholar
• Dacin P. A., Dacin M. T., Matear M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. doi: 10.5465/AMP.2010.52842950Link , Google Scholar
• D'Aunno T., Sutton R., Price R. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 636–661. doi: 10.2307/256409Link , Google Scholar
• Dees G. J. (2001). Mobilizing resources. In Dees G. J.Emerson J.Economy P. (Eds.), Enterprising nonprofits (pp. 63–102). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• Dees J. G., Anderson B. B. (2003). Sector-bending: Blurring lines between nonprofit and for-profit. Society, 40(4), 16–27. doi: 10.1007/s12115-003-1014-z Google Scholar
• Defourny J., Nyssens M. (2006). Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Defourny J., Nyssens M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202–228. doi: 10.1108/17508610810922703 Google Scholar
• Desa G. (2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(4), 727–751. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x Google Scholar
• Dichter T. W., Harper M. (2007). What's wrong with microfinance. Essex: Practical Action Publishing. Google Scholar
• Di Domenico M., Haugh H., Tracey P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 34(4), 681–703. Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920–1940. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101 Google Scholar
• Dorado S. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different process of creation, no? Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 319–343. doi: 10.1142/S1084946706000453 Google Scholar
• Douglas M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar
• Dunn B., Jones C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114–149. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114 Google Scholar
• Ebrahim A., Battilana J., Mair J. (2013). Neither fish nor flesh: Governance challenges within hybrid organizations. Unpublished Working Paper, Harvard Business School. Google Scholar
• Ebrahim A., Rangan V. K. (2010). Putting the brakes on impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance. Academy of management annual meeting proceedings, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp. 1–6. Google Scholar
• Eikenberry A. M., Kluver J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x Google Scholar
• Emerson J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51. doi: 10.2307/41166187 Google Scholar
• Feldman D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 433–452. doi: 10.2307/2391853 Google Scholar
• Feldman D. C. (2002). When you come to a fork in the road, take it: Career indecision and vocational choices of teenagers and young adults. In Feldman D. C. (Ed.), Work careers: A development perspective (pp. 93–125). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Google Scholar
• Fiol C. M., Pratt M. G., Connor J. O. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflicts. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 32–55. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2009.35713276Link , Google Scholar
• Freeman J., Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710. doi: 10.2307/2094928 Google Scholar
• Friedland R., Alford R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J., Barringer S. (2012). Social enterprises and social categories. In Gidron J.Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective (pp. 47–70). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Garrow E., Hasenfeld Y. (2012). Managing conflicting institutional logics: Social service vs. market. In Gidron B.Hasenfeld Y. (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective (pp. 121–143). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. doi: 10.2307/20159573Link , Google Scholar
• Glynn M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496 Google Scholar
• Glynn M. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable organizational identities. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Suddaby R.Sahlin-Andersson K. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413–430). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K., Rao H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611. doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.6.593 Google Scholar
• Gómez L. (2009). Time to socialize. Journal of Business Communication, 46(2), 179–207. doi: 10.1177/0021943608328077 Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. (1988). Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Theory, 9(3), 293–316. Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change—The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1052–1081. doi: 10.2307/256645Link , Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micelotta E. R., Lounsbury M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590299Link , Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Diaz A.M., Li S.X., Lorente J.C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0453 Google Scholar
• Guo B. (2006). Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 123–138. doi: 10.1177/0899764005282482 Google Scholar
• Haight C. (2011). The problem with fair trade coffee. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(3), 74–79. Google Scholar
• Hall P. D. (2013). Philanthropy and the social enterprise spectrum. In Lyons T. S. (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: How business can transform society (pp. 23–69). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Google Scholar
• Hannan M., Freeman J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964. doi: 10.1086/226424 Google Scholar
• Hannan M., Freeman J. (1986). Where do organizational forms come from? Sociological Forum, 1(1), 50–72. doi: 10.1007/BF01115073 Google Scholar
• Hatch M. J., Schultz M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55, 989–1018. doi: 10.1177/0018726702055008181 Google Scholar
• Haugh H. (2006). Social enterprise: Beyond economic outcomes and individual returns. In Mair J.Robinson J.Hockerts K. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 180–207). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Haveman H. A., Rao H. (2006). Hybrid forms and the evolution of thrifts. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 974–986. doi: 10.1177/0002764205285179 Google Scholar
• Hinings C. R., Greenwood R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 411–424. doi: 10.2307/3094844 Google Scholar
• Hirsch P. M., Levin D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10(2), 199–212. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 Google Scholar
• Hockerts K. (2006). Entrepreneurial opportunity in social purpose business ventures. In Mair J.Robinson J.Hockerts K. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 142–155). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Hoffman A., Badiane K., Haigh N. (2012). Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit & non-profit divide. In Golden-Biddle K.Dutton J. (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 131–150). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Hsu G., Koçak Ö., Hannan M. T. (2009). Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 150–169. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400108 Google Scholar
• Husock H. (2013). The dangers of quasi-capitalism. National Affairs, 14, 112–134. Google Scholar
• Hwang H., Powell W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268 Google Scholar
• Independent Sector. (2013). Hybrid position statement. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://www.independentsector.org/hybrid_position Google Scholar
• Jay J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0772Link , Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethnics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256. doi: 10.2307/3857812 Google Scholar
• Jones G. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262–279. doi: 10.2307/256188Link , Google Scholar
• Jones M. B. (2007). The multiple sources of mission drift. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 299–307. doi: 10.1177/0899764007300385 Google Scholar
• Kanter R. (2009). SuperCorp: How vanguard companies create innovation, profits, growth and social good. New York: Crown Business. Google Scholar
• Kanter R., Summers D. (1994). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance management in nonprofit organizations and the need for multiple—Constituency approach. In McKevitt D.Lawton A. (Eds.), Public sector management: Theory, critique and practice (pp. 220–36). London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Katz R., Kahn D. (1967). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• Kellogg K. C. (2009). Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 657–711. doi: 10.1086/603535 Google Scholar
• Kennedy E. D., Haigh N. (2013). Path to hybridization: Offensive and defensive changes to legal registration. Working Paper. Google Scholar
• Kerlin J. A. (2006). Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas, 17(3), 246–262. doi: 10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2 Google Scholar
• Ketchen D. J., Combs J. G., Russell C. J., Shook C., Dean M. A., Runge J., Lamoureux S. (1997). Organizational configurations and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 223–240. doi: 10.2307/257028Link , Google Scholar
• Kimberly J. R., Evanisko M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713. doi: 10.2307/256170Link , Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In Lawrence T. B.Suddaby R.Leca B. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S., Block E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Thousand Oals, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Lavie D., Stettner U., Tushman M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. doi: 10.1080/19416521003691287Link , Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–47. doi: 10.2307/2391211 Google Scholar
• Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R., Leca B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In Lawrence T. B.Suddaby R.Leca B. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Lee M. (in press). Mission and market? The performance of hybrid social ventures. Working Paper. Harvard Business School. Google Scholar
• Lee M., Battilana J. (2013). How the zebra got its stripes: Imprinting of individuals and hybrid social ventures. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper (14–005). Google Scholar
• Lev B., Petrovits C., Radhakrishnan S. (2010). Is doing good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200. Google Scholar
• Lok J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1305–1335. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317866Link , Google Scholar
• London T. (2009). Making better investments at the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 106–113. Google Scholar
• Mair J. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Taking stock and looking ahead. In Fayolle A.Matlay H. (Eds.), Handbook of research and social entrepreneurship (pp. 15–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Mair J., Battilana J., Cardenas J. (2012). Organizing for society: A typology of social entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 353–373. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3 Google Scholar
• Mair J., Marti I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002 Google Scholar
• March J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 Google Scholar
• Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. doi: 10.2307/3556659 Google Scholar
• Marquis C., Chen Y. (2013). Environmental reporting in China still likely to be greenwash. Chinadialogue. https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/6543-Environmental-reporting-in-China-still-likely-to-be-greenwash Google Scholar
• Marquis C., Velez-Villa L. (2012). Warby Parker: Vision of a “good” fashion brand. Harvard Business School Case No. 413–051. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
• McWilliams A., Siegel D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.Link , Google Scholar
• Mersland R., Strøm R. Ø. (2010). Microfinance mission drift? World Development, 38, 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.006 Google Scholar
• Meyer H.-D., Rowan B. (2006). The new institutionalism in education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. (1977). Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550 Google Scholar
• Minkoff D. C., Powell W. (2006). Nonprofit mission: Constancy, responsiveness, or deflection? In Powell W. W.Steinberg R. (Eds.), The non-profit sector (pp. 591–611). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
• Moizer J., Tracey P. (2010). Strategy making in social enterprise: The role of resource allocation and its effects on organizational sustainability. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 27(3), 252–266. doi: 10.1002/sres.1006 Google Scholar
• Murphy P., Coombes S. (2009). A model of social entrepreneurial discovery. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325–336. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9921-y Google Scholar
• Murray F. (2010). The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 341–388. doi: 10.1086/653599 Google Scholar
• Murray J. H. (2012). Choose your own master: Social enterprise, certifications, and benefit corporation statutes. American University Business Law Review, 2(2), 1–53. Google Scholar
• Nadler D., Tushman M. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35–51. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-X Google Scholar
• Nicholls A. (2009). “We do good things, don't we?”: “Blended value accounting” in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 755–769. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008 Google Scholar
• Nielsen R. P. (1986). Piggybacking strategies for nonprofits: A shared costs approach. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), 201–215. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250070303 Google Scholar
• O'Donahoe N., Leijonhufvud C., Saltuk Y., Bugg-Levine A., Brandenburg M. (2010). Impact investments: An emerging asset class. J.P. Morgan Global Research. Research Note. November 29, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/files/2b053b2b-8feb-46ea-adbd-f89068d59785-impact.pdf Google Scholar
• Oliver C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.Link , Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025Link , Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J. (2003). From separate system to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy, 32, 1081–1104. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7 Google Scholar
• Pache A.-C., Santos F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368Link , Google Scholar
• Pache A.-C., Santos F. (2012). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0405Link , Google Scholar
• Pache A.-C., Santos F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39, 3–35. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039B014 Google Scholar
• Padgett J. F., Powell W. W. (2012). The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Paton R. (2003). Managing and measuring social enterprise. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Pederson J. S., Dobbin F. (2006). In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 897–907. doi: 10.1177/0002764205284798 Google Scholar
• Peredo A. M., McLean M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007 Google Scholar
• Perrini F., Vurro C. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: Innovation and social change across theory and practice. In Mair J.Robinson J.Hockerts K. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 57–85). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Khurana R., Besharov M. L. (2010). Revisiting the meaning of leadership. In Nohria N.Khurana R. (Eds.), Handbook of leadership theory and practice (pp. 65–105). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Page K. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 57–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.57 Google Scholar
• Pólos L., Hannan M. T., Carroll G. R. (2002). Foundations of a theory of social forms. Industrial & Corporate Change, 11, 85–115. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.1.85 Google Scholar
• Powell W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336. Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Sandholtz K. W. (2012). Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6, 94–115. doi: 10.1002/sej.1129 Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Foreman P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42.Link , Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Rafaeli A. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 862–898. doi: 10.2307/256951Link , Google Scholar
• Rangan V. K. (1993). The Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India: In service for sight. Harvard Business School Case 9-593-098. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Google Scholar
• Rao H., Morrill C., Zald M. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 237–281. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22007-8 Google Scholar
• Reay T., Hinings C. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26, 349–382. doi: 10.1177/0170840605050872 Google Scholar
• Reiser D., Dean S. (2013). Hunting stag with fly paper: A hybrid financial instrument for social enterprise. Boston College Law Review, 5r B.C.L. Rev. 1495. Google Scholar
• Robinson J. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities. In Mair J.Robinson J.Hockerts K. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 95–121). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Ruef M., Patterson K. (2009). Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in 19th century America. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3), 486–520. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.486 Google Scholar
• Ruef M., Scott W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904. doi: 10.2307/2393619 Google Scholar
• Sabeti H. (2011). The for-benefit enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 99–103. Google Scholar
• Saks A. M., Ashforth B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50, 395–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00913.x Google Scholar
• Schein E. (2006). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M. (2002). Organizational heterogeneity and the production of new forms: Politics, social movements and mutual companies in American fire insurance, 1900–1930. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 19, 39–89. doi: 10.1016/S0733-558X(02)19002-1 Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M. (2011). Toward an organizationally diverse American Capitalism? Cooperative, mutual, and local, state-owned enterprise. Seattle University Law Review, 34(4), 1409–1434. Google Scholar
• Schneiberg M., King M., Smith T. (2008). Social movements and organizational form: Cooperative alternatives to corporations in the American insurance, dairy and grain industries. American Sociological Review, 73, 635–667. doi: 10.1177/000312240807300406 Google Scholar
• Scott R. A. (1967). The factory as a social service organization: Goal displacement in workshops for the blind. Social Problems, 15(2), 160–175. doi: 10.2307/799510 Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
• Scott W. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644 Google Scholar
• Scott W. R., Davis G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open systems perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Scott W. R., Meyer J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108–140). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Seelos C., Mair J. (2004). Social entrepreneurship: The contribution of individual entrepreneurs to sustainable development. Working Paper 553. IESE Business School. Google Scholar
• Selznick P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson. Google Scholar
• Seo M. G., Creed W. E. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.Link , Google Scholar
• Sharir M., Lerner M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.004 Google Scholar
• Short J. C., Moss T. W., Lumpkin G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161–194. doi: 10.1002/sej.69 Google Scholar
• Simon H. (1948). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Simon J., Dale H., Chisolm L. (2006). The federal tax treatment of charitable organizations. In Powell W. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 267–306). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
• Simons T., Ingram P. (1997). Organization and ideology: Kibbutzim and hired labor, 1951–1965. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 784–813. doi: 10.2307/2393657 Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Gonin M., Besharov M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442. doi: 10.5840/beq201323327 Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Lewis M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958Link , Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134 Google Scholar
• Stark D. (1999). Heterarchy: Distributed authority and organizing of diversity. In Clippinger J. H. (Ed.), The biology of business: Decoding the natural laws of enterprise (pp. 153–180). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
• Stern R. N., Barley S. R. (1996). Organizations and social systems: Organization theory's neglected mandate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 146–162. doi: 10.2307/2393989 Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In March J. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
• Teasdale S. (2012). Negotiating tensions: How do social enterprises in the homelessness field balance social and commercial considerations? Housing Studies, 27(4), 514–532. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.677015 Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Thornton P. H., Ocasio W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–843. doi: 10.1086/210361 Google Scholar
• Thornton P. H., Ocasio W., Lounsbury M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: Foundations, research, and theoretical elaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Tracey P., Phillips N., Jarvis O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0522 Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8–30. doi: 10.2307/41165852 Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. (2002). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
• VanSandt C. V., Sud M., Marme C. (2009). Enabling the original intent: Catalysts for social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 419–428. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0419-z Google Scholar
• Weber K. (2005). A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural tookits. Poetics, 33, 227–252. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.011 Google Scholar
• Weber K., Dacin T. (2011). The cultural construction of organizational life. Organization Science, 22(2), 286–298. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0632 Google Scholar
• Weisbrod B. (1998). To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit section. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Weisbrod B. (2004). The pitfalls of profits. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2, 40–47. Google Scholar
• Westall A. (2009). Value and the third sector. TSRC Working Paper 25, Birmingham. Google Scholar
• Wry T., Cobb J. A., Aldrich H. E. (2013). More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 439–486. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.781862 Google Scholar
• Wry T., Lounsbury M., Jennings P. D. (2013). Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0588Link , Google Scholar
• Yunus M., Moingeon B., Lehmann-Ortega L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43, 308–325. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005 Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Gedajlovic E., Neubaum D. O., Shulman J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007 Google Scholar
• Zilber T. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234–254. doi: 10.2307/3069294Link , Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438. doi: 10.1086/210178 Google Scholar