Published Online:

Addressing societal issues increasingly requires multistakeholder collaboration. Yet, cross-sector partnerships (CSPs) are often difficult to form and maintain because of coordination problems and conflicting interests of the organizations involved. To better understand how organizations overcome these challenges, we take a micro-foundational approach. First, we conducted an in-depth case study of a consulting firm to examine the emergence of a platform for CSPs. Second, using survey data from 665 employees, we identified critical elements that contributed to the stability of the platform. Our findings reveal how a for-profit organization can play a key role in coordinating other organizations to achieve social impact. We found that the emergence and stability of the platform were based on a novel operating model that aligned senior leaders’ interests in improving employee retention, employees’ desire for meaning in their work, and employees’ willingness to make short-term financial sacrifices to participate. Our study suggests that for-profit firms can play a central role in social impact collaborations but that doing so requires alignment of internal interests through intrapreneurship. It also underlines the potential value of using a micro-foundation approach in future research into CSPs.

Whiteboard Video Abstract


  • Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. 2008. Building microfoundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(6): 489–502. Google Scholar
  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. 2012. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4): 932–968. Google Scholar
  • Alt, E., & Craig, J. B. 2016. Selling issues with solutions: Igniting social intrapreneurship in for‐profit organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5): 794–820. Google Scholar
  • Ballesteros, L. F., & Gatignon, A. 2019. When is socially beneficial to channel corporate humanitarian aid via non-profit organizations? Strategic Management Journal, 40(4): 631–57. Google Scholar
  • Bansal, P. 2003. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to environmental issues. Organization Science, 14: 510–527. Google Scholar
  • Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1419–1440.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergkvist, L. 2015. Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay. Marketing Letters, 26(3): 245–55. Google Scholar
  • Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J.R. 2007. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of marketing research, 44(2): 175–84. Google Scholar
  • Bhanji, Z., & Oxley, J. E. 2013. Overcoming the dual liability of foreignness and privateness in international corporate citizenship partnerships. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4): 290–311. Google Scholar
  • Bode, C., & Singh, J. 2018. Taking a hit to save the world? Employee participation in a corporate social initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 1003–1030. Google Scholar
  • Bode, C., Singh, J., & Rogan, M. 2015. Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organization Science, 26(6): 1702–1720. Google Scholar
  • Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2014. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107–125. Google Scholar
  • Burbano, V. C., Mamer, J., & Snyder, J. 2018. How socially responsible business practices reinforce human capital strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 39(11): 2899–2920. Google Scholar
  • Cabral, S., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Potoski, M. 2019. Value creation and value appropriation in public and nonprofit organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4): 465–75. Google Scholar
  • Carnahan, S., Kryscynski, D., & Olson, D. 2017. How corporate social responsibility reduces employee turnover: Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 1932–1962.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. 2013. Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11): 1331–1350. Google Scholar
  • Chatain, O., & Plaksenkova, E. 2019. NGOs and the creation of value in supply chains. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4): 604–630. Google Scholar
  • Clarke, A., & Fuller, M. 2010. Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1): 85–101. Google Scholar
  • Coleman, J. S. 1986. Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(6): 1309–1335. Google Scholar
  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
  • Davis, G., & White, C. 2015. Changing your company from the inside out: A guide for social intrapreneurs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Google Scholar
  • Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2014. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 11: 2835–2857. Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. 2016. Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59 (4): 1113–1123.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. 2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 575–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. 2015. Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3): 363–390. Google Scholar
  • Flammer, C. 2015. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11): 2549–2568. Google Scholar
  • Gatignon, A., & Capron, L. 2019. The firm as an architect of polycentric governance: How natura built an open institutional infrastructure in Brazil. Working paper. Google Scholar
  • Gavetti, G. 2005. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16(6): 599–617. Google Scholar
  • George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. 2016. Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6): 1880–1895.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilligan, C. 1977. In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4): 481–517. Google Scholar
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2013. Qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 15–31. Google Scholar
  • Glavas, A., & Godwin, L. N. 2013. Is the perception of ‘goodness’ good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 114: 15–27. Google Scholar
  • Granovetter, M. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6): 1420–1443. Google Scholar
  • Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. 1998. Social mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville, J. A., & Hoffman, A. J. 2003. The importance of cultural framing to the success of social initiatives in business. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2): 70–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville, J. A., Nelson, A. J., Earle, A. G., Haack, J. A., & Young, D. M. 2017. “If chemists don’t do it, who is going to?” Peer-driven occupational change and the emergence of green chemistry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3: 524–560. Google Scholar
  • Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. 2018. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8): 2255–2276. Google Scholar
  • Kaplan, R. S., Serafeim, G., & Tugendhat, E. 2018. Inclusive growth: Profitable strategies for tackling poverty and inequality. Harvard Business Review, 96(1): 127–133. Google Scholar
  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. 2010. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1): 1–31. Google Scholar
  • Kourula, A., & Laasonen, S. 2010. Nongovernmental organizations in business and society, management, and international business research: Review and implications from 1998 to 2007. Business & Society, 49(1): 35–67. Google Scholar
  • Le Ber, M. J., & Branzei, O. 2010. (Re) forming strategic cross-sector partnerships: Relational processes of social innovation. Business & Society, 49(1): 140–172. Google Scholar
  • Locke, K. D. 2001. Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Lyneis, J., & Sterman, J. 2016. How to save a leaky ship: Capability traps and the failure of win-win investments in sustainability and social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(1): 7–32.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Neil, I., & Ucbasaran, D. 2016. Balancing “what matters to me” with “what matters to them”: Exploring the legitimation process of environmental entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(2): 133–152. Google Scholar
  • Odziemkowska, K., & McDonnell, M. H. 2019. Co-opting contention: Field-level effects of firm-activist collaborations. Working paper. Google Scholar
  • Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. 2010. Odd couples: Understanding the governance of firm–NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1): 55–70. Google Scholar
  • Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. 2003. An economic analysis of the determination of interchange fees in payment card systems. Review of Network Economics, 2(2): 66–79. Google Scholar
  • Rondinelli, D. A., & London, T. 2003. How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(1): 61–76.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen, S. 1986. The theory of equalizing differences. Handbook of Labor Economics, 1:641–692. Google Scholar
  • Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. 2009. Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2): 413–429. Google Scholar
  • Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6): 849–873. Google Scholar
  • Selznick, P. 2011. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro Books. Google Scholar
  • Soderstrom, S., & Weber, K. 2019. Organizational structures from interaction: Evidence from cororate sustainabilty efforts. Administrative Science Quarterly, Google Scholar
  • Sonenshein, S. 2006. Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1158–1172.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tonoyan, V., Strohmeyer R., & Jennings J. E. 2019. Gender gaps in perceived start-up ease: Implications of sex-based labor market segregation for entrepreneurship across 22 European countries. Administrative Science Quarterly. Google Scholar
  • Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. 2018. Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2): 315–332. Google Scholar
  • Vock, M., van Dolen, W., & Kolk. A. 2014. Micro-level interactions in business–nonprofit partnerships. Business & Society, 53(4): 517–550. Google Scholar
  • Waddock, S., Meszoely, G. M., Waddell, S., & Dentoni, D. 2015. The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6): 993–1012. Google Scholar
  • Wickert, C., & De Bakker, F. 2018. Pitching for social change: Toward a relational approach to selling and buying social issues. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(1): 50–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  Academy of Management
  555 Pleasantville Road, Suite N200
  Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8020, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
Academy of Management