When And How Diversity Benefits Teams: The Importance Of Team Members' Need For Cognition

REFERENCES

• Aiken L. S. , West S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Allen N. J. , Stanley D. J. , Williams H. M. , Ross S. J. 2007. Assessing the impact of nonresponse on work group diversity effects. Organizational Research Methods, 10: 262–286. Google Scholar
• Bantel K. , Jackson S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107–124. Google Scholar
• Bell S. T. 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 595–615. Google Scholar
• Blau P. M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Kozlowski S. W. J.Klein K. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349–382. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer. Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D. , Hanges P. J. 2004. Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7: 400–417. Google Scholar
• Brislin R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis H. C.Berry J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. 2: 349–444. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar
• Brodbeck F. C. , Kerschreiter R. , Mojzisch A. , Schulz-Hardt S. 2007. Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review, 32: 459–479.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Cacioppo J. T. , Petty R. E. , Feinstein J. , Jarvis W. B. G. 1996. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 197–253. Google Scholar
• Carter J. D. , Hall J. A. , Carney D. R. , Rosip J. C. 2006. Individual differences in the acceptance of stereotyping. Journal of Research in Personality, 40: 1103–1118. Google Scholar
• Chaiken S. , Trope Y. 1999. Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• Chan D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of comparison models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234–246. Google Scholar
• Costa P. T. , McCrae R. R. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Google Scholar
• Dahlin K. B. , Weingart L. R. , Hinds P. 2005. Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1107–1123.Link , Google Scholar
• Dickhäuser O. , Reinhard M.-A. 2006. Factors underlying expectancies of success and achievement: The influential roles of need for cognition and general or specific self-concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90: 490–500. Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383. Google Scholar
• Hampson S. E. , Goldberg L. R. 2006. A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91:763–779. Google Scholar
• Harrison D. A. , Klein K. J. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1199–1228.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Harrison D. A. , Price K. H. , Gavin J. H. , Florey A. T. 2002. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1029–1045.Link , Google Scholar
• Henningsen D. D. , Henningsen M. L. M. 2004. The effect of individual difference variables on information sharing in decision-making groups. Human Communication Research, 30: 540–555. Google Scholar
• Homan A. C. , Hollenbeck J. R. , Humphrey S. , van Knip-penberg D. , Ilgen D. R. , Van Kleef G. A. 2008. Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 1204–1222.Link , Google Scholar
• Homan A. C. , Van Knippenberg D. , Van Kleef G. A. , De Dreu C. K. W. 2007. Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1189–1199. Google Scholar
• Jackson S. E. , Joshi A. , Erhardt N. L. 2003. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29: 801–830. Google Scholar
• Jehn K. E. , Northcraft G. B. , Neale M. A. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741–763. Google Scholar
• Kearney E. , Gebert D. 2009. Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 77–89. Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L. , Shapiro D. L. 2005.aThe impact of cultural value diversity on multicultural team performance. In Shapiro D. L.Von Glinow M. A.Cheng J. L. (Eds.), Advances in international management: Managing multinational teams, vol. 18: 33–67. London: Elsevier. Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W. J. , Bell B. S. 2003. Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman W. C.Ilgen D. R.Klimoski R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 12: 333–375. Wiley. Google Scholar
• Kruglanski A. W. , Pierro A. , Mannetti L. , De Grada E. 2006. Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113: 84–100. Google Scholar
• Marks M. A. , Mathieu J. E. , Zaccaro S. J. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356–376.Link , Google Scholar
• McCrae R. R. 1996. Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120: 323–337. Google Scholar
• Morgan-Lopez A. A. , MacKinnon D. P. 2006. Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation. Behavior Research Methods, 38: 77–87. Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H. , Eisenhardt K. M. , Xin K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1–28. Google Scholar
• Petty R. E. , Briñol P. , Loersch C. , McCaslin M. J. 2009. The need for cognition. In Leary M. R.Hoyle R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior: 318–329. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• Schaller M. , Boyd C. , Yohannes J. , O'Brien M. 1995. The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 544–555. Google Scholar
• Shin S. J. , Zhou J. 2007. When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1709–1721. Google Scholar
• Shrout P. E. , Bolger N. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7: 422–445. Google Scholar
• Simons T. , Pelled L. H. , Smith K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662–673.Link , Google Scholar
• Stewart G. L. 2006. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32: 29–54. Google Scholar
• Tsui A. S. , Nifadkar S. S. , Ou A. Y. 2007. Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33: 426–478. Google Scholar
• Tuten T. L. , Bosnjak M. 2001. Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality, 29: 391–398. Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S. , Bunderson J. S. 2005. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 532–548.Link , Google Scholar
• Vander Vegt G. S. , Janssen O. 2003. Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29: 729–751. Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S. , Van De Vliert E. , Oosterhof A. 2003. Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 715–727.Link , Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D. , De Dreu C. K. W. , Homan A. C. 2004. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 1008–1022. Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D. , Schippers M. C. 2007. Work group diversity. In Posner M. I.Rothbart M. K. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 58: p515– 541. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
• Wall T. D. , Michie J. , Patterson M. , Wood S. J. , Sheehan M. , Clegg C. W. , West M. 2004. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57: 95–118. Google Scholar
• Webber S. S. , Donahue L. M. 2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27: 141–162. Google Scholar
• Williams K. , O'Reilly C. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of forty years of research. In Sutton R. I.Staw B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 20: 77–140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar