Watching the Clock: Action Timing, Patterning, and Routine Performance

REFERENCES

• Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. 1999. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10: 43–68. Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2009. Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. 2001. Municipal benchmarks: Assessing local performance and establishing community standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. 2001. Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26: 512–529.Link , Google Scholar
• Argote, L. 1982. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 420–434. Google Scholar
• Bapuji, H., Hora, M., & Saeed, A. M. 2012. Intentions, intermediaries, and interaction: Examining the emergence of routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1586–1607. Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A. 2003. Shared meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14: 312–330. Google Scholar
• Becker, M. C. 2004. Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13: 643–677. Google Scholar
• Becker, M. C. 2005. A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: Linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 817–846. Google Scholar
• Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 2005. Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 775–791. Google Scholar
• Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J., & Pek, S. 2016. Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines. Organization Science, 27: 573–593. Google Scholar
• Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Molter, B., & Glockner, A. 2004. Oops, I did it again: Relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93: 62–74. Google Scholar
• Bluedorn, A. C. 2002. The human organization of time. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
• Brekhus, W. 1998. A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory, 16: 34–51. Google Scholar
• Brekhus, W. 2000. A mundane manifesto. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 1: 89–106. Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1–34. Google Scholar
• Buis, M. K. 2010. Interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models. The Stata Journal, 10: 305–308. Google Scholar
• Cacciatori, E. 2012. Resolving conflict in problem-solving: Systems of artefacts in the development of new routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1559–1585. Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. 1998. Regression analysis of count data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Canales, R. 2014. Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organization Science, 25: 1–28. Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13: 442–455. Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15: 555–568. Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D. 2007. Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28: 773–786. Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., & Bacdayan, P. 1994. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5: 554–568. Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R, Dosi, G, Egidi, M, Marengo, L., Warglien, M., & Winter, S. G., 1996. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 653–698. Google Scholar
• D’Adderio, L. 2011. Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7: 197–230. Google Scholar
• D’Adderio, L. 2014. The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organization Science, 25: 1325–1350. Google Scholar
• Danner-Schröder, A., & Geiger, D. 2016. Unraveling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27: 633–658. Google Scholar
• Dionysiou, D. D., & Tsoukas, H. 2013. Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionalist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38: 181–205.Link , Google Scholar
• Dittrich, K., Guerard, S., & Seidl, D. 2016. Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organization Science, 27: 678–697. Google Scholar
• Dönmez, D., Grote, G., & Brusoni, S. 2016. Routine interdependencies as a source of stability and flexibility: A study of agile software teams. Information and Organization, 26: 63–83. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11: 611–629. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. 2003. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 727–752. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. 2015. Theory of routine dynamics and connections to strategy as practice. In D. GolsorkhiL. RouleauD. SeidelE. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice: 317−330. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. 2016. Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In J. Howard-GrenvilleRerup, C.Langley, A.Tsoukas, H. (Eds.), Organizational routines: How they are created, maintained, and changed: 23−46. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94–118. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. 2005. Organizational routines and the macro-actor. In B. Czarniawska (Ed.), Actor-network theory and organizing: 91−111. Copenhagen, Denmark: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L., & Lazaric, N. 2016. Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27: 505–513. Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Rafaeli, A. 2002. Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 39: 309–331. Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. 1974. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4: 28–36. Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. A. 2004. The strategy field from the perspective of Management Science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management Science, 50: 1309–1318. Google Scholar
• General Electric Company. 1998. Annual Report. Fairfield, CT. Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Gittell, J. H. 2002. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science, 48: 1408–1426. Google Scholar
• Glaser, V. L. 2017. Design performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 2126–2154.Link , Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109–122. Google Scholar
• Hammond, J. 1973. Two sources of error in ecological correlations. American Sociological Review, 38: 764–777. Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. 2011. Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J. A. 2005. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16: 618–636. Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J. A., & Rerup, C. 2017. A process perspective on organizational routines. In A. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), SAGE handbook of process organization studies: 323−339. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. 2016. Introduction: Advancing a process perspective on routines by zooming out and zooming in. In J. Howard-GrenvilleC. RerupA. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), Organizational routines: How they are created, maintained, and changed: 1–18. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. 2005. The ecological fallacy. In Kempf-Leonard, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement: 715−722. Boston, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. M., & Rivenbark, W. C. 2011. Performance budgeting for state and local government. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Google Scholar
• Knott, A. M., & McKelvey, B. 1999. Nirvana efficiency: A comparative test of residual claims and routines. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38: 365–383. Google Scholar
• Kremser, W., & Schreyögg, G. 2016. The dynamics of interrelated routines: Introducing the cluster level. Organization Science, 27: 698–721. Google Scholar
• Kvavilashvili, L., & Fisher, I. 2007. Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Effects of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136: 112–132. Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 1997. Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: Problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organization Studies, 18: 973–996. Google Scholar
• Larsson, R., & Bowen, D. E. 1989. Organization and customer: Managing design and coordination of services. Academy of Management Review, 14: 213–233.Link , Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1986. The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: 261−277. London, U.K.: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
• Lazaric, N., & Denis, B. 2005. Routinization and memorization of tasks in a workshop: The case of the introduction of ISO norms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 873–896. Google Scholar
• LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L., & Ilan, R. 2016. Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: An ethnomethodological study of handoff routines. Organization Science, 27: 514–534. Google Scholar
• Leidner, R. 1993. Fast food, fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Vaast, E. 2005. The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29: 335–363. Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Vaast, E. 2008. Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32: 307–322. Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43: 934–950. Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. 2011. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22: 1254–1265. Google Scholar
• Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. 1995. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21: 384–393. Google Scholar
• Lloyd, D., & Arstila, V. 2014. The disunity of time. In V. ArstilaD. Lloyd (Eds.), Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1992. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar
• March, J., & Simon, H. 1958. Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. 2007. Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• McTaggart, J. E. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind: A quarterly review of psychology and philosophy, 17: 456−473. Google Scholar
• Miller, K. D., Pentland, B. T., & Choi, S. 2012. Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1536–1558. Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1983. Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1989. Mintzberg on management. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin, J. F. 2012. Mixed methods research in strategic management: Impact and applications. Organizational Research Methods, 15: 33–56. Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Newton, I. 1934 [1689]. Mathematical principles of natural philosophy and his system of the world. Tran. by A. Motte (1729), Rev. by F. Cajori. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. 2003. Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. 2009. Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3: 463–502.Link , Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. 2002. It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13: 684–700. Google Scholar
• Parmigiani, A., & Howard-Grenville, J. A. 2011. Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 413–453.Link , Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T. 1992. Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 527–548. Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. 2005. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 793–815. Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. 2008a. Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18: 235–250. Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. 2008b. Issues in empirical field studies of organizational routines. In M. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines: 281−300. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T., & Hillison, D. 2010. Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organization Studies, 31: 917–940. Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T., & Reuter, H. H. 1994. Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 484–510. Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., Lambert, N., Murase, T., Asencio, R., & McDonald, J. 2017. Sequential analysis of processes. In A. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies: 254−270. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R. 1999. Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 49–65. Google Scholar
• Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. 2015. When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 618–648.Link , Google Scholar
• Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. 2017. Time, temporality, and process studies. In A. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies: 402−416. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar
• Rerup, C., & Feldman, M. S. 2011. Routines as a source of change in organizational schema: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 577–610.Link , Google Scholar
• Roth, P. L. 1994. Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47: 537–560. Google Scholar
• Rowell, C., Gustafsson, R., & Clemente, M. 2016. How institutions matter “in time”: The temporal structures of practices and their effect on practice reproduction. In J. Gehman, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), How institutions matter: Research in the sociology of organizations, Vol. 48A: 305−330. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing. Google Scholar
• Saito, Y. 2001. Everyday aesthetics. Philosophy and Literature, 25: 87–95. Google Scholar
• Salvato, C. 2009. Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20: 384–409. Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., & Rerup, C. 2011. Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37: 468–490. Google Scholar
• Schultz, M. 2014. Logic of consequences and logic of appropriateness. In M. AugierD. Teece (Eds.), Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 1998. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
• Spee, P., Jarzabkowski, P., & Smets, M. 2016. The influence of routine interdependence and skillful accomplishment on the coordination of standardizing and customizing. Organization Science, 27: 759–781. Google Scholar
• Stene, E. O. 1940. An approach to a science of administration. The American Political Science Review, 34: 1124–1137. Google Scholar
• Terza, J. V., Basu, A., & Rathouz, P. J. 2008. Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics, 27: 531–543. Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Turner, S. F. 2014. The temporal dimension of routines and their outcomes: Exploring the role of time in the capabilities and practice perspectives. In A. J. ShippY. Fried (Eds.), Time and work, vol. II: 115–145. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
• Turner, S. F., & Fern, M. J. 2012. Examining the stability and variability of routine performances: The effects of experience and context change. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1407–1434. Google Scholar
• Turner, S. F., & Rindova, V. 2012. A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23: 24–46. Google Scholar
• Waste Age. 2000. How to service trash. January 31: 68–73. Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2009. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Mason, OH: South-western. Google Scholar
• Zbaracki, M. J., & Bergen, M. 2010. When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21: 955–972. Google Scholar