The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective

REFERENCES

• Amabile T. M. 1983. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 357–377. Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10: 123–167. Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview. Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M. , Conti R. , Coon H. , Lazenby J. , Herron M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1154–1184. Link , Google Scholar
• Ancona D. , Caldwell D. 1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3: 321–341. Google Scholar
• Andrews F. M. 1979. Scientific productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Andrews J. , Smith D. C. 1996. In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for the mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33: 174–187. Google Scholar
• Barron F. , Harrington D. M. 1981. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32: 439–476. Google Scholar
• Basadur M. S. , Graen G. B. , Green S. G. 1982. Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30: 41–70. Google Scholar
• Basadur M. , Wakabayashi M. , Graen G. B. 1990. Individual problem-solving styles and attitudes toward divergent thinking before and after training. Creativity Research Journal, 3: 22–32. Google Scholar
• Bian Y. 1997. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62: 366–385. Google Scholar
• Bouty I. 2000. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 50–65. Link , Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 518–539. Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. 1985. Men's and women's network: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 327–343. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. 1995. Creativity: It's all in your social network. In Ford C. M.Gioia D. A. (Eds.), Creative action in organizations: 94–99. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. , Butterfield K. D. , Skaggs B. C. 1998. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23: 14–31. Link , Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M. E. , Brass D. J. 1990. Emerging patterns or patterns of change: Effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 104–127. Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. 1991. STRUCTURE. (Version 4.2). New York: Columbia University, Research Program in Structural Analysis, Center for the Social Sciences. Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339–365. Google Scholar
• Byrne D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
• Campbell D. 1960. Blind variation and selective retention in creative though as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67: 380–400. Google Scholar
• Cancian F. 1967. Stratification and risk-taking: A theory tested on agricultural innovation. American Sociological Review, 33: 921–927. Google Scholar
• Cashdan S. , Welsh G. S. 1966. Personality correlates of creative potential in talented high school students. Journal of Personality, 34: 445–455. Google Scholar
• Coser R. 1975. The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy. In Coser L. (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K Merton: 237–263. New York: Harcourt Brace. Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins. Google Scholar
• DeVanna M. A. , Tichy N. 1990. Creating the competitive organization of the 21st century: The boundaryless corporation. Human Resource Management, 29: 445–471. Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R. , Armeli S. 1997. Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 652–663. Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptualizations and clarifications. Social Networks, 1: 215–239. Google Scholar
• Friedkin N. 1980. A test of structural features of Granovetter's strength of weak ties theory. Social Networks, 2: 411–422. Google Scholar
• Ford C. M. 1996. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1112–1142. Link , Google Scholar
• Glynn M. A. 1996. Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1081–1111. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380. Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. 1974. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. 1982. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Marsden P. V.Lin N. (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis: 105–130. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82–111. Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 422–447. Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. , Andrews S. B. 1993. Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 277–303. Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. , Northcraft G. B. , Neale A. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741–763. Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10: 169–211. Google Scholar
• Kasperson C. J. 1978. Psychology of the scientist: XXXVII. Scientific creativity: A relationship with information channels. Psychological Reports, 42: 691–694. Google Scholar
• Kimberly J. R. , Evanisko M. J. 1981. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 689–713. Link , Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342–369. Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In Nohria N.Eccles R. C. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action: 216–239. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. , Porter L. W. 1985. When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationships between turnover and stayers' attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 242–261. Google Scholar
• Labianca G. , Brass D. J. , Gray B. 1998. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 55–67. Link , Google Scholar
• Laumann E. O. , Marsden P. V. , Prensky D. 1983. The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In Burt R. S.Minor M. J. (Eds.), Applied network analysis: 18–34. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Lin N. , Ensel W. M. , Vaughn J. C. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46: 393–405. Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R. , Miller J. 1979. Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 181–199. Google Scholar
• Lindsley D. H. , Brass D. J. , Thomas J. B. 1995. Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20: 645–678. Link , Google Scholar
• Marsden P. V. 1990. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16: 435–463. Google Scholar
• Martindale C. 1989. Personality, situation, and creativity. In Glover J. A.Ronnings R. R.Reynolds C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: 211–232. New York: Plenum. Google Scholar
• Masuch M. 1985. Vicious circles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 14–23. Google Scholar
• Mayhew B. H. , Levinger R. 1976. Size and density of interaction in human aggregates. American Journal of Sociology, 82: 86–110. Google Scholar
• Mehra A. , Kilduff M. , Brass D. J. 1998. At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 441–452. Link , Google Scholar
• Monge P. R. , Cozzens M. D. , Contractor N. S. 1992. Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3: 250–274. Google Scholar
• Mumford M. D. , Gustafson S. B. 1988. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 27–43. Google Scholar
• Nelson R. E. 1989. The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 377–401. Link , Google Scholar
• Oldham G. R. , Cummings A. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 607–634. Link , Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A. 1991. Organizational behavior: Where we've been, where we're going. Annual Review of Psychology, 42: 427–458. Google Scholar
• Payne R. 1990. The effectiveness of research teams: A review. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 101–122. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. , Baron J. N. 1997. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62: 673–693. Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Schein E. H. 1990. Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45: 109–119. Google Scholar
• Scott J. 1991. Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Shah P. P. 1998. Who are employees' social referents? Using a network perspective to determine referent others. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 249–268. Link , Google Scholar
• Shalley C. E. 1991. Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 179–185. Google Scholar
• Shalley C. E. 1995. Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 483–503. Link , Google Scholar
• Shalley C. E. , Gilson L. L. , Blum T. C. 2000. Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects of satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 215–223. Abstract , Google Scholar
• Shalley C. E. , Perry-Smith J. E. 2001. Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84: 1–22. Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K. 1975. Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 1119–1133. Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K. 1977. Creative productivity, age and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 791–804. Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K. 1984. Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 1273–1286. Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K. 1999. Origins of genius. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Sutton R. I. , Hargadon A. 1996. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 685–718. Google Scholar
• Tierney P. , Farmer S. M. , Graen G. B. 1999. An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52: 591–620. Google Scholar
• Van Gundy A. 1987. Organizational creativity and innovation. In Isaksen S. G. (Eds.), Frontiers of creativity research: 358–379. Buffalo, NY: Bearly. Google Scholar
• Visart N. 1979. Communication between and within research units. In Andrews F. M. (Eds.), Scientific productivity: 223–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar
• Williams K. Y. , O'Reilly C. A. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77–140. Google Scholar
• Woodman R. W. , Sawyer J. E. , Griffin R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293–321. Link , Google Scholar
• Zuckerman H. 1977. Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the U.S. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar