How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring, and Effort

REFERENCES

• Aubert B. A. , Kelsey B. L. 2003. Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34: 575–618. Google Scholar
• Baron R. M. , Kenny D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173–1182. Google Scholar
• Bennett N. , Kidwell R. E. 2001. The provision of effort in self-designing work groups: The case of collaborative research. Small Group Research, 32: 727–744. Google Scholar
• Bijlsma-Frankema K. M. , De Jong B. A. , Van de Bunt G. G. 2008. Heed, a missing link between trust, monitoring and performance in knowledge intensive teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1): 19–40. Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D. , Halverson R. R. 1998. Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. Journal of Management, 24(2): 157–172. Google Scholar
• Bradley J. , White B. J. , Mennecke B. E. 2003. Teams and tasks: A temporal framework for the effects of interpersonal interventions on team performance. Small Group Research, 34: 353–387. Google Scholar
• Brown S. P. , Leigh T. W. 1996. A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 358–368. Google Scholar
• Carter S. M. , West M. A. 1998. Reflexivity, effectiveness and mental health in BBC production teams. Small Group Research, 29: 583–601. Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A. , Flynn F. J. 2001. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 956–974.Link , Google Scholar
• Colquitt J. A. , Scott B. A. , LePine J. A. 2007. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 909–927. Google Scholar
• Cook J. , Wall T. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 39–52. Google Scholar
• Costa A. C. 2003. Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32: 605–622. Google Scholar
• Denison D. R. , Hart S. L. , Kahn J. A. 1996. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1005–1023.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Devine D. J. , Clayton L. D. , Philips J. L. , Dunford B. B. , Melner S. B. 1999. Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30: 678–711. Google Scholar
• Dillman D. A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T. 1999. The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 445–455. Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T. , Ferrin D. L. 2001. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12: 450–467. Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T. , Skarlicki D. P. 2004. Trust in leaders: Existing research and emerging issues. In Kramer R. M.Cook K. S. (Eds.), Trust and distrust across organizational contexts: Dilemmas and approaches: 21–41. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383. Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. 2004. Psychological safety, trust and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In Kramer R. M.Cook K. S. (Eds.), Trust and distrust across organizational contexts: Dilemmas and approaches: 239–273). New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar
• Ferrin D. L. , Bligh M. C. , Kohles J. C. 2008. It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107: 161–178. Google Scholar
• Ferrin D. L. , Shah P. P. 1997. Trust, conflict and cooperation in groups: A social network analysis of MBA task force teams. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston. Google Scholar
• Gambetta D. G. 1988. Can we trust trust? In Gambetta D. G. (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations: 213–237. New York: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
• George J. M. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 191–202.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Glick W. H. 1985. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10: 601–616.Link , Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R. 1987. The design of work teams. In Lorsch J. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior: 315–342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Hinkin T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 104–121. Google Scholar
• Hoegl M. , Parboteeah K. P. 2006. Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R&D Management, 36: 113–125. Google Scholar
• Hoyle R. H. , Kenny D. A. 1999. Sample size, reliability and tests of statistical mediation. In Hoyle R. H. (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research: 197–223. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Hu L. , Bentler P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling, 6: 1–55. Google Scholar
• James L. R. , Demaree R. G. , Wolf G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85–98. Google Scholar
• James L. R. , Demaree R. G. , Wolf G. 1993. r_wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 306–309. Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L. , Knoll K. , Leidner D. E. 1998. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4): 29–64. Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L. , Shaw T. R. , Staples D. S. 2004. Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15: 250–267. Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. , Shah P. 1997. Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 775–790. Google Scholar
• Jones G. R. 1984. Task visibility, free riding, and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9: 684–695.Link , Google Scholar
• Jones G. R. , George J. M. 1998. The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23: 531–546.Link , Google Scholar
• Karau S. J. , Kelly J. R. 2004. Time presssure and team performance: An attentional focus integration. In Blount S. (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams, vol. 6: 185–212. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Kidwell R. E. , Bennett N. 1993. Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18: 429–456.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Kiffin-Petersen S. A. 2004. Trust: A neglected variable in team effectiveness research. Journal of Management & Organization, 10(1): 38–53. Google Scholar
• Klein K. J. , Kozlowski S. W. J. 2000. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 211–236. Google Scholar
• Langfred C. W. 2004. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 385–399.Link , Google Scholar
• Langfred C. W. 2007. The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 885–900.Link , Google Scholar
• LePine J. A. , Piccolo R. F. , Jackson C. L. , Mathieu J. E. , Saul J. R. 2008. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61: 273–307. Google Scholar
• LePine J. A. , Van Dyne L. 2001. Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups. Academy of Management Review, 26: 67–84.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Lewicki R. J. , Bunker B. B. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Kramer R. M.Tyler T. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 114–139. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Liden R. C. , Wayne S. J. , Jaworski R. A. , Bennett N. 2004. Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30: 285–304. Google Scholar
• Long C. P. , Sitkin S. B. 2006. Trust in the balance: How managers integrate trust-building and task control. In Bachmann R.Zaheer A. (Eds.), Handbook of trust research: 87–106. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Luhmann N. 1988. Familiarity, confidence and trust: problems and alternatives. In Gambetta D. G. (Ed.), Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations: 94–107. New York: Blackwell. Google Scholar
• MacKinnon D. A. 2000. Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In Rose J. S.Chassin L.Presson C. C.Sherman S. J. (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions: 141–160. Mahwah, NJ: Erblaum. Google Scholar
• Marks M. A. , Mathieu J. E. , Zaccaro S. J. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356–376.Link , Google Scholar
• Marks M. A. , Panzer F. J. 2004. The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Human Performance, 17(1): 25–41. Google Scholar
• Mathieu J. E. , DeShon R. P. , Bergh D. D. 2008. Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 203–223. Google Scholar
• Mathieu J. E. , Maynard M. T. , Rapp T. , Gilson L. 2008. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34: 410–476. Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C. , Davis J. H. , Schoorman F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709–734.Link , Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C. , Gavin M. B. 2005. Trust for management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48: 874–888.Abstract , Google Scholar
• McAllister D. J. 1995. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24–59.Link , Google Scholar
• McAllister D. J. , Bigley G. A. , Tan H. H. , Kamdar D. A. 2005. Differential self-regulatory effects of two major forms of trust. Working paper, National University of Singapore. Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H. , Cummings L. L. , Chervany N. L. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23: 473–490.Link , Google Scholar
• Möllering G. 2001. The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35: 403–420. Google Scholar
• Mulvey P. W. , Klein H. J. 1998. The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74: 62–87. Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M. , MacKenzie S. B. , Lee J. , Podsakoff N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903. Google Scholar
• Porter T. W. , Lilly B. S. 1996. The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7: 361–376. Google Scholar
• Preacher K. J. , Hayes A. F. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36: 717–731. Google Scholar
• Rico R. , Sanchez-Manzanares M. , Gil F. , Gibson C. 2008. Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33: 163–184.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Rispens S. , Greer L. L. , Jehn K. 2007. It could be worse: A study on the alleviating role of trust and connectedness in intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18: 325–344. Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M. , Sitkin S. B. , Burt R. S. , Camerer C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393–404.Link , Google Scholar
• Salas E. , Sims D. E. , Burke C. S. 2005. Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36: 555–599. Google Scholar
• Saunders C. S. , Ahuja M. K. 2006. Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small Group Research, 37: 622–700. Google Scholar
• Schippers M. C. 2003. Reflexivity in teams (doctoral dissertation). Ridderkerk, The Netherlands: Ridderprint. Google Scholar
• Schoorman F. D. , Mayer R. C. , Davis J. H. 2007. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32: 344–354.Link , Google Scholar
• Shamir B. 1990. Calculations, values, and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation. Human Relations, 43: 313–332. Google Scholar
• Shamir B. , Lapidot Y. 2003. Trust in organizational superiors: Systemic and collective considerations. Organization Studies, 24: 463–492. Google Scholar
• Sheppard B. H. , Sherman D. M. 1998. The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review, 23: 422–437.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Simons T. L. , Peterson R. S. 2000. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 102–111. Google Scholar
• Spreitzer G. M. , Noble D. S. , Mishra A. K. , Cooke W. N. 1999. Predicting process improvement team performance in an automotive firm: Explicating the roles of trust and empowerment. In Wageman R. (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Groups in context, vol. 2: 71–92. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Steiner I. D. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
• Stewart G. L. , Barrick M. R. 2000. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 135–148.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Timmerman T. A. 2005. Missing persons in the study of groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 21–36. Google Scholar
• West M. A. 2000. Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In Beyerlein M. M.Johnson D. A.Beyerlein S. T. (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, vol. 5: 1–29. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
• Williams M. 2001. In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26: 377–396.Link , Google Scholar
• Williams M. 2007. Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32: 595–621.Abstract , Google Scholar
• Yeo G. B. , Neal A. 2004. A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: Effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 231–247. Google Scholar
• Zand D. E. 1972. Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 229–239. Google Scholar