Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0240

The physical layout of office space design has evolved to reflect the complexity of modern work and the transitory nature of contemporary employment. Although scholars have investigated the influence of physical workspace design on individual and organizational performance, there is a dearth of research evaluating its impact on work relationships. We contextualize workplace relationships in their physical environment and propose that spatial dimensions common to modern workspaces actively influence workplace relationships, focusing specifically on the spatial dimensions of proximity, workspace assignment, privacy, and crowding. Our spatial model of work relationships proposes that these elements work through relationship-building mechanisms, such as communication content, face-to-face frequency, communication duration, and identity marking, as well as through relationship-straining mechanisms, such as territoriality and ego depletion, to differentially influence both positive and negative relational ties at work. We highlight the trade-offs as well as the relational costs and benefits associated with modern office space dimensions and provide the first step in assessing the impact of the variations in spatial design found in the modern office space.

REFERENCES

  • Agrawal, A., Kapur, D., & McHale, J. 2008. How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. Journal of Urban Economics, 64: 258–269. Google Scholar
  • Altman, I. 1975. The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Google Scholar
  • Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. 1998. Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1531–1544. Google Scholar
  • Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. 1991. Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 251–280.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashforth, B. E., Schinoff, B. S., & Rogers, K. M. 2016. “I identify with her,” “I identify with him”: Unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 41: 28–60.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashkanasy, N. M., Ayoko, O. B., & Jehn, K. A. 2014. Understanding the physical environment of work and employee behavior: An affective events perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35: 1169–1184. Google Scholar
  • Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. 2003. Communicating and organizing in time. Management Communication Quarterly, 16: 380–415. Google Scholar
  • Ballinger, G. A., & Rockmann, K. W. 2010. Chutes versus ladders: Anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Academy of Management Review, 35: 373–392.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 248–287. Google Scholar
  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. 2013. The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38: 132–153.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barry, B., & Crant, J. M. 2000. Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science, 11: 648–664. Google Scholar
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Stillman, T. F. 2008. Self-regulation and close relationships. In J. Wood, A. Tesser, & J. G. Holmes (Eds.), The self and social relationships: 139–158. Philadelphia: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
  • Bechky, B. A. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14: 312–330. Google Scholar
  • Becker, F. 2002. Organisational dilemmas and workplace solutions. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 4: 129–149. Google Scholar
  • Bennett, J., Pitt, M., & Price, S. 2012. Understanding the impact of generational issues in the workplace. Facilities, 30: 278–288. Google Scholar
  • Bergström, J., Miller, M., & Horneij, E. 2015. Work environment perceptions following relocation to open-plan offices: A twelve-month longitudinal study. Work, 50: 221–228. Google Scholar
  • Berscheid, E., & Ammazzalorso, H. 2007. Emotional experience in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes: 308–330. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. 1989. The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 792–807. Google Scholar
  • Boutellier, R., Ullman, F., Schreiber, J., & Naef, R. 2008. Impact of office layout on communication in a science-driven business. R&D Management, 38: 372–391. Google Scholar
  • Bradbury, H., & Lichtenstein, B. M. B. 2000. Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11: 551–564. Google Scholar
  • Brennan, A., Chugh, J. S., & Kline, T. 2002. Traditional versus open office design: A longitudinal field study. Environment and Behavior, 34: 279–299. Google Scholar
  • Brown, G. 2009. Claiming a corner at work: Measuring employee territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29: 44–52. Google Scholar
  • Brown, G., & Baer, M. 2015. Protecting the turf: The effect of territorial marking on others’ creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 1785–1797. Google Scholar
  • Brown, G., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. 2014. Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology, 67: 463–485. Google Scholar
  • Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. 2005. Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30: 577–594.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown, G., & Robinson, S. L. 2011. Reactions to territorial infringement. Organization Science, 22: 210–224. Google Scholar
  • Brown, G., & Zhu, H. 2016. “My workspace, not yours”: The impact of psychological ownership and territoriality in organizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48: 54–64. Google Scholar
  • Brunia, S., & Hartjes-Gosselink, A. 2009. Personalization in non-territorial offices: A study of a human need. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11: 169–182. Google Scholar
  • Byron, K., & Laurence, G. A. 2015. Diplomas, photos, and tchotchkes as symbolic self-representations: Understanding employees’ individual use of symbols. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 298–323.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Casciaro, T., Gino, F., & Kouchaki, M. 2014. The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 705–735. Google Scholar
  • Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. 2006. The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132: 151–179. Google Scholar
  • Colbert, A. E., Bono, J. E., & Purvanova, R. K. 2016. Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1199–1223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. 1994. Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116: 457–475. Google Scholar
  • Danielsson, C. B., & Bodin, L. 2008. Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment and Behavior, 40: 636–668. Google Scholar
  • Danielsson, C. B., Bodin, L., Wulff, C., & Theorell, T. 2015. The relation between office type and workplace conflict: A gender and noise perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42: 161–171. Google Scholar
  • Danielsson, C. B., Wulff, C., & Westerlund, H. 2013. Is perception of leadership influenced by office environment? Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15: 194–212. Google Scholar
  • Daraganova, G., Pattison, P., Koskinen, J., Mitchell, B., Bill, A., Watts, M., & Baum, S. 2012. Networks and geography: Modelling community network structures as the outcome of both spatial and network processes. Social Networks, 34: 6–17. Google Scholar
  • Davis, G. F. 2016. The vanishing American corporation: Navigating the hazards of a new economy. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Davis, M. C., Leach, D. J., & Clegg, C. W. 2011. The physical environment of the office: Contemporary and emerging issues. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 26: 193–235. Google Scholar
  • De Croon, E., Sluiter, J., Kuijer, P. P., & Frings-Dresen, M. 2005. The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: A systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics, 48: 119–134. Google Scholar
  • Derlega, V. J., Harris, M. S., & Chaikin, A. L. 1973. Self-disclosure reciprocity, liking and the deviant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9: 277–284. Google Scholar
  • DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M. T., & Maner, J. K. 2008. Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34: 1653–1662. Google Scholar
  • Dindia, K. 2002. Self-disclosure research: Knowledge through meta analysis. In M. Allen, R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gagle, & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication: Advances through meta-analyses: 169–186. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. 2003. The power of high-quality connections. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 263–278. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. 2006. Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 59–96. Google Scholar
  • Elsbach, K. D. 2003. Relating physical environment to self-categorizations: Identity threat and affirmation in a non-territorial office space. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 622–654. Google Scholar
  • Evans, G. W., & Lepore, S. J. 1993. Household crowding and social support: A quasiexperimental analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 308–316. Google Scholar
  • Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. 2007. Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28: 605–634. Google Scholar
  • Ferris, G. R., Liden, R. C., Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Basik, K. J., & Buckley, M. R. 2009. Relationships at work: Toward a multidimensional conceptualization of dyadic work relationships. Journal of Management, 35: 1379–1403. Google Scholar
  • Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewé, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. 2007. Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33: 290–320. Google Scholar
  • Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. 2001. Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 263–277. Google Scholar
  • Finkenauer, C., Kubacka, K. E., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Kerkhof, P. 2009. Secrecy in close relationships. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications: 300–310. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. 2010. Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19: 101–105. Google Scholar
  • Fitzsimons, G. M., & Finkel, E. J. 2011. The effects of self-regulation on social relationships. In K. D. VohsR. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed.): 407–421. New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Fleming, I., Baum, A., & Weiss, L. 1987. Social density and perceived control as mediators of crowding stress in high-density residential neighborhoods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 899–906. Google Scholar
  • Forest, A. L., Kille, D. R., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. 2014. Discount and disengage: How chronic negative expressivity undermines partner responsiveness to negative disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107: 1013–1032. Google Scholar
  • Forgas, J. P. 2011. Affective influences on self-disclosure: Mood effects on the intimacy and reciprocity of disclosing personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100: 449–461. Google Scholar
  • Gallup. 2017. The state of the American workplace. Available at http://news.gallup.com/reports/199961/state-american-workplace-report-2017.aspx. Google Scholar
  • Gillen, N. M. 2006. The future workplace, opportunities, realities and myths: A practical approach to creating meaningful environments. In J. Worthington (Ed.), Reinventing the workplace (2nd ed.): 61–78. Oxford: Architectural Press. Google Scholar
  • Golden-Biddle, K., GermAnn, K., Reay, T., & Procyshen, G. 2007. Creating and sustaining positive organizational relationships: A cultural perspective. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 289–305. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • Grant, A. M. 2003. Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32: 393–417. Google Scholar
  • Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. 2010. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136: 495–525. Google Scholar
  • Hatch, M. J. 1987. Physical barriers, task characteristics, and interaction activity in research and development firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 387–399. Google Scholar
  • Hosman, L. A., & Tardy, C. H. 1980. Self-disclosure and reciprocity in short- and long-term relationships: An experimental study of evaluational and attributional consequences. Communication Quarterly, 28: 20–30. Google Scholar
  • Ittelson, W. H., Proshansky, H. M., & Rivlin, L. G. 1970. Bedroom size and social interaction of the psychiatric ward. Environment and Behavior, 2: 255–270. Google Scholar
  • Jahncke, H., Hygge, S., Halin, N., Green, A. M., & Dimberg, K. 2011. Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31: 373–382. Google Scholar
  • James, G. 2016. 9 Reasons that open-space offices are insanely stupid. Inc., February 25: https://www.inc.com/geoffrey-james/why-your-company-will-benefit-from-getting-rid-of-open-office-spaces-first-90.html. Google Scholar
  • Jett, Q. R., & George, J. M. 2003. Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 28: 494–507.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kabo, F. W., Cotton-Nessler, N., Hwang, Y., Levenstein, M. C., & Owen-Smith, J. 2014. Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 43: 1469–1485. Google Scholar
  • Kabo, F. W., Hwang, Y., Levenstein, M., & Owen-Smith, J. 2015. Shared paths to the lab: A sociospatial network analysis of collaboration. Environment and Behavior, 47: 57–84. Google Scholar
  • Kahn, W. A. 2007. Meaningful connections: Positive relationships and attachments at work. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 189–206. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • Kelley, W. M., & Waldron, V. R. 2006. Forgiveness: Communicative implications for social relationships. Communication Yearbook, 30: 302–341. Google Scholar
  • Kellogg, K. C. 2009. Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115: 657–711. Google Scholar
  • Kim, J., & de Dear, R. 2013. Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36: 18–26. Google Scholar
  • Knight, C., & Haslam, S. A. 2010. The relative merits of lean, enriched, and empowered offices: An experimental examination of the impact of workspace management strategies on well-being and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16: 158–172. Google Scholar
  • Konnikova, M. 2014. The open-office trap. New Yorker, January 7: http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/the-open-office-trap. Google Scholar
  • Kurland, N. B., & Egan, T. D. 1999. Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organization Science, 10: 500–513. Google Scholar
  • Labianca, G., & Brass, D. J. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31: 596–614.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., & Gray, B. 1998. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 55–67.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. 2009. Homeworkers’ usage of mobile phones: Social isolation in the home-workplace. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22: 257–274. Google Scholar
  • Lansdale, M., Parkin, J., Austin, S., & Baguley, T. 2011. Designing for interaction in research environments: A case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31: 407–420. Google Scholar
  • Laurence, G. A., Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. M. 2013. My space: A moderated mediation model of the effect of architectural and experienced privacy and workspace personalization on emotional exhaustion at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36: 144–152. Google Scholar
  • Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. 2005. Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25: 323–333. Google Scholar
  • Lepore, S. J., Evans, G. W., & Schneider, M. 1991. Dynamic role of social support in the link between chronic stress and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 899–909. Google Scholar
  • Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. 1979. Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 181–199. Google Scholar
  • Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Fitzsimons, G. M. 2011. The effects of self-regulatory strength, content, and strategies on close relationships. Journal of Personality, 79: 1251–1280. Google Scholar
  • Mann, A. 2017. How to make an open office floor plan work. Gallup Blog, June 22: https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/212741/open-office-floor-plan-work.aspx. Google Scholar
  • May, D. R., Oldham, G. R., & Rathert, C. 2005. Employee affective and behavioral reactions to the spatial density of physical work environments. Human Resource Management, 44: 21–33. Google Scholar
  • McCloskey, D. W., & Igbaria, M. 2003. Does “out of sight” mean “out of mind”? An empirical investigation of the career advancement prospects of telecommuters. Information Resources Management Journal, 16: 19–34. Google Scholar
  • Mehrabian, A., & Diamond, S. G. 1971. Effects of furniture arrangement, props, and personality on social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20: 18–30. Google Scholar
  • Methot, J. R., Melwani, S., & Rothman, N. B. 2017. The space between us: A social-functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships. Journal of Management, 43: 1789–1819. Google Scholar
  • Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Basu, R. 2007. Does distance make a difference for relationships? Social Networks, 29: 430–461. Google Scholar
  • Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. 2000. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126: 247–259. Google Scholar
  • Nagar, D., & Pandey, J. 1987. Affect and performance on cognitive task as a function of crowding and noise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17: 147–157. Google Scholar
  • Oldham, G. R., & Fried, Y. 1987. Employee reactions to workspace characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 75–80. Google Scholar
  • Oldham, G. R., & Rotchford, N. L. 1983. Relationships between office characteristics and employee reactions: A study of the physical environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 542–556. Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. 2008. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 433–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osmond, H. 1957. Function as the basis of psychiatric ward design. Mental Hospitals, 8: 23–29 (Architectural Supplement). Google Scholar
  • Parkin, J. K., Austin, S. A., Pinder, J. A., Baguley, T. S., & Allenby, S. N. 2011. Balancing collaboration and privacy in academic workspaces. Facilities, 29: 31–49. Google Scholar
  • Perlow, L. A. 1999. The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 57–81. Google Scholar
  • Peterson, M., & Wilson, J. F. 2002. The culture-work-health model and work stress. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26: 16–24. Google Scholar
  • Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. 1987. Expression of emotion as part of the work role. Academy of Management Review, 12: 23–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raghuram, S., & Wiesenfeld, B. 2004. Work‐nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management, 43: 259–277. Google Scholar
  • Ragins, B. R., & Dutton, J. E. 2007. Positive relationships at work: An introduction and invitation. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 3–25. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • Ragins, B. R., & Verbos, A. K. 2007. Positive relationships in action: Relational mentoring and mentoring schemas in the workplace. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.) Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 91–116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. 2016. Embracing agile. Harvard Business Review, 94(5): 40–50. Google Scholar
  • Rockmann, K. W., & Pratt, M. G. 2015. Contagious offsite work and the lonely office: The unintended consequences of distributed work. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1: 150–164.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ross, M., Layton, B., Erickson, B., & Schopler, J. 1973. Affect, facial regard, and reactions to crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28: 69–76. Google Scholar
  • Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. 2011. Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27: 1658–1664. Google Scholar
  • Sailer, K., & McCulloh, I. 2012. Social networks and spatial configuration—How office layouts drive social interaction. Social Networks, 34: 47–58. Google Scholar
  • Sailer, K., & Penn, A. 2009. Spatiality and transpatiality in workplace environments. In D. KochL. MarcusJ. Steen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium: 095:1–11. Stockholdm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Google Scholar
  • Sargent, K., Nurse, B., & Warner-Lacey, B. 2017. Moving beyond open plan spaces. Work Design Magazine, September 28: https://workdesign.com/2017/09/moving-beyond-open-plan-spaces/. Google Scholar
  • Schawbel, D. 2015. 10 workplace trends you’ll see in 2016. Forbes, November 1: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danschawbel/2015/11/01/10-workplace-trends-for-2016/#524d49f1237f. Google Scholar
  • Schmidt, D. E., & Keating, J. P. 1979. Human crowding and personal control: An integration of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 680–700. Google Scholar
  • Schönpflug, W. 1986. Behavior economics as an approach to stress theory. In M. H. Appley & R. A. Trumbull (Eds.), Dynamics of stress: 81–98. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
  • Schwartz, A. 2013. You’re not alone: Most people hate open offices. Fast Company, November 20: https://www.fastcompany.com/3021713/youre-not-alone-most-people-hate-open-offices. Google Scholar
  • Seabury, B. A. 1971. Arrangement of physical space in social work settings. Social Work, 16: 43–49. Google Scholar
  • Sermat, V., & Smyth, M. 1973. Content analysis of verbal communication in the development of a relationship: Conditions influencing self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26: 332–346. Google Scholar
  • Shah, N. P., Parker, A., & Waldstrøm, C. 2017. Examining the overlap: Individual performance benefits of multiplex relationships. Management Communication Quarterly, 31: 5–38. Google Scholar
  • Sias, P. M. 2005. Workplace relationship quality and employee information experiences. Communication Studies, 56: 375–395. Google Scholar
  • Sias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. 1998. From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62: 273–299 (Includes Communication Reports). Google Scholar
  • Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. 2007. Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32: 9–32.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith-Jackson, T. L., & Klein, K. W. 2009. Open-plan offices: Task performance and mental workload. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29: 279–289. Google Scholar
  • Smolders, K. C., de Kort, Y. A., Tenner, A. D., & Kaiser, F. G. 2012. Need for recovery in offices: Behavior-based assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32: 126–134. Google Scholar
  • Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 316–325.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sprecher, S., & Treger, S. 2015. The benefits of turn-taking reciprocal self-disclosure in get-acquainted interactions. Personal Relationships, 22: 460–475. Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer, G., Garrett, L., & Bacevice, P. 2015. Should your company embrace coworking? MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(1): 27–29. Google Scholar
  • Steelcase. n.d. The privacy crisis: Taking a toll on employee engagement. Available at https://www.steelcase.com/research/articles/privacy-crisis/. Google Scholar
  • Stephens, J. P., Heaphy, E. D., Carmeli, A., Spreitzer, G. M., & Dutton, J. E. 2013. Relationship quality and virtuousness: Emotional carrying capacity as a source of individual and team resilience. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49: 13–41. Google Scholar
  • Sundararajan, A. 2016. The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  • Sundstrom, E., Herbert, R. K., & Brown, D. W. 1982. Privacy and communication in an open plan office: A case study. Environment and Behavior, 14: 379–392. Google Scholar
  • U.S. General Services Administration 2011. Workspace utilization and allocation benchmark. Washington, DC: U.S. General Services Administration. Available at https://www.gsa.gov/cdnstatic/Workspace_Utilization_Banchmark_July_2012_%281%29.pdf. Google Scholar
  • Van den Bulte, C., & Moenaert, R. K. 1998. The effect of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Science, 44(Supplement): S1–S18. Google Scholar
  • Van Dyne, L., Kossek, E., & Lobel, S. 2007. Less need to be there: Cross-level effects of work practices that support work-life flexibility and enhance group processes and group-level OCB. Human Relations, 60: 1123–1154. Google Scholar
  • Veitch, J. A., Charles, K. E., Farley, K. M. J., & Newsham, G. R. 2007. A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27: 177–189. Google Scholar
  • Venezia, C., & Allee, V. 2007. Supporting mobile worker networks: Components for effective workplaces. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 9: 168–182. Google Scholar
  • Wineman, J. D., Kabo, F. W., & Davis, G. F. 2009. Spatial and social networks in organizational innovation. Environment and Behavior, 41: 427–442. Google Scholar
  • Wysocki, R. 2014. Effective complex project management: An adaptive agile framework for delivering business value. Plantation, FL: J. Ross Publishing. Google Scholar
  • Zahn, G. L. 1991. Face-to-face communication in an office setting the effects of position, proximity, and exposure. Communication Research, 18: 737–754. Google Scholar
  • Zhou, J., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. 1998. Employee reactions to the physical work environment: The role of childhood residential attributes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28: 2213–2238. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900