Competing in Digital Markets: A Platform-Based Perspective

REFERENCES

• Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 306–333. Google Scholar
• Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 493–520. Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. G., Jr., Parker, G. G., & Tan, B. 2014. Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Information Systems Research, 25: 152–172. Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. 2006. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37: 668–691. Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99: 116–131. Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & Woodard, C. J. 2009. The architecture of platforms: A unified view. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation: 19–44. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Binken, J. L. G., & Stremersch, S. 2009. The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. Journal of Marketing, 73: 88–104. Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J. 2010. Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access versus devolving control. Management Science, 56: 1849–1872. Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J. 2012. Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23: 1409–1427. Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. 2011. Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57: 843–863. Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. 2009. How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 68–76. Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T., Orsini, J., & Yin, P.-L. 2014. Platform choice by mobile apps developers, mimeo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Google Scholar
• Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. 2003. Chicken-and-egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34: 309–328. Google Scholar
• Capron, L., & Chatain, O. 2008. Competitors’ resource-oriented strategies: Acting on competitors’ resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Academy of Management Review, 33: 97–121. Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. 2012. Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36: 263–290. Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C. 2018. Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns. Journal of Management, 44: 3038–3069. Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H., & Kretschmer, T. 2018. Platform architecture and quality tradeoffs of multihoming complements. Information Systems Research, 29: 461–478. Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. 2013. Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1331–1350. Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. 2015. How to avoid platform traps. Sloan Management Review, 57: 12–15. Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. 2019. Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organization Science, 30: 617–641. Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-J. 1996. Competitor analysis and inter-firm rivalry: Towards a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 18, 204–226. Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H., & Appleyard, M. 2007. Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50: 57–76. Google Scholar
• Chung, W., & Kalnins, A. 2001. Agglomeration effects and performance: A test of the Texas lodging industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 969–988. Google Scholar
• Clark, B. 2017. Facebook tweaks News Feed to show more ‘authentic’ and ‘timely’ stories. Thenextweb.com. Retrieved from https://thenextweb.com/facebook/2017/01/31/facebook-tweaks-news-feed-show-authentic-timely-stories/ Google Scholar
• Claussen, J., Essling, C., & Kretschmer, T. 2015. When less can be more—Setting technology levels in complementary goods markets. Research Policy, 44: 328–339. Google Scholar
• Claussen, J., Kretschmer, T., & Mayrhofer, P. 2013. The effects of rewarding user engagement: The case of Facebook apps. Information Systems Research, 24: 186–200. Google Scholar
• Clements, M. T., & Ohashi, H. 2005. Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the U.S., 1994–2002. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53: 515–542. Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. 2018. Introduction—Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research, 29: 381–400. Google Scholar
• Corts, K. S., & Lederman, M. 2009. Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U.S. home video game market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27: 121–136. Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. 2011. Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1270–1285. Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. 2006. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84: 92–101. Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S. 2003. Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Review of Network Economics, 2: 191–209. Google Scholar
• Fuentelsaz, L., & Gomez, J. 2006. Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 477–499. Google Scholar
• Fuentelsaz, L. E., Garrido, J., & Maicas, P. 2015. A strategic approach to network value in network industries. Journal of Management, 41: 864–892. Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. 2014. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43: 1239–1249. Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. 2002. Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft and Cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. 2008. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49: 28–35. Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. 2007. Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16: 1–34. Google Scholar
• Gimeno, J. 1999. Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: Staking out “spheres of influence” in the US airline industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 101–128. Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A. 2005. Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND Journal of Economics, 37: 720–737. Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A. 2009. Two-sided platforms: product variety and pricing structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18: 1011–1043. Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A., & Spulber, D. 2013. First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Science, 59, 933–949. Google Scholar
• Halaburda, H., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. 2014. The limits of scale. Harvard Business Review, 4(92): 1–7. Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E., & Katz, M. L. 2013. Product differentiation through exclusivity: Is there a one-market-power-rent theorem? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22: 1–27. Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. 2018. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 2255–2276. Google Scholar
• Jayachandran, S., Gimeno, J., & Varadarajan, P. R. 1999. Theory of multimarket competition: A synthesis and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 63(3): 49–66. Google Scholar
• Johar, M., Menon, S., & Mookerjee, V. 2011. Analyzing sharing in peer-to-peer networks under various congestion measures. Information Systems Research, 22: 325–345. Google Scholar
• Karanovic, J., Berends, H., & Engel, Y. 2019. Platform cooperatives & strategic management of tradeoffs. Changing models of work in the digital platform economy. Working Paper. KIN Center for Digital Innovation, Vrije University, Amsterdam. Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. 1994. Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 93–115. Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., Snow, C. C., & Hoover, V. L. 2004. Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30: 779–804. Google Scholar
• Lacy, P., Hagenmueller, M., & Ising, J. 2016. Platform strategies: How the rules of competitiveness have changed in the era of ecosystems. Accenture Institute for High Performance, Hamburg, Germany. Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Lee, J., & Lee, J. 2006. Reconsideration of the winner-take-all hypothesis: Complex networks and local bias. Management Science, 52: 1838–1848. Google Scholar
• Livengood, R. S., & Reger, R. K. 2010. That’s our turf! Identity domains and competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 35: 48–66.Link , Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., & Buccholtz, A. K. 2009. Factor-market rivalry. Academy of Management Review, 34: 423–441.Link , Google Scholar
• Massa, L., Tucci, C., & Afuah, A. 2017. A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11: 73–104.Link , Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. P., & Subramaniam, M. 2009. Strategy in network industries: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35: 1494–1517. Google Scholar
• Meyer, T., & Cennamo, C. 2018. Market architectural shift: The impact of digital platforms on incumbent firms and the role of asset ownership. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3218170 Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. 1990. Rationalizability and learning in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica, 58: 1255–1278. Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. 2011. Orchestration process in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25: 40–57.Link , Google Scholar
• Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. 2018. Disruption in platform-based ecosystems? Journal of Management Studies, 55: 1203–1241. Google Scholar
• Panico, C., & Cennamo, C. 2020. User preferences and strategic interactions in platform ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal. Published online ahead of print. doi: 10.1002/smj.3149 Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. 2005. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51: 1494–1504. Google Scholar
• Piskorski, M. J., Halaburda, H., & Smith, T. 2008. eHarmony. Harvard Business School Case 709-424. Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 2001. Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3): 62–78. Google Scholar
• Priem, R. I. 2007. A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32: 219–235.Link , Google Scholar
• Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. 2003. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1: 990–1029. Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. 2002. Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 387–398.Link , Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. 2003. Technological leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. video game console industry. California Management Review, 45: 6–32. Google Scholar
• Seamans, R., & Zhu, F. 2014. Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Science, 60: 476–493. Google Scholar
• Shankar, V., & Bayus, B. L. 2003. Network effects and competition: An empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 375–384. Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W., & Ndofor, H. 2001. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In M. HittR. FreemanJ. Harrison. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management: 315–361. London, U.K.: Blackwell. Google Scholar
• Spinks R. 2019. To Airbnb, or not to be? What even is Airbnb anymore? Quartz.com Retrieved from https://qz.com/quartzy/1574182/ahead-of-its-ipo-what-even-is-airbnb-anymore/ Google Scholar
• Suarez, F. 2005. Network effects revisited: The role of strong ties in technology selection. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 710–720.Link , Google Scholar
• Suarez, F., & Kirteley, J. 2012. Dethroning an established platform. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(4): 35–41. Google Scholar
• Suarez, F. F. 2004. Battles for technological dominance: An integrative framework. Research Policy, 33: 271–286. Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, A. 2001. Resource partitioning and the evolution of specialist organizations: The role of location and identity in the U.S. wine industry. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1169–1185.Link , Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H., & Lee, C. 2008. Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence from the software industry. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 381–397.Link , Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1319–1350. Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2014, 18 January. Platforms: Something to stand on: Proliferating digital platforms will be at the heart of tomorrow’s economy, and even government. (Special report: Tech Startups). Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., Autio, E., & Gann, D. 2014. Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28: 198–219.Link , Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. 2015. Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Information Systems Research, 26: 266–281. Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. 2010. Research commentary—platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21: 675–687. Google Scholar
• Visnjic, I., & Cennamo, C. 2013. The gang of four: Acquaintances, friends or foes? Towards an integrated perspective on platform competition. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2013:1362–1367 Google Scholar
• Wareham, J., Fox, P., & Giner, J. 2014. Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25: 1195–1215. Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Woerner, S. 2013. Optimizing your digital business model. Sloan Management Review, 54: 71–78. Google Scholar
• West, J., & Wood, D. 2013. Evolving an open ecosystem: The rise and fall of the Symbian platform. Advances in Strategic Management, 30: 27–67. Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Venkatesh, V., Tam, K. Y., & Hong, S.-J. 2010. Model of migration and use of platforms: Role of hierarchy, current generation, and complementarities in consumer settings. Management Science, 56: 1304–1323. Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. 2010. Research commentary-The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21: 724–735. Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. 2012. Entry into platform‐based markets. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 88–106. Google Scholar