Skip main navigation
Articles

Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status

    Published Online:1 Jan 2011https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382

    Abstract

    The proposed theory extends research on cognitive and sociopolitical legitimacy, reputation, and status by advancing an evaluator's perspective on these concepts as forms of social judgment, each addressing a different evaluator's question about the organization. I describe how evaluators make their social judgments under conditions of bounded rationality and how cognitive and social factors influence this process. The proposed process model of social judgment formation highlights the complex and nondeterministic nature of this process.

    REFERENCES

    • Aldrich H. E., Fiol C. M. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19: 645–670.Link , Google Scholar
    • Argenti P. A., Druckenmiller B. 2004. Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 6: 368–374. Google Scholar
    • Ashforth B. E., Gibbs B. W. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1: 177–194. Google Scholar
    • Balmer J. M. T., Gray E. R. 2003. Corporate brands: What are they? What of them? European Journal of Marketing, 37: 972–997. Google Scholar
    • Bansal P., Clelland I. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 93–103.Link , Google Scholar
    • Barnett M. L. 2006. Waves of collectivizing: A dynamic model of competition and cooperation over the life of an industry. Corporate Reputation Review, 8: 272–292. Google Scholar
    • Barron D. N. 1998. Pathways to legitimacy among consumer loan providers in New York City, 1914–1934. Organization Studies, 19: 207–233. Google Scholar
    • Baum J. A. C., Oliver C. 1991. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 187–218. Google Scholar
    • Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. M. 1999. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 563–589. Google Scholar
    • Berger J., Ridgeway C. L., Fisek M. H., Norman R. Z. 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63: 379–405. Google Scholar
    • Berger P. L., Luckmann T. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Google Scholar
    • Bonardi J.-P., Hillman A. J., Keim G. D. 2005. The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Academy of Management Review, 30: 397–413.Link , Google Scholar
    • Brown N., Deegan C. 1998. The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1): 21–41. Google Scholar
    • Burris V. 2004. The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69: 239–264. Google Scholar
    • Burt R. S. 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 345–423. Google Scholar
    • Certo S. T. 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28: 432–446.Link , Google Scholar
    • Clemens E. S., Cook J. M. 1999. Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 441–466. Google Scholar
    • Coleman J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Cyert R. M., March J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
    • David R., Bitektine A. 2009. The deinstitutionalization of institutional theory? Exploring divergent agendas in institutional research. In Buchanan D.Bryman A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational research methods: 160–175. London: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Deephouse D. L. 1996. Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1024–1039.Link , Google Scholar
    • Deephouse D. L., Carter S. M. 2005. An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 329–360. Google Scholar
    • Deephouse D. L., Suchman M. C. 2008. Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 49–77. Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar
    • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160. Google Scholar
    • Dollinger M. J., Golden P. A., Saxton T. 1997. The effect of reputation on the decision to joint venture. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 127–140. Google Scholar
    • Dolphin R. R. 2004. Corporate reputation—A value creating strategy. Corporate Governance, 4(3): 77–93. Google Scholar
    • Dowling G. R. 1994. Corporate reputation. New York: Longman. Google Scholar
    • Dowling J., Pfeffer J. 1975. Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18: 122–136. Google Scholar
    • Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 239–263. Google Scholar
    • Elsbach K. D. 1994. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 57–88. Google Scholar
    • Elsbach K. D., Glynn M. A. 1996. Believing your own “PR”: Embedding identification in strategic reputation. Advances in Strategic Management, 13: 65–90. Google Scholar
    • Elsbach K. D., Kramer R. M. 1996. Members' responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 442–476. Google Scholar
    • Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. 1992. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 699–738.Link , Google Scholar
    • Fligstein N. 1985. The spread of the multi-divisional form among large firms 1919–1979. American Sociological Review, 50: 377–391. Google Scholar
    • Fombrun C. 1996. Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
    • Fombrun C., Rindova V. P. 2000. The road to transparency: Reputation management at Royal Dutch/Shell. In Schultz M.Hatch M. J.Larsen M. H. (Eds.), The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand: 77–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Fombrun C., Shanley M. 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233–258.Link , Google Scholar
    • Foreman P., Whetten D. A. 2002. Member's identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13: 618–635. Google Scholar
    • Gioia D. A., Thomas J. B. 1996. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 370–403. Google Scholar
    • Golant B. D., Sillince J. A. A. 2007. The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. Organization Studies, 28: 1149–1167. Google Scholar
    • Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Hinings C. R. 2002. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 58–80.Link , Google Scholar
    • Hall R. 1992. The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 135–144. Google Scholar
    • Hannan M. T. 1986. Competitive and institutional processes in organizational ecology. Technical Report No. 86-13. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of Sociology. Google Scholar
    • Hannan M. T., Carroll G. 1992. Dynamics of organizational populations: Density, legitimation, and competition. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Hannan M. T., Carroll G. R., Dundon E. A., Torres J. C. 1995. Organizational evolution in a multinational context: Entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy—Comment/reply. American Sociological Review, 60: 509–528. Google Scholar
    • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929–964. Google Scholar
    • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49: 149–164. Google Scholar
    • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. 1987. The ecology of organizational founding: American labor unions, 1836–1985. American Journal of Sociology, 92: 910–943. Google Scholar
    • Hayes B. K., Newell B. R. 2009. Induction with uncertain categories: When do people consider the category alternatives? Memory & Cognition, 37: 730–743. Google Scholar
    • Huberman B. A., Loch C. H., Onculer A. 2004. Status as a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67: 103–115. Google Scholar
    • Hybels R. C. 1994. Legitimation, population density, and founding rates: The institutionalization of commercial biotechnology in the U.S., 1971–1989. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar
    • Hybels R. C. 1995. On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: A critical review and integrative theoretical model. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings: 241–245. Google Scholar
    • Ingram P., Rao H. 2004. Store wars: The enactment and repeal of anti-chain-store legislation in America. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 446–488. Google Scholar
    • Jensen M., Roy A. 2008. Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Academy of Management Journal, 51: 495–516.Link , Google Scholar
    • Johnson J., Holub M. J. 2003. Questioning organizational legitimacy: The case of U.S. expatriates. Journal of Business Ethics, 47: 269–293. Google Scholar
    • Jonsson S., Greve H. R., Fujiwara-Greve T. 2009. Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 195–228. Google Scholar
    • Kelley H. H. 1971. The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28: 107–128. Google Scholar
    • Kostova T., Roth K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 215–233.Link , Google Scholar
    • Kostova T., Zaheer S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24: 64–81.Link , Google Scholar
    • Kruglanski A. W. 2001. Motivation and social cognition: Enemies or a love story? International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1 (1): 33–45. Google Scholar
    • Lamertz K., Baum J. A. C. 1998. The legitimacy of organizational downsizing in Canada: An analysis of explanatory media accounts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15 (1): 93–107. Google Scholar
    • Lawrence T. B. 1999. Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25: 161–187. Google Scholar
    • Lawrence T. B., Phillips N. 2004. From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization, 11: 689–711. Google Scholar
    • Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg S. R.Hardy C.Lawrence T. B.Nord W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies: 215–254. London: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23: 438–458.Link , Google Scholar
    • Lin N. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 467–488. Google Scholar
    • Lounsbury M., Glynn M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisitions of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 545–564. Google Scholar
    • Luoma-aho V. 2007. Neutral reputation and public sector organizations. Corporate Reputation Review, 10: 124–143. Google Scholar
    • Maguire S., Hardy C. 2009. Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 148–178.Link , Google Scholar
    • Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. 2004. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 657–679.Link , Google Scholar
    • Mahon J. F. 2002. Corporate reputation: A research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature. Business and Society, 41: 415–445. Google Scholar
    • March J. G., Simon H. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Maurer J. G. 1971. Readings in organizational theory: Open system approaches. New York: Random House. Google Scholar
    • Merton R. K. 1968. The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159: 56–63. Google Scholar
    • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363. Google Scholar
    • Meyer J. W., Scott R. W. 1983. Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In Meyer J. W.Scott R. W. (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality: 199–215. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Murray K. B. 1991. A test of services marketing theory: Consumer information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing, 55: 10–25. Google Scholar
    • Neisser U. 1967. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Google Scholar
    • Nooteboom B. 2005. Framing, attribution and scripts in the development of trust. Paper presented at the Symposium on Risk, Trust and Civility, Victoria College, University of Toronto. Google Scholar
    • Oliver C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145–179.Link , Google Scholar
    • Parsons T. 1951. The social system. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
    • Parsons T. 1960. Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J. 1981. Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
    • Podolny J. M. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829–872. Google Scholar
    • Podolny J. M. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 458–483. Google Scholar
    • Podolny J. M. 2005. Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
    • Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 631–642.Link , Google Scholar
    • Punj G. N., Staelin R. 1983. A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 9: 366–380. Google Scholar
    • Rao H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 29–44. Google Scholar
    • Rao H. 1998. Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 103: 912–961. Google Scholar
    • Rao H. 2004. Institutional activism in the early American automobile industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 359–384. Google Scholar
    • Rao H., Greve H. R., Davis G. F. 2001. Fool's gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 502–526. Google Scholar
    • Rao H., Morrill C., Zald M. 2000. Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 237–281. Google Scholar
    • Rhee M., Haunschild P. R. 2006. The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science, 17: 101–120. Google Scholar
    • Ridgeway C. L., Boyle E. H., Kuipers K. J., Robinson D. T. 1998. How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experience. American Sociological Review, 63: 331–350. Google Scholar
    • Rindova V. P., Pollock T. G., Hayward M. L. A. 2006. Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31: 50–71.Link , Google Scholar
    • Rosch E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Rosch E.Lloyd B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization: 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
    • Ross B. H., Murphy G. L. 1996. Category-based predictions: Influence of uncertainty and feature associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22: 736–753. Google Scholar
    • Ruef M., Scott W. R. 1998. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 877–904. Google Scholar
    • Scott W. R. 1994. Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches. In Scott W. R.Meyer J. W.Boli J. (Eds.), Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism: 81–97. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Scott W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Scott W. R., Meyer J. W. 1991. The organization of societal sectors. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 108–140. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Shenkar O., Yuchtman-Yaar E. 1997. Reputation, image, prestige, and goodwill: An interdisciplinary approach to organizational standing. Human Relations, 50: 1361–1382. Google Scholar
    • Simon H. A. 1982. A behavioral model of rational choice. In Simon H. A. (Ed.), Models of bounded rationality: Behavioral economics and business organization: 239–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Sine W. D., David R. J. 2003. Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy, 32: 185–207. Google Scholar
    • Sine W. D., David R. J., Mitsuhashi H. 2007. From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organization Science, 18: 578–594. Google Scholar
    • Singh J. V., Tucker D. J., House R. J. 1986. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 171–193. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M., Epstein L. D. 2000. What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 523–560. Google Scholar
    • Suchman M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610.Link , Google Scholar
    • Suddaby R., Greenwood R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 35–67. Google Scholar
    • Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messick D. M. (Eds.). 1999. Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
    • Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 22–39. Google Scholar
    • Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. 1996. Institutionalization of institutional theory. In Clegg S.Hardy C.Nord W. (Eds.), The handbook of organization studies: 175–190. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Tversky A., Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 1124–1131. Google Scholar
    • Tversky A., Kahneman D. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59: 251–278. Google Scholar
    • Uzzi B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 6: 674–698. Google Scholar
    • Vickers G. 1965. The art of judgment: A study of policy making. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
    • Wartick S. L. 1992. The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business and Society, 31: 33–49. Google Scholar
    • Wartick S. L. 2002. Measuring corporate reputation: Definition and data. Business and Society, 41: 371–393. Google Scholar
    • Washington M., Zajac E. J. 2005. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 281–296. Google Scholar
    • Weber M. 1968. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press. Google Scholar
    • Weigelt K., Camerer C. 1988. Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theories. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 443–454. Google Scholar
    • Wejnert B. 2002. Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 297–326. Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D., Gulati R., Shortell S. M. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 366–394. Google Scholar
    • Whetten D. A., Mackey A. 2002. A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business and Society, 41: 393–415. Google Scholar
    • Wilson W. K. 1997. The essentials of logic. Piskataway, NJ: Research & Education Association. Google Scholar
    • Wry T., Deephouse D. L., McNamara G. 2007. Substantive and evaluative media reputations among and within cognitive strategic groups. Corporate Reputation Review, 9: 225–242. Google Scholar
    • Yamauchi T., Yu N. 2008. Category labels versus feature labels: Category labels polarize inferential predictions. Memory & Cognition, 36: 544–553. Google Scholar
    • Zimmerman M. A., Zeitz G. J. 2002. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27: 414–431.Link , Google Scholar
    • Zucker L. G. 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42: 726–743. Google Scholar
    • Zyglidopoulos S. C. 2003. The issue life-cycle: Implications for reputation for social performance and organizational legitimacy. Corporate Reputation Review, 6: 70–82. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum