Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0316

We advance previous research that has associated extraversion with high status and neuroticism with low status in newly formed task groups by examining how variations in personality affect status changes over time. By building on research that emphasizes the dark sides of extraversion and the bright sides of neuroticism, we challenge the persistence of extraverts' advantage and neurotics' disadvantage in task group status hierarchies. In a field and an experimental study, we find that extraversion is associated with status losses and disappointing expectations for contributions to group tasks and neuroticism is associated with status gains due to surpassing expectations for group-task contributions. Whereas personality may inform status expectations through perceptions of competence when groups first form, as group members work together interdependently over time, actual contributions to the group's task are an important basis for reallocating status.

REFERENCES

  • Ames D. R.. 2008. In search of the right touch. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17: 381. Google Scholar
  • Ames D. R. , Flynn F. J.. 2007. What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92: 307–324. Google Scholar
  • Ames D. R. , Flynn F. J. , Weber E. U.. 2004. It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30: 461–474. Google Scholar
  • Anderson C. , Ames D. R. , Gosling S. D.. 2008. Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one's status in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34: 90–101. Google Scholar
  • Anderson C. , John O. P. , Keltner D. , Kring A. M.. 2001. Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 116–132. Google Scholar
  • Anderson C. , Kilduff G. J.. 2009. Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96: 491–503. Google Scholar
  • Anderson C. , Srivastava S. , Beer J. S. , Spataro S. E. , Chatman J. A.. 2006. Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91: 1094–1110. Google Scholar
  • Arkin R. M.. 1981. Self-presentation styles. In Tedeschi J. T.. (Ed.), Impression management: Theory and social psychological research: 311–333. New York: Academic. Google Scholar
  • Ashton M. C. , Lee K. , Paunonen S. V.. 2002. What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 245–252. Google Scholar
  • Auriol E. , Renault R.. 2008. Status and incentives. RAND Journal of Economics, 39: 305–326. Google Scholar
  • Bales R. F. , Strodtbeck F. L. , Mills T. M. , Roseborough M. E.. 1951. Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16: 461–468. Google Scholar
  • Bales R.. 1958. Task roles and social roles in problem-solving groups. In Maccoby E.Newcomb T.Hartley E.. (Eds.), Social psychology (3rd ed.): 437–447. New York: Holt. Google Scholar
  • Barrick M. R. , Mount M. K. , Judge T. A.. 2001. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9: 9–30. Google Scholar
  • Barrick M. R. , Stewart G. L. , Piotrowski M.. 2002. Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 43–51. Google Scholar
  • Barry B. , Stewart G. L.. 1997. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 62–78. Google Scholar
  • Bendersky C. , Hays N. A.. 2012. Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23: 323–340. Google Scholar
  • Bendersky C. , Shah N.. 2012. The costs of status attainment: Performance effects of individual's status mobility in task groups. Organization Science, 23: 308–322. Google Scholar
  • Berger J. , Cohen B. P. , Zelditch M.. 1972. Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37: 241–255. Google Scholar
  • Berger J. , Connor T. L. , Fisek M. H.. 1974. Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop. Google Scholar
  • Berger J. , Fisek H. M. , Norman R. Z. , Zelditch M.. 1977. Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  • Berger J. , Ridgeway C. L. , Fisek M. H. , Norman R. Z.. 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63: 379–405. Google Scholar
  • Besley T. , Ghatak M.. 2008. Status incentives. American Economic Review, 98: 206–211. Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M.. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Buhrmester M. , Kwang T. , Gosling S. D.. 2011. Amazon's mechanical turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6: 3. Google Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S.. 2003. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 557–591. Google Scholar
  • Casciaro T. , Lobo M. S.. 2008. When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 655. Google Scholar
  • Caspi A. , Roberts B. W. , Shiner R. L.. 2005. Personality development: Stability and change. In Fiske S. T.Kazdin A. E.Schacter D. L.. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, 56: 453–484. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
  • Chen X. , Ender P. B. , Mitchell M. , Wells C.. 2007. Stata web books: Regression with Stata, regression diagnostics, UCLA: Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. Google Scholar
  • Chizhik A. W. , Alexander M. G. , Chizhik E. W. , Goodman J. A.. 2003. The rise and fall of power and prestige orders: Influence of task structure. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66: 303–317. Google Scholar
  • Costa P. T. , McCrae R. R.. 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor (NEO-FFI) inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Google Scholar
  • DeYoung C. G. , Quilty L. C. , Peterson J. B.. 2007. Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93: 880–896. Google Scholar
  • Eden D.. 1990. Pygmalion without interpersonal contrast effects: Whole groups gain from raising manager expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 394. Google Scholar
  • Elliot A. J. , Harackiewicz J. M.. 1996. Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 461. Google Scholar
  • Elliot A. J. , Thrash T. M.. 2002. Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 804–818. Google Scholar
  • Fisek M. H.. 1991. Complex task structures and power and prestige orders. In Lawler E. J.Markovsky B.Ridgeway C.Walker H. A.. (Eds.), Advances in group processes, vol. 8: 115–134. Greenwich, CT: JAI. Google Scholar
  • Fiske S.. 2010. Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In Fiske S.Lindzey G.Gilbert D.. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed.): 941–982. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Flynn F. J.. 2003. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 539–553.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J. , Reagans R. E. , Amanatullah E. T. , Ames D. R.. 2006. Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91: 1123–1137. Google Scholar
  • Fragale A. R.. 2006. The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101: 243–261. Google Scholar
  • Frank R. H.. 1985. Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Fu P. P. , Tsui A. S. , Liu J. , Li L.. 2010. Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders' transformational behaviors and personal values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 222. Google Scholar
  • Goar C. , Sell J.. 2005. Using task definition to modify racial inequality within task groups. Sociological Quarterly, 46: 525–543. Google Scholar
  • Grant A. M. , Gino F. , Hofmann D. A.. 2011. Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. The Academy of Management Journal, 54: 528–550.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin M. A. , Neal A. , Parker S. K.. 2007. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. The Academy of Management Journal, 50: 327–347.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy C. L. , Van Vugt M.. 2006. Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32: 1402–1413. Google Scholar
  • Harrison D. A. , Klein K. J.. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1199–1228.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes A. F.. 2006. A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32: 385–410. Google Scholar
  • Higgins E. T.. 2000. Does personality provide unique explanations for behaviour? Personality as cross-person variability in general principles. European Journal of Personality, 14: 391–406. Google Scholar
  • Hogan R.. 1996. A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In Wiggins J. S.. (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: 163–179. New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Hogan R. , Curphy G. J. , Hogan J.. 1994. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49: 493–504. Google Scholar
  • Hogan R. , Hogan J.. 1991. Personality and status. In Gilbert D. G.Connolly J. J.. (Eds.), Personality, social skills and psychopathology: An individual differences approach: 137–154. New York: Plenum. Google Scholar
  • Hogan R. , Hogan J.. 2001. Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9: 40–51. Google Scholar
  • Hogan R. , Jones W. , Cheek J. M.. 1985. Socioanalytic theory: An alternative to armadillo psychology. In Schlenker B. R.. (Ed.), The self and social life: 175–198. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  • Huberman B. A. , Loch C. H. , Onculer A.. 2004. Status as a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67: 103–114. Google Scholar
  • James L. R. , Brett J. M.. 1984. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 307–321. Google Scholar
  • James L.. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219–229. Google Scholar
  • James L. , Demaree R. , Wolf G.. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85–98. Google Scholar
  • John O. P. , Srivastava S.. 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin L. A.John O. P.. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research: 102–138. New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Judge T. A. , Bono J. E.. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—With job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 80–92. Google Scholar
  • Judge T. A. , Bono J. E. , Ilies R. , Gerhardt M. W.. 2002a. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 765–780. Google Scholar
  • Judge T. A. , Erez A. , Bono J. E. , Thoresen C. J.. 2002b. Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 693–710. Google Scholar
  • Judge T. A. , Piccolo R. F. , Kosalka T.. 2009. The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 855–875. Google Scholar
  • Jussim L. , Harber K. D.. 2005. Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9: 131–155. Google Scholar
  • Kalkhoff W.. 2005. Collective validation in multi-actor task groups: The effects of status differentiation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68: 57–74. Google Scholar
  • Keller T.. 1999. Images of the familiar: Individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10: 589–607. Google Scholar
  • Kenny D. A. , La Voie L.. 1984. The social relations model. In Berkowitz L.. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 18: 142–182. Orlando, FL: Academic. Google Scholar
  • Klein K. J. , Kozlowski S. W. J.. 2000. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 211–236. Google Scholar
  • Kwan V. S. , John O. P. , Kenny D. A. , Bond M. H. , Robins R. W.. 2004. Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111: 94–110. Google Scholar
  • KylHeku L. M. , Buss D. M.. 1996. Tactics as units of analysis in personality psychology: An illustration using tactics of hierarchy negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences, 21: 497–517. Google Scholar
  • Le H. , Oh I. S. , Robbins S. B. , Ilies R. , Holland E. , Westrick P.. 2011. Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 113–133. Google Scholar
  • Lord R. G. , Devader C. L. , Alliger G. M.. 1986. A meta-analysis of the relationship between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 402–410. Google Scholar
  • Magee J. C. , Galinsky A. D.. 2008. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2: 351–398.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur A.. 1985. Biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64: 377–402. Google Scholar
  • McClelland D.. 1987. Human motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • McCrae R. R. , Costa P. T.. 1995. Positive and negative valence within the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 29: 443–460. Google Scholar
  • McNiel J. M. , Fleeson W.. 2006. The causal effects of extraversion on positive affect and neuroticism on negative affect: Manipulating state extraversion and state neuroticism in an experimental approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 40: 529–550. Google Scholar
  • Nickerson R. S.. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2: 175. Google Scholar
  • Norem J. K. , Cantor N.. 1986. Defensive pessimism: Harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1208–1217. Google Scholar
  • Norem J. K. , Illingworth K.. 1993. Strategy-dependent effects of reflecting on self and tasks: Some implications of optimism and defensive pessimism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 822. Google Scholar
  • Owens D. A. , Sutton R. I.. 2001. Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. In Turner M. E.. (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research: 299–316. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  • Paulhus D. L.. 1998. Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1197–1208. Google Scholar
  • Paulhus D. L. , John O. P.. 1998. Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66: 1025–1060. Google Scholar
  • Pettit N. C. , Yong K. , Spataro S. E.. 2010. Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46: 396–401. Google Scholar
  • Preacher K. J. , Hayes A. F.. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40: 879–891. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L.. 1982. Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47: 76–88. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L.. 1987. Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups. American Sociological Review, 52: 683–694. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L.. 1991. The social construction of status value—Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70: 367–386. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. , Berger J.. 1986. Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51: 603–617. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. , Boyle E. H. , Kuipers K. J. , Robinson D. T.. 1998. How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. American Sociological Review, 63: 331–350. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. , Correll S. J.. 2006. Consensus and the creation of status beliefs. Social Forces, 85: 431–453. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L. , Diekema D. , Johnson C.. 1995. Legitimacy, compliance, and gender in peer groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58: 298–311. Google Scholar
  • Rusting C. L. , Larsen R. J.. 1998. Personality and cognitive processing of affective information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 200–213. Google Scholar
  • Smillie L. D. , Yeo G. B. , Furnham A. F. , Jackson C. J.. 2006. Benefits of all work and no play: The relationship between neuroticism and performance as a function of resource allocation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 139–155. Google Scholar
  • Tamir M.. 2005. Don't worry, be happy? Neuroticism, trait-consistent affect regulation, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89: 449–461. Google Scholar
  • Tamir M. , Robinson M. D.. 2004. Knowing good from bad: The paradox of neuroticism, negative affect, and evaluative processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 913–925. Google Scholar
  • Thibaut J. W. , Kelly H. H.. 1959. The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Warner R. M. , Kenny D. A. , Stoto M.. 1979. A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 1742–1757. Google Scholar
  • Weber M.. 1946. Class, status, party. In Gerth H. H.Mills C. W.. (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology: 180–195. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Wiggens J. S.. 1968. Personality structure. In Farnsworth P. R.Rosenzweig M. R.Polelka J. T.. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 19: 293–350. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
  • Wiggins J. S. , Trapnell P. D.. 1996. A dyadic-interactional perspective on the five-factor model. In Wiggins J. S.. (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives: 88–162. New York: Guilford. Google Scholar
  • Willer R.. 2009. Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74: 23–43. Google Scholar
  • Winter D.. 1973. The power motive. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  • Wolfe R. N. , Lennox R. D. , Cutler B. L.. 1986. Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 356–361. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  555 Pleasantville Road, Suite N200
  Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8020, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900