Skip main navigation
Research & Reviews

Toward a Novel Theory of Rational Managerial Deliberation: Stakeholders, Ethical Values, and Corporate Governance

    Published Online:26 Oct 2020https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0198

    Abstract

    How should managers deliberate, and how do we teach them to do so? How one evaluates managerial decision making will partly depend on what conception of the corporate function one endorses. Agency Theory and its accompanying shareholder conception of the corporate function has long dominated management. Voices in management learning have called for a change, but we argue that such change has been hampered by the lack of a theory of managerial deliberation, which is compatible with the alternative stakeholder conception of the corporate function. Here, we develop a novel theory of managerial deliberation: one that is suited to stakeholder theory. We argue that if genuine ethical deliberation is to become prevalent within management, then we must conceive of managerial deliberation as a creative, yet rational, learning process, while we assure that this process is adequately constrained to allow for managerial accountability. By taking inspiration from modern philosophical theories of deliberation, we provide such a theory of rational managerial deliberation.

    REFERENCES

    • Adler, N. J. 2006. The arts & leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5: 486–499.Link , Google Scholar
    • Baden, D., & Higgs, M. 2015. Challenging the perceived wisdom of management theories and practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(4): 539–555.Link , Google Scholar
    • Barnard, C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive, Thirtieth Anniversary Edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120. Google Scholar
    • Barney, J., & Mackey, A. 2018. Monopoly Profits, Efficiency Profits, and Teaching Strategic Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3):359-373Link , Google Scholar
    • Becker, G. 1993. The economic way of looking at behaviour, (Nobel Lecture). Journal of Political Economy, 101(3): 385–409. Google Scholar
    • Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., Krause, R., & Hitt, M. 2018. From the Guest Editors: Opportunities and challenges for advancing Strategic Management Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3): 233–240.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Beschorner, T. 2013. Creating shared value: The one-trick pony approach - A comment on Michael Porter and Mark Kramer. Business Ethics Journal Review, 1(17): 106–112. Google Scholar
    • Brandom, R. 1994. Making it explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Brandom, R. 2000. Articulating reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Brandom, R. 2009. Reason in philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Boyatzis, R., Smith, M., & Blaize, N. 2006. Developing sustainable leaders through coaching and compassion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5: 8–24.Link , Google Scholar
    • Buckley, J. 2018. How Theory Can Inform Strategic Management Education and Learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3): 339–358Link , Google Scholar
    • Chia, R., & Holt, R. 2008. The nature of knowledge in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(4): 471–486.Link , Google Scholar
    • Clarkson, M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92–117.Link , Google Scholar
    • Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., & Sullivan, W. 2011. Rethinking undergraduate business education. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Google Scholar
    • Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L., & Matten, D. 2014. Contesting the value of ‘creating shared value’. California Management Review, 56(2): 130–153. Google Scholar
    • Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., Seijts, G., & Gandz, J. 2013. Developing leadership character in business programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12: 285–305.Link , Google Scholar
    • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371–382.Link , Google Scholar
    • Dancy, J. 1995. In defense of thick concepts. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 20: 263–279. Google Scholar
    • Dancy, J. 2004. Ethics without principles. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Dancy J. 2013. Moral particularism. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, (Fall 2013 edition). Google Scholar
    • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22: 20–47.Link , Google Scholar
    • De los Rayes, G., Kim, T., & Weaver, G. 2017. Teaching ethics in business schools: A conversation on disciplinary differences, academic provincialism, and the case for integrated pedagogy. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16: 314–336. Google Scholar
    • Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. 2005. Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5): 779–792. Google Scholar
    • Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75–91.Link , Google Scholar
    • Grant, R., & Baden-Fuller, C. 2018. How to develop strategic management competency: Reconsidering. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3): 322–338Link , Google Scholar
    • Fourcade, M., & Khurana, R. 2017. The social trajectory of a finance professor and the common sense of capital. History of Political Economy, 49: 347–381. Google Scholar
    • Freeman, R. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & De Colle, S. 2010. Stakeholder Theory - The state of the art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Friedman, M., & Savage, L. 1952. The expected-utility hypothesis and the measurability of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 60: 463–474. Google Scholar
    • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Friedman, M. 1970: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970. Google Scholar
    • Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Just how bad are our theories? A response to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1): 104–107.Link , Google Scholar
    • Hay, A. 2018. Bringing the heart and soul back in: Collaborative inquiry and the DBA. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18: 59–80. Google Scholar
    • Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. 2013. Stakeholder theory, value and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23: 97–124. Google Scholar
    • Hayek, F. 1988. The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Henisz, W. 2011. Leveraging the financial crisis to fulfill the promise of progressive management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10: 298–321.Link , Google Scholar
    • Herfeld, C. 2012. The potentials and limitations of rational choice theory: An interview with Gary Becker. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 5: 73–86. Google Scholar
    • Holt, R., & Chia, R. 2014. Strategy without design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Jensen, M. 2001. Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate function. European Financial Management, 7: 297–317. Google Scholar
    • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360. Google Scholar
    • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1998. The nature of man. In M. C. Jensen (Ed.), Foundations of organizational strategy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Joullié, J.-E. 2016. The philosophical foundations of management thought. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1): 157–179.Link , Google Scholar
    • Kant, I. 1785/2012. In M. GregorJ. Timmerman (Eds.), Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Kaplan, S., & Orlikowski, W. J. 2013. Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science, 24: 965–995. Google Scholar
    • Khurana, R. 2007. From higher aims to hired hands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
    • Korsgaard, C. 1996. The sources of normativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Lear, J. 2011. A case for irony. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Linden, B., & Freeman, R. 2017. Profit and other values: Thick evaluation in decision making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27: 353–379. Google Scholar
    • Martin, R., & Dunne, D. 2006. Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4): 512–523. Google Scholar
    • McDowell, J. 1979/1998. Virtue and reason. Meaning, knowledge, and reality: 50–73. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Mill, J. 1861/1998. Utilitarianism. Roger Crisp (Ed.), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Mintzberg, H. 2005. How inspiring. How sad. Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal’s paper. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1): 108.Link , Google Scholar
    • McKenna, B., Rooney, D., & Kenworthy, A. L. 2013. Introduction: Wisdom and management—A guest-edited special collection of resource reviews for management educators. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2): 306–311.Link , Google Scholar
    • Montgomery, C. 2008. Putting leadership back into strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86: 54–60. Google Scholar
    • Nonaka, I., Chia, R., Holt, R., & Peltokorpi, V. 2014. Wisdom, management and organization. Management Learning, 45: 365–376. Google Scholar
    • Petriglieri, G., & Petriglieri, J. 2015. Can business schools humanize leadership? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14: 625–647.Link , Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer, J. 2005. Theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1): 96–100.Link , Google Scholar
    • Porter, M. 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74: 61–78. Google Scholar
    • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89: 62–77. Google Scholar
    • Putnam, H. 2002. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy: And other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Putnam, H. 2003. For ethics and economics without the dichotomies. Review of Political Economy, 15: 395–412. Google Scholar
    • Ramsey, F. 1926/1931. Truth and probability. In R. B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays: 156–198. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Google Scholar
    • Raz, J. 1999. Engaging reason: On the theory of value and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Raz, J. 2011. From normativity to responsibility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Savage, L. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
    • Shareef, R. 2007. Want better business theories? Maybe Karl Popper has the answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2): 272–280. Google Scholar
    • Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. 2014. In search of phronesis: Leadership and the art of judgment. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13: 224–243.Link , Google Scholar
    • Sonenshein, S. 2007. The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32: 1022–1040.Link , Google Scholar
    • Statler, M. 2014. Developing wisdom in a business school? Critical reflections on pedagogical practice. Management Learning, 45(4): 397–417. Google Scholar
    • Steyaert, C.,Beyes, T.,Parker, M. 2016. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to reinventing management education. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar
    • Sundaram, A., & Inkpen, A. 2004. The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15: 350–363. Google Scholar
    • Sutherland, I. 2012. Arts-based methods in leadership development: Affording aesthetic workspaces, reflexivity and memories with momentum. Management Learning, 44: 25–43. Google Scholar
    • Waddock, S., & Lozano, J. 2013. Developing more holistic management education: Lessons learned from two programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12: 265–284.Link , Google Scholar
    • Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. 2008. Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37: 327–341. Google Scholar
    • Weaver, G., Reynolds, S., & Brown, M. 2014. Moral intuition: Connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice. Journal of Management, 40: 100–129. Google Scholar
    • Weick, C. W. 2008. Issues of consequence: Lessons for educating tomorrow’s business leaders from philosopher William James. Management Learning, 7(1): 88–98.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Williams, B. 1982. Practical necessity. In D. MacKenzie MacKinnonB. HebblethwaiteS. R. Sutherland (Eds.), The philosophical frontiers of Christian theology: Essays presented to D. M. Mackinnon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum