Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0084

Tacit knowledge is the knowledge that we draw on in use, but is difficult to have consciousness of, or to express in language. The proliferation in the use of tacit knowledge in management research has generated a diversity of understandings that has reduced the clarity of the concept. In this review, our main goal was to contribute to an integrative theorizing of tacit knowledge. In particular, we aim to grasp the different understandings of tacit knowledge, trace them to the onto-epistemological assumptions researchers make concerning the nature of knowledge and action, and suggest a framework that enables researchers to get a coherent understanding of the diverse literature. We identify three perspectives on tacit knowledge: the conversion, interactional, and practice perspectives. We describe each perspective, trace its development to particular ontological and epistemological commitments, and discuss commonalities and differences. Furthermore, we reflect on methodological issues and suggest possibilities for further research, including the relationship between artificial intelligence and tacit knowledge.

REFERENCES

  • Akbar, H. 2003. Knowledge levels and their transformation: Towards the integration of knowledge creation and individual learning. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8): 1997–2021. Google Scholar
  • Akbar, H., & Tzokas, N. 2013. An exploration of new product development’s front-end knowledge conceptualization process in discontinuous innovations. British Journal of Management, 24(2): 245–263. Google Scholar
  • Almeida, P., Song, J. Y., & Grant, R. M. 2002. Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organization Science, 13(2): 147–161. Google Scholar
  • Almond, P. 2011. The sub-national embeddedness of international HRM. Human Relations, 64(4): 1–21. Google Scholar
  • Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. 2000. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9): 1125–1149. Google Scholar
  • Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. 2001. Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7): 994–1018. Google Scholar
  • Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. 2001. Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6): 811–829. Google Scholar
  • Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. 2005. Reducing causal ambiguity to facilitate strategic learning. Management Learning, 36(4): 493–512. Google Scholar
  • Aplaydin, E. 2016. Machine learning: The new AI. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
  • Armstrong, S. J., & Li, Y. 2017. A study of Anglo expatriate managers’ learning, knowledge acquisition, and adjustment in multinational companies in China. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(1): 1–22.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong, S. J., & Mahmud, A. 2008. Experiential learning an acquisition of manage tacit knowledge. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2): 189–208.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold, V., Clark, N., Collier, P. A., Leech, S. A., & Sutton, S. G. 2006. The differential use and effect of knowledge based system explanations in novice and expert judgment decisions. MIS Quarterly, 30(1): 79–97. Google Scholar
  • Athanassiou, N., & Douglas, N. 1999. The impact of U.S. Company internationalization on top management team advice networks: A tacit knowledge perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1): 83–92. Google Scholar
  • Attewell, P. 1992. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1): 1–19. Google Scholar
  • Baldwin, T. T., Pierce, J. R., Joines, R. C., & Farouk, S. 2011. The elusiveness of applied management knowledge: A critical challenge for management educators. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4): 583–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett, M., Oborn, E., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. 2012. Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organization Science, 23(5): 1448–1466. Google Scholar
  • Barthélemy, J. 2008. Opportunism, knowledge, and the performance of franchise chains. Strategic Management Journal, 29(13): 1451–1463. Google Scholar
  • Baum, J. R., Bird, B. J., & Singh, S. 2011. The practical intelligence of entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a link with new venture growth. Personnel Psychology, 64(2): 397–425. Google Scholar
  • Beane, M., & Orlikowski, W. J. 2015. What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organization Science, 26(6): 1553–1573. Google Scholar
  • Becerra, M., Lunnan, R., & Huemer, L. 2008. Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4): 691–713. Google Scholar
  • Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. W. L. 2002. Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the national basketball association. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 13–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. 2009. The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3): 481–509. Google Scholar
  • Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R., & Ridderstrale, J. 2002. Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organization Science, 13(3): 274–289. Google Scholar
  • Blackman, D., & Sadler-Smith, E. 2009. The silent and the silenced in organizational knowing and learning. Management Learning, 40(5): 569–585. Google Scholar
  • Bloodgood, J. M., Morrow, J. L., & Morrow Jr., J. L. 2003. Strategic organizational change: Exploring the roles of environmental structure, internal conscious awareness and knowledge. Journal of Management Studies, 40(7): 1761–1782. Google Scholar
  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. 2001. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2): 198–213. Google Scholar
  • Burke, L. A., & Sadler-Smith, E. 2006. Instructor intuition in the educational setting. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(2): 169–181.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. 2016. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Burt, R. S. 2007. Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 119–148.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Castillo, J. 2002. A note on the concept of tacit knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(1): 46–57. Google Scholar
  • Cattani, G., Dunbar, R. L. M., & Shapira, Z. 2013. Value creation and knowledge loss: The case of Cremonese stringed instruments. Organization Science, 24(3): 813–830. Google Scholar
  • Chia, R. 2000. Organizational analysis as discourse analysis: A critique. Organization, 7(3): 513–518. Google Scholar
  • Choudhury, P. 2017. Innovation outcomes in a distributed organization: Intrafirm mobility and access to resources. Organization Science, 28(2): 339–354. Google Scholar
  • Christian, M. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. 2010. Situational judgment tests: Constructs assessed and a meta-analysis of their criterion-related validities. Personnel Psychology, 63(1): 83–117. Google Scholar
  • Chuang, C.-H., Jackson, S. E., & Jiang, Y. 2016. Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership, and tacit knowledge. Journal of Management, 42(2): 524–554. Google Scholar
  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van de Velde, E. 2011. Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spin-off companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6): 1420–1442. Google Scholar
  • Coff, R. W., Coff, D. C., & Eastvold, R. 2006. The knowledge-leveraging paradox: How to achieve scale without making knowledge imitable. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 452–465.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Collins, H. 2006. Bicycling on the moon: Collective tacit knowledge and somatic-limit tacit knowledge. Organization Studies, 28(2): 257–262. Google Scholar
  • Collins, H. 2010. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. 1999. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4): 381–400. Google Scholar
  • Cunliffe, A. 2002. Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33(1): 35–61. Google Scholar
  • D’Eredita, M., & Barreto, C. 2006. How does tacit knowledge proliferate? An episode-based perspective. Organization Studies, 27(12): 1821–1841. Google Scholar
  • Donaldson, L. 2001. Reflections on knowledge and knowledge intensive firms. Human Relations, 54(7): 955–963. Google Scholar
  • Dörfler, V., & Ackermann, F. 2012. Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition. Management Learning, 43(5): 545–564. Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus, H. L. 2017. On expertise and embodiment: Insights from Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Samuel Todes. In J. SandbergL. RouleauA. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), Skillful performance: Enacting capabilities, knowledge, competence and expertise in organizations: 147–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus, H. L. 1988. The socratic and platonic basis of cognitivism. AI & Society, 2(2): 99–112. Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus, H. L. 2007. Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18): 1137–1160. Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus, H. L. 2014. In M. A. Wrathall (Ed.), Skillful coping: Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. 2005. Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5): 779–792. Google Scholar
  • Dutta, S., & Weiss, A. M. 1997. The relationship between a firm’s level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements. Management Science, 43(3): 343–356. Google Scholar
  • Dyck, B., Starke, F. A., Mischke, G. A., & Mauws, M. 2005. Learning to build a car: An empirical investigation of organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2): 387–416. Google Scholar
  • Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. 2011. The evolving field of organizational learning and knowledge management. In M. Easterby-SmithM. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed.): 1–22. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Ebbers, J. J., & Wijnberg, N. M. 2009. Organizational memory: From expectations memory to procedural memory. British Journal of Management, 20(4): 478–490. Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • El Arkemi, A., Mignonac, K., & Perrigot, R. 2010. Opportunistic behaviours in franchise chains: The role of cohesion among franchises. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 930–948. Google Scholar
  • Elster, J. 2015. Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Enberg, C., Lindkvist, L., & Tell, F. 2006. Exploring the dynamics of knowledge integration: Acting and interacting in project teams. Management Learning, 37(2): 143–165. Google Scholar
  • Fabrizio, K. R., & Thomas, L. G. 2012. The impact of local demand on innovation in a global industry. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1): 42–64. Google Scholar
  • Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. 2018. Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1): 62–70. Google Scholar
  • Feldman, E. R. 2014. Legacy divestitures: Motives and implications. Organization Science, 25(3): 815–832. Google Scholar
  • Feller, J., Parhankangas, A., Smeds, R., & Jaatinen, M. 2013. How companies learn to collaborate: Emergence of improved inter-organizational processes in R&D alliances. Organization Studies, 34(3): 313–343. Google Scholar
  • Fey, C., & Furu, P. 2008. Top management incentive compensation and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1301–1323. Google Scholar
  • Fu, X. 2012. Foreign direct investment and managerial knowledge spillovers through the diffusion of management practices. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5): 970–999. Google Scholar
  • Galunic, C., & Rodan, S. 1998. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1193–1201. Google Scholar
  • Gehman, J., Trevino, L. K., & Garud, R. 2013. Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organisational values practice. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 84–112.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Voelpel, S. C. 2017. A phase model of intergenerational learning in organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2): 193–216.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerwin, D., & Ferris, J. S. 2004. Organizing new product development projects in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 15(1): 22–37. Google Scholar
  • Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. 2000. To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization, 7(2): 329–348. Google Scholar
  • Gourlay, S. 2006a. Conceptualizing knowledge creation: A critique of nonaka’s theory. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7): 1415–1436. Google Scholar
  • Gourlay, S. 2006b. Towards conceptual clarity for ‘tacit knowledge’: A review of empirical studies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(1): 60–69. Google Scholar
  • Gray, J. V., Siemsen, E., & Vasudeva, G. 2015. Colocation still matters: Conformance quality and the interdependence of R&D and manufacturing in the pharmaceutical industry. Management Science, 61(11): 2760–2781. Google Scholar
  • Griffith, T. L., & Sawyer, J. E. 2010. Multilevel knowledge and team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1003–1031. Google Scholar
  • Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. 2003. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(2): 265–287. Google Scholar
  • Gueldenberg, S., & Helting, H. 2007. Bridging “the great divide”: Nonaka’s synthesis of “western” and “eastern” knowledge concepts reassessed. Organization, 14(1): 101–122. Google Scholar
  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 496, 473–496. Google Scholar
  • Hall, R. 1992. The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 135–144. Google Scholar
  • Harré, R. 1985. The philosophies of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Hecker, A. 2012. Knowledge beyond the individual? Making sense of a notion of collective knowledge in organization theory. Organization Studies, 33(3): 423–445. Google Scholar
  • Hedlund, G. 1994. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 73–90. Google Scholar
  • Helfat, C. E. 1994. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science, 40(12): 1720–1747. Google Scholar
  • Helfat, C. E. 1997. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5): 339–360. Google Scholar
  • Hong, J. F. L. 2012. Glocalizing Nonaka’s knowledge creation model: Issues and challenges. Management Learning, 43(2): 199–215. Google Scholar
  • Huang, X., Po-An Hsieh, J. J., & He, W. 2014. Expertise dissimilarity and creativity: The contingent roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5): 816–830. Google Scholar
  • Inkpen, A. C., & Dinur, A. 1998. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9(4): 454–468. Google Scholar
  • Inkpen, A. C., & Pien, W. 2006. An examination of collaboration and knowledge transfer: China-Singapore suzhou industrial park. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4): 779–811. Google Scholar
  • Ivory, C. J., Alderman, N., Thwaites, A. T., McLoughlin, I. P., & Vaughan, R. 2007. Working around the barriers to creating and sharing knowledge in capital goods projects: The client’s perspective. British Journal of Management, 18(3): 224–240. Google Scholar
  • Janowicz-Panjaitan, M., & Noorderhaven, N. G. 2009. Trust, calculation, and interorganizational learning of tacit knowledge: An organizational roles perspective. Organization Studies, 30(10): 1021–1044. Google Scholar
  • Kachra, A., & White, R. E. 2008. Know-how transfer: The role of social economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management Journal, 51(2): 315–334. Google Scholar
  • Kale, P., & Singh, H. 2007. Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 981–1000. Google Scholar
  • Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 217–237. Google Scholar
  • Kalnins, A., & Mayer, K. J. 2004. Franchising, ownership, and experience: A study of pizza restaurant survival. Management Science, 50(12): 1716–1728. Google Scholar
  • Kamoche, K., Beise-Zee, R., & Mamman, A. 2014. Knowledge appropriation and identity: Toward a multi-discourse analysis. Organization Studies, 35(9): 1373–1392. Google Scholar
  • Kamoche, K., & Maguire, K. 2011. Pit sense: Appropriation of practice-based knowledge in a UK coalmine. Human Relations, 64(5): 725–744. Google Scholar
  • Kayes, D. C. 2002. Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2): 137–149.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kidd, J. 1998. Knowledge creation in Japanese manufacturing companies in Italy. Management Learning, 29(2): 131–146. Google Scholar
  • Kim, D.-J., & Kogut, B. 1996. Technological platforms and diversification. Organization Science, 7(3): 283–301. Google Scholar
  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397. Google Scholar
  • Krumm, S., Lievens, F., Hüffmeier, J., Lipnevich, A. A., Bendels, H., & Hertel, G. 2015. How “situational” is judgment in situational judgment tests? Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2): 399–416. Google Scholar
  • Kudesia, R. 2019. Mindfulness as metacognitive practice. Academy of Management Review, 44(2): 405–423.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laing, A., Sporn, B., Galliers, B., & Roe, B. 2015. Academic journal guide 2015. London: Association of Business Schools. Google Scholar
  • Lam, A. 1997. Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: Problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organization Studies, 18(6): 973–996. Google Scholar
  • Lam, A. 2000. Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3): 487–513. Google Scholar
  • Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. 2017. Introduction: Process thinking, process theorizing and process researching. In A. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), The Sage handbook of process organization studies: 1–26. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar
  • Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2015. The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations for organizational curatorship. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 397–415. Google Scholar
  • Lecuona, J., & Reitzig, M. 2014. Knowledge worth having in “excess”: The value of tacit and firm-specific human resource slack. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 954–973. Google Scholar
  • Lee, D., & Van den Steen, E. 2010. Managing know-how. Management Science, 56(2): 270–285. Google Scholar
  • Lehrer, M., & Asakawa, K. 2003. Managing intersecting R&D social communities: A comparative study of European knowledge incubators in Japanese and American firms. Organization Studies, 24(5): 771–792. Google Scholar
  • Lei, D., Hitt, M. A., & Bettis, R. 1996. Dynamic core competences through meta-learning and strategic context. Journal of Management, 22(4): 549–569. Google Scholar
  • Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. 2011. The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. In D. Leonard (Ed.), Managing knowledge assets, creativity and innovation: 301–323. Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar
  • Leonardi, P., & Bailey, D. 2008. Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quarterly, 32(2): 411–436. Google Scholar
  • Leroy, F. F., & Ramanantsoa, B. 1997. The cognitive and behavioural dimensions of organizational learning in a merger: An empirical study. Journal of Management Studies, 34(6): 871–894. Google Scholar
  • Levin, D., & Cross, R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11): 1477. Google Scholar
  • Levitas, E., & Chi, T. 2002. Rethinking Rouse and Daellenbach’s rethinking: Isolating vs. testing for sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10): 957–962. Google Scholar
  • Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2010. Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(4): 349–370. Google Scholar
  • Li, M., & Gao, F. 2003. Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: A critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4): 6–14. Google Scholar
  • Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. 2011. The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5): 927–940. Google Scholar
  • Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. 2012. The validity of interpersonal skills assessment via situational judgment tests for predicting academic success and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2): 460–468. Google Scholar
  • Lindley, E., & Wheeler, F. P. 2000. The learning square: Four domains that impact on strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(4): 357–364. Google Scholar
  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. 2014. Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 57–125.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martenson, P., & Lee, A. 2004. Dialogical action research at omega corporation. MIS Quarterly, 28(3): 507–536. Google Scholar
  • Martin, A., Woods, M., & Dawkins, S. 2015. Mental health issues: Identification of conceptual and procedural knowledge for development within management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(1): 50–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martin, X., & Salomon, R. 2003. Tacitness, learning, and international expansion: A study of foreign direct investment in a knowledge-intensive industry. Organization Science, 14(3): 297–311. Google Scholar
  • McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P., & Cudeck, R. 1994. A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4): 493–505. Google Scholar
  • Miller, K. 2008. Simon and Polanyi on rationality and knowledge. Organization Studies, 29(7): 933–955. Google Scholar
  • Miller, K., Zhao, M., & Calantone, R. J. 2006. Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March’s exploration-exploitation model. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 709–722.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mohr, L. 1982. Explaining organizational behaviour. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  • Moreno-Luzón, M. D., & Begoña Lloria, M. 2008. The role of non-structural and informal mechanisms of integration and coordination as forces in knowledge creation. British Journal of Management, 19(3): 250–276. Google Scholar
  • Morgan, G. 1997. Images of organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  • Motowidlo, S. J., & Beier, M. E. 2010. Differentiating specific job knowledge from implicit trait policies in procedural knowledge measured by a situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2): 321–333. Google Scholar
  • Mueller, F. 1996. Human resources as strategic assets: An evolutionalry resource-based theory*. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6): 757–785. Google Scholar
  • Munoz, C. A., Mosey, S., & Binks, M. 2011. Developing opportunity-identification capabilities in the classroom: Visual evidence. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(2): 277–295. Google Scholar
  • Nagarajan, A., & Mitchell, W. 1998. Evolutionary diffusion: Internal and external methods used to acquire encompassing, complementary, and incremental technological changes in the lithotripsy industry. Strategic Management Journal, 19(11): 1063–1077. Google Scholar
  • Nagel, T. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4): 435–450. Google Scholar
  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. 2008. The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2): 392–423. Google Scholar
  • Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37. Google Scholar
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. 2009. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3): 635–652. Google Scholar
  • Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. C. 2006. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8): 1179–1208. Google Scholar
  • Oborn, E., & Dawson, S. 2010. Knowledge and practice in multidisciplinary teams: Struggle, accommodation and privilege. Human Relations, 63(12): 1835–1857. Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing. Organization Science, 13(3): 249–273. Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. 2008. 10 sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1): 433–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. 2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5): 538–550. Google Scholar
  • Pentland, B. T. 2003. Sequential variety in work processes. Organization Science, 14(5): 528–540. Google Scholar
  • Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. 2004. Discourse and institutions. Academy of Magagement Review, 29(4): 635–652.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Polanyi, M. 1966a. The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, 41(155): 1–18. Google Scholar
  • Polanyi, M. 1966b. The tacit dimension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. 1977. Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. 2017. Thinking together: What makes communities of practice work? Human Relations, 70(4): 389–409. Google Scholar
  • Radman, Z. 2012. In Z. Radman (Ed.), Knowing without thinking. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave. Google Scholar
  • Raelin, J. A. 1997. A model of work-based learning. Organization Science, 8(6): 563–578. Google Scholar
  • Raelin, J. A. 2007. Toward an epistemology of practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(4): 495–519.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ribeiro, R. 2017. The embodied versus embedded versions of expertise: Revisiting the dreyfus-collins debate. In J. SandbergL. RouleauA. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), Skillful performance: Enacting capabilities, knowledge, competence and expertise in organizations: 184–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Ribeiro, R., & Collins, H. 2007. The bread-making machine: Tacit knowledge and two types of action. Organization Studies, 28(9): 1417–1433. Google Scholar
  • Robins, J., & Wiersema, M. F. 1995. A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4): 277–299. Google Scholar
  • Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  • Rouleau, L. 2005. Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7): 1413–1441. Google Scholar
  • Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson. Google Scholar
  • Salisbury, M. 2001. An example of managing the knowledge creation process for a small work group. Management Learning, 32(3): 305–319. Google Scholar
  • Salomon, R., & Martin, X. 2008. Learning, knowledge transfer, and technology implementation performance: A study of time-to-build in the global semiconductor industry. Management Science, 54(7): 1266–1280. Google Scholar
  • Sandberg, J., & Pinnington, A. H. 2009. Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7): 1138–1170. Google Scholar
  • Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. 2015. Making sense of the sensemaking perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36: S6–S32. Google Scholar
  • Sandberg, J., Rouleau, L., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. 2017. Introduction: Skillful performance, enacting capabilities, knowledge, competence, and expertise in organizations. In J. SandbergL. RouleauA. LangleyH. Tsoukas (Eds.), Skillful performance: Enacting capabilities, knowledge, competence and expertise in organizations: 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. 2011. Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 338–360.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling, M. A., & Steensma, H. K. 2002. Disentangling the theories of firm boundaries: A path model and empirical test. Organization Science, 13(4): 387–401. Google Scholar
  • Schweizer, L. 2005. Organizational integration of acquired biotechnology companies into pharmaceutical companies: The need for a hybrid approach. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1051–1074.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schwens, C., Eiche, J., & Kabst, R. 2011. The moderating impact of informal institutional distance and formal institutional risk on SME entry mode choice. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 330–351. Google Scholar
  • Shamsie, J., & Mannor, M. J. 2013. Looking inside the dream team: Probing into the contributions of tacit knowledge as an organizational resource. Organization Science, 24(2): 513–529. Google Scholar
  • Shenkar, O., & Li, J. 1999. Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organization Science, 10(2): 134–143. Google Scholar
  • Shoham, Y., Perrault, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Clark, J., & LeGassick, C. 2017. Artificial Intelligence Index: 2017 annual report. Artificial Intelligence Index. Google Scholar
  • Shotter, J. 2005. Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies, 27(4): 585–604. Google Scholar
  • Shotter, J., & Katz, A. 1996. Articulating a practice from within the practice itself: Establishing formative dialogues by the use of a ‘social poetics’. Concepts and Transformation, 1(2/3): 213–237. Google Scholar
  • Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. 2014. In search of phronesis: Leadership and the art of judgment. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(2): 224–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silver, D., Huang, A., Madisson, C., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. 2016. Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529: 484–489. Google Scholar
  • Singh, J., & Agrawal, A. 2011. Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Science, 57(1): 129–150. Google Scholar
  • Singh, H., Dryscynski, D., Li, X., & Ram, G. 2016. Pipes, pools, and filters: How collaboration networks affect innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 1649–1666. Google Scholar
  • Sitzmann, T. 2011. A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2): 489–528. Google Scholar
  • Sitzmann, T., Bell, B. S., Kraiger, K., & Kanar, A. M. 2009. A multilevel analysis of the effect of prompting self-regulation in technology-delivered instruction. Personnel Psychology, 62: 697–734. Google Scholar
  • Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. 2006. The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction. Personnel Psychology, 59: 623–664. Google Scholar
  • Spencer, J. W. 2008. The impact of multinational enterprise strategy on indigenous enterprises: Horizontal spillovers and crowding out in developing countries. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 341–361.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spender, J.-C. 2008. Organizational learning and knowledge management: Whence and whither? Management Learning, 39(2): 159–176. Google Scholar
  • Sternberg, R. J. 1997. Managerial intelligence: Why IQ isn’t enough. Journal of Management, 23(3): 475–493. Google Scholar
  • Styhre, A., Josephson, P., & Knauseder, I. 2006. Organization learning in non-writing communities: The case of construction workers. Management Learning, 37(1): 83–100. Google Scholar
  • Subramaniam, M., Rosenthal, S. R., & Hatten, K. J. 1998. Global new product development processes: Preliminary findings and research propositions. Journal of Management Studies, 35(6): 773–796. Google Scholar
  • Suddaby, R. 2010. Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 346–357.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swart, J. 2011. That’s why it matters: How knowing creates value. Management Learning, 42(3): 319–332. Google Scholar
  • Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., & Jensen, R. J. 2016. Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organization Science, 27(2): 304–322. Google Scholar
  • Tamer Cavusgil, S., Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. 2003. Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1): 6–21. Google Scholar
  • Tell, F. 2004. What do organizations know? Dynamics of justification contexts in R&D activities. Organization, 11(4): 443–471. Google Scholar
  • Thomas, K., & Allen, S. 2006. The learning organization: A meta‐analysis of themes in literature. The Learning Organization, 13(2): 123–139. Google Scholar
  • Thompson, M. 2011. Ontological shift or ontological drift? Reality claims, epistemological frameworks, and theory generation in organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 36(4): 754–773.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson, P., Warhurst, C., & Callaghan, G. 2001. Ignorant theory and knowledgeable workers: Interrogating the connections between knowledge, skills and services. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7): 1–942. Google Scholar
  • Trantopoulos, K., von Krogh, G., Wallin, M., & Woerter, M. 2017. External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. MIS Quarterly, 41(1): 287–300. Google Scholar
  • Tsang, E. W. K. 2002. Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing and learning myopia. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 835–854. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. 1996. The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 11–25. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. 2005. Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. 2009a. A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6): 941–957. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. 2009b. Craving for generality and small-N studies: A Wittgensteinian approach towards the epistemology of the particular in organization and management studies. In D. BuchananA. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods: 285–301. Los Angeles: SAGE. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. 2011. How should we understand tacit knowledge? A phenomenological view. In M. Easterby-SmithM. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (2nd ed.): 453–476. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. 2017. Don’t simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjuctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 54(2): 132–153. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H. 2019. Philosophical organization theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5): 567–582. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. 2011. Introduction: Why philosophy matters to organization theory. In H. TsoukasR. Chia (Eds.), Philosophy and organizational theory: 1–21. Bingley, England: Emerald. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H., & Knudsen, C. 2005. The conduct of strategy research: Meta-theoretical issues. In H. Tsoukas (Ed.), Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology: 340–377. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H., & Knudsen, C. 2009. Introduction: The need for meta-theoretical reflection in organization theory. New York: The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. 2001. What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7): 973–993. Google Scholar
  • Tywoniak, S. A. 2007. Knowledge in four deformation dimensions. Organization, 14(1): 53–76. Google Scholar
  • Van Den Bulte, C., & Moenaert, R. K. 1998. The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Science, 44(11, Pt. 2): S1–S18. Google Scholar
  • Venkitachalam, K., & Busch, P. 2012. Tacit knowledge: Review and possible research directions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2): 357–372. Google Scholar
  • von Krogh, G. 2018. Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(4): 404–409.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Rechsteiner, L. 2012. Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: A review and framework. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1): 240–277. Google Scholar
  • Wang, P., & Ramiller, N. C. 2009. Community learning in information technology innovation. MIS Quarterly, 33(4): 709–734. Google Scholar
  • Weekley, J., & Casey, J. 1999. Further studies of situational tests. Personnel Psychology, 52: 679–700. Google Scholar
  • Weigelt, C. 2009. The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrative capabilities and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6): 595–616. Google Scholar
  • Williams, A. P. O. 2001. A belief-focused process model of organizational learning*. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1): 67–85. Google Scholar
  • Wittgenstein, L. 1986. Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.) (3rd ed.). Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Wollersheim, J., Leyer, M., & Spörrle, M. 2016. When more is not better: The effect of the number of learning interventions on the acquisition of process-oriented thinking. Management Learning, 47(2): 137–157. Google Scholar
  • Yang, H., Zheng, Y., & Zaheer, A. 2015. Asymmetric learning capabilities and stock market returns. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2): 356–374.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yanow, D., & Tsoukas, H. 2009. What is reflection in action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8): 1339–1364. Google Scholar
  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1): 76–92. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900