Skip main navigation
Article

Toward Reimagining Strategy Research: Retrospection and Prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award Article

    Published Online:11 Oct 2013https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0097

    Abstract

    We focus on implications of an agreed upon yet little considered conclusion from our 2001 article—that resource value is determined outside the business-level resource-based view. Starting with this premise, we argue that knowledge accumulation from strategy research—especially actionable knowledge about effective versus ineffective managerial judgments—would be stimulated with more balanced attention not only to value capture for the firm but also to value creation for the firm's customers and, ultimately, consumers. To spur such wider attention, we offer an expanded boundary model that includes the demand side, business models, and business ecosystems within the strategy research “umbrella.” Our proposal (1) extends what the current scholarly consensus might consider “normal” strategy research, (2) sets specific boundaries to guide future research, and (3) brings value creation for consumers to a more central position in the field. Viewing strategy from this broader perspective requires a shift in mindset, from focusing primarily on the firm to focusing more equally on the consumer, and from a primary emphasis on value capture to an equal emphasis on value creation. Such a shift faces obstacles but likely would spur innovative knowledge generation and result in a more dynamic, yet accumulative and prescriptive, strategy field.

    REFERENCES

    • Adner R. 2002. When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 667–688. Google Scholar
    • Adner R. 2012. The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. New York: Portfolio/Penguin. Google Scholar
    • Adner R. , Kapoor R. 2010. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 306–333. Google Scholar
    • Adner R. , Levinthal D. 2001. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Science, 47: 611–628. Google Scholar
    • Adner R. , Snow D. 2010. Old technology responses to technology threats: Demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19: 1655–1675. Google Scholar
    • Adner R. , Zemsky P. 2006. A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 215–239. Google Scholar
    • Alderson W. 1965. Dynamic marketing behavior. Homewood, IL: Irwin. Google Scholar
    • Almeida Costa L. , Cool K. , Dierickx I. 2013. The competitive implications of the deployment of unique resources. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 445–463. Google Scholar
    • Andrews K. R. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin. Google Scholar
    • Ansoff H. I. 1965. Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
    • Arend R. J. , Lévesque R. 2010. Is the resource-based view a practical organizational theory? Organization Science, 21: 913–930. Google Scholar
    • Argyres N. , Bigelow L. , Nickerson J. A. 2011. Dominant design, the conpositio desiderata, and the follower's dilemma. Working paper, Washington University, St. Louis. Google Scholar
    • Arora A. , Gambardella A. , Magazzini L. , Pammolli F. 2009. A breath of fresh air? Firm type, scale, scope, and selection effects in drug development. Management Science, 55: 1638–1653. Google Scholar
    • Augier M. , Teece D. 2008. Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organization Studies, 29: 1187–1208. Google Scholar
    • Baker T. , Nelson R. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 329–366. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. 2001. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes! Academy of Management Review, 26: 41–56.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. 2002. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. , Ketchen D. J. , Wright M. 2011. The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37: 1299–1315. Google Scholar
    • Bomsdorf C. , Hansegard J. 2013. Lego weighs tie-up with “The Simpsons.” Wall Street Journal (Europe Ed.): http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323628804578345903226060938.html; accessed March 13, 2013. Google Scholar
    • Bowman C. , Ambrosini V. 2000. Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11: 1–15. Google Scholar
    • Bowman C. , Ambrosini V. 2001. “Value” in the resource-based view of the firm: A contribution to the debate. Academy of Management Review, 26: 501–502. Google Scholar
    • Brandenburger A. M. , Stuart H. W. 1996. Value-based business strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5: 5–24. Google Scholar
    • Brown T. 2008. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(3): 84–92. Google Scholar
    • Chatain O. 2011. Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 76–102. Google Scholar
    • Chatain O. , Zemsky P. 2007. The horizontal scope of the firm: Organizational tradeoffs vs. buyer-supplier relationships. Management Science, 53: 550–565. Google Scholar
    • Chesbrough H. , Rosenbloom R. S. 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 529–555. Google Scholar
    • Child J. 1972. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6: 1–22. Google Scholar
    • Daily C. C. , Dalton D. R. , Cannella A. A.. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28: 371–382.Link , Google Scholar
    • Denrell J. , Fang C. , Zhao Z. 2013. Inferring superior capabilities from sustained superior performance: A Bayesian analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 182–196. Google Scholar
    • Dierickx I. , Cool K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35: 1504–1511. Google Scholar
    • The Economist. 2012a. A game of thrones. December 1: 23–26. Google Scholar
    • The Economist. 2012b. Inditex: Fashion forward. March 24: 63–64. Google Scholar
    • Foss K. , Foss N. J. , Klein P. G. , Klein S. K. 2007. The entrepreneurial organization of heterogeneous capital. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 1165–1186. Google Scholar
    • Freeman R. E. , Harrison J. S. , Wicks A. C. 2007. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
    • Gulati R. , Wang L. O. 2002. Size of the pie and share of the pie: Implications of network embeddedness and business relatedness for value creation and value appropriation in joint ventures. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 20: 209–242. Google Scholar
    • Hambrick D. C. 2004. The disintegration of strategic management: It's time to consolidate our gains. Strategic Organization, 2: 91–98. Google Scholar
    • Hambrick D. C. , Mason P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193–206.Link , Google Scholar
    • Holcomb T. , Holmes R. , Connelly B. 2009. Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 457–485. Google Scholar
    • Jacobson R. 1992. The Austrian school of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 17: 782–807.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P. 2004. Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practice-in-use. Organization Studies, 25: 529–560. Google Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P. , Giulietti M. , Oliveira B. , Amoo N. 2013. “We don't need no education”—Or do we? Management education and alumni adoption of strategy tools. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22: 4–24. Google Scholar
    • Johnson M. W. , Christensen C. M. , Kagermann H. J. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(6): 50–59. Google Scholar
    • Jones G. R. 2001. Towards a positive interpretation of transaction cost theory: The central roles of entrepreneurship and trust. In Hitt M. A.Freeman R. E.Harrison J. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 208–228. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
    • Jonsson S. , Regnér P. 2009. Normative barriers to imitation: Social complexity of core competences in a mutual fund industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 517–536. Google Scholar
    • Kaplan S. 2008. Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19: 729–752. Google Scholar
    • Katz D. , Kahn R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Kirzner I. M. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Kirzner I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 60–85. Google Scholar
    • Klemperer P. 1987. Markets with consumer switching costs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102: 375–394. Google Scholar
    • Koestler A. 1971. The case of the midwife toad. London: Hutchinson. Google Scholar
    • Kor Y. Y. , Mahoney J. T. , Michael S. C. 2007. Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 1187–1212. Google Scholar
    • Kor Y. Y. , Mesko A. 2013. Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives' capabilities and the firm's dominant logic. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 233–244. Google Scholar
    • Kraaijenbrink J. , Spender J.-C. , Groen A. J. 2010. The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36: 349–372. Google Scholar
    • Kuhn T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Lippmann S. A. , Rumelt R. P. 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 418–438. Google Scholar
    • Lippmann S. A. , Rumelt R. P. 2003. The payments perspective: Micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 903–927. Google Scholar
    • Lockett A. , Thompson S. , Morgenstern U. 2009. The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11: 9–28. Google Scholar
    • Machlup F. 1952. The economics of sellers' competition: Model analysis of sellers' conduct. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
    • Madhok A. 2002. Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 535–550. Google Scholar
    • Madhok A. , Li S. , Priem R. L. 2010. The resource-based view revisited: Comparative firm advantage, willingness-based isolating mechanisms and competitive heterogeneity. European Management Review, 7: 91–100. Google Scholar
    • Makadok R. 2001. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 387–402. Google Scholar
    • Makadok R. 2011. Invited editorial: The four theories of profit and their joint effects. Journal of Management, 37: 1316–1334. Google Scholar
    • Makadok R. , Coff R. 2002. The theory of value and the value of theory: Breaking new ground versus reinventing the wheel. Academy of Management Review, 27: 10–13. Google Scholar
    • Mantere S. , Ketokivi M. 2013. Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38: 70–89.Link , Google Scholar
    • Markóczy L. 1997. Measuring beliefs: Accept no substitutes. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1128–1142. Google Scholar
    • Martin R. L. 2009. The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
    • McGahan A. , Porter M. 1997. How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, 18: 15–30. Google Scholar
    • McGrath R. G. , MacMillan I. C. 2005. Market busting: Strategies for exceptional business growth. Harvard Business Review, 83(3): 80–89. Google Scholar
    • Nag R. , Hambrick D. C. , Chen M.-J. 2007. What is strategic management really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 935–956. Google Scholar
    • Nerur S. P. , Rasheed A. A. , Natarajan V. 2008. The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 319–336. Google Scholar
    • Nickerson B. A. , Silverman B. S. , Zenger T. R. 2007. The “problem” of creating and capturing value. Strategic Organization, 5: 211–225. Google Scholar
    • Oakes L. S. , Townley B. , Cooper D. J. 1998. Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 257–292. Google Scholar
    • Penrose E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Peteraf M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179–191. Google Scholar
    • Peteraf M. A. , Barney J. B. 2003. Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24: 309–323. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18: 599–620.Link , Google Scholar
    • Porac J. H. , Thomas H. , Baden-Fuller C. 1989. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26: 397–416. Google Scholar
    • Porter M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
    • Porter M. E. 1980. Competitive strategies: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. 1994. Executive judgment, organizational congruence, and firm performance. Organization Science, 5: 421–437. Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. 2001. The business-level RBV: Great Wall or Berlin Wall? Academy of Management Review, 26: 499–501. Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. 2007. A consumer perspective on value creation. Academy of Management Review, 32: 219–235.Link , Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. , Butler J. E. 2001a. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26: 22–40.Link , Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. , Butler J. E. 2001b. Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments. Academy of Management Review, 26: 57–66.Link , Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. , Cycyota C. 2001. On strategic judgment. In Hitt M.Freeman R.Harrison J. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 493–519. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. , Harrison D. A. 1994. Exploring strategic judgment: Methods for testing the assumptions of prescriptive contingency theories. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 311–324. Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. , Li S. , Carr J. 2012. Insights and new directions from demand-side approaches to technology innovation, entrepreneurship and strategic management research. Journal of Management, 38: 346–374. Google Scholar
    • Priem R. L. , Rasheed A. M. A. , Amirani S. 1997. Alderson's transvection and Porter's value system: A comparison of two independently developed theories. Journal of Management History, 3: 145–165. Google Scholar
    • Ramos-Rodriguez A.-R. , Ruiz-Navarro J. 2004. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 981–1004. Google Scholar
    • Ratchford B. 2001. The economics of consumer knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 27: 397–411. Google Scholar
    • Ross D. G. 2012. On evaluation costs in strategic factor markets: The implications for competition and organizational design. Management Science, 58: 791–804. Google Scholar
    • Schendel D. , Hofer C. 1979. Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning. Boston: Little Brown. Google Scholar
    • Schmidt J. , Keil T. 2013. What makes a resource valuable? Identifying the drivers of firm-idiosyncratic resource value. Academy of Management Review, 38: 206–228.Link , Google Scholar
    • Shah S. K. , Tripsas M. 2007. The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 123–140. Google Scholar
    • Sherer P. D. , Lee K. 2002. Institutional change in large law firms: A resource dependency and institutional perspective. Academy of Management Review, 45: 102–119.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Teece D. L. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature of microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1319–1350. Google Scholar
    • Teece D. L. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43: 172–194. Google Scholar
    • Thomas A. B. 1988. Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance? Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 388–400. Google Scholar
    • Tripsas M. 2008. Customer preference discontinuities: A trigger for radical technological change. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 79–97. Google Scholar
    • Vickers G. 1965. The art of judgment: A study of policy making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • von Hippel E. A. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5: 212–239. Google Scholar
    • Williamson O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
    • Wooliscroft B. , Tamilia R. D. , Shapiro S. J. 2006. A twenty-first century guide to Aldersonian marketing thought. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
    • Ye G. , Priem R. L. , Alshwer A. 2012. Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organization Science, 23: 207–224. Google Scholar
    • Zander I. , Zander U. 2005. The inside track: On the important (but neglected) role of customers in the resource-based view of strategy and firm growth. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1519–1548. Google Scholar
    • Zott C. , Amit R. , Massa L. 2011. The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37: 1019–1042. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum