The Organizational Drivetrain: A Road To Integration of Dynamic Capabilities Research

References

• Adner R. , Helfat C. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025. Google Scholar
• Agarwal R. , Echambadi R. , Franco A. M. , Sarkar M. B. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spinout generation, development, and survival. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 501–522.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Ahuja G. , Katila R. (2004). Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 887–907. Google Scholar
• Ambrosini V. , Bowman C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49. Google Scholar
• Amit R. , Zott C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(7), 493–520. Google Scholar
• Aragon-Correa J. A. , Sharma S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.Link , Google Scholar
• Arend R. , Bromiley P. (2009). Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: Spare change, everyone? Strategic Organization, 7(1), 79–90. Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. Google Scholar
• Barreto I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36, 256–280. Google Scholar
• Barua A. , Konana P. , Whinston A. B. , Fang Y. (2004). An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 585–620. Google Scholar
• Becker B. E. , Huselid M. A. (2006). Strategic human resource management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32, 898–925. Google Scholar
• Becker M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–677. Google Scholar
• Benner M. J. , Tushman M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.Link , Google Scholar
• Bhatt G. D. , Grover V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253–277. Google Scholar
• Bromiley P. (2004). Behavioral foundations of strategic management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Google Scholar
• Bromiley P. , Fleming L. (2002). The resource based view of strategy: A behavioral critique. In Augier M.March J. G. (Eds.), The economics of change, choice and organization: Essays in memory of Richard M. Cyert (pp. 319–336). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Carney T. F. (1990). Collaborative inquiry methodology. Windsor, Ontario: University of Windsor, Division for Instructional Development. Google Scholar
• Carpenter M. A. , Sanders W. G. , Gregersen H. B. (2001). Bundling human capital with organizational context: The impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 493–511.Link , Google Scholar
• Chatterji A. , Patro A. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and managing human capital. Academy of Management Perspectives, this issue. Google Scholar
• Cohen J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. Google Scholar
• Colbert B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 341–358.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Conner K. R. , Prahalad C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501. Google Scholar
• Cornelissen J. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751–764.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M. , March J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Danneels E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121. Google Scholar
• Devinney T. M. (2013). Is microfoundational thinking critical to management thought and practice? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 81–84.Link , Google Scholar
• Di Stefano G. , Peteraf M. A. , Verona G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204. Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E. , Ashford S. J. , O'Neill R. M. , Hayes E. , Wierba E. E. (1997). Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 407–423. Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H. , Nobeoka K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367. Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith M. , Lyles M. , Peteraf M. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. British Journal of Management, 20(1), S1–S8. Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. , Brown S. L. (1999). Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 72–82. Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. , Furr N. R. , Bingham C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263–1273. Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. , Martin J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. , Sull D. N. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106–116. Google Scholar
• Eriksson T. (2013). Methodological issues in dynamic capabilities research: A critical review. Baltic Journal of Management, 8(3), 306–327. Google Scholar
• Ewers J. (2006, June 26). Cisco's connections: The tech giant has mastered the art of acquisitions. U.S. News & World Report. Google Scholar
• Galunic D. , Eisenhardt K. (2001). Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1229–1249.Link , Google Scholar
• Garfield E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. In Garfield E. (Ed.), Mapping the structure of science (pp. 98–147). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• Gherardi S. , Turner B. (1987). Real men don't collect soft data. Dipartimento di Politica Sociale of the University of Trento, Booklet 13, Trento, Italy. Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122. Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339–360. Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. , Finkelstein S. , Mitchell W. , Peteraf M. A. , Singh H. , Winter S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. , Peteraf M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. , Raubitschek R. S. (2000). Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 961–979. Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. , Winter S. G. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243–1250. Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A. , Ireland R. D. , Camp S. M. , Sexton D. L. (2001). Guest editors' introduction to the special issue—Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(7), 479–491. Google Scholar
• Ireland R. D. , Hitt M. A. , Sirmon D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989. Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G. , Winter S. G. (2005). The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 395–413. Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P. , Van Den Bosch F. A. J. , Volberda H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015.Link , Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560. Google Scholar
• Kahl S. (2014). Associations, jurisdictional battles, and the development of dual-purpose capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives, this issue. Google Scholar
• Kale P. , Singh H. (2007). Managing strategic alliances: What do we know now, and where do we go from here? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 45–62. Google Scholar
• Kang S. C. , Morris S. S. , Snell S. A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 236–256.Abstract , Google Scholar
• King A. A. , Tucci C. L. (2002). Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Science, 48(2), 171–186. Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum A. , Stuart T. (2014). Network responsiveness: The social structural microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives, this issue. Google Scholar
• Knight G. A. , Cavusgil S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141. Google Scholar
• Kogut B. , Zander U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397. Google Scholar
• Lavie D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638–658.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Lockett A. , Wright M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057. Google Scholar
• Lubatkin M. H. , Simsek Z. , Ling Y. , Veiga J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. Google Scholar
• Madhok A. (2002). Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 535–550. Google Scholar
• Makadok R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 387–401. Google Scholar
• Malhotra A. , Gosain S. , El Sawy O. A. (2005). Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 145–187. Google Scholar
• Martin J. A. (2011). Dynamic managerial capabilities and the multibusiness team: The role of episodic teams in executive leadership groups. Organization Science, 22(1), 118–140. Google Scholar
• McMillan G. S. (2008). Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D management. R&D Management, 38(1), 69–83. Google Scholar
• Melville N. , Kraemer K. , Gurbaxani V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322. Google Scholar
• Miles M. B. , Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Nelson R. , Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Newbert S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146. Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. , Tushman M. (2008). Ambidexterity as dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A. , Barney J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 309–323. Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A. , Di Stefano G. , Verona G. (2013). The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1389–1410. Google Scholar
• Ponzi L. J. (2002). The intellectual structure and interdisciplinary breadth of knowledge management: A bibliometric study of its early stage of development. Scientometrics, 55(2), 259–272. Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Price D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515. Google Scholar
• Rai A. , Patnayakuni R. , Seth N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225–246. Google Scholar
• Raisch S. , Birkinshaw J. M. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. Google Scholar
• Rindova V. P , Kotha S. (2001). Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1263–1280.Link , Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V. , Bharadwaj A. , Grover V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263. Google Scholar
• Santos F. M. , Eisenhardt K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508. Google Scholar
• Sapienza H. J. , Autio E. , George G. , Zahra S. A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31, 914–933.Link , Google Scholar
• Schilke O. (2014). Second-order dynamic capabilities: How do they matter? Academy of Management Perspectives, this issue. Google Scholar
• Schreyögg G. , Kliesch-Eberl M. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 913–933. Google Scholar
• Schulze W. (2004). The two schools of thought in resource-based theory: Definitions and implications for research. Advances in Strategic Management, 10: 127–152. Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. (1945). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Subramaniam M. , Youndt M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.Link , Google Scholar
• Taylor A. , Helfat C. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 20(4), 718–739. Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. (2000). Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 35–54. Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Teece D. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, this issue. Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. , Pisano G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556. Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. , Pisano G. , Shuen A. (1990). Firm capabilities, resources, and the concept of strategy (Working Paper). University of California, Berkeley, Haas School of Business. Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. , Pisano G. , Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Google Scholar
• Todorova G. , Durisin B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Vohora A. , Wright M. , Lockett A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175. Google Scholar
• Wade M. , Hulland J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107–142. Google Scholar
• Wang C. L. , Ahmed P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51. Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. Google Scholar
• White H. D. (1996). Literature retrieval for interdisciplinary syntheses. Library Trends, 4(2), 239–264. Google Scholar
• White H. D. , Griffith B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163–171. Google Scholar
• Wilden R. , Devinney T. , Dowling G. (2013).The architecture of dynamic capability research: A scientometric investigation (Working Paper). Sydney: UTS Business School. Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 91–101. Google Scholar
• Wright P. M. , Dunford B. B. , Snell S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721. Google Scholar
• Wu L. Y. (2010). Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research, 63, 27–31. Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A. , George G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, re-conceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A. , Sapienza H. J. , Davidsson P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. Google Scholar
• Zhu K. (2004). The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 167–202. Google Scholar
• Zhu K. , Kraemer K. L. (2002). E-commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: Assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 275–295. Google Scholar
• Zollo M. , Singh H. (2004). Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1233–1256. Google Scholar
• Zollo M. , Winter S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339–351. Google Scholar
• Zott C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97–125. Google Scholar