Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Articles

The Way We Make Each Other Feel: Relational Affect and Joint Task Performance

Published Online:14 Mar 2022https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0095

Abstract

When two people work closely together to perform a task interdependently, do the emotions they elicit in each other matter for their joint performance? If so, which emotions matter most, and does performance itself affect which emotions arise? Our study discovers the unique role of relational tension in dyads as an antecedent and an outcome of joint task performance. We analyzed longitudinal archival and survey data on surgeons working in dyads to execute visceral surgeries, with a sample including 1,315 surgeries conducted before the relational survey, and 475 surgeries afterward. Of all forms of relational affect we considered—how relaxed, excited, alert, nervous, tense, or lethargic surgeons felt when working with each other—we found that only relational tension predicted subsequent surgery performance. Regarding the antecedents of relational affect, the past performance of a surgeon dyad explained only relational tension. But not all forms of past performance mattered. Only having experienced performance peaks lowered relational tension, while performance valleys and averages had no effect. No form of positive relational affect had a discernible role as either an antecedent or an outcome of joint performance. These findings chart new territory on the affect–performance link, with implications for management theory and practice.

Whiteboard Video Abstract

Download Original Video (147.7 MB)

REFERENCES

  • Adam, H., & Brett, J. M. 2018. Everything in moderation: The social effects of anger depend on its perceived intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76: 12–18. Google Scholar
  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. 2005. Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 367–403. Google Scholar
  • Ashkanasy, N. M., & Dorris, A. D. 2017. Emotions in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4: 67–90. Google Scholar
  • Ball, C. G., Pitt, H. A., Kilbane, M. E., Dixon, E., Sutherland, F. R., & Lillemoe, K. D. 2010. Peri-operative blood transfusion and operative time are quality indicators for pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB: The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 12: 465–471. Google Scholar
  • Barsade, S. G. 2002. The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 644–675. Google Scholar
  • Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. 2007. Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21: 36–59.Link , Google Scholar
  • Barsade, S. G., & O’Neill, O. A. 2014. What’s love got to do with it? A longitudinal study of the culture of companionate love and employee and client outcomes in a long-term care setting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 551–598. Google Scholar
  • Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. 2015. Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2: 21–46. Google Scholar
  • Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 2000. To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 802–836. Google Scholar
  • Carneiro, D., Novais, P., & Neves, J. 2014. Conflict resolution and its context: From the analysis of behavioural patterns to efficient decision-making. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar
  • Casciaro, T. 2014. Affect in organizational networks. In D. BrassG. LabiancaA. MehraD. HalginS. P. Borgatti(Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks: 217–236. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing. Google Scholar
  • Casciaro, T., & Lobo, M. S. 2008. When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 655–684. Google Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. 2001. Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 937–955.Link , Google Scholar
  • Cropanzano, R., Weiss, H. M., Hale, J. M. S., & Reb, J. 2003. The structure of affect: Reconsidering the relationship between negative and positive affectivity. Journal of Management, 29: 831–857. Google Scholar
  • Daley, B. J., Cecil, W., Clarke, P. C., Cofer, J. B., & Guillamondegui, O. D. 2015. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: An analysis from the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 220: 550–558. Google Scholar
  • Desai, V. M. 2015. Learning through the distribution of failures within an organization: Evidence from heart bypass surgery performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1032–1050.Link , Google Scholar
  • Eisenkraft, N., & Elfenbein, H. A. 2010. The way you make me feel: Evidence for individual differences in affective presence. Psychological Science, 21: 505–510. Google Scholar
  • Erskine, A., Morley, S., & Pearce, S. 1990. Memory for pain—a review. Pain, 41: 255–265. Google Scholar
  • Finnesgard, E. J., Pandian, T. K., Kendrick, M. L., & Farley, D. R. 2018. Do not break up the surgical team! Familiarity and expertise affect operative time in complex surgery. American Journal of Surgery, 215: 447–449. Google Scholar
  • Fong, A. J., Smith, M., & Langerman, A. 2016. Efficiency improvement in the operating room. Journal of Surgical Research, 204: 371–383. Google Scholar
  • Fredrickson, B. L. 2001. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56: 218–226. Google Scholar
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. 2005. Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19: 313–332. Google Scholar
  • Gooty, J., Gavin, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2009. Emotions research in OB: The challenges that lie ahead. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 833–838. Google Scholar
  • Gray, J. R. 2001. Emotional modulation of cognitive control: Approach–withdrawal states double-dissociate spatial from verbal two-back task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130: 436–452. Google Scholar
  • Hull, L., Arora, S., Aggarwal, R., Darzi, A., Vincent, C., & Sevdalis, N. 2012. The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: A systematic review. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 214: 214–230. Google Scholar
  • Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. 2014. Team microdynamics. Academy of Management Annals, 8: 443–503.Link , Google Scholar
  • Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. 2009. Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 48–61. Google Scholar
  • Huy, Q. N. 1999. Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24: 325–345.Link , Google Scholar
  • Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. 1984. The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 1206–1217. Google Scholar
  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar
  • KC, D., Staats, B. R., & Gino, F. 2013. Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Science, 59: 2435–2449. Google Scholar
  • Kelly, J., & Cameron, K. 2017. Applying positive organisational scholarship to produce extraordinary performance. In C. Proctor(Ed.), Positive psychology interventions. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar
  • Kenny, D. A. 1994. Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Kim, B. D., Hsu, W. K., De Oliveira, G. S., Jr., Saha, S., & Kim, J. Y. 2014. Operative duration as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in single-level lumbar fusion: An analysis of 4588 surgical cases. Spine, 39: 510–520. Google Scholar
  • Knight, A. P. 2015. Mood at the midpoint: Affect and change in exploratory search over time in teams that face a deadline. Organization Science, 26: 99–118. Google Scholar
  • Knight, A. P., Menges, J. I., & Bruch, H. 2018. Organizational affective tone: A meso perspective on the origins and effects of consistent affect in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 191–219.Link , Google Scholar
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein& S. W. J. Kozlowski(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 3–90. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. 1992. Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark(Ed.), Emotion: 25–59. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar
  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. 1967. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1–47. Google Scholar
  • Leong, G., Wilson, J., & Charlett, A. 2006. Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: Comparison of English and U.S. data. Journal of Hospital Infection, 63: 255–262. Google Scholar
  • Martin, E. A., & Kerns, J. G. 2011. The influence of positive mood on different aspects of cognitive control. Cognition and Emotion, 25: 265–279. Google Scholar
  • McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  • Methot, J. R., Melwani, S., & Rothman, N. B. 2017. The space between us: A social–functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships. Journal of Management, 43: 1789–1819. Google Scholar
  • Ohly, S., & Schmitt, A. 2015. What makes us enthusiastic, angry, feeling at rest, or worried? Development and validation of an affective work events taxonomy using concept mapping methodology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30: 15–35. Google Scholar
  • Posner, M. C., & Tseng, J. 2016, January 31. Open transhiatal esophagectomy [Video file]. Retrieved from https://csurgeries.com/video/open-transhiatal-esophagectomy Google Scholar
  • Procter, L. D., Davenport, D. L., Bernard, A. C., & Zwischenberger, J. B. 2010. General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 210: 60–65. Google Scholar
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. 2001. Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar
  • Roses, R. E., Paulson, E. C., Kanchwala, S. K., & Morris, J. B. 2009. Gowned and gloved surgery: Introduction to common procedures. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  • Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. 1999. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 805–819. Google Scholar
  • Shockley, K. M., Ispas, D., Rossi, M. E., & Levine, E. L. 2012. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between state affect, discrete emotions, and job performance. Human Performance, 25: 377–411. Google Scholar
  • Singh, S., Swarer, K., & Resnick, K. 2017. Longer operative time is associated with increased post-operative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 147: 554–557. Google Scholar
  • Sitzmann, T., & Yeo, G. 2013. A meta-analytic investigation of the within-person self-efficacy domain: Is self-efficacy a product of past performance or a driver of future performance? Personnel Psychology, 66: 531–568. Google Scholar
  • Staw, B., & Barsade, S. G. 1993. Affect and managerial performance: A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 304–331. Google Scholar
  • Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. 1981. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 501–524. Google Scholar
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
  • Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  • Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., & Erez, M. 2013. Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 945–971.Link , Google Scholar
  • Venkataramani, V., Labianca, G., & Grosser, T. J. 2013. Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 1028–1039. Google Scholar
  • Vuori, T. O., & Huy, Q. N. 2016. Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 9–51. Google Scholar
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 1063–1070. Google Scholar
  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. 1985. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98: 219–235. Google Scholar
  • Weiss, H. M. & Cropanzano, R. 1996. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw& L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 18: 1–74. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
  • Xu, R., Carty, M. J., Orgill, D. P., Lipsitz, S. R., & Duclos, A. 2013. The teaming curve: A longitudinal study of the influence of surgical team familiarity on operative time. Annals of Surgery, 258: 953–957. Google Scholar
  Academy of Management
  555 Pleasantville Road, Suite N200
  Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8020, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
Academy of Management
© 2023 Academy of Management
Powered by Atypon® Literatum