It’s Not Black and White: Toward a Contingency Perspective on the Consequences of Being a Token

REFERENCES

• The articles that are included in the review are noted with an asterisk (*). Google Scholar
• Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33–52. Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1966). Status classes in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 264–283. Google Scholar
• *Archbold, C. A., & Schulz, D. (2008). Making rank: The lingering effects of tokenism on female police officers’ promotion aspirations. Police Quarterly, 11, 50–73. Google Scholar
• *Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 235–249. Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. Google Scholar
• *Barclay, K. J., & Scott, K. (2014). Workplace sex composition and ischaemic heart disease: A longitudinal analysis using Swedish register data. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42(6), 525–533. Google Scholar
• Bell, E. L., & Nkomo, S. (1992). The glass ceiling vs. the concrete wall: Career perceptions of White and African-American women managers (Working Paper No. 3470-92). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
• Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436. Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255. Google Scholar
• *Biernat, M., Crandall, C. S., Young, L. V., Kobrynowicz, D., & Halpin, S. M. (1998). All that you can be: Stereotyping of self and others in a military context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 301–317. Google Scholar
• *Biernat, M., & Vescio, T. K. (1993). Categorization and stereotyping: Effects of group context on memory and social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 166–202. Google Scholar
• *Bryngelson, A., Bacchus Hertzman, J., & Fritzell, J. (2011). The relationship between gender segregation in the workplace and long-term sickness absence in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 39, 618–626. Google Scholar
• Buchanan, N. T. (2005). The nexus of race and gender domination: Racialized sexual harassment of African American women. In J. E. GruberP. Morgan (Eds.), In the company of men: Male dominance and sexual harassment (pp. 295–320). Boston: Northeastern University Press. Google Scholar
• *Budig, M. J. (2002). Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass elevator? Social Problems, 49, 258–277. Google Scholar
• Cadaret, M. C., Hartung, P. J., Subich, L. M., & Weigold, I. K. (2017). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 40–51. Google Scholar
• Catalyst. (2018). Quick take: Women in management. Retrieved from https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-management/ Google Scholar
• *Chatman, J. A., Boisnier, A. D., Spataro, S. E., Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2008). Being distinctive versus being conspicuous: The effects of numeric status and sex-stereotyped tasks on individual performance in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 141–160. Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956–974.Link , Google Scholar
• Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749–780. Google Scholar
• *Cognard-Black, A. J. (2004). Will they stay, or will they go? Sex-atypical work among token men who teach. Sociological Quarterly, 45(1), 113–139. Google Scholar
• *Cohen, L. L., & Swim, J. K. (1995). The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 876–884. Google Scholar
• Connley, C. (2017). 3 things to know about Rosalind Brewer, Starbucks' first female and African-American COO. CNBC.com. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/13/3-things-to-know-about-rosalind-brewer-starbucks-first-female-and-african-american-coo.html Google Scholar
• *Craig, K. M., & Feasel, K. E. (1998). Do solo arrangements lead to attributions of tokenism? Perceptions of selection criteria and task assignments to race and gender solos. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1810–1836. Google Scholar
• *Craig, K. M., & Rand, K. A. (1998). The perceptually “privileged” group member: Consequences of solo status for African Americans and Whites in task groups. Small Group Research, 29, 339–358. Google Scholar
• *Crowley, J. E. (2004). When tokens matter. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29, 109–136. Google Scholar
• *Danaher, K., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Maintaining the system with tokenism: Bolstering individual mobility beliefs and identification with a discriminatory organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 343–362. Google Scholar
• *Duguid, M. (2011). Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 104–115. Google Scholar
• Dwertmann, D. J., Nishii, L. H., & van Knippenberg, D. (2016). Disentangling the fairness & discrimination and synergy perspectives on diversity climate: Moving the field forward. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1136–1168. Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• *Elstad, B., & Ladegård, G. (2012). Women on corporate boards: Key influencers or tokens? Journal of Management and Governance, 16, 595–615. Google Scholar
• *Elvira, M. M., & Cohen, L. E. (2001). Location matters: A cross-level analysis of the effects of organizational sex composition on turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 591–605. Google Scholar
• *Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589. Google Scholar
• *Floge, L., & Merrill, D. M. (1986). Tokenism reconsidered: Male nurses and female physicians in a hospital setting. Social Forces, 64, 925–947. Google Scholar
• *Flores, G. M. (2011). Racialized tokens: Latina teachers negotiating, surviving and thriving in a White woman’s profession. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 313–335. Google Scholar
• *Fontaine, D. C., & Greenlee, S. P. (1993). Black women: Double solos in the workplace. Western Journal of Black Studies, 17, 121–125. Google Scholar
• Fortune. (2017). These are the women CEOs leading Fortune 500 companies. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/06/07/fortune-500-women-ceos/ Google Scholar
• French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Google Scholar
• *Fuegen, K., & Biernat, M. (2002). Reexamining the effects of solo status for women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 913–925. Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Raver, J. L., & Schneider, B. (2005). Discrimination in organizations: An organizational-level systems perspective. In R. DipboyeA. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 89–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183–211.Link , Google Scholar
• *Gupta, N. (2007). Indian women in doctoral education in science and engineering. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32, 507–533. Google Scholar
• *Gustafson, J. L. (2008). Tokenism in policing: An empirical test of Kanter’s hypothesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 1–10. Google Scholar
• *Haas, M., Koeszegi, S. T., & Zedlacher, E. (2016). Breaking patterns? How female scientists negotiate their token role in their life stories. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(4), 397–413. Google Scholar
• Habecker, S. (2017). Becoming African Americans: African immigrant youth in the United States and hybrid assimilation. Africology: The Journal of Pan African Studies, 10, 55–75. Google Scholar
• Healey, J. R. (2013). GM’s Barra: First female CEO at major automaker. USA Today. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2013/12/10/gm-new-ceo/3950057 Google Scholar
• *Heikes, E. (1991). When men are the minority: The case of men in nursing. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 389–401. Google Scholar
• *Heilman, M. E., & Blader, S. L. (2001). Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 188–193. Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., & Simon, M. C. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935–942. Google Scholar
• *Hewstone, M., et al.. (2006). Tokens in the tower: Perceptual processes and interaction dynamics in academic settings with “skewed,” “tilted,” and “balanced” sex ratios. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 509–532. Google Scholar
• *Hewstone, M., Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2011). Perceptions of gender group variability in majority and minority contexts: Two field studies with nurses and police officers. Social Psychology, 42, 135–143. Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End Press. Google Scholar
• *Hoyt, C. L., Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S., & Skinnell, K. (2010). The impact of blatant stereotype activation and group sex-composition on female leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 716–732. Google Scholar
• *Hultin, M. (2003). Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Career consequences of occupational sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 30, 30–61. Google Scholar
• *Jackson, P. B., Thoits, P. A., & Taylor, H. F. (1995). Composition of the workplace and psychological well-being: The effects of tokenism on America’s Black elite. Social Forces, 74, 543–557. Google Scholar
• *Johnson, S. E., & Richeson, J. A. (2009). Solo status revisited: Examining racial group differences in the self-regulatory consequences of self-presenting as a racial solo. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1032–1035. Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• *Kanthak, K., & Krause, G. A. (2010). Valuing diversity in political organizations: Gender and token minorities in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 839–854. Google Scholar
• *Keller, J., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2008). Solo status and women’s spatial test performance: The role of individuation tendencies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1044–1053. Google Scholar
• *Kelly, H. (2007). Racial tokenism in the school workplace: An exploratory study of Black teachers in overwhelmingly White schools. Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 41, 230–254. Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Google Scholar
• *Kiefer, A., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Barczyk, A. (2006). When appearance concerns make women look bad: Solo status and body image concerns diminish women’s academic performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 78–86. Google Scholar
• King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs,14, 42–72. Google Scholar
• *King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., George, J. M., & Matusik, S. F. (2010). Understanding tokenism: Antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. Journal of Management, 36, 482–510. Google Scholar
• *Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37, 145–164. Google Scholar
• *Krimmel, J. T., & Gormley, P. E. (2003). Tokenism and job satisfaction for policewomen. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 73–88. Google Scholar
• Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25, 428–438.Link , Google Scholar
• Lublin, J. S., & Karp, H. (2011, December 14). Avon replacing Andrea Jung as CEO. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203518404577096901465046874 Google Scholar
• *Mansfield, P. K., Koch, P. B., Henderson, J., Vicary, J. R., Cohn, M., & Young, E. W. (1991). The job climate for women in traditionally male blue-collar occupations. Sex Roles, 25, 63–79. Google Scholar
• *Maume, D. J., & Sebastian, R. (2007). Racial composition of workgroups and job satisfaction among Whites. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 609, 85–103. Google Scholar
• McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Google Scholar
• *McDonald, T. W., Toussaint, L. L., & Schweiger, J. A. (2004). The influence of social status on token women leaders’ expectations about leading male-dominated groups. Sex Roles, 50, 401–409. Google Scholar
• *Mellor, S. (1995). Gender composition and gender representation in local unions: Relationships between women’s participation in local office and women’s participation in local activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 706–720. Google Scholar
• *Nesbitt, P. D. (1997). Gender, tokenism and the construction of elite clergy careers. Review of Religious Research, 38, 193–210. Google Scholar
• *Niemann, Y. F., & Dovidio, J. F. (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic ranks, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 55–71. Google Scholar
• *Pazy, A., & Oron, I. (2001). Sex proportion and performance evaluation among high-ranking military officers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 689–702. Google Scholar
• *Pollak, K. I., & Niemann, Y. (1998). Black and White tokens in academia: A difference of chronic versus acute distinctiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 954–972. Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. Google Scholar
• *Renzulli, L. A., Parrott, H., & Beattie, I. R. (2011). Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional public schools. Sociology of Education, 84, 23–48. Google Scholar
• Richard, N. T., & Wright, S. C. (2010). Advantaged group members’ reactions to tokenism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 559–569. Google Scholar
• *Richman, L., van Dellen, M., & Wood, W. (2011). How women cope: Being a numerical minority in a male-dominated profession. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 492–509. Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70(2), 367–386. Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Walker, H. A. (1995). Status structures. In K. CookG. FineJ. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 281–310). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Google Scholar
• *Roberson, L., Deitch, E. A., Brief, A. P., & Block, C. J. (2003). Stereotype threat and feedback seeking in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 176–188. Google Scholar
• Romano, A. (2010). Why we need to reimagine masculinity. Newsweek. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/why-we-need-reimagine-masculinity-71993 Google Scholar
• *Rosenberg, J., Perlstadt, H., & Phillips, W. R. (1993). Now that we are here: Discrimination, disparagement, and harassment at work and the experience of women lawyers. Gender & Society, 7, 415–433. Google Scholar
• *Roth, L. (2004). The social psychology of tokenism: Status and homophily processes on Wall Street. Sociological Perspectives, 47, 189–214. Google Scholar
• *Ryan, K. M., King, E. B., Adis, C., Gulick, L. V., Peddie, C., & Hargraves, R. (2012). Exploring the asymmetrical effects of gender tokenism on supervisor–subordinate relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 56–102. Google Scholar
• *Sackett, P. R., DuBois, C. L., & Noe, A. W. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 263–267. Google Scholar
• *Santos, M. H., Amâncio, L., & Roux, P. (2015). Numbers do not tell the whole story: Gender and medicine in Portugal. Women’s Studies International Forum, 53, 73–82. Google Scholar
• *Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2002). The differential effects of solo status on members of high- and low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 694–707. Google Scholar
• *Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74. Google Scholar
• *Sekaquaptewa, D., Waldman, A., & Thompson, M. (2007). Solo status and self-construal: Being distinctive influences racial self-construal and performance apprehension in African American women. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 321–327. Google Scholar
• Sesko, A. K., & Biernat, M. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 356–360. Google Scholar
• *Simpson, R. (1997). Have times changed? Career barriers and the token woman manager. British Journal of Management, 8, 121–129. Google Scholar
• *Smith, N., & Parrotta, P. (2018). Why so few women on boards of directors? Empirical evidence from Danish companies in 1998–2010. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 445–467. Google Scholar
• *Sorensen, J. (2004). The organizational demography of racial employment segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 626–671. Google Scholar
• *Stangor, C., Carr, C., & Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1191–1197. Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811. Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
• *Stichman, A. J., Hassell, K. D., & Archbold, C. A. (2010). Strength in numbers? A test of Kanter’s theory of tokenism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 633–639. Google Scholar
• *Stroshine, M. S., & Brandl, S. G. (2011). Race, gender, and tokenism in policing: An empirical elaboration. Police Quarterly, 14, 344–365. Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K., Aiken, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. WorchelW. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relation (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall. Google Scholar
• *Taylor, C. J. (2010). Occupational sex composition and the gendered availability of workplace support. Gender & Society, 24, 189–212. Google Scholar
• *Taylor, C. J. (2016). Relational by nature? Men and women do not differ in physiological response to social stressors faced by token women. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 49–89. Google Scholar
• Thorton, M. C., Taylor, R. J., & Brown, A. T. N. (1999). Correlates of racial label use among Americans of African descent: Colored, Negro, Black, and African American. Race & Society, 2, 149–164. Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D. (1986). The dynamics of interdependence in organizations. Human Relations, 39, 517–540. Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., Simons, T., Andrews, A., & Rhee, J. (1995). The effects of gender composition in academic departments on faculty turnover. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 48, 562–579. Google Scholar
• Toossi, M. (2002). A century of change: The U.S. labor force, 1950–2050. Monthly Labor Review, (May), 15–28. Google Scholar
• Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 299–317. Google Scholar
• Tung, R. L. (1993). Managing cross-national and intra-national diversity. Human Resource Management, 32, 461–477. Google Scholar
• *Turco, C. J. (2010). Cultural foundations of tokenism: Evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. American Sociological Review, 75, 894–913. Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In M. HoggP. OakesS. ReicherM.S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory (pp. 42–67). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G., & Van De Vliert, E. (2000). Team members’ affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management, 26, 633–655. Google Scholar
• *Viallon, M., & Martinot, D. (2009). The effects of solo status on women’s and men’s success: The moderating role of the performance context. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 191–205. Google Scholar
• *Voci, A., Hewstone, M., Crisp, R. J., & Rubin, M. (2008). Majority, minority, and parity: Effects of gender and group size on perceived group variability. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71, 114–142. Google Scholar
• von Hippel, C., Sekaquaptewa, D., & McFarlane, M. (2015). Stereotype threat among women in finance: Negative effects on identity, workplace well-being, and recruiting. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 405–414. Google Scholar
• *Wallace, J. E. (2014). Gender and supportive co‐worker relations in the medical profession. Gender, Work and Organization, 21(1), 1–17. Google Scholar
• *Wallace, J. E., & Kay, F. M. (2012). Tokenism, organizational segregation, and coworker relations in law firms. Social Problems, 59, 389–410. Google Scholar
• *White, J. B. (2008). Fail or flourish? Cognitive appraisal moderates the effect of solo status on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1171–1184. Google Scholar
• *Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantage for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267. Google Scholar
• *Wingfield, A. (2009). Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23, 5–26. Google Scholar
• *Wingfield, A. (2010). Are some emotions marked “Whites only”? Racialized feeling rules in professional workplaces. Social Problems, 57, 251–268. Google Scholar
• *Wingfield, A. H., & Wingfield, J. H. (2014). When visibility hurts and helps: How intersections of race and gender shape black professional men’s experiences with tokenization. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 483–490. Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & Society, 5, 178–192. Google Scholar
• *Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 150–159. Google Scholar
• *Yoder, J. D., & Aniakudo, P. (1997). Outsider within the firehouse: Subordination and difference in the social interactions of African American women firefighters. Gender & Society, 11, 324–341. Google Scholar
• *Yoder, J. D., Aniakudo, P., & Berendsen, L. (1996). Looking beyond gender: The effects of racial differences on tokenism perceptions of women. Sex Roles, 35, 389–400. Google Scholar
• *Yoder, J. D., Schleicher, T. L., & McDonald, T. W. (1998). Empowering token women leaders: The importance of organizationally legitimated credibility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 209–222. Google Scholar
• *Young, J. L., & James, E. (2002). Token majority: The work attitudes of male flight attendants. Sex Roles, 45, 299–319. Google Scholar
• Zarya, V. (2017). The 2017 Fortune 500 includes a record number of women CEOs. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/06/07/fortune-women-ceos Google Scholar
• *Zatzick, C. D., Elvira, M. M., & Cohen, L. E. (2003). When is more better? The effects of racial composition on voluntary turnover. Organization Science, 14, 483–496. Google Scholar
• Zimmer, L. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems, 35(1), 64–77. Google Scholar