Skip main navigation
Articles

Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations

    Published Online:30 Nov 2017https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037420

    Abstract

    In this article, we study the conditions under which having ties that span organizational boundaries (bridging ties) are conducive to the generation of innovations. Whereas previous research has shown that bridging ties have a positive impact on innovative performance, our analysis of 276 R&D scientists and engineers reveals that there are no advantages associated with bridging per se. In contrast, our findings suggest that the advantages traditionally associated with bridging ties are contingent upon the nature of the ties forming the bridge—specifically, whether these bridging ties are Simmelian.

    REFERENCES

    • Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425–455. Google Scholar
    • Allen T. J. , Cohen S. I. 1969. Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 12–19. Google Scholar
    • Allen T. J. , Tushman M. L. , Lee M. S. 1979. Technology transfer as as function of position in the spectrum from research through development to technical services. Academy of Management Journal, 22: 684–708. Google Scholar
    • Ancona D. , Caldwell D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634–665. Google Scholar
    • Argote L. 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
    • Bechky B. A. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge on a production floor. Organization Science, 14: 312–330. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339–365. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. In Sutton R. I.Staw B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 22: 345–423. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 2002. Bridge decay. Social Networks, 24: 333–363. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349–399. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Carley K. M. , Krackhardt D. 1996. Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Social Networks, 18: 1–27. Google Scholar
    • Carlile P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13: 442–455. Google Scholar
    • Carlile P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative and relational approach to sharing and assessing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15: 555–568. Google Scholar
    • Carlile P. R. , Rebentisch E. S. 2003. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49: 1180–1195. Google Scholar
    • Chesbrough H. 2003. Open innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Cohen W. M. , Levinthal D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152. Google Scholar
    • Coleman J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95–120. Google Scholar
    • Cross R. , Cummings J. N. 2004. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 928–937.Link , Google Scholar
    • Dekker D. 2006. Measures of Simmelian tie strength, Simmelian brokerage, and Simmelianly brokered. Journal of Social Structure, 7(1): 1–22. Google Scholar
    • Dougherty D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2): 179–202. Google Scholar
    • Freeman L. A. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1: 215–239. Google Scholar
    • Granovetter M. S. 1982. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Marsden P. V.Lin N. (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis: 105–130. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Hansen M. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82–111. Google Scholar
    • Hargadon A. 2002. Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. In Staw B. M.Kramer R. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 24: 41–85. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Krackhardt D. 1987. Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9: 109–134. Google Scholar
    • Krackhardt D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342–369. Google Scholar
    • Krackhardt D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organization. In Nohria N.Eccles R. G. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: 216–239. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
    • Krackhardt D. 1998. Simmelian tie: Super strong and sticky. In Kramer R. M.Neale M. A. (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations: 21–38. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Krackhardt D. 1999. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. In Andrews S. B.Knocke D. (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations, vol. 16: 183–210. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Krackhardt D. , Stern R. 1988. Informal networks and organizational crisis: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51: 123–140. Google Scholar
    • Laursen K. , Salter A. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 131–150. Google Scholar
    • Lawrence P. , Lorsch J. 1967. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1–30. Google Scholar
    • McEvily B. , Zaheer A. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1133–1156. Google Scholar
    • Mors M. L. 2010. Innovation in a global consulting firm: When the problem is too much diversity. Strategic Management Journal: In press. Google Scholar
    • Obstfeld D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 100–130. Google Scholar
    • Perry-Smith J. E. 2006. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 85–101.Link , Google Scholar
    • Reagans R. , McEvily B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 240–267. Google Scholar
    • Reagans R. , Zuckerman E. 2001. Network, diversity and performance: The social capital of R&D units. Organization Science, 12: 502–517. Google Scholar
    • Simmel G. 1950. The sociology of George Simmel [Wolff K. H., Ed.]. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Google Scholar
    • Simon H. A. 1985. What we know about the creative process. In Kuhn R. L. (Ed.), Frontiers in creative and innovative management: 3–20. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar
    • Tsai W. P. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 996–1004.Link , Google Scholar
    • Tushman M. 1977. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 587–605. Google Scholar
    • Tushman M. , Scanlan T. J. 1981. Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 83–98.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Utterback J. M. 1971. The process of technological innovation within the firm. Academy of Management Journal, 14: 75–88.Link , Google Scholar
    • Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67. Google Scholar
    • von Hippel E. 1994. “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implication for innovation. Management Science, 40: 429–439. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum