Pitching for Social Change: Toward a Relational Approach to Selling and Buying Social Issues

REFERENCES

• Aguilera R. V., Rupp D., Williams C. A., & Ganapathi J. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836–863.Link , Google Scholar
• Aguinis H., & Glavas A. 2012. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38: 932–968. Google Scholar
• Alt E., & Craig J. B. 2016. Selling issues with solutions: Igniting social intrapreneurship in for-profit organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 794–820. Google Scholar
• Andersson L. M., & Bateman T. S. 2000. Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 548–570. Google Scholar
• Ashford S. J., & Barton M. A. 2007. Identity-based issue selling. In C. A. BartelS. BladerA. Wrzesniewski (Eds.), Identity and the modern organization, 223–244. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Ashford S. J., Sutcliffe K. E., & Christianson M. K. 2009. Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. In J. GreenbergM. S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations, 175–202. Bingley, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar
• Bansal P. 2003. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14: 510–527. Google Scholar
• Baumann-Pauly D., Wickert C., Spence L. J., & Scherer A. G. 2013. Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115: 693–705. Google Scholar
• Briscoe F., & Safford S. 2008. The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 460–491. Google Scholar
• Briscoe F., & Gupta A. 2016. Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10: 671–727.Link , Google Scholar
• Corbin J., & Strauss A. 2008. Basics of qualitative research 3rd ed.. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar
• Crane A., Palazzo G., Spence L. J., & Matten D. 2014. Contesting the value of “Creating Shared Value”. California Management Review, 56: 130–153. Google Scholar
• Daudigeos T. 2013. In their profession’s service: How staff professionals exert influence in their organization. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 722–749. Google Scholar
• Davis M. S. 1971. That’s interesting: Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1: 309–344. Google Scholar
• de Bakker F. G. A., Groenewegen P., & den Hond F. 2005. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44: 283–317. Google Scholar
• de Dreu C. K. W. 2006. Rational self-interest and other orientation in organizational behavior: A critical appraisal and extension of Meglino and Korsgaard (2004). Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 1245–1252. Google Scholar
• Detert J. R., & Burris E. R. 2007. Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 869–884.Link , Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Ashford S. J., Lawrence K. A., & Miner-Rubino K. 2002. Red light, green light: making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science, 13: 355–369. Google Scholar
• Dutton J. R., & Jackson S. E. 1987. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review, 12: 76–90.Link , Google Scholar
• Dutton J. R., & Ashford S. J. 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18: 397–428.Link , Google Scholar
• Dutton J. R., Ashford S. J., O’Neill R. M., Hayes E., & Wierba E. E. 1997. Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 407–425. Google Scholar
• Dutton J. R., Ashford S. J., O’Neill R. M., & Lawrence K. A. 2001. Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 716–736.Link , Google Scholar
• Erez A., & Judge T. A. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1270–1279. Google Scholar
• Gioia D. A., Corley K. G., & Hamilton A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15–31. Google Scholar
• Golan M. E., & Bamberger P. A. 2015. Mapping the emergent choreography of assistance: The dynamics of dyadic peer helping relations in organizations. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1: 124–149.Link , Google Scholar
• Grant A. M., & Berry J. W. 2011. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 73–96.Link , Google Scholar
• Green S. E. 2004. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29: 653–669.Link , Google Scholar
• Haack P., Schoeneborn D., & Wickert C. 2012. Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33: 815–845. Google Scholar
• Habermas J. 1971. Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press. Google Scholar
• Hemingway C., & Maclagan P. 2004. Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50: 33–44. Google Scholar
• Hiss S. 2009. From implicit to explicit corporate social responsibility: Institutional change as a fight for myths. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19: 433–451. Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville J. A. 2007. Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organization Science, 18: 560–577. Google Scholar
• Johnson G., & Scholes K. 2002. Exploring corporate strategy 6th ed.. Essex: Pearson. Google Scholar
• Ling Y., Floyd S. W., & Baldridge D. C. 2005. Toward a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 637–654. Google Scholar
• Locke K. D. 2001. Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Lyneis J., & Sterman J. 2016. How to save a leaky ship: Capability traps and the failure of win-win investments in sustainability and social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2: 2–32. Google Scholar
• Maak T., Pless N. M., & Voegtlin C. 2016. Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro-foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 463–493. Google Scholar
• Maon F., Lindgreen A., & Swaen V. 2009. Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 71–89. Google Scholar
• Martin P. Y., & Turner B. A. 1986. Grounded theory and organizational research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22: 141–147. Google Scholar
• Maurer C. C., Bansal P., & Crossan M. M. 2011. Creating economic value through social values: Introducing a culturally informed resource-based view. Organization Science, 22: 432–448. Google Scholar
• Melé D. 2003. The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44: 77–88. Google Scholar
• Meyerson D. E. 2001. Tempered radicals: How people use difference to inspire change at work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
• Meyerson D. E., & Scully M. A. 1995. Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6: 585–600. Google Scholar
• Morris T., & Lancaster Z. 2006. Translating management ideas. Organization Studies, 27: 207–233. Google Scholar
• Parker S. K., & Axtell C. M. 2001. Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1085–1100.Link , Google Scholar
• Risi D., & Wickert C. 2017. Reconsidering the ‘symmetry’ between institutionalization and professionalization: The case of corporate social responsibility managers. Journal of Management Studies, 54: 613–646. Google Scholar
• Rouleau L. 2005. Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1413–1441. Google Scholar
• Scully M. A., & Segal A. 2002. Passion with an umbrella: Grassroots activists in the workplace. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 19: 125–168. Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S. 2006. Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1158–1172.Link , Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S. 2009. Emergence of ethical issues during strategic change implementation. Organization Science, 20: 223–239. Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S. 2016. How corporations overcome issue illegitimacy and issue equivocality to address social welfare: The role of the social change agent. Academy of Management Review, 41: 349–366.Link , Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S., DeCelles K. A., & Dutton J. E. 2014. It’s not easy being green: The role of self-evaluations in explaining support of environmental issues. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 7–37.Link , Google Scholar
• Suchman M. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610.Link , Google Scholar
• Strand R. 2013. The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112: 721–734. Google Scholar
• Vidal N., Kozak R., & Hansen E. 2015. Adoption and implementation of corporate responsibility practices: A proposed framework. Business & Society, 54: 701–717. Google Scholar
• Waldman D. A., Siegel D. S., & Javidan M. 2006. Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1703–1725. Google Scholar
• Wang H., Tong L., Takeuchi R., & George G. 2016. Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 534–544.Link , Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. 1984. Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39: 40–49. Google Scholar
• Whiteman G., & Cooper W. H. 2016. Decoupling rape. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2: 115–154.Link , Google Scholar
• Wickert C., & Schaefer S. M. 2015. Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations, 68: 107–130. Google Scholar
• Wickert C., Scherer A. G., & Spence L. J. 2016. Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: Implications of firm size and organizational cost. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 1169–1196. Google Scholar
• Willmott H. 2003. Organization theory as a critical science? In H. TsoukasC. Knudsen (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, 88–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Wright C., & Nyberg D. 2012. Working with passion: Emotionology, corporate environmentalism and climate change. Human Relations, 65: 1561–1587. Google Scholar
• Zald M., & Berger M. 1978. Social movements in organizations: Coup d’etat, insurgency, and mass movements. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 823–861. Google Scholar