Skip main navigation
Articles

What Drives Exploration? Convergence and Divergence of Exploration Tendencies among Alliance Partners and Competitors

    Published Online:2 Nov 2020https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1409

    Abstract

    Management research has alluded to organizational and environmental conditions that drive firms’ tendencies to explore versus exploit. We complement this research by developing theory on vicarious learning to explain how a firm adjusts its own exploration level based on the exploration levels of its alliance partners and competitors. Using panel data on 180 electronics firms publicly traded in the United States, we reveal an inverted U-shaped association between a firm’s exploration tendency and the exploration levels of its partners and competitors. Convergence is explained by imitation and legitimation, while divergence is associated with risk perception and specialization in the knowledge domain. We further show how the convergence of the exploration tendency becomes stronger under firm-specific uncertainty but weaker when the exploration patterns exhibited by the firm’s partners and competitors are incoherent. Finally, counter to expectations, we show that this convergence is weakened by the technological proximity of the firm’s competitors. Our findings inform research on vicarious learning and the antecedents of exploration by underscoring the role of interdependence in firms’ exploration tendencies.

    REFERENCES

    • Abrahamson, E. 1996. Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21: 254–285.Link , Google Scholar
    • Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. 2013. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 270–301. Google Scholar
    • Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 521–543. Google Scholar
    • Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2010. Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 1343–1364. Google Scholar
    • Anand, J., Mesquita, L. F., & Vassolo, R. S. 2009. The dynamics of multimarket competition in exploration and exploitation activities. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 802–821.Link , Google Scholar
    • Argyres, N. S., & Silverman, B. S. 2004. R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 929–958. Google Scholar
    • Baltagi, B. H., & Wu, P. X. 1999. Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15: 814–823. Google Scholar
    • Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. 2006. To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1559–1581. Google Scholar
    • Baum, J. A. C., Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. 2000. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 766–801. Google Scholar
    • Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. 2004. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15: 259–275. Google Scholar
    • Billor, N., Hadi, A. S., & Velleman, P. F. 2000. BACON: Blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 34: 279–298. Google Scholar
    • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87: 115–143. Google Scholar
    • Botosan, C., & Stanford, M. 2005. Managers’ motives to withhold segment disclosures and the effect of SFAS no. 131 on analysts’ information environment. Accounting Review, 80: 751–771. Google Scholar
    • Brix, J. 2017. Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33: 113–127. Google Scholar
    • Chen, M.-J. 1996. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21: 100–134.Link , Google Scholar
    • Chen, W. R. 2008. Determinants of firms’ backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organization Science, 19: 609–622. Google Scholar
    • Clark, B., & Montgomery, D. 1999. Managerial identification of competitors. Journal of Marketing, 63: 67–83. Google Scholar
    • Cockburn, I. M., & Griliches, Z. 1987. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents (NBER working paper no. 2465). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
    • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152. Google Scholar
    • Conti, R. 2014. Do non-competition agreements lead firms to pursue risky R&D projects? Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1230–1248. Google Scholar
    • Cuypers, I. R., & Martin, X. 2010. What makes and what does not make a real option? A study of equity shares in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 47–69. Google Scholar
    • Deeds, D. L., & Hill, C. W. L. 1996. Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11: 41–55. Google Scholar
    • Deephouse, D. L. 1996. Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1024–1039.Link , Google Scholar
    • Deephouse, D. L. 1999. To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 147–166. Google Scholar
    • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160. Google Scholar
    • Dobrev, S. D. 2007. Competing in the looking-glass market: Imitation, resources, and crowding. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1267–1289. Google Scholar
    • Dothan, A., & Lavie, D. 2016. Resource reconfiguration: Learning from performance feedback. In T. B. FoltaC. E. HelfatS. Karim (Eds.), Resource redeployment and corporate strategy: 319–369. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group. Google Scholar
    • Eggers, J. P., & Kaul, A. 2018. Motivation and ability? A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 67–93.Link , Google Scholar
    • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7: 136–150. Google Scholar
    • Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I., & Hussainey, K. 2013. Aggregated, voluntary, and mandatory risk disclosure incentives: Evidence from U.K. FTSE all-share companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30: 320–333. Google Scholar
    • Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. 1995. Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 461–476. Google Scholar
    • Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47: 117–132. Google Scholar
    • Gallini, N. T. 2002. The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 131–154. Google Scholar
    • Ganzaroli, A., De Noni, I., Orsi, L., & Belussi, F. 2016. The combined effect of technological relatedness and knowledge utilization on explorative and exploitative invention performance post-M&A. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19: 167–188. Google Scholar
    • Giachetti, C., Lampel, J., & Pira, S. L. 2017. Red queen competitive imitation in the U.K. mobile phone industry. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 1882–1914.Link , Google Scholar
    • Giachetti, C., & Lanzolla, G. 2016. Product technology imitation over the product diffusion cycle: Which companies and product innovations do competitors imitate more quickly? Long Range Planning, 49: 250–264. Google Scholar
    • Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. 2008. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37: 1717–1731. Google Scholar
    • Gimeno, J., Hoskisson, R. E., Beal, B. D., & Wan, W. P. 2005. Explaining the clustering of international expansion moves: A critical test in the U.S. telecommunications industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 297–319.Link , Google Scholar
    • Gioia, D. A., & Manz, C. C. 1985. Linking cognition and behavior: A script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. Academy of Management Review, 10: 527–539.Link , Google Scholar
    • Greene, W. H. 2012. Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Google Scholar
    • Greve, H. R. 1996. Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 29–60. Google Scholar
    • Greve, H. R. 1998. Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 967–988. Google Scholar
    • Greve, H. R. 2003. Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Greve, H. R. 2005. Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organization Studies, 26: 1025–1047. Google Scholar
    • Greve, H. R. 2007. Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16: 945–975. Google Scholar
    • Greve, H. R. 2011. Fast and expensive: The diffusion of a disappointing innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 949–968. Google Scholar
    • Griliches, Z. 1998. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence: 287–343. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Grimpe, C., & Hussinger, K. 2014. Resource complementarity and value capture in firm acquisitions: The role of intellectual property rights. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1762–1780. Google Scholar
    • Guan, J., & Liu, N. 2016. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. Research Policy, 45: 97–112. Google Scholar
    • Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397–420. Google Scholar
    • Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Singh, H. 2009. The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1213–1233. Google Scholar
    • Gupta, A., & Misangyi, V. F. 2018. Follow the leader (or not): The influence of peer CEOs’ characteristics on interorganizational imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 1437–1472. Google Scholar
    • Haans, R. F., Pieters, C., & He, Z.-L. 2016. Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 1177–1195. Google Scholar
    • Hair, J., Jr.., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. 2010. Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
    • Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (NBER working paper no. 8498). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
    • Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics, 32: 101–128. Google Scholar
    • Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. 1997. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 472–500. Google Scholar
    • Haveman, H. A. 1993. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 593–627. Google Scholar
    • Heckman, J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47: 153–161. Google Scholar
    • Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 443–475. Google Scholar
    • Hess, A. M., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2011. When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 895–909. Google Scholar
    • Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2003. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28: 257–274.Link , Google Scholar
    • Hsieh, K.-Y., Tsai, W., & Chen, M.-J. 2015. If they can do it, why not us? Competitors as reference points for justifying escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 38–58.Link , Google Scholar
    • Hu, S., Blettner, D., & Bettis, R. A. 2011. Adaptive aspirations: Performance consequences of risk preferences at extremes and alternative reference groups. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1426–1436. Google Scholar
    • Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2: 88–115. Google Scholar
    • Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76: 984–999. Google Scholar
    • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577–598. Google Scholar
    • Jansen, J. J., Kostopoulos, K. C., Mihalache, O. R., & Papalexandris, A. 2016. A socio-psychological perspective on team ambidexterity: The contingency role of supportive leadership behaviours. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 939–965. Google Scholar
    • Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. 2006. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52: 1661–1674. Google Scholar
    • Jansen, J. J., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. 2009. Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Quarterly, 20: 5–18. Google Scholar
    • Jansen, J. J., Volberda, H. W., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. 2005. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57: 351–363. Google Scholar
    • Kang, E., & Uhlenbruck, K. 2006. A process framework of entrepreneurship: From exploration, to exploitation, to exit. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 12: 47–71. Google Scholar
    • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1183–1194.Link , Google Scholar
    • Katila, R., & Shane, S. 2005. When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48: 814–829.Link , Google Scholar
    • Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., & Oshri, I. 2017. Customer co-creation and exploration of emerging technologies: The mediating role of managerial attention and initiatives. Long Range Planning, 50: 221–242. Google Scholar
    • Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 193–210. Google Scholar
    • Kilduff, G. J., Elfenbein, H. A., & Staw, B. M. 2010. The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 943–969.Link , Google Scholar
    • Kim, J.-Y. J., & Miner, A. S. 2007. Vicarious learning from the failures and near-failures of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 687–714.Link , Google Scholar
    • Kim, T., & Rhee, M. 2009. Exploration and exploitation: Internal variety and environmental dynamism. Strategic Organization, 7: 11–41. Google Scholar
    • Kondra, A. Z., & Hinings, C. R. 1998. Organizational diversity and change in institutional theory. Organization Studies, 19: 743–767. Google Scholar
    • Kraatz, M. S. 1998. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 621–643.Link , Google Scholar
    • Lavie, D. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1187–1212. Google Scholar
    • Lavie, D. 2009. Capturing value from alliance portfolios. Organizational Dynamics, 38: 26–36. Google Scholar
    • Lavie, D., & Drori, I. 2012. Collaborating for knowledge creation and application: The case of nanotechnology research programs. Organization Science, 23: 704–724. Google Scholar
    • Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. 2006. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 797–818.Link , Google Scholar
    • Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. 2010. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4: 109–155.Link , Google Scholar
    • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95–112. Google Scholar
    • Li, Q., Maggitti, P. G., Smith, K. G., Tesluk, P. E., & Katila, R. 2013. Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 893–916.Link , Google Scholar
    • Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. 2006. Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31: 366–385.Link , Google Scholar
    • Lind, J., & Mehlum, H. 2010. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72: 109–118. Google Scholar
    • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. 2014. Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8: 57–125.Link , Google Scholar
    • Makri, M., Hitt, M. A., & Lane, P. J. 2010. Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 602–628. Google Scholar
    • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87. Google Scholar
    • Massini, S., Lewin, A. Y., & Greve, H. R. 2005. Innovators and imitators: Organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines. Research Policy, 34: 1550–1569. Google Scholar
    • McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31: 132–152.Link , Google Scholar
    • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415–444. Google Scholar
    • Menz, M., & Scheef, C. 2014. Chief strategy officers: Contingency analysis of their presence in top management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 461–471. Google Scholar
    • Miner, A. S., & Mezias, S. J. 1996. Ugly duckling no more: Pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organization Science, 7: 88–99. Google Scholar
    • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77–91. Google Scholar
    • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1245–1264.Link , Google Scholar
    • O’Neill, H. M., Pouder, R. W., & Buchholtz, A. K. 1998. Patterns in the diffusion of strategies across organizations: Insights from the innovation diffusion literature. Academy of Management Review, 23: 98–114.Link , Google Scholar
    • Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. 2006. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 369–388. Google Scholar
    • Polidoro, F., Jr., Ahuja, G., & Mitchell, W. 2011. When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 203–223.Link , Google Scholar
    • Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. 1990. Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review, 15: 224–240.Link , Google Scholar
    • Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden-Fuller, C. 1989. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26: 397–416. Google Scholar
    • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145. Google Scholar
    • Puranam, P., & Srikanth, K. 2007. What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 805–825. Google Scholar
    • Reed, R., & DeFilippi, R. J. 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15: 88–102.Link , Google Scholar
    • Rhee, M., Kim, Y.-C., & Han, J. 2006. Confidence in imitation: Niche-width strategy in the UK automobile industry. Management Science, 52: 501–513. Google Scholar
    • Roodman, D. 2009. How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9: 86–136. Google Scholar
    • Rosenkopf, L., & Abrahamson, E. 1999. Modeling reputational and informational influences in threshold models of bandwagon innovation diffusion. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5: 361–384. Google Scholar
    • Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49: 751–766. Google Scholar
    • Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287–306. Google Scholar
    • Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 201–221. Google Scholar
    • Schilling, M. A. 2015. Technology shocks, technological collaboration, and innovation outcomes. Organization Science, 26: 668–686. Google Scholar
    • Schimmer, M., & Brauer, M. 2012. Firm performance and aspiration levels as determinants of a firm’s strategic repositioning within strategic group structures. Strategic Organization, 10: 406–435. Google Scholar
    • Sears, J., & Hoetker, G. 2014. Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 48–67. Google Scholar
    • Semadeni, M., & Anderson, B. S. 2010. The follower’s dilemma: Innovation and imitation in the professional services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1175–1193.Link , Google Scholar
    • Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. 2007. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18: 20–38. Google Scholar
    • Sidhu, J. S., Volberda, H. W., & Commandeur, H. R. 2004. Exploring exploration orientation and its determinants: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 913–932. Google Scholar
    • Skilton, P. F., & Bernardes, E. 2015. Competition network structure and product market entry. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 1688–1696. Google Scholar
    • Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. 2000. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 81–112. Google Scholar
    • Srinivasan, R., Haunschild, P., & Grewal, R. 2007. Vicarious learning in new product introductions in the early years of a converging market. Management Science, 53: 16–28. Google Scholar
    • Stettner, U., & Lavie, D. 2014. Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1903–1929. Google Scholar
    • Stuart, T. E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791–811. Google Scholar
    • Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610.Link , Google Scholar
    • Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. 2017. Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11: 451–478.Link , Google Scholar
    • Tallman, S., & Li, J. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 179–196.Link , Google Scholar
    • Terlaak, A., & Gong, Y. 2008. Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Academy of Management Review, 33: 846–868.Link , Google Scholar
    • Toh, P. K., & Kim, T. 2013. Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm’s technological specialization. Organization Science, 24: 1214–1236. Google Scholar
    • Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. B. 2002. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. In A. B. JaffeM. Trajtenberg (Eds.), Patents, citations & innovation: A window on the knowledge economy: 51–87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Turner, S. F., Mitchell, W., & Bettis, R. A. 2010. Responding to rivals and complements: How market concentration shapes generational product innovation strategy. Organization Science, 21: 854–872. Google Scholar
    • Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. 2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 221–231. Google Scholar
    • Upton, G., & Cook, I. 1996. Understanding statistics. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Veugelers, R. 1997. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26: 303–315. Google Scholar
    • Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. 2008. The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 147–164.Link , Google Scholar
    • Wilden, R., Hohberger, J., Devinney, T., & Lavie, D. 2018. Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation? Strategic Organization, 16: 352–369. Google Scholar
    • Zajac, E., & Westphal, J. 2004. The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. American Sociological Review, 69: 433–457. Google Scholar
    • Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. 2017. Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 93–113. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum