Skip main navigation
Articles

Reframing the Decision-Makers’ Dilemma: Towards a Social Context Model of Creative Idea Recognition

    Published Online:16 Mar 2017https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0887

    Abstract

    Can decision-maker roles—roles with responsibility for allocating resources toward ideas—shape which ideas people in those roles view as creative? Prior theory suggests that expertise should influence creativity assessments, yet examples abound of experts in different roles disagreeing about whether the same idea is creative. We build and test a social context model of creative idea recognition to show how decision-maker roles can shift creativity assessments. In an experimental study, we show that relative to non-decision-making roles, decision-making roles inculcate an economic mindset and so lead to downgrading otherwise creative ideas with cues of low social approval. A quasi-experimental study triangulates and extends this finding showing that organizational decision-making roles can habitually evoke an economic mindset that shapes creativity assessments. In both studies, decision-maker role, economic mindset, and social approval levels were unrelated to idea usefulness ratings. By integrating work on organizational roles, economic mindsets, and implicit theories of creative ideas, we provide a broadly applicable theoretical framework to describe how social context shapes creativity assessments. This work has important implications for the creativity and innovation literatures, and suggests a new interpretation of the longstanding puzzle of why organizations desire but often reject creative ideas.

    REFERENCES

    • Amabile, T. M. 1982. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 997–1013. Google Scholar
    • Amabile, T. M. 1983. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 357–376. Google Scholar
    • Amabile, T. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10: 123–167. Google Scholar
    • Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar
    • Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. 2007. Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Z. C. Shalley (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity: 33–62. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
    • Amblee, N., & Bui, T. 2011. Harnessing the influence of social proof in online shopping: The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales of digital microproducts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16: 91–114. Google Scholar
    • Atran, S., Medin, D. L., & Ross, N. O. 2005. The cultural mind: Environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review, 112, 744–776. Google Scholar
    • Batey, M. 2012. The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24: 55–65. Google Scholar
    • Berg, J. 2016. Balancing on the creative high-wire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 433–468. Google Scholar
    • Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. 2012. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49: 192–205. Google Scholar
    • Biddle, B. J. 1986. Recent development in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12: 67–92. Google Scholar
    • Boudreau, K. J., Guinan, E. C., Lakhani, K. R., & Riedl, C. 2016. Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Science, 62: 2765–2783. Google Scholar
    • Callero, P. L. 1986. Toward a Meadian conceptualization of role. Sociological Quarterly, 27: 343–358. Google Scholar
    • Cialdini, R. B. 1993. Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers. Google Scholar
    • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58: 1015–1026. Google Scholar
    • Cooper, R. 2006. Managing technology development projects. Research Technology Management, 49: 23–31. Google Scholar
    • Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. 2016. Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 433–460. Google Scholar
    • Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. 2007. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32: 761–773.Link , Google Scholar
    • Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1999. Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity: 313–335. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Davies, M. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–present. Available at: https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ Google Scholar
    • Day, G. 2007. Is it real? Can we win? Is it worth doing?: Managing risk and reward in an innovation portfolio. Harvard Business Review, 85: 110. Google Scholar
    • De Cristofaro, E., Friedman, A., Jourjon, G., Kaafar, M. A., & Shafiq, M. Z. 2014, November.Paying for likes?: Understanding Facebook like fraud using honeypots. Paper presented at the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement. Google Scholar
    • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 741–749. Google Scholar
    • Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. 2011. Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 461–488.Link , Google Scholar
    • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51: 629. Google Scholar
    • Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. 1999. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24: 286–307.Link , Google Scholar
    • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. 1995. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6: 267–285. Google Scholar
    • Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. 2003. Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 283–301.Link , Google Scholar
    • Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. 2000. Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management, 26: 705–732. Google Scholar
    • Ford, C. M., Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. 2008. Factors associated with creative strategic decisions. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17: 171–185. Google Scholar
    • Ford, C. M., & Sullivan, D. M. 2005. Selective retention processes that create tensions between novelty and value in business domains. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse: 245–259. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Google Scholar
    • Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. 2006. Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90: 351–367. Google Scholar
    • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1975. Development of the job diagnostic survey. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 159–170. Google Scholar
    • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 250–279. Google Scholar
    • Haran, U., Moore, D. A., & Morewedge, C. K. 2010. A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 5: 467–476. Google Scholar
    • Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
    • Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. 2010. Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed.): 253–260. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
    • Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Ferris, G. R. 2005. Negative affectivity as a moderator of the form and magnitude of the relationship between felt accountability and job tension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 517–534. Google Scholar
    • Hsee, C. K. 1996. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67: 247–257. Google Scholar
    • Huang, L., & Pearce, J. L. 2015. Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 634–670. Google Scholar
    • Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256–282. Google Scholar
    • Keller, J., & Loewenstein, J. 2011. The cultural category of cooperation: A cultural consensus model analysis for China and the United States. Organization Science, 22: 299–319. Google Scholar
    • Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. 2005. Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14: 243–246. Google Scholar
    • Kornish, L. J., & Ulrich, K. T. 2011. Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Science, 57: 107–128. Google Scholar
    • Krishnan, V., & Ulrich, K. T. 2001. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science. Special Issue: Design and Development, 47: 1–21. Google Scholar
    • Kruglanski, A. W., Friedman, I., & Zeevi, G. 1971. The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance. Journal of Personality, 39: 606–617. Google Scholar
    • Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S., & Ochsner, K. N. 2010. Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14: 457–463. Google Scholar
    • Loewenstein, J., & Mueller, J. 2016. Implicit theories of creative ideas: How culture guides creativity assessments. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2: 320–348.Link , Google Scholar
    • MacCoun, R. J. 2012. The burden of social proof: Shared thresholds and social influence. Psychological Review, 119: 345. Google Scholar
    • Mintzberg, H. 1971. Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Science, 18: B-97–B-110. Google Scholar
    • Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. 2011. The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 740–760.Link , Google Scholar
    • Molinsky, A. L., Grant, A. M., & Margolis, J. D. 2012. The bedside manner of homo economicus: How and why priming an economic schema reduces compassion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119: 27–37. Google Scholar
    • Mollick, E. 2012. People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1001–1015. Google Scholar
    • Moreau, C. P., Lehmann, D. R., & Markman, A. B. 2001. Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 38: 14–29. Google Scholar
    • Morgan, D. L., & Schwalbe, M. L. 1990. Mind and self in society: Linking social structure and social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53: 148–164. Google Scholar
    • Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. 1999. Taking charge at work: Extra role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 403–419.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. 2012. The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23: 13–17. Google Scholar
    • Mueller, J. S., Wakslak, C. J., & Krishnan, V. 2014. Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51: 81–87. Google Scholar
    • Paletz, S. B., & Peng, K. 2008. Implicit theories of creativity across cultures: Novelty and appropriateness in two product domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39: 286–302. Google Scholar
    • Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 631–642.Link , Google Scholar
    • Rao, H., Greve, H. R., & Davis, G. F. 2001. Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 502–526. Google Scholar
    • Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. 2008. The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72: 58–75. Google Scholar
    • Salganik, M. J., & Watts, D. J. 2009. Web‐based experiments for the study of collective social dynamics in cultural markets. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1: 439–468. Google Scholar
    • Schilling, M. A., & Hill, C. W. 1998. Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives. The Academy of Management Executive, 12: 67–81.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Siler, K., Lee, K., & Bero, L. 2015. Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112: 360–365. Google Scholar
    • Sinaceur, M., Heath, C., & Cole, S. 2005. Emotional and deliberative reactions to a public crisis: Mad Cow disease in France. Psychological Science, 16: 247–254. Google Scholar
    • Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. 2007. Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32: 9–32.Link , Google Scholar
    • Sonenshein, S. 2006. Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1158–1172.Link , Google Scholar
    • Sternberg, R. J. 1985. Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 607–627. Google Scholar
    • Stevens, G. A., & Burley, J. 1997. 3,000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success! Research Technology Management, 40: 16–27. Google Scholar
    • Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. 2006. The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314: 1154–1156. Google Scholar
    • Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. 2011. Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10: 643–660.Link , Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum