The Future of HRM Incentivizing Strathern’s Paradox? Workers’ Responses to Algorithmic Human Resource Management
Abstract
The future of human resource management (HRM) has often been described as one of algorithmic HRM—that is, automating human resources (HR) decisions by using computational algorithms. Algorithmic HRM promises more objective HR decisions and less administrative workload for HR managers. Although incentivizing is a core HRM task, most of the research on algorithmic HRM takes place under the assumption that algorithms do not influence the behavior they are designed to predict. On the contrary, any behavioral changes activated by them threaten their validity. In a mixed-methods study using a classroom simulation of an algorithmic personnel evaluation with undergraduate students, we found that this premise does not hold. Rather, we discovered that (a) algorithmic HRM incentivized workers to behave contrary to their own preferences, (b) workers did attribute their discomfort with this outcome to the algorithmic personnel evaluation ignoring behavior, and (c) workers’ attitudes toward the algorithm were not related to their behavior. The observed phenomena can be explained with Strathern’s paradox, which states that measures underlying an algorithm cease to be valid when used for HRM decision-making.
REFERENCES
- 2011. Decolonializing discourse: Critical reflections on organizational discourse analysis. Human Relations, 64: 1121–1146. Google Scholar
- 2016. HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge. Human Resource Management Journal, 26: 1–11. Google Scholar
- 2005. Human resource management and labour demand dynamics in Belgium. International Journal of Manpower, 26: 724–743. Google Scholar
- Association for Computing Machinery (Eds.). 2019. Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency—FAT* ‘19. New York: ACM Press. Google Scholar
- 2011. Raging debates in HR Analytics. People & Strategy, 34: 14–18. Google Scholar
- 2018.
Motivation as a function of expectancy and incentive . In J. HeckhausenH. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action: 163–220. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar - 2004. Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance. Human Resource Management, 43: 3–48. Google Scholar
- 2009. From the editors: Student samples in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 361–364. Google Scholar
- 2017. Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28: 1041–1055. Google Scholar
- 2006. What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84: 517–538. Google Scholar
- 2008. The paradoxical processes of feminization in the professions: The case of established, aspiring and semi-professions. Work, Employment and Society, 22: 281–299. Google Scholar
- Bondarouk, T.Fisher, S. (Eds.). 2020. Encyclopedia of electronic HRM (1st ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Google Scholar
- 2013. Employee perceptions of line management performance: Applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers’ HRM implementation. Human Resource Management, 52: 861–877. Google Scholar
- 2022. Artificial intelligence—challenges and opportunities for international HRM: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33: 1065–1097. Google Scholar
- 1969. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24: 409–429. Google Scholar
- 1979. Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2: 67–90. Google Scholar
- 2018. Big data techniques and talent management: Recommendations for organizations and a research agenda for I-O psychologists. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11: 250–257. Google Scholar
- 2020.
Can data science change human resources ? In J. CanalsF. Heukamp (Eds.), The future of management in an AI world: 93–115. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar - 2022. Estimating and penalizing induced preference shifts in recommender systems. In K. ChaudhuriS. JegelkaL. SongC. SzepesvariG. NioS. Sabato (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, 162: 2686–2708. Google Scholar
- 2019. An ROI-based review of HR analytics: Practical implementation tools. Personnel Review, 48: 1429–1448. Google Scholar
- 2014. Do cardiology quality measures actually improve patient outcomes? Journal of the American Heart Association, 3: 1–9. Google Scholar
- 2021. A critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice. Human Resource Management Review, 31: 100698. Google Scholar
- 2003. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 740–751.Link , Google Scholar
- 2022. Quantifying human resource management: A literature review. Personnel Review, 51: 1386–1409. Google Scholar
- 2016. There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538: 311–313. Google Scholar
- 2009. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
- 1971. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18: 105–115. Google Scholar
- 2013. Lost in translation? An actor-network approach to HRIS implementation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22: 225–237. Google Scholar
- 1995. Human resource management in the knowledge age. Employee Relations, 17: 9–23. Google Scholar
- 1988. A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9: 281–286. Google Scholar
- 2020. Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30: 114–132. Google Scholar
- 2021. Mind the channel! An affordance perspective on how digital voice channels encourage or discourage employee voice. Human Resource Management Journal, 31: 259–276. Google Scholar
- 2007. Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113: 1–40. Google Scholar
- 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 313–343. Google Scholar
- 2008. A sociology of quantification. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 49: 401–436. Google Scholar
European Commission . 2021. New rules for artificial intelligence: Questions and answers. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_21_1683. Google Scholar- 2001.
Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research . In R. WodakM. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis: 121–138. London: Sage. Google Scholar - 2016. June 7: Even tiny rewards can motivate people to go the extra mile. Harvard Business Review. Google Scholar
- 2016. The hidden power of small rewards: The effects of insufficient external rewards on autonomous motivation to learn. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15: 45–59.Link , Google Scholar
- 2017. Goodhart taxonomy. AI Alignment Forum. Google Scholar
- 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15–31. Google Scholar
- 1981.
Problems of monetary management: The U.K. experience . In A. S. Courakis (Ed.), Inflation, depression, and economic policy in the West: 111–144. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books. Google Scholar - 2004. How people work: And how you can help them to give their best. Edinburgh: Pearson Education. Google Scholar
- 2020. HR analytics: The onto‐epistemology and politics of metricised HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30: 494–507. Google Scholar
- 2000. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12: 19–30. Google Scholar
- 2000. Performance and rewards: Cleaning out the stables. Human Resource Management Journal, 10: 46–62. Google Scholar
- 2015. Framing manipulations in contests: A natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118: 372–382. Google Scholar
- 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635–672.Link , Google Scholar
- 2018. The science and practice of workforce analytics: Introduction to the HRM special issue. Human Resource Management, 57: 679–684. Google Scholar
- 2001.
Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis . In R. WodakM. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis: 32–62. London: Sage. Google Scholar - 2019. Algorithms and authenticity. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5: 38–56.Link , Google Scholar
JASP Team . 2020. JASP. Version 0.11.1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google Scholar- 2022.
Voice in platform-enabled gig work . In A. WilkinsonT. DundonP. K. MowbrayS. Brooks (Eds.), Missing voices? Integrating worker voice and social dialogue in the platform economy: 153–173. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar - 2020. Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14: 366–410.Link , Google Scholar
- 2005. Strategic global human resource management research in the twenty-first century: An endorsement of the mixed-method research methodology. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16: 22–45. Google Scholar
- 2020. Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13: 795–848. Google Scholar
- 2009. Broad-based incentive plans, HR practices and company performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 19: 355–374. Google Scholar
- 1981. Increasing productivity through performance appraisal (Reprinted ed. with corrections). Reading, U.K.: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar
- 2018. Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 5. doi:10.1177/2053951718756684. Google Scholar
- 1999. Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. Houndmills, U.K.: Macmillan. Google Scholar
- 2019. The challenges of algorithm-based HR decision-making for personal integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 160: 377–392. Google Scholar
- 2020. Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organization Studies, 41: 1601–1625. Google Scholar
LimeSurvey Project Team , &Schmitz, C. 2012. LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool. Version 3.26.1. Hamburg, Germany. Google Scholar- 1968. Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3: 157–189. Google Scholar
- 1970. Fundamentals of learning and motivation (5th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown. Google Scholar
- 2005. Classroom research: Bridging the ivory divide. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 8–21.Link , Google Scholar
- 2019. Categorizing variants of Goodhart’s law. arXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1803.04585. Google Scholar
- 2017. An evidence-based review of HR Analytics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28: 3–26. Google Scholar
- 2021. The duality of algorithmic management: Toward a research agenda on HRM algorithms, autonomy and value creation. Human Resource Management Review, 33: 100876. Google Scholar
- 2021. Algorithmic human resource management: Synthesizing developments and cross-disciplinary insights on digital HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32: 2545–2562. Google Scholar
- 2019. Conceptualizing human resource management in the gig economy. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34: 214–232. Google Scholar
- 2017. Exploring the complementarities within high-performance work systems: A set-theoretic analysis of UK firms. Human Resource Management, 56: 651–672. Google Scholar
- 2018. Building credible human capital analytics for organizational competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 57: 701–713. Google Scholar
- 2021. Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46: 552–571.Link , Google Scholar
- 2005. The influence of public reporting of outcome data on medical decision making by physicians. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165: 83–87. Google Scholar
- 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3: 398–427. Google Scholar
- 2008. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 433–474.Link , Google Scholar
- 2010.
Evaluations: Hidden costs, questionable benefits, and superior alternatives . In T. JansenG. van den BrinkJ. Kole (Eds.), Professional pride. A powerful force: 175–196. Amsterdam: Boom. Google Scholar - 2015. Ranking games. Evaluation Review, 39: 102–129. Google Scholar
- 2022. Incentive effects on ethics. Academy of Management Annals, 16: 297–333.Link , Google Scholar
- 2011. Desired goals and actual outcomes of e-HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 21: 335–354. Google Scholar
- 2018. Performance-based financing in the heath sector in low- and middle-income countries: Is there anything whereof it may be said, see, this is new? International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 33: 51–66. Google Scholar
- 2021. Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46: 192–210.Link , Google Scholar
- 2020. A numbers game: Quantification of work, auto-gamification, and worker productivity. American Sociological Review, 85: 573–609. Google Scholar
- 2015. Learning from practice: How HR analytics avoids being a management fad. Organizational Dynamics, 44: 236–242. Google Scholar
- 2018. December 9: There ought to be a law! Campbell versus Goodhart. Significance Magazine. Google Scholar
- 2003. Zu Risiken und Nebenwirkungen fragen Sie die Patienten. Eine Studie zur Darstellung von Ärzten in Krankenhausserien und ihrem Einfluss auf das Arztbild von Patienten [As regards to risks and side-effects, ask the atients. A study of representation of doctors in ospital series and their influence on the doctor’s image of patients]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51: 497–522. Google Scholar
- 2007. The contribution of e‐HRM to HRM effectiveness. Employee Relations, 29: 280–291. Google Scholar
- 2022. If we succeed. Daedalus, 151: 43–57. Google Scholar
- 2009. Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8: 559–573.Link , Google Scholar
- 2012. What counts as a nudge? American Journal of Bioethics, 12: 11–12. Google Scholar
- 1997. “Improving ratings”: Audit in the British university system. European Review, 5: 305–321. Google Scholar
- 2020.
Algorithmic decision making In HRM . In T. BondaroukS. Fisher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of electronic HRM (1st ed.): 54–59. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Google Scholar - 2014. HRM in the digital age—digital changes and challenges of the HR profession. Employee Relations, 36. doi:10.1108/ER-03-2014-0032. Google Scholar
- 2015.
Artificial intelligence techniques in human resource management—A conceptual exploration . In C. KahramanS. C. Onar (Eds.), Intelligent techniques in engineering management: Theory and applications: 149–172. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar - 2022. Digital is different: Digitalization undermines stakeholder relations because it impedes firm anthropomorphization. Academy of Management Discoveries, 9: 297–319. Google Scholar
- 2022. Scientism as illusio in HR algorithms: Towards a framework for algorithmic hygiene for bias proofing. Human Resource Management Journal, 34: 311–325. Google Scholar
VERBI Software . 2019. MAXQDA. Version 2020. Berlin. Google Scholar- 2018. Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4: 404–409.Link , Google Scholar
- 2021. Controlled by the algorithm, coached by the crowd—How HRM activities take shape on digital work platforms in the gig economy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32: 2643–2682. Google Scholar
- 2021. “You can’t pick up a phone and talk to someone”: How algorithms function as biopower in the gig economy. Organization, 28: 26–43. Google Scholar
- 2020.
Sailing in stormy weather: Digitalization, ethics and e-HRM . In T. BondaroukS. Fisher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of electronic HRM (1st ed.): 156–162. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Google Scholar - 2021. Digitalised talent management and automated talent decisions: The implications for HR professionals. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32: 2592–2621. Google Scholar