Managing by Design

REFERENCES

• Accenture. 2013. Accenture 2013 global consumer pulse survey: Global & U.S. key findings. http://www.accenture.com/sitecollectiondocuments/pdf/accenture-global-consumer-pulse-research-study-2013-key-findings.pdf (accessed January 9, 2015). Google Scholar
• Black C. D. , Baker M. J. 1987. Success through design. Design Studies, 8: 207–216. Google Scholar
• Brown T. 2008. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86: 84–92, 141. Google Scholar
• Bruce M. , Bessant J. 2002. Design in business: Strategic innovation through design. New York, NY: FT/Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
• Chiva R. , Alegre J. 2009. Investment in design and firm performance: The mediating role of design management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26: 424–440. Google Scholar
• Cox G. , Dayan Z. 2005. Cox review of creativity in business: Building on the UK's strengths. London, U.K.: HM Treasury. Google Scholar
• Dark Horse Innovation. 2014. Thank God it's Monday! Wie wir die Arbeitswelt revolutionieren. Berlin: Ullstein eBooks. Google Scholar
• Fauchart E. , Gruber M. 2011. Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 935–957.Link , Google Scholar
• GDS. 2015. UK government digital services. https://www.gov.uk/design-principles (accessed January 9, 2015). Google Scholar
• Gemser G. , Leenders M. 2001. How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18: 28–38. Google Scholar
• George G. , Bock A. J. 2011. The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35: 83–111. Google Scholar
• George G. , Bock A. J. 2012. Models of opportunity: How entrepreneurs design firms to achieve the unexpected. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Hargadon A. , Sutton R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 716–749. Google Scholar
• Kotler P. , Rath G. A. 1984. Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. Journal of Business Strategy, 5: 16–21. Google Scholar
• Moultrie J. , Livesey F. 2014. Measuring design investment in firms: Conceptual foundations and exploratory UK survey. Research Policy, 43: 570–587. Google Scholar
• Myerson J. , Ross P. 2013. Sensors and serendipity in architectural space. In Gee E.Myerson J. (Eds.), Time & motion: Redefining working life: 129–137. Liverpool, U.K.: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar
• Pine B. J. , Gilmore J. H. 2011. The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
• Rittel H. W. J. , Webber M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155–169. Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. 1981. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
• Stigliani I. , Ravasi D. 2012. Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual- to group-level prospective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1232–1259.Link , Google Scholar
• Stubbs M. 2013. The value of time spent. In Gee E.Myerson J. (Eds.), Time & motion: Redefining working life: 41–49. Liverpool, U.K.: Liverpool University. Google Scholar
• UK Design Council. 2007. The value of design factfinder report. London, U.K.: Design Council. Google Scholar
• Walsh V. 1996. Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm. Research Policy, 25: 509–529. Google Scholar
• Zomerdijk L. G. , Voss C. A. 2010. Service design for experience-centric services. Journal of Service Research, 13: 67–82. Google Scholar