Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1063

Social movement scholars have typically focused either on how social movements strategically use collective action frames to confront targets and mobilize supporters or on how targets respond to social movements. Few have captured the interactional dynamics between the two. This oversight tends to obscure how an extant collective action frame may shift or how a new one may arise during such interactions. To address this issue, we focus on movement–target interactions and illuminate the microfoundations of framing that produce a new collective action frame. Drawing on real-time participant observations, we examine how an unintended collective action frame emerged and escalated during a year-long interaction between the Occupy London movement and St. Paul’s Cathedral, Church of England. Occupy protesters shifted from a “capitalism is crisis” frame targeting the U.K.’s financial establishment to a “what would Jesus do?” frame targeting the Church of England. We develop a process model based on the interplay of frame laminations and three situational mechanisms—emotional attachment to a frame, frame sacralization, and frame amplification—derived from an analysis of framing in movement–target interactions to explain the emergence and escalation of an unexpected collective action frame.

REFERENCES

  • Ansari, S. , Wijen, F. , & Gray, B. 2013. Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organization Science , 24: 1014–1040. Google Scholar
  • Barberá-Tomás, D. , Castelló, I. , de Bakker, F. G. A. , & Zietsma, C. 2019. Energizing through visuals: How social entrepreneurs use emotion-symbolic work for social change. Academy of Management Journal , 62: 1789–1817.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benford, R. D. 1997. An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry , 67: 409–430. Google Scholar
  • Benford, R. D. , & Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology , 26: 611–639. Google Scholar
  • Briscoe, F. , & Gupta, A. 2016. Social activism in and around organizations. Academy of Management Annals , 10: 671–727.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Butt, R. , Malik, S. , & Davies, L. 2011, October 27. St Paul’s Cathedral canon resigns. Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oct/27/st-pauls-cathedral-canon-resigns Google Scholar
  • Carey, G. 2011, October 27. The occupy protest at St Paul’s Cathedral—A parable of our times.. Telegraph . Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8853098/The-Occupy-protest-at-St-Pauls-Cathedral-a-parable-of-our-times.html. Google Scholar
  • Collins, R. 2001. Social movements and the focus of emotional attention. In J. Goodwin J. M. Jasper F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements : 27–44. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Collins, R. 2004. Interaction ritual chains . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  • Cornelissen, J. P. , Mantere, S. , & Vaara, E. 2014. The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell shooting. Journal of Management Studies , 51: 699–736. Google Scholar
  • Cornelissen, J. P. , & Werner, M. D. 2014. Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals , 8: 181–235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Creed, D. , Hudson, B. , Okhuysen, G. , & Smith-Crowe, K. 2014. Swimming in a sea of shame: Incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review , 39: 275–301. Google Scholar
  • Creed, W. D. , Langstraat, J. A. , & Scully, M. A. 2002. A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organizational Research Methods , 5: 34–55. Google Scholar
  • Dewulf, A. , Gray, B. , Putnam, L. , Lewicki, R. , Aarts, N. , Bouwen, R. , & van Woerkum, C . 2009. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations , 62: 155–193. Google Scholar
  • Diehl, D. , & McFarland, D. 2010. Toward a historical sociology of social situations. American Journal of Sociology , 115: 1713–1752. Google Scholar
  • Fan, G. H. , & Zietsma, C. 2017. Constructing a shared governance logic: The role of emotions in enabling dually embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal , 60: 2321–2351.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferraro, F. , & Beunza, D. 2018. Creating common ground: A communicative action model of dialogue in shareholder engagement. Organization Science , 29: 1187–1207. Google Scholar
  • Fiss, P. C. , & Zajac, E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal , 49: 1173–1193.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fraser, G. 2015, May 24. My hopes for the Occupy St Paul’s drama that puts me on the stage. Guardian . Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/stage/2015/may/24/giles-fraser-occupy-london-st-pauls-protest-drama-temple-donmar. Google Scholar
  • Furnari, S. 2019. Situating frames and institutional logics: The social situation as a key institutional microfoundation. In H. Patrick, S. Jost, & W. Lauri (Eds.), Microfoundations of institutions , vol. 65B: 193–209. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Publishing. Google Scholar
  • Gibson, D. R. 2011. Avoiding catastrophe: The interactional production of possibility during the Cuban missile crisis. American Journal of Sociology , 117: 361–419. Google Scholar
  • Gioia, D. A. , Corley, K. G. , & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods , 16: 15–31. Google Scholar
  • Giorgi, S. 2017. The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies , 54: 711–738. Google Scholar
  • Goffman, E. 1964. The neglected situation. American Anthropologist , 66: 133–136. Google Scholar
  • Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Goffman, E. 1983. The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review , 48: 1–17. Google Scholar
  • Goodwin, J. , & Jasper, J. M. 1999. Caught in a winding, snarling vine: The structural bias of political process theory. Sociological Forum , 14: 27–54. Google Scholar
  • Gordon, R. 2012, March 12. A tale of two Occupies. St Paul’s Institute . Retrieved from http://www.stpaulsinstitute.org.uk/dialogue/robert-gordon/opinion/2012/mar/12/a-tale-of-two-occupies. Google Scholar
  • Graeber, D. 2013. The democracy project. A history, a crisis, a movement . New York, NY: Random House. Google Scholar
  • Gray, B. , Purdy, J. M. , & Ansari, S. S. 2015. From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review , 40: 115–143.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gross, N. 2009. A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review , 74: 358–379. Google Scholar
  • Gutierrez, B. , Howard-Grenville, J. , & Scully, M. A. 2010. The faithful rise up: Split identification and an unlikely change effort. Academy of Management Journal , 53: 673–699.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn, T. , Preuss, L. , Pinkse, J. , & Figge, F. 2014. Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review , 39: 463–487.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hallett, T. 2003. Emotional feedback and amplification in social interaction. Sociological Quarterly , 44: 705–726. Google Scholar
  • Hallett, T. , & Ventresca, M. J. 2006. Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society , 35: 213–236. Google Scholar
  • Harrison, S. H. , Ashforth, B. E. , & Corley, K. G. 2009. Organizational sacralization and sacrilege. Research in Organizational Behavior , 29: 225–254. Google Scholar
  • Hedström, P. , & Swedberg, R. 1998. Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Helms, W. S. , Oliver, C. , & Webb, K. 2012. Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal , 55: 1120–1145.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt, S. R. , Sine, W. D. , & Tolbert, P. S. 2009. From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly , 54: 635–667. Google Scholar
  • Hill, S. 2011. Would Jesus kick the Occupy London protesters off St Paul’s grounds? The Guardian . Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/oct/20/occupy-london-st-pauls-christianity Google Scholar
  • Höllerer, M. A. , van Leeuwen, T. , Jancsary, D. , Meyer, R. , Andersen, T. H. , & Vaara, E. 2019. Visual and multimodal research in organization and management studies . New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Jasper, J. 2004. A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly , 9: 1–16. Google Scholar
  • Jasper, J. M. 2011. Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology , 37: 285–303. Google Scholar
  • Jasper, J. M. 2015. Playing the game. In J. M. Jasper J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest : 9–32. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar
  • King, B. G. 2008. A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly , 53: 395–421. Google Scholar
  • Kurzman, C. 2008. Meaning-making in social movements. Anthropological Quarterly , 81: 5–15. Google Scholar
  • Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review , 24: 691–710.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee, M. , Ramus, T. , & Vaccaro, A. 2018. From protest to product: Strategic frame brokerage in a commercial social movement organization. Academy of Management Journal , 61: 2130–2158.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leibel, E. , Hallett, T. , & Bechky, B. A. 2018. Meaning at the source: The dynamics of field formation in institutional research. Academy of Management Annals , 12: 154–177.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levy, D. , Reinecke, J. , & Manning, S. 2016. The political dynamics of sustainable coffee: Contested value regimes and the transformation of sustainability. Journal of Management Studies , 53: 364–401. Google Scholar
  • Lewicki, R. , Gray, B. , & Elliott, M. 2003. Making sense of intractable environmental disputes . Washington, DC: Island Press. Google Scholar
  • Litrico, J.-B. , & David, R. J. 2017. The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields: Actor positions, framing trajectories, and field settlement. Academy of Management Journal , 60: 986–1015.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury, M. , Ventresca, M. , & Hirsch, P. M. 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review , 1: 71–104. Google Scholar
  • MacKay, R. B. , & Chia, R. 2013. Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of NorthCo Automotive. Academy of Management Journal , 56: 208–230.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Massa, F. G. 2017. Guardians of the internet: Building and sustaining the Anonymous online community. Organization Studies , 38: 959–988. Google Scholar
  • McAdam, D. , McCarthy, J. D. , & Zald, M. N. 1996. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • McDonnell, M.-H. , King, B. G. , & Soule, S. A. 2015. A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. American Sociological Review , 80: 654–678. Google Scholar
  • Meyer, D. S. , & Whittier, N. 1994. Social movement spillover. Social Problems , 41: 277–298. Google Scholar
  • Meyer, R. E. , & Höllerer, M. A. 2010. Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal , 53: 1241–1262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Occupied Times. 2011, November 9. Righteous resistance. Retrieved from https://theoccupiedtimes.org/?p=620. Google Scholar
  • Oliver, P. E. , & Johnston, H. 2000. What a good idea! Ideologies and frames in social movement research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly (San Diego, Calif.) , 5: 37–54. Google Scholar
  • Powell, W. W. , & Colyvas, J. A. 2008. Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood C. Oliver K. Sahlin R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism : 276–298. London, U.K.: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Reinecke, J. 2018. Social movements and prefigurative organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies , 39: 1299–1321. Google Scholar
  • Reinecke, J. , & Ansari, S. 2016. Taming wicked problems: The role of framing in the construction of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies , 53: 299–329. Google Scholar
  • Sasson-Levy, O. , & Rapoport, T. 2003. Body, gender, and knowledge in protest movements: The Israeli case. Gender & Society , 17: 379–403. Google Scholar
  • Scheff, T. J. 1990. Microsociology: Discourse, emotion, and social structure . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Snow, D. , Benford, R. , McCammon, H. , Hewitt, L. , & Fitzgerald, S. 2014. The emergence, development, and future of the framing perspective: 25+ years since frame alignment. Mobilization: An International Quarterly (San Diego, Calif.) , 19: 23–46. Google Scholar
  • Snow, D. A. , & Benford, R. D. 1992. Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory : 133–155. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
  • Snow, D. A. , & Moss, D. M. 2014. Protest on the fly: Toward a theory of spontaneity in the dynamics of protest and social movements. American Sociological Review , 79: 1122–1143. Google Scholar
  • Snow, D. A. , Rochford, E. B. , Worden, S. K. , & Benford, R. D. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review , 51: 464–481. Google Scholar
  • Steinberg, M. W. 1999. The talk and back talk of collective action: A dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among nineteenth‐century English cotton spinners. American Journal of Sociology , 105: 736–780. Google Scholar
  • Steinberg, M. W. 2002. Toward a more dialogic analysis of social movement culture. In D. S. Meyer N. Whittier B. Robnett (Eds.), Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state : 208–225. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe, A. L. 1991. The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences , 21: 367–388. Google Scholar
  • Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. M. 1997. Grounded theory in practice . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review , 51: 273–286. Google Scholar
  • Tarrow, S. 1996. Social movements in contentious politics: A review article. American Political Science Review , 90: 874–883. Google Scholar
  • Tarrow, S. G. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Taylor, J. 2012, March 10. Christians were dragged from St Paul’s while they prayed. The Independent . Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/christians-were-dragged-from-st-paul-s-while-they-prayed-7547262.html. Google Scholar
  • Thompson, J. B. 1995. The media and modernity: A social theory of the media . Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press. Google Scholar
  • Tilly, C. 1979. Repertoires of contention in America and Britain, 1750–1830. In M. E. Zald J. D. McCarthy (Eds.), The dynamics of social movements : 126–155. Cambridge, U.K.: Winthrop. Google Scholar
  • Tilly, C. 2005. Identities, boundaries, and social ties . Boulder, CO: Paradigm. Google Scholar
  • Toubiana, M. , & Zietsma, C. 2017. The message is on the wall? Emotions, social media and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal , 60: 922–953.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. , & Chia, R. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science , 13: 567–582. Google Scholar
  • Voronov, M. 2014. Towards a toolkit for emotionalizing institutional theory. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Hätel (Eds.), Emotions and the organizational fabric (research on emotion in organizations) , vol. 10: 167–196. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald. Google Scholar
  • Wang, D. J. , Rao, H. , & Soule, S. 2019. Crossing categorical boundaries: A study of diversification by social movement organizations. American Sociological Review , 84: 420–458. Google Scholar
  • Williams, R. 2011, November 1. Time for us to challenge the idols of high finance. Financial Times . Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a561a4f6-0485-11e1-ac2a-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1nQoKnQes. Google Scholar
  • Young, P. 1998. Individual strategy and social structure . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  • Zald, M. N. 1996. Culture, ideology, and strategic framing. In D. McAdam J. D. McCarthy M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings : 261–274. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Zilber, T. B. 2002. Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal , 45: 234–254.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zilber, T. B. 2016. How institutional logics matter: A bottom-up exploration. In J. Gehman, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), How institutions matter! : 137–155. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900