Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0207

How do teams working on complex projects get the help they need? Our qualitative investigation of the help provided to project teams at a prominent design firm revealed two distinct helping processes, both characterized by deep, sustained engagement that far exceeds the brief interactions described in the helping literature. Such deep help consisted of (1) guiding a team through a difficult juncture by working with its members in several prolonged, tightly clustered sessions, or (2) path clearing by helping a team address a persistent deficit via briefer, intermittent sessions throughout a project’s life. We present a model theorizing these processes, which has two noteworthy features. First, it emphasizes the socially constructed nature of helping behavior. That is, the parties must establish and maintain a helping frame for their interaction, especially when help givers are high-status external leaders. Second, the model specifies that the rhythms of deep help—the duration and temporal patterns of giver–receiver interactions—are resource-allocation decisions that also contribute to the social meaning of help. These findings illuminate the theoretical and practical overlap between helping and external leadership in knowledge-intensive project work, and the role of temporality in the helping process.

REFERENCES

  • Alvesson, M. 2001. Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations, 54: 863–886. Google Scholar
  • Amabile, T., Fisher, C. M., & Pillemer, J. 2014. IDEO’s culture of helping. Harvard Business Review, 92: 54–61. Google Scholar
  • Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. 2016. The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36: 157–183. Google Scholar
  • Ancona, D., & Chong, C. L. 1999. Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. In E. A. MannixM. A. Neale (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: 251–284. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
  • Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634–665. Google Scholar
  • Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. 2001. Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26: 512–529.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baer, M., & Brown, G. 2012. Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118: 60–71. Google Scholar
  • Bamberger, P. 2009. Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research. In J. J. MartocchioH. Liao (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 28: 49–98. Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley, U.K. Google Scholar
  • Bechky, B. A. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14: 312–330. Google Scholar
  • Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. 2016. The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10: 599–670.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. 2003. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49: 432–445. Google Scholar
  • Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1–34. Google Scholar
  • Carlile, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15: 555–568. Google Scholar
  • Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239–290. Google Scholar
  • Collins, R. 2004. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  • Cummings, J. N., & Haas, M. R. 2012. So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 316–341. Google Scholar
  • Deelstra, J. T., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., Stroebe, W., & Zijlstra, F. R. H., et al.. 2003. Receiving instrumental support at work: When help is not welcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 324–331. Google Scholar
  • Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. 2003. The power of high-quality connections. In K. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 263–278. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543–576.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach, K. D., & Flynn, F. J. 2013. Creative collaboration and the self-concept: A study of toy designers. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 515–544. Google Scholar
  • Fisher, C. M. 2017. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure? Two experiments on in-process interventions in decision-making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138: 59–73. Google Scholar
  • Fisher, C. M., & Amabile, T. M. 2009. Creativity, improvisation and organizations. In T. Rickards, M. A. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity: 13–24. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Flanagan, J. C. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51: 327–358. Google Scholar
  • Flynn, F. J. 2006. How much is it worth to you? Subjective evaluations of help in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27: 133–174. Google Scholar
  • Flynn, F. J., & Lake, V. K. B. 2008. If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95: 128–143. Google Scholar
  • Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. 1983. The social construction of helping relationships. In J. FisherJ. D. FisherA. NadlerB. M. DePaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping: Recipient reactions to aid, vol. 1: 144–166. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15–31. Google Scholar
  • Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar
  • Golan, M. E., & Bamberger, P. A. 2015. Mapping the emergent choreography of assistance: The dynamics of dyadic peer helping relations in organizations. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1: 124–149.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. 1995. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219–247. Google Scholar
  • Grant, A. M., & Patil, S. V. 2012. Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units. Academy of Management Review, 37: 547–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grodal, S., Nelson, A. J., & Siino, R. M. 2015. Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 136–168.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. 2005. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30: 269–287.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. 2006. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17: 484–500. Google Scholar
  • Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. 2015. An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 375–404.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hernes, T., Simpson, B., & Söderlund, J. 2013. Managing and temporality. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29: 1–6. Google Scholar
  • Hofmann, D. A., Lei, Z., & Grant, A. M. 2009. Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1261–1274. Google Scholar
  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
  • Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. 2006. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17: 22–44. Google Scholar
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., Mak, S., & Chao, G. T. 2016. Team-centric leadership: An integrative review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3: 21–54. Google Scholar
  • Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24: 691–710.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.), 2017. The SAGE handbook of process organization studies. London, U.K.: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  • Lee, F. 2002. The social costs of seeking help. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38: 17–35. Google Scholar
  • LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. 2002. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 52–65. Google Scholar
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. 2014. Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1434–1452.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke, K. 2001. Grounded theory in management research. London, U.K.: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  • Long Lingo, E., & O’Mahony, S. 2010. Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 47–81. Google Scholar
  • MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Ahearne, M. 1998. Some possible antecedents and consequences of in-role and extra-role salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 62: 87–98. Google Scholar
  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. Jr. 1987. Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 106–129. Google Scholar
  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. 2004. The logic of appropriateness. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science: 479–497. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • McClelland, D. C. 1998. Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9: 331–339. Google Scholar
  • Methot, J. R., Lepak, D., Shipp, A. J., & Boswell, W. R. 2017. Good citizen interrupted: Calibrating a temporal theory of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Review, 42: 10–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Metiu, A., & Rothbard, N. P. 2013. Task bubbles, artifacts, shared emotion, and mutual focus of attention: A comparative study of the microprocesses of group engagement. Organization Science, 24: 455–475. Google Scholar
  • Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. 2011. Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 489–508.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morgeson, F. P. 2005. The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 497–508. Google Scholar
  • Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. 2010. Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36: 5–39. Google Scholar
  • Morrison, E. W. 1994. Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1543–1567.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler, A. 1987. Determinants of help seeking behaviour: The effects of helper’s similarity, task centrality and recipient’s self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17: 57–67. Google Scholar
  • Nadler, A. 2015. The other side of helping: Seeking and receiving help. In D. Schroeder & W. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior: 307–328. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Nadler, A., Ellis, S., & Bar, I. 2003. To seek or not to seek: The relationship between help seeking and job performance evaluations as moderated by task-relevant expertise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33: 91–109. Google Scholar
  • Nadler, A., & Halabi, S. 2006. Intergroup helping as status relations: Effects of status stability, identification, and type of help on receptivity to high-status group’s help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91: 97–110. Google Scholar
  • Perlow, L., & Weeks, J. 2002. Who’s helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 345–361. Google Scholar
  • Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. 2017. From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42: 53–79.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. 2009. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 122–141. Google Scholar
  • Rajan, R. G., & Wulf, J. 2006. The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88: 759–773. Google Scholar
  • Rouse, E. 2016. Beginning’s end: How founders psychologically disengage from their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1605–1629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau, D. M. 2004. Psychological contracts in the workplace: Understanding the ties that motivate. The Academy of Management Executive, 18: 120–127.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. 1996. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 685–718. Google Scholar
  • Toegel, G., Kilduff, M., & Anand, N. 2013. Emotion helping by managers: An emergent understanding of discrepant role expectations and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 334–357.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Von Nordenflycht, A. 2010. What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35: 155–174.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman, R. 2001. How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12: 559–577. Google Scholar
  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316: 1036–1039. Google Scholar
  • Zerubavel, E. 1985. Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900