Skip main navigation
Articles

Faking It or Muddling Through? Understanding Decoupling in Response to Stakeholder Pressures

    Published Online:7 May 2012https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0697

    Abstract

    We advance a multilevel argument that challenges and qualifies existing explanations of firms' responses to institutional pressures. In an in-depth study of 17 multinational corporations involving 359 interviews with internal and external actors, we find that firms facing identical pressures decouple policy from practice in different ways and for different reasons. When firms' responses are generated locally, without firmwide coordination, these responses can be either intentional or emergent. In the presence of information asymmetry between firms and their stakeholders, we find that managers' responses are intentional (“faking it”) and depend on how they perceive their interests. In the presence of competing stakeholder expectations, responses are emergent (“muddling through”) and depend on the degree of consensus among managers in their readings of the environment. These findings suggest that theories of decoupling need to be broadened to include the role of “muddling through” and the interplay of internal managerial and external stakeholder dynamics.

    REFERENCES

    • Aguilera R. V. , Rupp D. E. , Williams C. A. , Ganapathi J. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836–863.Link , Google Scholar
    • Akerlof G. 1970. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84: 488–500. Google Scholar
    • Allport G. W. 1958. The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Google Scholar
    • Argote L. , Greve H. R. 2007. A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organization Science, 18: 337–349. Google Scholar
    • Axelrod R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
    • Bansal P. , Clelland I. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 93–103.Link , Google Scholar
    • Bansal P. , Roth K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717–736.Link , Google Scholar
    • Basu K. , Palazzo G. 2008. Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33: 122–136.Link , Google Scholar
    • Battilana J. , Dorado S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419–1440.Link , Google Scholar
    • Christian Aid. 2004. Behind the mask: The real face of corporate social responsibility. London: Christian Aid. Google Scholar
    • Christmann P. , Taylor G. 2001. Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 439–458. Google Scholar
    • Cress D. M. , Snow D. A. 1996. Mobilization at the margins: Resources, benefactors, and the viability of homeless social movement organizations. American Sociological Review, 61: 1089–1109. Google Scholar
    • Crilly D. , Schneider S. C. , Zollo M. 2008. The psychological antecedents to socially responsible behavior. European Management Review, 5: 175–190. Google Scholar
    • Crilly D. , Sloan P. 2012. Corporate attention to stakeholders: Enterprise logic and an inside-out explanation. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1174–1193. Google Scholar
    • Cyert R. M. , March J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
    • David P. , Bloom M. , Hillman A. J. 2007. Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 91–100. Google Scholar
    • Davis K. 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16: 312–323.Link , Google Scholar
    • Delmas M. , Toffel M. 2008. Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1027–1055. Google Scholar
    • Den Hond F. , de Bakker F. G. A. 2007. Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32: 901–924.Link , Google Scholar
    • Fedderson T. , Gilligan T. 2001. Saints and markets: Activists and the supply of credence goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10: 149–171. Google Scholar
    • Fiss P. C. 2011. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 393–420.Link , Google Scholar
    • Fiss P. C. , Zajac E. J. 2004. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 501–534. Google Scholar
    • Fiss P. S. , Zajac E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1173–1193.Link , Google Scholar
    • Freeman R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Google Scholar
    • Gamoran A. , Dreeben R. 1986. Coupling and control in educational organizations: An explication and illustrative comparative test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 612–632. Google Scholar
    • Garud R. , Jain S. , Kumaraswamy A. 2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 196–214.Link , Google Scholar
    • George E. , Chattopadhyay P. , Sitkin S. , Barden J. 2006. Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31: 347–365.Link , Google Scholar
    • Global Reporting Initiative. 2000. A common framework for sustainability reporting. www.globalreporting.org. Google Scholar
    • Goodrick E. , Salancik G. R. 1996. Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and Cesarean births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 1–28. Google Scholar
    • Greening D. W. , Gray B. 1994. Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 467–498.Link , Google Scholar
    • Hambrick D. C. , Finkelstein S. , Cho T. S. , Jackson E. M. 2005. Isomorphism in reverse: Institutional theory as an explanation for recent increases in intraindustry heterogeneity and managerial discretion. In Staw B.Kramer R. M. (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 26: 307–350. Greenwich, CT: JAI. Google Scholar
    • Hannan M. T. , Freeman J. H. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929–964. Google Scholar
    • Hardin C. D. , Higgins E. T. 1996. Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In Higgins E. T.Sorrentino R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context, vol. 3: 28–84). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
    • Jensen M. C. , Meckling W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360. Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.Link , Google Scholar
    • Kaplan S. 2008a. Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 672–695.Link , Google Scholar
    • Kaplan S. 2008b. Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19: 729–752. Google Scholar
    • Kennedy M. T. , Fiss P. C. 2009. Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 897–918.Link , Google Scholar
    • King A. A. , Lenox M. J. , Terlaak A. 2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standards. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1091–1106.Link , Google Scholar
    • Krippendorff K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Kulkarni S. P. 2000. Information asymmetry among organizational stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 27: 215–228. Google Scholar
    • Labianca G. , Gray B. , Brass D. J. 2000. A grounded model of organizational change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11: 235–257. Google Scholar
    • Lacey R. , Fiss P. C. 2009. Comparative organizational analysis across multiple levels: A set-theoretic approach. In King B.Felin T.Whetten D. (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 26 (Studying differences between organizations: Comparative approaches to organizational research): 91–116. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald. Google Scholar
    • Leifer E. M.. 1988. Interaction preludes to role setting: Exploratory local action. American Sociological Review, 53: 865–878. Google Scholar
    • Leland H. E. 1979. Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87: 1328–1346. Google Scholar
    • Li J. T. , Hambrick D. C. 2005. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultiness, conflict and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 794–813.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • March J. G. 1962. The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24: 662–678. Google Scholar
    • Margolis J. D. , Walsh J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268–305. Google Scholar
    • Meyer J. W. , Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363. Google Scholar
    • Mintzberg H. , Waters J. A. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 257–272. Google Scholar
    • Nayyar P. R. 1990. Information asymmetries: A source of competitive advantage for diversified service firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 513–519. Google Scholar
    • Novo Nordisk. 2011. Novo Nordisk annual report 2010. http://annualreport.novonordisk.com/. Accessed January 1. Google Scholar
    • Orlikowski W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11: 404–428. Google Scholar
    • Post J. E. , Preston L. E. , Sachs S. 2002. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1): 6–28. Google Scholar
    • Pratt M. G. , Foreman P. O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25: 18–42.Link , Google Scholar
    • Purdy J. M. , Gray B. 2009. Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 355–380.Link , Google Scholar
    • Quinn D. P. , Jones T. M. 1995. An agent morality view of business policy. Academy of Management Review, 20: 22–42.Link , Google Scholar
    • Ragin C. C. 2008. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Ragin C. C. , Drass K. A. , Davey S. 2006. Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Tucson: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona. Google Scholar
    • Ragin C. C. , Fiss P. 2008. Net effects versus configurations: An empirical demonstration. In Ragin C. C. (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond: 190–212. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Redding K. , Viterna J. S. 1999. Political demands, political opportunities: Explaining the differential success of left-libertarian parties. Social Forces, 78: 491–510. Google Scholar
    • Rihoux B.Ragin C. C. (Eds.). 2008. Configurational comparative methods. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks and London: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Schneider M. , Schulze-Bentrop C. , Paunescu M. 2010. Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 246–266. Google Scholar
    • Scott W. R. , Meyer J. W. 1983. The organization of societal sectors. In Meyer J. W.Scott W. R. (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality: 129–154. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Sherif M. 1966. In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Google Scholar
    • Sivaramakrishnan K. 1994. Information asymmetry, participation, and long-term contracts. Management Science, 40: 1228–1244. Google Scholar
    • Sonenshein S. 2006. The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1022–1040. Google Scholar
    • Tilcsik A. 2010. From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1474–1498.Link , Google Scholar
    • Thornton P. H. , Ocasio W. 2008. Institutional logics. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Andersen S. K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism: 99–129. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Uzzi B. , Gillespie J. 1999. Corporate social capital and the cost of financial capital: An embeddedness approach. In Leenders R.Gabbay S. (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability: 446–459. Boston: Kluwer. Google Scholar
    • Weaver G. R. , Treviño L. K. , Cochran P. L. 1999. Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 539–552.Link , Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D. , Zajac E. J. 1994. Substance and symbolism in CEOs' long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 367–390. Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D. , Zajac E. J. 1998. The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 127–153. Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D. , Zajac E. J. 2001. Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 202–228. Google Scholar
    • Winter S. G. , Szulanski G. 2001. Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12: 730–743. Google Scholar
    • World Bank. 2003. Strengthening implementation of corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Google Scholar
    • Yoshikawa T. , Tsui-Auch L. S. , McGuire J. 2007. Corporate governance reform as institutional innovation: The case of Japan. Organization Science, 18: 885–897. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2024 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum