10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization

References

• Ackoff R.L. 1979. The future of operational research is past. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(2): 93–104. Google Scholar
• Aldrich H.E. 1972. Technology and organizational structure: A reexamination of the findings of the Aston group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1): 26–43. Google Scholar
• Aiman‐Smith L., Green S.C. 2002. Implementing new manufacturing technology: The related effects of technology characteristics and user learning activities. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2): 421–430. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Aral S., Weill P. 2007. IT assets, organizational capabilities and firm performance. Organization Science, 18(5): 763–780. Google Scholar
• Attewell P., Rule J. 1984. Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don’t know. Communications of the ACM, 27(12): 1184–1192. Google Scholar
• Austin John L. 1962. How to do things with words, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
• Avgerou C. 2002. Information systems and global diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Barad K. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3): 801–831. Google Scholar
• Barley S.R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 78–108. Google Scholar
• Barley S.R. 1988. Technology, power, and the social organization of work. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 6: 33–80. Google Scholar
• Barley S.R. 1990. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 1–8. Google Scholar
• Barrett M., Walsham G. 1999. Electronic trading and work transformation in the London insurance market. Information Systems Research, 10(1): 1–22. Google Scholar
• Bechky B.A. 2003. Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3): 720–752. Google Scholar
• Berg M. 1997. Of forms, containers, and the electronic medical record: Some tools for a sociology of the formal. Science, Technology & Human Values, 22(4): 403–433. Google Scholar
• Blau P.M., Falbe C.M., McKinley W., Tracy P.K. 1976. Technology and organization in manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 20–40. Google Scholar
• Blauner R. 1964. Alienation and freedom: The factory worker and his industry, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Boudreau M.‐C., Robey D. 2005. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16(1): 3–18. Google Scholar
• Bowker G.C., Star S.L. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• Brin S., Page L. 1998. The anatomy of a large‐scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30: 107–117. Google Scholar
• Brown J.S., Duguid P. 2000. “Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation”. In Knowledge and Communities, Edited by: Lesser E.L.Fontaine M.A.Slusher J.A. 196–229. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. 1996. Paradox lost? Firm‐level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4): 541–558. Google Scholar
• Buenza D., Stark D. 2004. Tools of the trade: The socio‐technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2): 369–400. Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M.E., Brass D.J. 1990. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 104–127. Google Scholar
• Butler D. 2000. Souped‐up search engines. Nature, 405(6783): 112–115. Google Scholar
• Butler J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Callon M. 1986. “Some elements of a sociology of translations: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen in St Brieuc Bay”. In Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge, Edited by: Law J. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Callon M., ed. 1998. The laws of the markets, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Google Scholar
• Callon M., Muniesa F. 2005. Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8): 1229–1250. Google Scholar
• Carlile P.R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4): 442–455. Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. & Associates. 2001. From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures , (2nd edn.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Collins P.D., Hage J., Hull F. 1986. A framework for analyzing technical systems in complex organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 6: 81–100. Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B. 1998. A narrative approach to organization studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Davis F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340. Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M.S. 1994. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2): 121–147. Google Scholar
• Dewett T., Jones G.R. 2001. The role of information technology in the organization: A review, model, and assessment. Journal of Management, 27(3): 313–346. Google Scholar
• Duguid P. 2005. The art of knowing: social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21: 109–118. Google Scholar
• Feldman M.S., Pentland B.T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94–118. Google Scholar
• Friedmann J. 1987. Planning in the public domain, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Fry L.W. 1982. Technology‐structure research: Three critical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 25: 532–552. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Gagliardi P., ed. 1990. Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape, New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
• Gherardi S. 2006. Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
• Gibson J.J. 1977. “The theory of affordances”. In Perceiving, acting, and knowing, Edited by: Shaw R.Bransford J. 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Gibson J.J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
• Giddens A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Goodman P.Sproull L.Associates, eds. 1990. Technology and organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass. Google Scholar
• Griffith T.L. 1999. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 472–488. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M. 1969. Routine technology, social structure, and organization goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(3): 366–376. Google Scholar
• Harvey E. 1968. Technology and the structure of organizations. American Sociological Review, 33(2): 247–259. Google Scholar
• Hickson D.J., Pugh D.S., Pheysey D.C. 1969. Operations technology, and organization structure: An empirical appraisal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 378–397. Google Scholar
• Hinds P., Kiesler S. 1995. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organization Science, 6(4): 373–393. Google Scholar
• Huber G.P. 1990. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 47–71. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Hutchby I. 2001. Technologies, texts, and affordances. Sociology, 35(2): 441–456. Google Scholar
• Introna L.D., Nissenaum H. 2000. Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3): 169–185. Google Scholar
• Jones M.R. 1998. “Information systems and the double mangle: Steering a course between the scylla of embedded structure and the charybdis of material agency”. In Information systems: Current issues and future challenges, Edited by: Larsen T.Levine L.DeGross J.I. 287–302. Laxenburg: International Federation for Information Processing. Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J. 2006. The consequences of information: Institutional implications of technological change, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Kipnis D. 1991. The technological perspective. Psychological Science, 2(2): 62–69. Google Scholar
• Kling R. 1991. Computerization and social transformations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(3): 342–367. Google Scholar
• Knorr‐Cetina K. 1997. Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4): 1–30. Google Scholar
• Kraut R., Koch S., Dumais S. 1989. Computerization, productivity, and quality of employment. Communications of the ACM, 32(21): 220–238. Google Scholar
• Latham R., Sassen S. 2005. Digital formations: IT and new architectures in the global realm, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Latour B. 1987. Science in action, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Latour B. 1992. “Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts”. In Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, Edited by: Bijker W.Law J. 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• Latour B. 2004. “Nonhumans”. In Patterned ground: Entanglements of nature and culture, Edited by: Harrison S.Pile S.Thrift N. 224–227. London: Reaktion Books. Google Scholar
• Latour B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor‐network‐theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Law J. 1992. Notes on the theory of the actor‐network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5: 379–393. Google Scholar
• Law J. 2000. Objects, spaces and others, 1–3. Lancaster, UK: Center for Science Studies, Lancaster University. (http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law‐Objects‐Spaces‐Others.pdf) Google Scholar
• Law J., Urry J. 2004. Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3): 390–410. Google Scholar
• Leavitt H.J., Whisler T.L. 1958. Management in the 1980s. Harvard Business Review, 36(6): 41–48. Google Scholar
• Leonard‐Barton D. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17(5): 251–267. Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P. 2005. Strategy as practice, London: Sage. Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D. 2005. “How a superportfolio emerges: Long‐term capital management and the sociology of arbitrage”. In The sociology of financial markets, Edited by: Knorr‐Cetina K.Preda A. 62–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D. 2006. An engine not a camera: How financial models shape markets, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D., Millo Y. 2003. Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109: 107–145. Google Scholar
• Malone T.W., Yates J., Benjamin R.I. 1987. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6): 484–497. Google Scholar
• Mansell R.Avgerou C.Quah D.Silverstone R., eds. 2007. The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Markus M.L. 1994. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5(4): 502–527. Google Scholar
• Markus M.L., Robey D. 1988. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5): 583–598. Google Scholar
• Powell W.W.DiMaggio P.J., eds. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Mohr L.B. 1982. Explaining organizational behavior, San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass. Google Scholar
• Mol A., Law J. 1994. Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24: 641–671. Google Scholar
• Monteiro E., Hanseth O. 1996. “Social shaping of information infrastructure: On being specific about the technology”. In Information technology and changes in organizational work, Edited by: Orlikowski W.J.Walsham G.Jones M.DeGross J.I. 325–343. London: Chapman & Hall. Google Scholar
• Morgan G., ed. 1983. Beyond method: Strategies for social research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W.J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures. Organization Science, 11(4): 404–428. Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W.J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(4): 249–273. Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W.J. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28: 1435–1448. Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W.J., Iacono C.S. 2001. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2): 121–134. Google Scholar
• Pentland B.T., Feldman M.S. 2007. Narrative networks, patterns of technology and organization. Organization Science, 18(5): 781–795. Google Scholar
• Perrow C. 1967. Framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32: 194–208. Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Leblebici H. 1977. Information technology and organizational structure. Pacific Sociological Review, 20(2): 241–261. Google Scholar
• Pickering A. 1993. The mangle of practice, agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3): 559–589. Google Scholar
• Pickering A. 1995. The mangle of practice, time, agency and science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Prasad P. 1993. Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1400–1429. Link , Google Scholar
• Rafaeli A. 1986. Employee attitudes toward working with computers. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 7(2): 89–106. Google Scholar
• Rafaeli A.Pratt M.G., eds. 2006. Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Reckwitz A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2): 243–263. Google Scholar
• Rice R.E., Aydin C. 1991. Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 219–244. Google Scholar
• Roberts K., Grabowski M. 1996. “Organizations, technology and structuring”. In Handbook of organization studies, Edited by: Clegg S.Hardy C.Nord W. 409–423. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D.M. 1979. Assessment of technology in organizations: Closed versus open systems approaches. Academy of Management Review, 4: 531–542. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Sahlin‐Andersson K.Engwall L., eds. 2002. The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows and sources, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
• Schatzki T.R.Schatzki T.R.Knorr‐Cetina K.von Savigny E., eds. 2001. “Practice theory”. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, 1–14. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Schatzki T.R. 2002. The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Google Scholar
• Schatzki T.R.Knorr‐Cetina K.Savigny E., eds. 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory, London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Scott W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Scott S.V., Wagner E.L. 2003. Networks, negotiations, and new times: The implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration. Information and Organization, 13(4): 285–313. Google Scholar
• Sewell G. 1998. The discipline of teams: The control of team‐based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 397–428. Google Scholar
• Silva L., Backhouse J. 1997. “Becoming part of the furniture: The institutionalisation of information systems”. In Information systems and qualitative research, Edited by: Lee A.S.Liebenau J.DeGross J.I. 389–414. London: Chapman & Hall. Google Scholar
• Slife B.D. 2005. Taking practice seriously: Toward a relational ontology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2): 157–178. Google Scholar
• Suchman L.A. 2007. Human–machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Thomas R.J. 1994. What machines can’t do: Politics and technology in the industrial enterprise, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Thompson J.D., Bates F.L. 1958. Technology, organization, and administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1: 325–343. Google Scholar
• Trevino L.K., Webster J., Stein E.W. 2000. Making connections, complementary influences on communication media choices, attitudes, and use. Organization Science, 11(2): 163–182. Google Scholar
• Trist E.L. 1981. “The sociotechnical perspective: The evolution of sociotechnical systems as a conceptual framework and an action research program”. In Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior, Edited by: van de Ven A.H.Joyce W.F. 19–75. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• Trist E.L., Bamforth K.W. 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal‐getting. Human Relation, 4(1): 3–38. Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Anderson P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3): 439–465. Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. 1994. “Sticky Information” and the locus of problem solving, implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4): 429–439. Google Scholar
• Walsham G. 1993. Interpreting information systems in organizations, Chichester, UK: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Walsham G., Sahay S. 1999. GIS for district‐level administration in india, problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 39–65. Google Scholar
• Wagner E., Scott S., Galliers R.D. 2006. The creation of “best practice” software, myth, reality and ethics. Information and Organization, 16(3): 251–275. Google Scholar
• Weick K.E. 1990. “Technology as equivoque”. In Technology and organizations, Edited by: Goodman P.Sproull L.Associates. 1–44. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass. Google Scholar
• Weick K.E. 1996. Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 301–313. Google Scholar
• Wenger E. 1998. Communities of practice, learning, meaningful, and identity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Whittington R. 2006. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5): 613–634. Google Scholar
• Winner L. 1977. Autonomous technology: Technics‐out‐of‐control as a theme in political thought, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• Woodward J. 1958. Management and technology, London: HMSO. Google Scholar
• Yates J., Orlikowski W.J., Okamura K. 1999. Explicit and implicit structuring of genres, electronic communication in a Japanese R&D organization. Organization Science, 10(1): 83–103. Google Scholar
• Zammuto R.F., Griffith T.L., Majchrzak A., Dougherty D.J., Faraj S. 2007. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5): 749–762. Google Scholar
• Zuboff S. 1988. In the age of the smart machine, New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar