Editor's Comments: Reflections on the Craft of Clear Writing

REFERENCES

• Alvesson M., Sandberg J. 2011. Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36: 247–271.Link , Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy N. M. 2011. Advancing theory: More than just “gap filling.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32: 819–821. Google Scholar
• Cook C. K. 1985. Line by line: How to edit your own writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Google Scholar
• Corley K. G., Gioia D. A. 2011. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36: 12–32.Link , Google Scholar
• Dane E. 2011. Changing the tune of academic writing: Muting cognitive entrenchment. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 332–336. Google Scholar
• Forster E. M. 1927. Aspects of the novel. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Google Scholar
• Fulmer I. S. 2012. Editor's comments: The craft of writing theory articles—Variety and similarity in AMR. Academy of Management Review, 37: 327–331. Google Scholar
• Grant A. M., Pollock T. G. 2011. Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 873–879.Link , Google Scholar
• Gunning R. 1952. The technique of clear writing. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Gunning R. 1968. The technique of clear writing (rev. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Hale C. 1999. Sin and syntax: How to craft wickedly effective prose. New York: Three Rivers Press. Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck J. R. 2008. The role of editing in knowledge development: Consensus shifting and consensus creation. In Baruch Y.Konrad A. M.Aguinis H.Starbuck W. H. (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 16–26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
• Huff A. S. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Lanham R. A. 2007. Revising prose (5th ed.). New York: Pearson/Longman. Google Scholar
• Locke K., Golden-Biddle K. 1997. Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1023–1062.Link , Google Scholar
• Silvia P. J. 2007. How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
• Strunk W., White E. B. 2009. The elements of style (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar
• Suddaby R. 2010. Editor's comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35: 346–357.Link , Google Scholar
• Toulmin S. E. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. 1989. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14: 516–531.Link , Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. 1995. What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 385–390. Google Scholar
• Whetten D. A. 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14: 490–495.Link , Google Scholar
• Williams J. M., Colomb G. G. 2010. Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (10th ed.). Boston: Longman. Google Scholar
• Zinsser W. 2006. On writing well: The classic guide to writing nonfiction (7th ed.). New York: HarperCollins. Google Scholar