Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/256159

Three models with the potential to explain significant organizational research outcomes are described and evaluated. One model focuses on antecedent conditions, another on research processes, and the third on characteristics of research outcomes. Fifty-six organizational scholars reported about one of their significant and one of their not-so-significant research projects. Significance was operationally defined by ten attributes, including citations, awards, and positive responses from other researchers. The retrospective data identified several reported factors that occurred prior to and during research projects that were related to research outcomes. The model dealing with the research process itself differentiated significant from not-so-significant research better than either of the other models.

REFERENCES

  • Andrews S. M. 1979. Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. London: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Berry C. 1981. The Nobel scientist and the origins of scientific achievement. British Journal of Sociology. 32: 381–391. Google Scholar
  • Beyer J. M. 1978. Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. Sociological Quarterly. 19: 68–88. Google Scholar
  • Campbell J. P. , Daft R. L. , Hulin C. L. 1982. What to study: Generating and developing research questions. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  • Connolly T. , Conlon E. J. , Deutsch S. J. 1980. Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5: 211–217.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings L. L. , Frost P. J. 1985. Publishing in the organizational sciences. Homewood. Ill.: Richard D. Irwin. Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L. 1986. Organization theory and design. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co. Google Scholar
  • Davis M. S. 1971. That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Science, 1: 309–344. Google Scholar
  • Duncan R. B. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In Tillman R. H.Pondy L. R.Slaven D. (Eds.), The managment of organization, vol. 1: 167–188. New York: North Holland. Google Scholar
  • Glueck W. S. , Diech I. 1972. Antecedents and consequences of research planning in a university setting. Managment Science, 20: 240–252. Google Scholar
  • Cottfredson S. D. 1978. Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgment. American Psychologist, 33: 920–934. Google Scholar
  • Huber C. P. , Power D. J. 1985. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Managment Journal, 6: 171–180. Google Scholar
  • Jauch L. R. , Glueck W. S. 1975. Evaluation of university professors' research performance. Management Science, 22:66–75. Google Scholar
  • Lambright W. H. , Teich A. H. 1981. The organizational context of scientific research. In Nystrom D. C.Starbuck W. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design, vol. 2: 305–319. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Lodahl J. Beyer , Gordon G. 1972. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review. 37: 57–72. Google Scholar
  • McDonough E. F. , Leifer R. 1983. Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 727–735.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • McKinley W. , Cheng J. L. C. , Schick A. G. 1986. Perceptions of resource criticality in times of resource scarcity: The case of university departments. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 623–632.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Manis J. G. 1951. Some academic influences upon publication productivity. Social Forces, 29: 267–272. Google Scholar
  • Meyers J. T. 1982. Hemisphericity research: An overview with some implications for problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16: 197–212. Google Scholar
  • Moynihan C. , Mehrabian A. 1981. The psychological aesthetics of narrative forms. In Day H. I. (Ed.), Advances in intrinsic motivation and aesthetics: 323–340. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
  • Pearlman C. 1983. A theoretical model for creativity. Education, 103: 294–305. Google Scholar
  • Pelz D. C. , Andrews F. M. 1976. Scientists in organizations. Ann Arbor. Mich.: Institute for Social Research. Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. , Leong A. , Strehl K. 1977. Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces, 55: 938–951. Google Scholar
  • Quinn R. E. , Rohrbaugh J. 1983. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29: 363–377. Google Scholar
  • Schneider J. , Locke E. A. 1971. A critique of Herzberg's incident classification system and a suggested revision. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6: 441–457. Google Scholar
  • Silver H. R. 1983. Scientific achievement and the concept of risk. British Journal of Sociology, 34: 39–43. Google Scholar
  • Stein M. I. 1982. Creativity, groups, and management. In Guzzo R. A. (Ed.), Improving group decision making in organizations: 127–155. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  • Vessels G. 1982. The creative process: An open-systems conceptualization. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16: 185–196. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  555 Pleasantville Road, Suite N200
  Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8020, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900