Skip main navigation
Articles

Putting Escalation of Commitment in Context: A Multilevel Review and Analysis

    Published Online:18 Oct 2017https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0046

    Abstract

    Organizations, and the groups and individuals within them, sometimes face the thorny dilemma of whether or not to continue failing courses of action. Escalation of commitment describes the tendency to “carry on” with such questionable endeavors, regardless of whether doing so is likely to result in success. Despite the wide variability between and within organizations, early research on escalation of commitment largely ignored the role of context. Since then, an impressive volume of studies on the context of escalation has accumulated, and we present a fresh take on the literature by reviewing and analyzing this work. Using a multilevel framework, we elucidate how escalation is influenced by factors at the group and organizational levels, as well as by factors external to the organization. Ultimately, we aim to provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of escalation to stimulate new avenues of research and offer insights into how decision-makers can respond more effectively to escalation dilemmas.

    REFERENCES

    • Albert D., Kreutzer M., Lechner C. 2015. Resolving the paradox of interdependency and strategic renewal in activity systems. Academy of Management Review, 40(2): 210–234.Link , Google Scholar
    • Aldrich H. E., Pfeffer J. 1976. Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1): 79–105. Google Scholar
    • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 634–665. Google Scholar
    • Bamberger P. 2008. Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macros gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5): 839–846.Link , Google Scholar
    • Barrick M. R., Bradley B. H., Kristof-Brown A. L., Colbert A. E. 2007. The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3): 544–557.Link , Google Scholar
    • Bazerman M. H., Giuliano T., Appelman A. 1984. Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(2): 141–152. Google Scholar
    • Beard D. W., Dess G. G. 1979. Industry profitability and firm performance: A preliminary analysis on the business portfolio question., Academy of Management Proceedings, 1979: 123–127.Link , Google Scholar
    • Bishop D., Trevino L. K., Gioia D. A. 2014. An iconic figure’s precipitous fall from grace: Transforming the media narrative of Joe Paterno. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014: 13805.Link , Google Scholar
    • Booth P., Schulz A. K.-D. 2004. The impact of an ethical environment on managers' project evaluation judgments under agency problem conditions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5): 473–488. Google Scholar
    • Bort J. 2015. Mark Zuckerberg shared some simple advice for success: Don’t give up. http://www.businessinsider.com/zuckerberg-shared-advice-for-success-2015-4. Accessed December 30, 2015. Google Scholar
    • Boulding W., Morgan R., Staelin R. 1997. Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. Journal of Marketing research, 34(1): 164–176. Google Scholar
    • Bowen M. G. 1987. The escalation phenomenon reconsidered: Decision dilemmas or decision errors? Academy of Management Review, 12(1): 52–66.Link , Google Scholar
    • Branzei O., Ursacki-Bryant T. J., Vertinsky I., Zhang W. J. 2004. The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25(11): 1075–1095. Google Scholar
    • Brockner J., Rubin J. Z., Lang E. 1981. Face-saving and entrapment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(1): 68–79. Google Scholar
    • Brockner J. 1992. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17(1): 39–61.Link , Google Scholar
    • Buchholtz A. K., Lubatkin M., O'Neill H. M. 1999. Seller responsiveness to the need to divest. Journal of Management, 25(5): 633–652. Google Scholar
    • Buehler R., Messervey D., Griffin D. 2005. Collaborative planning and prediction: Does group discussion affect optimistic biases in time estimation? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(1): 47–63. Google Scholar
    • Cerasoli C. P., Nicklin J. M., Ford M. T. 2014. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4): 980–1008. Google Scholar
    • Chatterjee A., Hambrick D. C. 2011. Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2): 202–237. Google Scholar
    • Chen M.-J., Miller D. 2012. Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1): 135–210.Link , Google Scholar
    • Chng D. H. M., Rodgers M. S., Shih E., Song X. B. 2012. When does incentive compensation motivate managerial behaviors? An experimental investigation of the fit between incentive compensation, executive core self-evaluation, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(12): 1343–1362. Google Scholar
    • Colombo M. G., Delmastro M. 2001. Technology use and plant closure. Research Policy, 30(1): 21–34. Google Scholar
    • Connelly B. L., Tihanyi L., Certo S. T., Hitt M. A. 2010. Marching to the beat of different drummers: The influence of institutinal owners on competitive actions Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 723–742.Link , Google Scholar
    • Courtright S. H., Thurgood G. R., Stewart G. L., Pierotti A. J. 2015. Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6): 1825. Google Scholar
    • Cronin M. A., Gonzalez C., Sterman J. D. 2009. Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1): 116–130. Google Scholar
    • David P., Hitt M. A., Gimeno J. 2001. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1): 144–157.Link , Google Scholar
    • Davidsson P., Gordon S. R. 2015. Much ado about nothing? The surprising persistence of nascent entrepreneurs through macroeconomic crisis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4). Google Scholar
    • De Dreu C. K., Nijstad B. A., van Knippenberg D. 2008. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1): 22–49. Google Scholar
    • DeRue D. S. 2011. Adaptive leadership theory: Leading and following as a complex adaptive process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31: 125–150. Google Scholar
    • DeTienne D. R., Shepherd D. A., De Castro J. O. 2008. The fallacy of “only the strong survive”: The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decision for under-performing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5): 528–546. Google Scholar
    • Devers C. E., McNamara G., Wiseman R. M., Arrfelt M. 2008. Moving closer to the action: Examining compensation design effects on firm risk. Organization Science, 19(4): 548–566. Google Scholar
    • Devigne D., Manigart S., Wright M. 2016. Escalation of commitment in venture capital decision making: Differentiating between domestic and international investors. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(3): 253–271. Google Scholar
    • Dilts D. M., Pence K. R. 2006. Impact of role in the decision to fail: An exploratory study of terminated projects. Journal of Operations Management, 24(4): 378–396. Google Scholar
    • Drummond H. 1994. Too little too late: A case study of escalation in decision making. Organization Studies, 15(4): 591–607. Google Scholar
    • Drummond H. 1995. De-escalation in decision making: A case of a disastrous partnership. Journal of Management Studies, 32(3): 265–281. Google Scholar
    • Duhaime I. M., Grant J. H. 1984. Factors influencing divestment decision-making: Evidence from a field study. Strategic Management Journal, 5(4): 301–318. Google Scholar
    • Edmondson A. C. 2012. Teamwork on the fly. Harvard Business Review, 90(4): 72–80. Google Scholar
    • Edmondson A. C., Lei Z. 2014. Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1): 23–43. Google Scholar
    • Erdogan B., Bauer T. N. 2014. Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory: The relational approach to leadership. The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations: 407: 407–433. Google Scholar
    • Fotaki M., Hyde P. 2014. Organizational blind spots: Splitting, blame and idealization in the National Health Service. Human Relations, 68(3): 0018726714530012. Google Scholar
    • Furneaux B., Wade M. R. 2011. An exploration of organizational level information systems discontinuance intentions. Mis Quarterly, 35(3): 573–598. Google Scholar
    • Gamache D., McNamara G. 2017. Responding to bad press: How CEO temporal focus influences the sensitivity to media coverage. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016: 15972. Google Scholar
    • Gamache D. L., McNamara G., Mannor M. J., Johnson R. E. 2015. Motivated to acquire? The impact of CEO regulatory focus on firm acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4): 1261–1282.Link , Google Scholar
    • Gelfand M. J., Nishii L. H., Raver J. L. 2006. On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1225–1244. Google Scholar
    • Gimeno J., Folta T. B., Cooper A. C., Woo C. Y. 1997. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 750–783. Google Scholar
    • Gonzalez C. 2005. Decision support for real-time, dynamic decision-making tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(2): 142–154. Google Scholar
    • Greer C. R., Stephens G. K. 2001. Escalation of commitment: A comparison of differences between Mexican and US decision-makers. Journal of Management, 27(1): 51–78. Google Scholar
    • Griffin M. A., Neal A., Parker S. K. 2007. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 327–347.Link , Google Scholar
    • Guler I. 2007. Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(2): 248–285. Google Scholar
    • Hambrick D. C., Humphrey S. E., Gupta A. 2015. Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3): 449–461. Google Scholar
    • Haunschild P. R. 1994. How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3): 391–411. Google Scholar
    • Hayward M. L. A., Shimizu K. 2006. De-commitment to losing strategic action: Evidence from the divestiture of poorly performing acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(6): 541–557. Google Scholar
    • Hiller N. J., Hambrick D. C. 2005. Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4): 297–319. Google Scholar
    • Hinojosa A. S., Gardner W. L., Walker H. J., Cogliser C., Gullifor D. 2016. A review of cognitive dissonance theory in management research opportunities for further development. Journal of Management, 43(1):0149206316668236. Google Scholar
    • Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., Vollrath D. A. 1997. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1): 43–64. Google Scholar
    • Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., Nagao D. H. 2008. Accentuation of information processes and biases in group judgments integrating base-rate and case-specific information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1): 116–126. Google Scholar
    • Hitt M. A., Beamish P. W., Jackson S. E., Mathieu J. E. 2007. Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1385–1399.Link , Google Scholar
    • Hoang H., Gimeno J. 2010. Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1): 41–53. Google Scholar
    • Hofstede G. H. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Hsieh K.-Y., Tsai W., Chen M.-J. 2015. If they can do it, why not us? Competitors as reference points for justifying escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1): 38–58.Link , Google Scholar
    • Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R., Johnson M., Jundt D. 2005. Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 517–543. Google Scholar
    • Inkpen A. C., Ross J. 2001. Why do some strategic alliances persist beyond their useful life? California Management Review, 44(1): 132–148. Google Scholar
    • Jackson S. E., Joshi A. 2011. Work team diversity. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Vol. 1. 651–686. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
    • Jacobides M. G. 2007. The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 18(3): 455–477. Google Scholar
    • Janis I. L. 1972. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
    • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. 1979. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In Economics social institutions: 163–231. Boston, MA: Springer. Google Scholar
    • Johns G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 386–408.Link , Google Scholar
    • Joseph J., Gaba V. 2015. The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13): 1960–1978. Google Scholar
    • Kahneman D., Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47: 263–291. Google Scholar
    • Keil M. 1995. Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS quarterly: 421–447. Google Scholar
    • Keil M., Montealegre R. 2000. Cutting your losses: Extricating your organization when a big project goes awry. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(3): 55. Google Scholar
    • Keil M., Tan B. C., Wei K.-K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., Wassenaar A. 2000. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS quarterly, 24(2): 299–325. Google Scholar
    • Keil M., Mähring M. 2010. Is your project turning into a black hole? California Management Review, 53(1): 6–31. Google Scholar
    • Kerr N. L., Tindale R. S. 2004. Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 623–655. Google Scholar
    • Kozlowski S. W. J., Klein K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In Klein K. J.Kozlowski S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions: 3–90. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
    • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. 1992. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13(8): 585–608. Google Scholar
    • Larrick R. P. 2016. The social context of decisions. In Morgeson F. P. (Ed.), Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, vol. 3: 441–467. Google Scholar
    • Leatherwood M. L., Conlon E. J. 1987. Diffusibility of blame - Effects on persistence in a project Academy of Management Journal, 30(4): 836–847.Link , Google Scholar
    • Lowe R. A., Ziedonis A. A. 2006. Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Management Science, 52(2): 173–186. Google Scholar
    • March J. G. 2006. Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3): 201–214. Google Scholar
    • Maslach D. 2016. Change and persistence with failed technological innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4): 714–723. Google Scholar
    • McCarthy A. M., Schoorman F. D., Cooper A. C. 1993. Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision-making or escalation of commitment? Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1): 9–24. Google Scholar
    • McCauley C. 1998. Group dynamics in Janis's theory of groupthink: Backward and forward. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2–3): 142–162. Google Scholar
    • McDonald M. L., Westphal J. D., Graebner M. E. 2008. What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11): 1155–1177. Google Scholar
    • McNamara G., Moon H., Bromiley P. 2002. Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization's attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2): 443–452.Link , Google Scholar
    • McWilliams A., Van Fleet D. D., Cory K. D. 2002. Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5): 707–724. Google Scholar
    • Miller D., Sardais C. 2013. How our frames direct us: A poker experiment. Organization Studies, 34(9): 1381–1405. Google Scholar
    • Miller D. T., McFarland C. 1987. Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 53(2): 298. Google Scholar
    • Montealegre R., Keil M. 2000. De-escalating information technology projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport. Mis Quarterly, 24: 417–447. Google Scholar
    • Moon H. 2001. The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 533–540. Google Scholar
    • Moon H., Conlon D. E., Humphrey S. E., Quigley N., Devers C. E., Nowakowski J. M. 2003. Group decision process and incrementalism in organizational decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1): 67–79. Google Scholar
    • Mowday R. T., Sutton R. I. 1993. Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1): 195–229. Google Scholar
    • Nadkarni S., Chen J. 2014. Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6): 1810–1833.Link , Google Scholar
    • Nijstad B. A., De Dreu C. K. 2012. Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32: 87–111. Google Scholar
    • Noda T., Bower J. L. 1996. Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1): 159–192. Google Scholar
    • Park S. H., Westphal J. D., Stern I. 2011. Set up for a fall: The insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2): 257–302. Google Scholar
    • Pearsall M. J., Ellis A. P. J. 2011. Thick as thieves: The effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2): 401–411. Google Scholar
    • Petrenko O. V., Aime F., Ridge J., Hill A. 2016. Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 262–279. Google Scholar
    • Puri M., Zarutskie R. 2012. On the life cycle dynamics of venture-capital-and non-venture-capital-financed firms. The Journal of Finance, 67(6): 2247–2293. Google Scholar
    • Quigley T. J., Hambrick D. C. 2015. Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America's attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6): 821–830. Google Scholar
    • Roberto M. A. 2002. Lessons from Everest: The interaction of cognitive bias, psychological safety, and system complexity. California Management Review, 45(1): 136–158. Google Scholar
    • Ross J., Staw B. M. 1986. Expo 86: An escalation prototype. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2): 274–297. Google Scholar
    • Ross J., Staw B. M. 1993. Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4): 701–732.Link , Google Scholar
    • Rousseau D. M., Fried Y. 2001. Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1): 1–13. Google Scholar
    • Salancik G. R, Pfeffer J. 1978. Social information-processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2): 224–253. Google Scholar
    • Schmidt F. L., Hunter J. E. 2015. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
    • Schultze T., Pfeiffer F., Schulz-Hardt S. 2012. Biased information processing in the escalation paradigm: Information search and information evaluation as potential mediators of escalating commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1): 16–32. Google Scholar
    • Sharp D. J., Salter S. B. 1997. Project escalation and sunk costs: A test of the international generalizability of agency and prospect theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1): 101–121. Google Scholar
    • Simon H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
    • Sinha P. N., Inkson K., Barker J. R. 2012. Committed to a failing strategy: Celebrity CEO, intermediaries, media and stakeholders in a co-created drama. Organization Studies, 33(2): 223–245. Google Scholar
    • Sleesman D. J., Conlon D. E., McNamara G., Miles J. E. 2012. Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3): 541–562.Link , Google Scholar
    • Sorensen J. B. 2002. The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1): 70–91. Google Scholar
    • Starbuck W. H. 1976. Organizations and their environments. In Dunnette M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 1069–1123. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1): 27–44. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M. 1981. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4): 577–587.Link , Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M., Ross J. 1987. Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 39–78. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M. 1997. The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. Organizational Decision Making, 191: 215. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M., Barsade S. G., Koput K. W. 1997. Escalation at the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives' recognition and write-off of problem loans. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1): 130–142. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M. 2016. Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: An autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3: 1–19. Google Scholar
    • Sunstein C. R., Hastie R. 2015. Wiser: Getting beyond groupthink to make groups smarter. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
    • Sutcliffe K. M., McNamara G. 2001. Controlling decision-making practice in organizations. Organization Science, 12(4): 484–501. Google Scholar
    • Tannenbaum S. I., Mathieu J. E., Salas E., Cohen D. 2012. Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1): 2–24. Google Scholar
    • Thompson J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
    • Tost L. P., Gino F., Larrick R. P. 2013. When power makes others speechless: The negative impact of leader power on team performance Academy of Management Journal, 56(5): 1465–1486.Link , Google Scholar
    • Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. 1978. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 613–624.Link , Google Scholar
    • Vagnani G. 2015. Exploration and long-run organizational performance: The moderating role of technological interdependence. Journal of Management, 41(6): 1651–1676. Google Scholar
    • Valentine M. A., Edmondson A. C. 2014. Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organization Science, 26(2): 405–422. Google Scholar
    • van Knippenberg D., Mell J. N. 2016. Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136: 135–145. Google Scholar
    • Van Oorschot K. E., Akkermans H., Sengupta K., Van Wassenhove L. N. 2013. Anatomy of a decision trap in complex new product development projects. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 285–307.Link , Google Scholar
    • Walker W. 2000. Entrapment in large technology systems: Institutional commitment and power relations. Research Policy, 29(7): 833–846. Google Scholar
    • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. 2003. Hospitals as cultures of entrapment: A re-analysis of the Bristol Royal Infirmary. California Management Review, 45(2): 73–84. Google Scholar
    • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4): 409–421. Google Scholar
    • Weingart L. R., Behfar K. J., Bendersky C., Todorova G., Jehn K. A. 2015. The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Academy of Management Review, 40(2): 235–262.Link , Google Scholar
    • Westphal J. D., Bednar M. K. 2005. Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms' strategic persistence in response to low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2): 262–298. Google Scholar
    • Whyte G. 1991. Diffusion of responsibility: Effects on the escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3): 408. Google Scholar
    • Whyte G. 1993. Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(3): 430–455. Google Scholar
    • Wong K. F. E., Yik M., Kwong J. Y. Y. 2006. Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: The role of negative affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2): 282–297. Google Scholar
    • Wowak A. J., Mannor M. J., Arrfelt M., McNamara G. 2016. Earthquake or glacier? How CEO charisma manifests in firm strategy over time. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3): 586–603. Google Scholar
    • Yates J. F., de Oliveira S. 2016. Culture and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136: 106–118. Google Scholar
    • Zaheer S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.Link , Google Scholar
    • Zardkoohi A. 2004. Do real options lead to escalation of commitment? Academy of Management Review, 29(1): 111–119.Link , Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum