The Multiple Pathways through which Internal and External Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Organizational Identification and Multifoci Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Cultural and Social Orientations

REFERENCES

• Aberson C. L., Healy M., Romero V. 2000. Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4: 157–173. Google Scholar
• Aguilera R. V., Rupp D. E., Williams C. A., Ganapathi J. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836–863.Link , Google Scholar
• Aguinis H., Glavas A. 2012. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38: 932–968. Google Scholar
• Ambrose M. L., Schminke M. 2009. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 491–500. Google Scholar
• Arbuckle J. L. 2015. Factor analysis. In J. L. Arbuckle, IBM SPSS Amos 19: User’s guide: 137–144. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation. http://amosdevelopment.com/download/amos.pdf (accessed June 15, 2014). Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Harrison S. H., Corley K. G. 2008. Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34: 325–374. Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Mael F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20–39.Link , Google Scholar
• Bartel C. A. 2001. Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 379–413. Google Scholar
• Bauman C. W., Skitka L. J. 2012. Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32: 63–86. Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya C., Sen S. 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47: 9–24. Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya C., Sen S., Korschun D. 2008. Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49: 37–44. Google Scholar
• Bradley-Geist J. C., King E. B. 2013. Building an inclusive work world: Promoting diversity and positive inter-group relations through CSR. In J. Olson-Buchanan, L. K. Bryan, & L. F. Thompson (Eds.), Using industrial–organizational psychology for the greater good: Helping those who help others: 176–204. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Brammer S., Millington A. 2005. Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61: 29–44. Google Scholar
• Brammer S., Millington A., Rayton B. 2007. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18: 1701–1719. Google Scholar
• Butts M. M., Casper W. J., Yang T. S. 2013. How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 1–25. Google Scholar
• Caligiuri P., Mencin A., Jiang K. 2013. Win–win–win: The influence of company-sponsored volunteerism programs on employees, NGOs, and business units. Personnel Psychology, 66: 825–860. Google Scholar
• Carmeli A., Gilat G., Waldman D. A. 2007. The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 972–992. Google Scholar
• Chin W. W. 1998. Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22: 7–16. Google Scholar
• Christ O., Dick R., Wagner U., Stellmacher J. 2003. When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among schoolteachers. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73: 329–341. Google Scholar
• Chung J., Monroe G. S. 2003. Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44: 291–302. Google Scholar
• Cornelius N., Todres M., Janjuha-Jivraj S., Woods A., Wallace J. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 81: 355–370. Google Scholar
• Cronbach L. J. 1970. Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Harper. Google Scholar
• Cronbach L. J., Gleser G. C. 1965. Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.) (Illini books, 61). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R., Mitchell M. S. 2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31: 874–900. Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R., Rupp D. E., Mohler C. J., Schminke M. 2001. Three roads to organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20: 1–113. Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 239–263. Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R., Stinglhamber F., Vandenberghe C., Sucharski I. L., Rhoades L. 2002. Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 565–573. Google Scholar
• El Akremi A., Gond J. P., Swaen V., De Roeck K., Igalens J. 2015. How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management. Published online ahead of print. doi:10.1177/0149206315569311. Google Scholar
• Epitropaki O., Martin R. 2005. The moderating role of individual differences in the relation between transformational/transactional leadership perceptions and organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 16: 569–589. Google Scholar
• Farooq M., Farooq O., Jasimuddin S. M. 2014. Employees’ response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees’ collectivist orientation. European Management Journal, 32: 916–927. Google Scholar
• Farooq O., Payaud M., Merunka D., Valette-Florence P. 2014. The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 125: 563–580. Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 382–388. Google Scholar
• Fuller J. B., Hester K., Barnett T., Beu D., Frey L., Relyea C. 2009. Extending the group engagement model: An examination of the interactive effects of prestige, respect, and employee role identity. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21: 119–139. Google Scholar
• Fuller J. B., Hester K., Barnett T., Frey L., Relyea C., Beu D. 2006. Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Human Relations, 59: 815–846. Google Scholar
• Gerstner C. R., Day D. V. 1997. Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 827–844. Google Scholar
• Gjølberg M. 2009. Measuring the immeasurable?: Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25: 10–22. Google Scholar
• Goldberg A. I. 1976. The relevance of cosmopolitan/local orientations to professional values and behavior. Work and Occupations, 3: 331–356. Google Scholar
• Hameed I., Roques O., Arain G. A. 2013. Nonlinear moderating effect of tenure on organizational identification (OID) and the subsequent role of OID in fostering readiness for change. Group & Organization Management, 38: 101–127. Google Scholar
• Harman H. H. 1960. Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Hayes A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 2015. Country comparison: Pakistan. Retrieved June 5, 2015, from http://geert-hofstede.com/pakistan.html. Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D., Saldanha N., Deng X. 2007. A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17: 140–154. Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. 2005. ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. http://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation.pdf (accessed 5 August 2015). Google Scholar
• Iverson R. D., Mueller C., Price J. L. 2004. Revisiting the cosmopolitan–local construct. In R. E. Griffeth, P. E. Hom, & R. W. O. Griffeth (Eds.), Innovative theory and empirical research on employee turnover: 55–72. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Google Scholar
• Jones D. A. 2010. Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 857–878. Google Scholar
• Jones D. A., Rupp D. E. In press. Social responsibility IN and OF organizations: The psychology of corporate social responsibility among organizational members. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (2nd ed.)—vol. 3: Managerial psychology and organizational approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Jones D., Willness C., Madey S. 2014. Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 383–404.Link , Google Scholar
• Kline R. B. 2011. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Brewer M. B. 1986. Social group identity and the emergence of cooperation in resource conservation dilemmas (Research paper no. 870). Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Google Scholar
• Lavelle J., Rupp D. E., Manegold J. G., Thornton M. A. 2015. Multifoci justice and target similarity: Emerging research and extension. In M. Ambrose & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in work organizations: 165–185. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Leary M. R., Baumeister R. F. 2000. The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 32: 1–62. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
• Macho S., Ledermann T. 2011. Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: The phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16: 34–43. Google Scholar
• Mael F., Ashforth B. E. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 103–123. Google Scholar
• Mael F., Ashforth B. E. 1995. Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48: 309–333. Google Scholar
• March J., Simon H. 1958. Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268–305. Google Scholar
• Markus H. R., Kitayama S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98: 224–253. Google Scholar
• Mesquita B. 2001. Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80: 68–74. Google Scholar
• Moorman R. H., Blakely G. L. 1995. Individualism collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 127–142. Google Scholar
• Mueller K., Hattrup K., Spiess S. O., Lin-Hi N. 2012. The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees’ affective commitment: A cross-cultural investigation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 1186–1200. Google Scholar
• Organ D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403–441. Google Scholar
• Pajo K., Lee L. 2011. Corporate-sponsored volunteering: A work design perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 99: 467–482. Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903. Google Scholar
• Posthuma R. A., Campion M. C., Masimova M., Campion M. A. 2013. A high-performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39: 1184–1220. Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G. 1998. To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetton & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: 171–208. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40: 879–891. Google Scholar
• Richmond S. M., Bissell B. L., Beach L. R. 1998. Image theory’s compatibility test and evaluations of the status quo. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73: 39–53. Google Scholar
• Riordan C. M., Gatewood R. D., Bill J. B. 1997. Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 401–412. Google Scholar
• Rupp D. E., Ganapathi J., Aguilera R. V., Williams C. A. 2006. Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 537–543. Google Scholar
• Rupp D. E., Mallory D. B. 2015. Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2: 211–236. Google Scholar
• Rupp D. E., Shao R., Jones K. S., Liao H. 2014. The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123: 159–185. Google Scholar
• Rupp D. E., Shao R., Thornton M. A., Skarlicki D. P. 2013. Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66: 895–933. Google Scholar
• Rupp D. E., Skarlicki D., Shao R. 2013. The psychology of corporate social responsibility and humanitarian work: A person-centric perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6: 361–368. Google Scholar
• Rupp D. E., Williams C. A., Aguilera R. V. 2011. Increasing corporate social responsibility through stakeholder value internalization (and the catalyzing effect of new governance): An application of organizational justice, self-determination, and social influence theories. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality: 71–90. New York, NY: Routledge/Psychology Press. Google Scholar
• Shamir B. 1990. Calculations, values, and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation. Human Relations, 43: 313–332. Google Scholar
• Shen J., Benson J. 2014. When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42: 1723–1746. Google Scholar
• Smidts A., Pruyn A. T. H., Van Riel C. B. M. 2001. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1051–1062.Link , Google Scholar
• Sparrowe R. T., Mayer K. J. 2011. Publishing in AMJ—Part 4: Grounding hypotheses. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 1098–1102.Link , Google Scholar
• Stinglhamber F., De Cremer D. 2008. Co-workers’ justice judgments, own justice judgments and employee commitment: A multi-foci approach. Psychologica Belgica, 48: 197–218. Google Scholar
• Stites J. P., Michael J. H. 2011. Organizational commitment in manufacturing employees: Relationships with corporate social performance. Business & Society, 50: 50–70. Google Scholar
• Swaan A. 1990. The management of normality: Critical essays in health and welfare. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J. C. 1985. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed.): 7–24. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. Google Scholar
• Taylor S. E., Brown J. D. 1994. Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116: 21–27. Google Scholar
• Taylor A. B., MacKinnon D. P., Tein J. Y. 2007. Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 241–269. Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C. 1995. Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C. 2001. Individualism–collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69: 907–924. Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C., Bontempo R., Villareal M. J., Asai M., Lucca N. 1988. Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 323–338. Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C., McCusker C., Hui C. H. 1990. Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1006–1020. Google Scholar
• Turker D. 2009. How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89: 189–204. Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R. 1999. Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21: 201–246. Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. 2001. Identity and cooperative behavior in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4: 207–226. Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. 2002. Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 813–838. Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. 2003. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 349–361. Google Scholar
• Valentine S., Fleischman G. 2008. Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77: 159–172. Google Scholar
• Waldman D. A., Siegel D. S., Javidan M. 2006. Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1703–1725. Google Scholar
• Werther W. B., Chandler D. 2010. Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders in a global environment. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Williams K. Y., O’Reilly C. A. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77–140. Google Scholar
• Yammarino F. J. 1998. Multivariate aspects of the varient /WABA approach: A discussion and leadership illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 9: 203–227. Google Scholar