How Does Leader Humility Influence Team Performance? Exploring the Mechanisms of Contagion and Collective Promotion Focus

REFERENCES

• Abdel-Halim A. A. 1981. Effects of role stress–job design–technology interaction on employee work satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 260–273.Link , Google Scholar
• Anderson C., Srivastava S., Beer J. S., Spataro S. E., Chatman J. A. 2006. Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91: 1094–1110. Google Scholar
• Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. 1991. Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 732–740. Google Scholar
• Arbuckle J. 2010. IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc. Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Mael F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20–39.Link , Google Scholar
• Basford T. E., Offermann L. R., Behrend T. S. 2014. Please accept my sincerest apologies: Examining follower reactions to leader apology. Journal of Business Ethics, 119: 99–117. Google Scholar
• Bass B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Bass B. M., Avolio B. 1990. Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Bass B. M., Avolio B. J. 1993. Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17: 112–121. Google Scholar
• Baumeister R. F. 1998. The self. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: 680–740. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Beersma B., Homan A. C., Van Kleef G. A., de Dreu C. K. W. 2013. Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121: 194–203. Google Scholar
• Berson Y., Da’as R., Waldman D. A. 2015. How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes? Personnel Psychology, 68: 79–108. Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D. 1998. Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 355–373. Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 349–381. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
• Board B. J., Fritzon K. 2005. Disordered personalities at work. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11: 17–32. Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. 2003. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 552–560. Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Van der Vegt G. S., Sparrowe R. T. 2013. Status inertia and member replacement in role-differentiated teams. Organization Science, 25: 57–72. Google Scholar
• Burke C. S., Stagl K. C., Klein C., Goodwin G. F., Salas E., Halpin S. M. 2006. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 288–307. Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T., Stanley J. C., Gage N. L. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
• Campion M. A., Medsker G. J., Higgs A. C. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823–847. Google Scholar
• Cesario J., Grant H., Higgins E. T. 2004. Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86: 388–404. Google Scholar
• Cha S. E., Edmondson A. C. 2006. When values backfire: Leadership, attribution, and disenchantment in a values-driven organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 57–78. Google Scholar
• Chan D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234–246. Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A., Hambrick D. C. 2011. Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 202–237. Google Scholar
• Cialdini R. B., Trost M. R. 1998. Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: 151–192. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Cialdini R. B., Vincent J. E., Lewis S. K., Catalan J., Wheeler D., Darby B. L. 1975. Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31: 206–215. Google Scholar
• Cohen S. G., Ledford G. E., Spreitzer G. M. 1996. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49: 643–676. Google Scholar
• Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. 1992. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4: 5–13. Google Scholar
• Cummings L. L., Huber G. P., Arendt E. 1974. Effects of size and spatial arrangements on group decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 17: 460–475.Link , Google Scholar
• Dasborough M. T., Ashkanasy N. M., Tee E. Y. J., Tse H. H. M. 2009. What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 571–585. Google Scholar
• Deal T. E., Kennedy A. A. 2000. Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Dennett D. 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
• Dimotakis N., Davison R. B., Hollenbeck J. R. 2012. Team structure and regulatory focus: The impact of regulatory fit on team dynamic. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 421–434. Google Scholar
• Dragoni L. 2005. Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 1084–1095. Google Scholar
• Dufresne R. L., Clair J. A. 2013. Mind the gap: Hypocrisy monitoring and integrity striving as a source of ethical leadership. In R. T. By & B. Burnes (Eds.), Organizational change, leadership and ethics: Leading organizations towards sustainability: 97–119. Abingdon, England: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Dunning D. 1995. Trait importance and modifiability as factors influencing self-assessment and self-enhancement motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21: 1297–1306. Google Scholar
• Eagly A. H. 2009. The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. The American Psychologist, 64: 644–658. Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383. Google Scholar
• Exline J., Geyer A. 2004. Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self and Identity, 3: 95–115. Google Scholar
• Faddegon K., Scheepers D., Ellemers N. 2008. If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as a group identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38: 880–895. Google Scholar
• Fast N. J., Tiedens L. Z. 2010. Blame contagion: The automatic transmission of self-serving attributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46: 97–106. Google Scholar
• Festinger L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7: 117–140. Google Scholar
• Förster J., Grant H., Idson L. C., Higgins E. T. 2001. Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37: 253–260. Google Scholar
• Förster J., Higgins E. T., Bianco A. T. 2003. Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90: 148–164. Google Scholar
• Gardner W. L., Avolio B. J., Luthans F., May D. R., Walumbwa F. 2005. “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16: 343–372. Google Scholar
• Gelfand M. J., Leslie L. M., Keller K., de Dreu C. 2012. Conflict cultures in organizations: How leaders shape conflict cultures and their organizational-level consequences. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 1131–1147. Google Scholar
• Gordon M. 2010. Learning to laugh at ourselves: Humor, self-transcendence, and the cultivation of moral virtues. Educational Theory, 60: 735–749. Google Scholar
• Grenberg J. M. 2005. Kant and the ethics of humility: A story of dependence, corruption and virtue. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Vidmar N. 1970. Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions. Sociometry, 33: 37–54. Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Quigley T. J. 2014. Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 473–491. Google Scholar
• Hardin C. D., Higgins E. T. 1996. Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, vol. 3: 28–84. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• Hayes A. F. 2009. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76: 408–420. Google Scholar
• Hayes A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• Higgins E. T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. The American Psychologist, 52: 1280–1300. Google Scholar
• Hirst G., van Knippenberg D., Zhou J. 2009. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 280–293.Link , Google Scholar
• Hofmann D. A., Jones L. M. 2005. Leadership, collective personality, and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 509–522. Google Scholar
• Homans G. C. 1961. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World. Google Scholar
• Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. R. 2008. Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6: 53–60. Google Scholar
• Hume D. 1994. Political writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. Google Scholar
• Interpretive Simulations. 2014. Our simulations: StratSimManagement. Available at http://www.interpretive.com/rd6/?pg=ssc4. Accessed June 15, 2013. Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85–98. Google Scholar
• Johnson M. D., Hollenbeck J. R., DeRue D. S., Barnes C. M., Jundt D. 2013. Functional versus dysfunctional team change: Problem diagnosis and structural feedback for self-managed teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122: 1–11. Google Scholar
• Johnson M. K., Rowatt W. C., Petrini L. 2011. A new trait on the market: Honesty–humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 50: 857–862. Google Scholar
• Johnson S. K. 2009. Do you feel what I feel? Mood contagion and leadership outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20: 814–827. Google Scholar
• Kark R., Van Dijk D. 2007. Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32: 500–528.Link , Google Scholar
• Kenny D. A. 2004. PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8: 265–280. Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Ziegert J. C., Knight A. P., Xiao Y. 2006. Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 590–621. Google Scholar
• Koerner M. M. 2014. Courage as identity work: Accounts of workplace courage. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 63–93.Link , Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W., Gully S. M., Nason E. R., Smith E. M. 1999. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development: 240–292. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
• Lauber J. K., Baetge M. M., Acomb D. B. 1986. Crew factors in flight operations: The operational significance of exposure to short-haul air transport operations. Iii. Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center. Google Scholar
• Levine J. M., Higgins E. T., Choi H. S. 2000. Development of strategic norms in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82: 88–101. Google Scholar
• Lewin K. 1951. Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Liden R., Wayne S., Liao C., Meuser J. 2014. Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1434–1452.Link , Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., Latham G. P. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist, 57: 705–717. Google Scholar
• Lockwood P., Jordan C. H., Kunda Z. 2002. Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 854–864. Google Scholar
• Lorinkova N., Pearsall M. J., Sims H. P. 2013. Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 573–596.Link , Google Scholar
• MacKinnon D. P., Lockwood C. M., Hoffman J. M., West S. G., Sheets V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7: 83–104. Google Scholar
• Marks M. A., Mathieu J. E., Zaccaro S. J. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356–376.Link , Google Scholar
• Mathieu J., Maynard M. T., Rapp T., Gilson L. 2008. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34: 410–476. Google Scholar
• Menon T., Phillips K. W. 2011. Getting even vs. being the odd one out: Cohesion in even- and odd-sized groups. Organization Science, 22: 738–753. Google Scholar
• Mohammed S., Klimoski R., Rentsch J. R. 2000. The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 123–165. Google Scholar
• Morgeson F. P., Hofmann D. A. 1999. The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24: 249–265.Link , Google Scholar
• Morris J. A., Brotheridge C. M., Urbanski J. C. 2005. Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58: 1323–1350. Google Scholar
• Naumann S. E., Ehrhart M. G. 2005. A unit-level perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. In Turnipseed D. L. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational citizenship behavior: 143–156. New York, NY: Nova. Google Scholar
• Nielsen R., Marrone J. A., Slay H. S. 2010. A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17: 33–43. Google Scholar
• Ou Y., Tsui A. S., Kinicki A. J., Waldman D. A., Xiao Z., Song L. J. 2014. Understanding humble chief executive officers: Connections to top management team integration and middle manager responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 34–72. Google Scholar
• Owens B. P., Hekman D. 2012. Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 5: 787–818. Google Scholar
• Owens B. P., Johnson M. J., Mitchell T. R. 2013. Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24: 1517–1538. Google Scholar
• Owens B. P., McCornack A. 2010. The influence of humility on team psychological safety, cohesion, task allocation effectiveness, efficacy, and performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Montreal. Google Scholar
• Owens B. P., Rowatt W. C., Wilkins A. L. 2011. Exploring the relevance and implications of humility in organizations. In K. S. Cameron & G. S. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 260–272. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Owens B. P., Wallace A., Waldman D. A. 2015. Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 1203–1213. Google Scholar
• Park S. H., Westphal J. D., Stern I. 2011. Set up for a fall the insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 257–302. Google Scholar
• Parry K. W., Proctor-Thomson S. B. 2003. Leader career development: Who should take responsibility? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41: 316–337. Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B. 1994. Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31: 351–363. Google Scholar
• Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40: 879–891. Google Scholar
• Quick J. C., Wright T. A. 2011. Character-based leadership, context and consequences. The Leadership Quarterly, 22: 984–988. Google Scholar
• Quinn R. E. 2004. Building the bridge as you walk on it. Leader to Leader, 34: 21–26. Google Scholar
• Reave L. 2005. Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 16: 655–687. Google Scholar
• Rietzschel E. F. 2011. Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14: 337–345. Google Scholar
• Roberts K. H. 1990. Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organization Science, 1: 160–176. Google Scholar
• Roberts R. C., Wood W. J. 2003. Humility and epistemic goods. In M. dePaul & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology: 257–289. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
• Rynes S. L., Bartunek J. M., Dutton J. E., Margolis J. D. 2012. Care and compassion through an organizational lens: Opening up new possibilities. Academy of Management Review, 37: 503–523.Link , Google Scholar
• Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 224–253. Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck J., Lam S. S., Peng A. C. 2011. Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 863–871. Google Scholar
• Schein E. H. 1990. Organizational culture. The American Psychologist, 45: 109–119. Google Scholar
• Schilpzand P., Hekman D. R., Mitchell T. R. 2015. An inductively generated typology and process model of workplace courage. Organization Science, 26: 52–77. Google Scholar
• Seligman M. 2002. Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: The Free Press. Google Scholar
• Sparrowe R. T. 2005. Authentic leadership and the narrative self. The Leadership Quarterly, 16: 419–439. Google Scholar
• Steiner I. D. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar
• Sun W., Xu A., Shang Y. 2014. Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31: 127–147. Google Scholar
• Sy T., Cote S., Saavedra R. 2005. The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 295–305. Google Scholar
• Tangney I. P. 2000. Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19: 70–82. Google Scholar
• Templeton J. M. 1997. Worldwide laws of life. Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press. Google Scholar
• Van Dijk D., Kluger A. N. 2004. Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Applied Psychology, 53: 113–135. Google Scholar
• van Kleef E., van Trijp H., Luning P. 2005. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: A critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 16: 181–201. Google Scholar
• Vera D., Rodriguez-Lopez A. 2004. Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33: 393–408. Google Scholar
• Visser V. A., van Knippenberg D., van Kleef G. A., Wisse B. M. 2013. How leader displays of happiness and sadness influence follower performance: Emotional contagion and creative versus analytical performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 24: 172–188. Google Scholar
• Walumbwa F. O., Avolio B., Zhu W. 2008. How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61: 793–825. Google Scholar
• Williams H. M., Parker S. K., Turner N. 2010. Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 301–324. Google Scholar
• Yaffe T., Kark R. 2011. Leading by example: The case of leader OCB. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 806–826. Google Scholar
• Zaccaro S. J., Rittman A. L., Marks M. A. 2002. Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12: 451–483. Google Scholar