Successful Organizational Change: Integrating the Management Practice and Scholarly Literatures

REFERENCES

• Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179–211. Google Scholar
• Alänge S., & Steiber A. 2009. The board’s role in sustaining major organizational change: An empirical analysis of three change programs. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1: 280–293. Google Scholar
• Amiot C. E., Terry D. J., Jimmieson N. L., & Callan V. J. 2006. A longitudinal investigation of coping processes during a merger: Implications for job satisfaction and organizational identification. Journal of Management, 32: 552–574. Google Scholar
• Appelbaum S. H., Habashy S., Malo J. L., & Shafiq H. 2012. Back to the future: Revisiting Kotter’s 1996 change model. Journal of Management Development, 31: 764–782. Google Scholar
• Armenakis A., & Harris S. G. 2009. Reflections: Our Journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management, 9: 127–142. Google Scholar
• Armenakis A. A., Harris S. G., & Feild H. S. 1999. Making change permanent: A model for institutionalizing change interventions. In W. A. PasmoreR. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development, vol. 12: 97–128. New York: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Armstrong-Stassen M. 1994. Coping with transition: A study of layoff survivors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 597–621. Google Scholar
• Ashford S. J. 1988. Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24: 19–36. Google Scholar
• Astor T., Morales M., Kiefer D., & Repenning N. 2016. What problem are you trying to solve: An introduction to structured problem solving. MIT Report. http://mitsloan.mit.edu/shared/ods/documents/?DocumentID=2450. Google Scholar
• Babalola M. T., Stouten J., & Euwema M. 2016. Frequent change and turnover intention: The moderating role of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 134: 311–322. Google Scholar
• Balogun J. 2003. From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential: Creating change intermediaries. British Journal of Management, 14: 69–83. Google Scholar
• Bamford D., & Daniel S. 2005. A case study of change management effectiveness within the NHS. Journal of Change Management, 5: 391–406. Google Scholar
• Barends E., Janssen B., ten Have W., & ten Have S. 2013. Effects of change interventions: What kind of evidence do we really have? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50: 28–33. Google Scholar
• Barends E., & Rousseau D. M. 2018. Evidence-based management: How to use evidence to make better organizational decisions. London: Kogan Page. Google Scholar
• Barends E., Villanueva J., Rousseau D. M., Briner R. B., Jepsen D. M., Houghton E., & ten Have S. 2017. Managerial attitudes and perceived barriers regarding evidence-based practice: An international survey. PLoS One, 12: e0184594. Google Scholar
• Bartunek J. M., Rousseau D. M, Rudolph J., & Depalma J. 2006. On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42: 182–206. Google Scholar
• Battilana J., & Casciaro T. 2012. Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 381–398.Link , Google Scholar
• Battilana J., & Casciaro T. 2013. Overcoming resistance to organizational change: Strong ties and affective cooptation. Management Science, 59: 819–836. Google Scholar
• Battilana J., Gilmartin M., Sengul M., Pache A. C., & Alexander J. A. 2010. Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. Leadership Quarterly, 21: 422–438. Google Scholar
• Baum J. R., Locke E. A., & Kirkpatrick S. A. 1998. A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 43–54. Google Scholar
• Bednall T. C., Bove L. L., Cheetham A., & Murray A. L. 2013. A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions. Social Science and Medicine, 96: 86–94. Google Scholar
• Beer M. 1980. Organization change and development: A systems view. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear. Google Scholar
• Beer M. 2009. Sustain organizational performance through continuous learning, change and realignment. In E. A. Locke (ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd ed.): 537–555. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
• Beer M., Eisenstat R. A., & Spector B. 1990. Why change programs do not produce change. Harvard Business Review, 68: 158–166. Google Scholar
• Bellou V. 2007. Shaping psychological contracts in the public and private sectors: A human resources management perspective. International Public Management Journal, 10: 327–349. Google Scholar
• Bennebroek Gravenhorst K. M., & Boonstra J. J. 1998. The use of influence tactics in constructive change processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7: 179–196. Google Scholar
• Bernerth J. B., Armenakis A. A., Feild H. S., & Walker H. J. 2007. Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43: 303–326. Google Scholar
• Bies R. J. 2013. The delivery of bad news in organizations. Journal of Management, 39: 136–162. Google Scholar
• Bies R. J., & Moag J. S. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. LewickiB. H. SheppardM. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations: 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Bordia P., Hobman E., Jones C., Gallois V., & Callan J. 2004. Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18: 507–532. Google Scholar
• Bordia P., Restubog S. L. D., Jimmieson N. L., & Irmer B. E. 2011. Haunted by the past: Effects of poor change management history on employee attitudes and turnover. Group & Organization Management, 36: 191–222. Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles A., Renkema M., & Janssen M. 2017. HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46: 1228–1253. Google Scholar
• Bruch H., & Sattelberger T. 2001. Lufthansa’s transformation marathon: Process of liberating and focusing change energy. Human Resource Management, 40: 249–259. Google Scholar
• Bryant M., & Stensaker I. 2011. The competing roles of middle management: Negotiated order in the context of change. Journal of Change Management, 11: 353–373. Google Scholar
• Buchanan D. A. 2011. Reflections: Good practice, not rocket science–understanding failures to change after extreme events. Journal of Change Management, 11: 273–288. Google Scholar
• Burnes B. 2004a. Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management studies, 41: 977–1002. Google Scholar
• Burnes B. 2004b. Managing change: A strategic approach to organisational dynamics (4th rev. ed.). Essex, UK: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Burnes B. 2015. Understanding resistance to change—Building on Coch and French. Journal of Change Management, 15: 92–116. Google Scholar
• By R. T. 2005. Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5: 369–380. Google Scholar
• Caldwell S. D., Herold D. M., & Fedor D. B. 2004. Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: A cross-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 868–882. Google Scholar
• Carter M. Z., Armenakis A. A., Feild H. S., & Mossholder K. W. 2013. Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34: 942–958. Google Scholar
• Chan Y. E. 2002. Why haven’t we mastered alignment? The importance of the informal organization structure. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1: 97–112. Google Scholar
• Cinite I., Duxbury L. E., & Higgins C. 2009. Measurement of perceived organizational readiness for change in the public sector. British Journal of Management, 20: 265–277. Google Scholar
• Clark S. M., Gioia D. A., Ketchen D. J. Jr., & Thomas J. B. 2010. Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational identity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 397–438. Google Scholar
• Cobb A. T., Folger R., & Wooten K. 1995. The role justice plays in organizational change. Public Administration Quarterly, 19: 135–151. Google Scholar
• Coch L., & French J. R. P. Jr. 1948. Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1: 512–532. Google Scholar
• Cooperrider D. L., & Srivastva S. 1987. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In R. W. WoodmanW. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development: 129–169. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro J. A.-M. 1999. Employee participation and assessment of an organizational change intervention: A three-wave study of total quality management. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35: 439–456. Google Scholar
• Creed W. E. D., & Scully M. A. 2011. Songs of ourselves: Employees’ deployment of social identity in workplace encounters. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 408–429. Google Scholar
• Cummings T. G., & Worley C. G. 2009. Organization development and change. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Cunningham C. E., Woodward C. A., Shannon H. S., MacIntosh J., Lendrum B., Rosenbloom D., & Brown J. 2002. Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75: 377–392. Google Scholar
• Dahl M. S. 2011. Organizational change and employee stress. Management Science, 57: 240–256. Google Scholar
• Daly J. P., & Geyer P. D. 1994. The role of fairness in implementing large-scale change: Employee evaluations of process and outcome in seven facility relocations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 623–638. Google Scholar
• Day K. M., Armenakis A., Feild H. S., & Norris D. R. 2012. Other organizations are doing it, why shouldn’t we? A look at downsizing and organizational identity through an institutional theory lens. Journal of Change Management, 12: 165–188. Google Scholar
• Demerouti E., Xanthopoulou D., Petrou P., & Karagkounis C. 2017. Does job crafting assist dealing with organizational changes due to austerity measures? Two studies among Greek employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26: 574–589. Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T., Cummings L. L., & Pierce J. L. 1996. Psychological ownership in organizations: Conditions under which individuals promote and resist change. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 9: 1–23. Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., & Ashford S. J. 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Journal, 18: 397–428.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Ashford S. J., O’Neill R. M., & Lawrence K. A. 2001. Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 716–736.Link , Google Scholar
• Eby L. T., Adams D. M., Russell J. E. A., & Gaby S. H. 2000. Perceptions of organizational readiness for change: Factors related to employees’ reactions to the implementation of team-based selling. Human Relations, 53: 419–442. Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383. Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. 2002. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13: 128–146. Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., & Pisano G. P. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 685–716. Google Scholar
• Ericsson K. A. (Ed.). 2009. Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., & Pentland B. T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94–118. Google Scholar
• Ferlie E., Fitzgerald L., Wood M., & Hawkins C. 2005. The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 117–134.Link , Google Scholar
• Fligstein N. 1997. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 397–405. Google Scholar
• Frese M., Garst H., & Fay D. 2007. Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1084–1102. Google Scholar
• Friedlander F., & Brown L. D. 1974. Organization development. Annual Review of Psychology, 25: 313–341. Google Scholar
• Fugate M., & Kinicki A. J. 2008. A dispositional approach to employability: Development of a measure and test of implications for employee reactions to organizational change. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81: 503–527. Google Scholar
• Fugate M., Prussia G. E., & Kinicki A. J. 2012. Managing employee withdrawal during organizational change. Journal of Management, 38: 890–914. Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle K. 2013. How to change an organization without blowing it up. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54: 35–41. Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S. 2000. Missing organizational linkages. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Goodman P., Rousseau D., & Church A. 2004. Organizational change that produces results: The linkage approach [and executive commentary]. Academy of Management Executive, 18: 7–21.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Greenberg J. 1990. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts: Correction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 667. Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T., Robert G., Macfarlane F., Bate P., & Kyriakidou O. 2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82: 581–629. Google Scholar
• Griffin M. A., Parker S. K., & Mason C. M. 2010. Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 174–182. Google Scholar
• Griffin M. A., Rafferty A. E., & Mason C. M. 2004. Who started this? Investigating different sources of organizational change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18: 555–570. Google Scholar
• Hardeman W., Johnston M., Johnston D., Bonetti D., Wareham N., & Kinmonth A. L. 2002. Application of the theory of planned behaviour in behaviour change interventions: A systematic review. Psychology and Health, 17: 123–158. Google Scholar
• Harigopal K. 2006. Management of organizational change: Leveraging transformation (2nd ed.). New Delhi, India: Response Books. Google Scholar
• Heckmann N., Steger T., & Dowling M. 2016. Organizational capacity for change, change experience, and change project performance. Journal of Business Research, 69: 777–784. Google Scholar
• Herold D., Fedor D., & Caldwell S. 2007. Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees’ commitment to change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 942–951. Google Scholar
• Heyden M. L., Fourné S. P., Koene B. A., Werkman R., & Ansari S. S. 2017. Rethinking ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ roles of top and middle managers in organizational change: Implications for employee support. Journal of Management Studies, 54: 961–985. Google Scholar
• Hiatt J. M. 2006. ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community: How to implement successful change in our personal lives and professional careers. Loveland, CO: Prosci Research. Google Scholar
• Higgins M. C., Weiner J., & Young L. 2012. Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 366–388. Google Scholar
• Holbeche L. 2006. Understanding change: Theory, implementation and success. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. Google Scholar
• Hornung S., & Rousseau D. M. 2007. Active on the job—Proactive in change: How autonomy at work contributes to employee support for organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43: 401–426. Google Scholar
• Hornung S., Rousseau D. M., & Glaser J. 2008. Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 655–664. Google Scholar
• Hülsheger U. R., Anderson N., & Salgado J. F. 2009. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1128. Google Scholar
• Iverson R. D. 1996. Employee acceptance of organizational change: The role of organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7: 122–149. Google Scholar
• Jarrel T. 2017. Success factors for implementing change at scale. New York: McKinsey & Co Presentation, Behavioral Science & Policy Association. Google Scholar
• Jimmieson N., Peach M., & White K. M. 2008. Utilizing the theory of planned behavior to inform change management: An investigation of employee intentions to support organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44: 237–262. Google Scholar
• Judge T., Thoresen C., Pucik V., Welbourne T., & Murphy K. R. 1999. Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 107–122. Google Scholar
• Judson A. 1991. Changing behaviour in organizations: Minimizing resistance to change. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., & Klein G. 2009. Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64: 515–526. Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M. 1999. Change is everyone’s job: Managing the extended enterprise in a globally connected world. Organizational Dynamics, 28: 7–23. Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M., Stein B. A, & Jick T. D. 1992. The challenge of organizational change: How companies experience it and leaders guide it. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Kao R. H. 2017. The relationship between work characteristics and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A multi-level study on transformational leadership and organizational climate in immigration workers. Personnel Review, 46: 1890–1914. Google Scholar
• Kavanagh M. H., & Ashkanasy N. M. 2006. The impact of leadership and change management strategy on organizational culture and individual acceptance of change during a merger. British Journal of Management, 17: S81–S103. Google Scholar
• Kellogg K. C. 2012. Making the cut: Using status-based countertactics to block social movement implementation and microinstitutional change in surgery. Organization Science, 23: 1546–1570. Google Scholar
• Kerr S. 1975. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18: 769–783.Link , Google Scholar
• Kerr S. 1995. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive, 9: 7–14.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Kickul J., Lester S. W., & Finkl J. 2002. Promise breaking during radical organizational change: Do justice interventions make a difference? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 469–488. Google Scholar
• Kim T. G., Hornung S., & Rousseau D. M. 2011. Change-supportive employee behavior: Antecedents and the moderating role of time. Journal of Management, 37: 1664–1693. Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick S. A. 2009. Lead through vision and values. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd ed.): 367–387. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
• Kleingeld A., van Mierlo H., & Arends L. 2011. The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 1289–1304. Google Scholar
• Kluger A. N., & DeNisi A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254–284. Google Scholar
• Knight C., Patterson M., & Dawson J. 2017. Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38: 792–812. Google Scholar
• Koivisto S., Lipponen J., & Platow M. J. 2013. Organizational and supervisory justice effects on experienced threat during change: The moderating role of leader in-group representativeness. Leadership Quarterly, 24: 595–607. Google Scholar
• Kossek E., Lewis S., & Hammer L. B. 2010. Work—Life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human Relations, 63(1): 3–19. Google Scholar
• Kotter J. P. 1996. Leading change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
• Kotter J. P. 2005. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73: 59–67. Google Scholar
• Kotter J. P. 2012. Accelerate! How the most innovative companies capitalize on today’s rapid-fire strategic challenges—and still make their numbers. Harvard Business Review, 90: 43–58. Google Scholar
• Lam S. S., & Schaubroeck J. 2000. A field experiment testing frontline opinion leaders as change agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 987. Google Scholar
• Latham G. P., Winters D. C., & Locke E. A. 1994. Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 49–63. Google Scholar
• Lau C.-M., & Woodman R. 1995. Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 226. Google Scholar
• Laurin K., Kay A. C., & Fitzsimons G. J. 2012. Reactance versus rationalization: Divergent responses to constrained freedom. Psychological Science, 23: 205–209. Google Scholar
• Lazarus R. S., & Folkman S. 1984. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
• Leadership Competencies. 2008. Available at: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/behavioral-competencies/leadership-and-navigation/pages/leadershipcompetencies.aspx. Accessed September 15, 2017. Google Scholar
• Leppitt N. 2006. Challenging the code of change: Part 1. Praxis does not make perfect. Journal of Change Management, 6: 121–142. Google Scholar
• Lewin K. 1948. Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper. Google Scholar
• Lewin K. 1952. Selected theoretical papers. London: Tavistock. Google Scholar
• Linden D. V. D., Keijsers G. P., Eling P., & Schaijk R. V. 2005. Work stress and attentional difficulties: An initial study on burnout and cognitive failures. Work & Stress, 19: 23–36. Google Scholar
• Lippitt R., Watson J., & Westley B. 1958. The dynamics of planned change. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., & Latham G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Locke E. A., & Latham G. P. 2006. New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15: 265–268. Google Scholar
• Loeser H., O’Sullivan P., & Irby P. 2007. Leadership lessons from curricular change and the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. Academic Medicine, 82: 324–330. Google Scholar
• Lok P., Hung R. Y., Walsh P., Wang P., & Crawford J. 2005. An integrative framework for measuring the extent to which organizational variables influence the success of process improvement programmes. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1357–1381. Google Scholar
• Malina M. A., & Selto F. H. 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13: 47–90. Google Scholar
• Marin-Garcia J. A., & Tomas J. M. 2016. Deconstructing AMO framework: A systematic review. Intangible Capital, 12: 1040–1087. Google Scholar
• Marshak R. J. 2002. Changing the language of change: How new contexts and concepts are challenging the ways we think and talk about organizational change. Strategic Change, 11: 279–286. Google Scholar
• Mathieu J. E., & Zajac D. M. 1990. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108: 171–194. Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709–734.Link , Google Scholar
• McCauley C. 2006. Developmental assignments: Creating learning experiences without changing jobs. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership Press. Google Scholar
• McCormack B., Rycroft-Malone J., DeCorby K., Hutchinson A. M., Bucknall T., Kent B., Schultz A., Snelgrove-Clarke E., Stetler C., Titler M., Wallin L., & Wilson V. 2013. A realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-informed healthcare: A focus on change agency. Implementation Science, 8: 107. Google Scholar
• McCracken M., & McIvor R. 2013. Transforming the HR function through outsourced shared services: Insights from the public sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24: 1685–1707. Google Scholar
• Meaney M., & Pung C. 2008. McKinsey global results: Creating organizational transformations. McKinsey Quarterly: 1–7. Google Scholar
• Melkonian T., Monin P., & Noorderhaven N. 2011. Distributive justice, procedural justice, exemplarity, and employees’ willingness to cooperate in M&A integration processes: Analysis of the air France-KLM merger. Human Resource Management, 50: 809–837. Google Scholar
• Meuris J., & Leana C. R. 2015. The high cost of low wages: Economic scarcity effects in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35: 143–158. Google Scholar
• Meyer J. P., Srinivas E. S., Lal J. B., & Topolnytsky L. 2007. Employee commitment and support for an organizational change: Test of the three-component model in two cultures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80: 185–211. Google Scholar
• Michela J. L., & Vena J. 2012. A dependence-regulation account of psychological distancing in response to major organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 12: 77–94. Google Scholar
• Mirvis P. H. 1985. Negotiations after the sale: The roots and ramifications of conflict in an acquisition. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 6: 65–84. Google Scholar
• Morrison E. W., & Phelps C. C. 1999. Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 403–419.Link , Google Scholar
• Nadler D. A. 1976. The use of feedback for organizational change: Promises and pitfalls. Group & Organization Studies, 1: 177–186. Google Scholar
• Nelson A., Cooper C. L., & Jackson P. R. 1995. Uncertainty amidst change: The impact of privatization on employee job satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68: 57–71. Google Scholar
• Nesler M. S., Aguinis H., Quigley B. M., & Tedeschi J. T. 1993. The effect of credibility on perceived power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23: 1407–1425. Google Scholar
• Neubert M. J. 1998. The value of feedback and goal setting over goal setting alone and potential moderators of this effect: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 11: 321–335. Google Scholar
• Neuman G. A., Edwards J. E., & Raju N. S. 1989. Organizational development interventions: A meta-analysis of their effects on satisfaction and other attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 42: 461–489. Google Scholar
• Nurick A. J. 1982. Participation in organizational change: A longitudinal field study. Human Relations, 35: 413–429. Google Scholar
• Nutt P. C. 1999. Surprising but true: Half the decisions in organizations fail. Academy of Management Executive, 13: 75–90.Abstract , Google Scholar
• O’Leary-Kelly A. M., Martocchio J. J., & Frink D. D. 1994. A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1285–1301.Link , Google Scholar
• Oreg S., Vakola M., & Armenakis A. 2011. Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47: 461–524. Google Scholar
• Parker S. K., Williams H. M., & Turner N. 2006. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 636–652. Google Scholar
• Peach M., Jimmieson N. L., & White K. M. 2005. Beliefs underlying employee readiness to support a building relocation: A theory of planned behavior perspective. Organization Development Journal, 23: 9–22. Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A., Woodman R., & Cameron K. 2001. Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 697–713.Link , Google Scholar
• Phelan M. W. 2005. Cultural revitalization movements in organization change management. Journal of Change Management, 5: 47–56. Google Scholar
• Piderit S. K. 2000. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25: 783–794.Link , Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan C. 2004. The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34: 243–281. Google Scholar
• Pritchard R. D., Harrell M. M., DiazGranados D., & Guzman M. J. 2008. The productivity measurement and enhancement system: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 540–567. Google Scholar
• Proudfoot D., & Kay A. C. 2014. System justification in organizational contexts: How a motivated preference for the status quo can affect organizational attitudes and behaviors. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34: 173–187. Google Scholar
• Rafferty A. E., & Griffin M. A. 2006. Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 1154–1162. Google Scholar
• Rafferty A. E., & Restubog S. L. D. 2017. Why do employees’ perceptions of their organization’s change history matter? The role of change appraisals. Human Resource Management, 56: 533–550. Google Scholar
• Rafferty A. E., & Simons R. H. 2006. An examination of the antecedents of readiness for fine-tuning and corporate transformation changes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20: 325–350. Google Scholar
• Reay T., Golden-Biddle K., & Germann K. 2006. Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 977–998.Link , Google Scholar
• Reiman T., & Pietikäinen E. 2012. Leading indicators of system safety–monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Safety Science, 50: 1993–2000. Google Scholar
• Rerup C., & Feldman M. S. 2011. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 577–610.Link , Google Scholar
• Rich A., Brandes K., Mullan B., & Hagger M. S. 2015. Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38: 673–688. Google Scholar
• Robinson O., & Griffiths A. 2005. Coping with the stress of transformational change in a government department. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41: 204–221. Google Scholar
• Rodell J. B., & Colquitt J. A. 2009. Looking ahead in times of uncertainty: The role of anticipatory justice in an organizational change context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 989–1002. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M. 1995. Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M. 1996. Changing the deal while keeping the people. Academy of Management Executive, 10: 50–61.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M. 2005. I-deals: Idiosyncratic deals workers bargain for themselves. New York: M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M. 2018. Making evidence-based organizational decisions. Organizational Dynamics, in press. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., & Gunia B. C. 2016. Evidence-based practice: The psychology of EBP implementation. Annual Review of Psychology, 67: 667–692. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., Hansen S., & Tomprou T. 2018. A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, in press. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., Manning J., & Denyer D. 2008. Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 475–515.Link , Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S., & Camerer C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393–404.Link , Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., & Tijoriwala S. 1999. What’s a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in promoting organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 514–528. Google Scholar
• Sackett D. L., Straus S. E., Richardson W. S., Rosenberg W., & Haynes R. B. 2000. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone. Google Scholar
• Sastry M. A. 1997. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 237–275. Google Scholar
• Schechter C., & Qadach M. 2012. Toward an organizational model of change in elementary schools: The contribution of organizational learning mechanisms. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48: 116–153. Google Scholar
• Scheck C. L., & Kinicki A. J. 2000. Identifying the antecedents of coping with an organizational acquisition: A structural assessment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21: 627–648. Google Scholar
• Schweiger D. M., & DeNisi A. S. 1991. Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 110–135.Link , Google Scholar
• Schweitzer M. E., Ordóñez L., & Douma B. 2004. Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 422–432.Link , Google Scholar
• Seijts G. H., & Latham G. P. 2005. Learning versus performance goals: When should each be used? Academy of Management Executive, 19: 124–131.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Senge P. M, Kleiner A., & Roberts C. 1996. Het vijfde discipline praktijkboek: Strategieen en instrumenten voor het bouwen van een lerende organisatie [The fifth discipline practice book: Strategies and instruments for building a learning organization], vol. 2. Schoonhoven, The Netherlands: Academic service. Google Scholar
• Shapiro D. L., Buttner E. H., & Barry B. 1994. Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58: 346–368. Google Scholar
• Sharif M. M., & Scandura T. A. 2014. Do perceptions of ethical conduct matter during organizational change? Ethical leadership and employee involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124: 185–196. Google Scholar
• Shaw J. C., Wild E., & Colquitt J. A. 2003. To justify or excuse? A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 444–458. Google Scholar
• Shojania K. G., Ranji S. R., Shaw L. K., Charo L. M., Lai J. C., Rushakoff R. J., McDonald K. M., & Owens D. K. 2004. Diabetes mellitus care. In K. G. ShojaniaK. M. McDonaldR. M. WachterD. K. Owens (Eds.), Closing the quality gap: A critical analysis of quality improvement strategies. Technical Review 9, vol. 2. Rockville, MD: Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-Based Practice Center. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Google Scholar
• Simpson R. 1998. Presenteeism, power and organizational change: Long hours as a career barrier and the impact on the working lives of women managers. British Journal of Management, 9: 37–50. Google Scholar
• Soenen G., Melkonian T., & Ambrose M. L. 2017. To shift or not to shift? Determinants and consequences of phase shifting on justice judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 798–817.Link , Google Scholar
• Stanley D. J., Meyer J. P., & Topolnytsky L. 2005. Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19: 429–459. Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., & Dutton J. E. 1981. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 501–524. Google Scholar
• Szamosi L. T., & Duxbury L. 2002. Development of a measure to assess organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15: 184–201. Google Scholar
• ten Have S., ten Have W., Huijsmans A. B., & Otto M. 2016. Reconsidering change management: Applying evidence-based insights in change management practice, vol. 16. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Tichy N., & DeVanna M. 1986. The transformational leader. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., & Romanelli E. 1985. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. StawL. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: 171–222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Tyler T. R., & Blader S. L. 2003. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7: 349–361. Google Scholar
• Unsworth K. L., Dmitrieva A., & Adriasola E. 2013. Changing behaviour: Increasing the effectiveness of workplace interventions in creating pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34: 211–229. Google Scholar
• Vakola M., & Nikolaou I. 2005. Attitudes towards organizational change: What is the role of employees’ stress and commitment? Employee Relations, 27: 160–174. Google Scholar
• Valentino C. 2004. The role of middle managers in the transmission and integration of organizational culture. Journal of Healthcare Management, 49: 393–404. Google Scholar
• Valleala U. M., Herranen S., Collin K., & Paloniemi S. 2015. Fostering learning opportunities through employee participation amid organizational change. Vocations and Learning, 8: 1–34. Google Scholar
• van der Smissen S., Schalk R., & Freese C. 2013. Organizational change and the psychological contract: How change influences the perceived fulfillment of obligations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26: 1071–1090. Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg B., Martin L., & Tyler T. 2006. Process-orientation versus outcome-orientation during organizational change: The role of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 685–704. Google Scholar
• Wagner J. A. 1994. Participation’s effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19: 312–330.Link , Google Scholar
• Wagner J. A. 2009. Use participation to share information and distribute knowledge. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd ed.): 445–460. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Wanberg C. R., & Banas J. T. 2000. Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 132–142. Google Scholar
• Wanberg C. R., Gavin M. B., & Bunce L. W. 1999. Perceived fairness of layoffs among individuals who have been laid off: A longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 52: 59–84. Google Scholar
• Weiner B. J., Amick H., & Lee S. Y. D. 2008. Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: A review of the literature in health services research and other fields. Medical Care Research and Review, 65: 379–436. Google Scholar
• Wensing M., Wollersheim H., & Grol R. 2006. Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: A structured review of reviews. Implementation Science, 1: 2. Google Scholar
• Westerlund A., Garvare R., Höög E., & Nyström M. E. 2015. Facilitating system-wide organizational change in health care. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7: 72–89. Google Scholar
• Wiedner R., Barrett M., & Oborn E. 2017. The emergence of change in unexpected places: Resourcing across organizational practices in strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 823–854.Link , Google Scholar
• Wright P., & Nishii L. H. 2013. Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. In D. GuestJ. PaauweP. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges: 97–110. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Wrzesniewski A., & Dutton J. E. 2001. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26: 179–201.Link , Google Scholar
• Zadeh L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8: 338–353. Google Scholar
• Zheng W., Yang B., & McLean G. N. 2010. Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63: 763–771. Google Scholar