Stakeholder theory has been a popular heuristic for describing the management environment for years, but it has not attained full theoretical status. Our aim in this article is to contribute to a theory of stakeholder identification and salience based on stakeholders possessing one or more of three relationship attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. By combining these attributes, we generate a typology of stakeholders, propositions concerning their salience to managers of the firm, and research and management implications.

REFERENCES

  • Ahlstedt L., Tahnukainen I. 1971. Yrifysorganisaatio Yhteistoiminnan ohjausjaerjestelmaenae Helsinki: Weilin + Goeoes. Google Scholar
  • Alkhataji A. F. 1989. A stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Managing in a dynamic environment. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Google Scholar
  • Bowie N. 1988. The moral obligations of multinational corporations. In Luper-Foy S. (Ed.), Problems of international justice: 97–113. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar
  • Brenner S. N. 1993. The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In Pasquero J.Collins D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 205–210. San Diego. Google Scholar
  • Brenner S. N. 1995. Stakeholder theory of the firm: Its consistency with current management techniques. In Nasi J. (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking: 75–96. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy. Google Scholar
  • Brenner S. N., Cochran P. L. 1991. The stakeholder model of the firm: Implications for business and society research. In Mahan J. F. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the International Association lor Business and Society: 449–467. Sundance, UT. Google Scholar
  • Carroll A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497–505.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll A. B. 1989. Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: South-Western. Google Scholar
  • Caroll A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons. July-August: 30–48. Google Scholar
  • Carroll A. B. 1993. Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (2nd ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western. Google Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T. 1989. Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 411–430. Google Scholar
  • Clarkson M. 1994. A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto. Google Scholar
  • Clarkson M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92–117.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cobb R. W., Elder C. D. 1972. Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
  • Cornell B., Shapiro A. C. 1987. Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16: 5–14. Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G. 1963. The behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Sormunen J., Parks D. 1988. Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 123–139. Google Scholar
  • Dahl R. A. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2: 201–215. Google Scholar
  • Davis K. 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal. 16: 312–322.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Dawkins R. 1976. The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Dimaggio P. J., Powell W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields. American Sociological Review, 46: 147–160. Google Scholar
  • Dimaggio P. J., Powell W. W. 1991. Introduction. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P.J. (Eds.), The new institutianalism in organizational analysis: 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Donaldson T., Preston L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Etzioni A. 1964. Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  • Etzioni A. 1988. The moral dimension. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
  • Evan W. M., Freeman R. E. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Beauchamp T. L.Bowie N. (Eds). Ethical theory and business: 75–84. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Google Scholar
  • Eyestone R. 1978. From social issue to public policy. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Frederick W. C. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2. The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33: 150–164. Google Scholar
  • Frederick W. C. 1995. Values, nature and culture in the American corporation. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Frederick W. C., Post J. E., Lawrence A., Weber J. 1996. Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, ethics (8th. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 409–421. Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E., Evan W. M. 1990. Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19: 337–359. Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E., Gilbert D. R. 1987. Managing stakeholder relationships. In Sethi S. P.Falbe C. M. (Eds), Business and society: Dimensions of conflict and cooperation, 397–423. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E., Reed D. L. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3): 93–94. Google Scholar
  • French J. R. P., Raven B. 1960. The base of social power. In Cartwright D.Zander A. F. (Eds.), Group dynamics (2nd ed.): 607–623. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson. Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510. Google Scholar
  • Greer C. R., Downey H. K. 1982. Industrial compliance with social legislation: Investigations of decision rationales. Academy of Management Review, 7: 488–498.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L., Jones T. M. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2): 131–154. Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–360. Google Scholar
  • Jones G. R., Hill C. W. L. 1988. Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 159–172. Google Scholar
  • Jones T. M. 1980. Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(2): 59–67. Google Scholar
  • Jones T. M. 1993 Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16: 366–395. Google Scholar
  • Jones T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kreiner P., Bhambri A. 1988. Influence and information in organization-stakeholder relationships. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings: 319–323. Anaheim, CA. Google Scholar
  • Langtry B. 1994. Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 431–443. Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. 1977. Institutional organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology. 80: 340–363. Google Scholar
  • Näsi J. 1995. What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In Näsi J. (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking: 19–32. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy. Google Scholar
  • Näsi J., Näsi S., Savage G. T. 1994. A stubborn entrepreneur under pressure of a union and the courts: An analysis of stakeholder strategies in a conflict process. In Wartick S.Collins D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Filth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 228–234. Hilton Head, SC. Google Scholar
  • Parsons T. 1960. Structure and process in modern societies. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  • Paul K. 1992. The impact of U.S. sanctions on Japanese business in South Africa: Further developments in the internationalization of social activism. Business & Society, 31: 51–58. Google Scholar
  • Perrow C. 1986. Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: Random House. Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. 1981. Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman. Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
  • Rhenman E. 1964. Foeretagsdemokrati och foeretagsorganisation. Stockholm: Thule. Google Scholar
  • Ring P. S. 1994. Fragile and resilient trust and their roles in cooperative interorganizational relationships. In Pasquero J.Collins D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 107–113. San Diego. Google Scholar
  • Salancik G. R., Pfelfer J. 1974. The bases and use of power in organizational decisionmaking: The case of universities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19: 453–473. Google Scholar
  • Savage G. T., Nix T.H., Whitehead C. J., Blair J. D. 1991. Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5; 61–75.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R. 1987. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  • Starik M. 1993. Is the environment an organizational stakeholder? Naturally! In Pasquero J.Collins D. (Eds), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 466–471. San Diego. Google Scholar
  • Starik M. 1994. Essay by Mark Starik. Pp. 89-95 of The Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 33: 82–131. Google Scholar
  • Suchman M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. K., Wartick S. L., Smith H. L. 1991. Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: Implications for a research agenda in small business. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12: 207–230. Google Scholar
  • Wartick S. L., Mahon J. M. 1994. Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct: A review and synthesis of the literature. Business & Society, 33: 293–311. Google Scholar
  • Weber M. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  • Wicks A. C, Gilbert D. R., Freeman R. E. 1994. A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475–497. Google Scholar
  • Williamson. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  • Williamson, 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
  • Wilson E. O. 1974. Ecology, evolution and population biology, readings from Scientific American. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. Google Scholar
  • Windsor D. 1992. Stakeholder management in multinational enterprises. In Brenner S. N.Waddock S. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society: 121–128. Leuven, Belgium. Google Scholar
  • Wood D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16: 691–718.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Wood D. J. 1994. Business and Society (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  555 Pleasantville Road, Suite N200
  Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8020, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900