Skip main navigation
Articles

Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards

    Published Online:1 Aug 2007https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279222

    Abstract

    Women are increasing in number among corporations' boards of directors, yet their representation is far from uniform across firms. In this study, we adopted a resource dependence theory lens to identify organizational predictors of women on boards. We tested our hypotheses using panel data from the 1,000 U.S. firms that were largest in terms of sales between 1990 and 2003. We found that organizational size, industry type, firm diversification strategy, and network effects (linkages to other boards with women directors) significantly impact the likelihood of female representation on boards of directors.

    REFERENCES

    • Aldrich H. E. , Zimmer C. 1986. Entrepreneurship through social networks. In Sexton D. L.Smilor R. W. (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneur-ship: 3–23. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar
    • Amason A. C. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 123–148. Link , Google Scholar
    • Ashforth B. E. , Gibbs B. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1: 117–194. Google Scholar
    • Baysinger B. D. , Butler H. N. 1985. Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1: 101–124. Google Scholar
    • Bazerman M. H. , Schoorman F. D. 1983. A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. Academy of Management Review, 8: 206–217. Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Bertrand M. , Schoar A. 2003. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 1169–1208. Google Scholar
    • Bilimoria D. , Piderit S. K. 1994. Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1453–1477. Link , Google Scholar
    • Blackman A. 2004. Casting a wider net: Diversity in the boardroom is gaining as a way to improve governance and business decisions. Wall Street Journal, June 21: B6–B7. Google Scholar
    • Boeker W. , Goodstein J. 1991. Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 805–826 Link , Google Scholar
    • Boyd B. K. 1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 419–430. Google Scholar
    • Browder D. 1995. Shareholders are valuing diversity. Directors and Boards, 19(3): 12–17. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 1980. Cooptive corporate actor networks: A reconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 557–582. Google Scholar
    • Carpenter M. A. , Westphal J. D. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 639–660. Link , Google Scholar
    • Carter D. , Simkins B. , Simpson W. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1): 33–53. Google Scholar
    • Catalyst. 2005. Catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners and Catalyst census of women board directors: http://www.catalyst.org. Google Scholar
    • Certo S. T. 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28: 432–446 Link , Google Scholar
    • Chatterjee S. , Price B. 1991. Regression analysis by example (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Coffey B. , Fryxell G. E. 1991. Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 10: 437–444 Google Scholar
    • Cox T. , Lobel S. , McLeod P. 1991. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 827–847 Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Cox T. , Nkomo S. 1991. A race and gender group analysis of the early career experience of MBAs. Work Occupations, 18: 431–446 Google Scholar
    • Crockett R. 2006. The rising stock of black directors, BusinessWeek, February 27: 34. Google Scholar
    • Daily C. M. , Certo S. T. , Dalton D. R. 1999. A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the board-room, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 93–99. Google Scholar
    • Daily C. M. , Dalton D. R. , Cannella A. A. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28: 371–382. Link , Google Scholar
    • Daily C. M. , Schwenk C. 1996. Chief executive officers, top management teams, and boards of directors: Congruent or countervailing forces? Journal of Management, 22(2): 185–208. Google Scholar
    • Dalton D. R. , Daily C. M. , Johnson J. L. , Ellstrand A. E. 1999. Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 674–686. Link , Google Scholar
    • Davis G. F. , Mizruchi M. S. 1999. The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the US system of corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 215–239. Google Scholar
    • DiMaggio P. J. , Powell W. W. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93: 1155–1177. Google Scholar
    • Dutton J. E. , Duncan R. B. 1987. The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 279–295. Google Scholar
    • Dvorak P. 2006. Women slowly break into boardroom: They are gaining seats as directors, but progress remains inconsistent, Wall Street Journal, March 27: B3. Google Scholar
    • Elgart L. 1983. Women on Fortune 500 boards. California Management Review, 24(4): 121–127. Google Scholar
    • Erhardt N. L. , Werbel J. D. , Shrader C. B. 2003. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2): 102–111. Google Scholar
    • Gasparino C. , Boyce J. 1998. SEC to hold meetings in effort to boost women and minorities in corporate US. Wall Street Journal, January 19: A3. Google Scholar
    • Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510. Google Scholar
    • Greene W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
    • Hambrick D. C. , Cannella A. A. 2004. CEOs who have COOs: Contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 959. Google Scholar
    • Hambrick D. C. , D'Aveni R. A. 1992. Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38: 1445–1466. Google Scholar
    • Hambrick D. C. , Mason P. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206. Link , Google Scholar
    • Haunschild P. R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 564–592. Google Scholar
    • Haunschild P. R. , Beckman C. 1998. When do inter-locks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 815–844 Google Scholar
    • Hillman A. J. 2004. Governance from scratch: The Pepsi Bottling Group IPO (Ivey publishing case 9B04M062). London, ON: Ivey. Google Scholar
    • Hillman A. J. , Cannella A. A. , Harris I. C. 2002. Women and minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28: 747–763 Google Scholar
    • Hillman A. J. , Cannella A. A. , Paetzold R. L. 2000. The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 235–255. Google Scholar
    • Hillman A. J. , Dalziel T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28: 383–396. Link , Google Scholar
    • Hoffman L. R. , Maier N. 1961. Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 2: 401–407 Google Scholar
    • Hultin M. , Szulkin R. 1999. Wages and unequal access to organizational power: An empirical test of gender discrimination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 453. Google Scholar
    • Ibarra H. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 422–447 Google Scholar
    • Ibarra H. 1993. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18: 56–87. Link , Google Scholar
    • Jensen M. , Zajac E. J. 2004. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 507–524. Google Scholar
    • Johnson J. L. , Daily C. M. , Ellstrand A. E. 1996. Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3): 409–438. Google Scholar
    • Kanner B. 2004. Pocketbook power. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
    • Kesner I. F. 1988. Directors' characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 66–84. Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Konrad A. M. , Mangel R. 2000. The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1225. Google Scholar
    • Larkey L. 1996. Toward a theory of communicative interactions in culturally diverse workgroups. Academy of Management Review, 21: 463–491 Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Lublin J. S. , Hawkins L. 2006. GM's board seeks to add an African-American director, Wall Street Journal: B1. Google Scholar
    • Mattis M. 1993. Women directors: Progress and opportunities for the future. Business in the Contemporary World, 5: 140–156. Google Scholar
    • Meyer J. , Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363. Google Scholar
    • Miller C. C. , Burke L. M. , Glick W. H. 1998. Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 39–58. Google Scholar
    • Milliken F. J. , Martins L. L. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21: 402–433 Link , Google Scholar
    • Mizruchi M. S. 1983. Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and board of directors in large American corporations. Academy of Management Review, 8: 426–435. Link , Google Scholar
    • Munk C. W. 2003. Women still minority on boards of most Fortune 500 companies, Wall Street Journal, December 10: 1. Google Scholar
    • Natividad I. 2005. Women directors and the global company, Directors Monthly, March: 13–15. Google Scholar
    • Nemeth C. J. 1986. Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 91: 23–32. Google Scholar
    • Palepu K. 1985. Diversification strategy, profit performance, and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 239–255. Google Scholar
    • Pelled L. H. , Eisenhardt K. M. , Xin K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1–28. Google Scholar
    • Peng M. W. 2004. Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 453. Google Scholar
    • Petersen T. 1985. A comment on presenting results from logit and probit models. American Sociological Review, 50: 130–131. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 218–229. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J. , Salancik G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
    • Robinson G. , Dechant K. 1997. Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3): 21. Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Rynes S. , Rosen B. 1995. A field survey of factors affecting the adoption and perceived success of diversity training. Personnel Psychology, 48: 247. Google Scholar
    • Salancik G. R. 1979. Interorganizational dependence and responsiveness to affirmative action: The case of women and defense contractors. Academy of Management Journal, 22: 375. Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Sanders W. G. , Boivie S. 2004. Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 167. Google Scholar
    • Scott W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Selznick P. 1949. TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
    • Simon C. J. , Warner J. T. 1992. Matchmaker, match-maker: The effect of old boy networks on job match quality, earnings, and tenure. Journal of Labor Economics, 10: 306. Google Scholar
    • Singh V. 2005. Shuffling the deck for boardroom diversity, Financial Times, June> 10: 4. Google Scholar
    • STATA. 2003. Cross-sectional time series. College Station, TX: Stata Press. Google Scholar
    • Stearns L. B. , Mizruchi M. S. 1993. Board composition and corporate financing: The impact of financial institution representation on borrowing. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 603–618 Link , Google Scholar
    • Suchman M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610 Link , Google Scholar
    • Sutcliffe K. M. 1994. What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1360–1378. Link , Google Scholar
    • U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Minority- and women-owned businesses, United States, 1997 economic census. http://www.census.gov/epod/mwb97/us/us.html. Google Scholar
    • Watson W. E. , Kumar K. , Michaelsen L. K. 1993. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 590–602. Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 7–24. Link , Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D. , Milton L. P. 2000. How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 366–398. Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D. , Stern I. 2006. The other pathway to the boardroom: How interpersonal influence behavior can substitute for elite credentials and demographic majority status in gaining access to board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 169–193. Google Scholar
    • Zald M. N. 1969. The power and functions of boards of directors. American Journal of Sociology, 5: 97–111. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum