Organizational routines are ubiquitous, yet their contribution to organizing has been underappreciated. Our longitudinal, inductive study traces the relationship between organizational routines and organizational schemata in a new research institution, Learning Lab Denmark. We show how trial-and-error learning can connect routines and schemata through a microfoundation of observable action. Our analysis (1) identifies two processes of trial-and-error learning and (2) strengthens theory about the coevolution of interpretive schemata and routines. By recognizing the complex relationship between routines and schemata and the role that trial-and-error learning processes play in this relationship, organizations can gain a previously overlooked tool for managing change.

REFERENCES

  • Aldrich H. 1999. Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Argote L. 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  • Argote L. , Greve H. R. 2007. A behavioural theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organization Science, 18: 337–349. Google Scholar
  • Balogun J. , Johnson G. 2004. Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 523–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balogun J. , Johnson G. 2005. From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26: 1573–1601. Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 78–108. Google Scholar
  • Barry D. , Rerup C. 2006. Going mobile: Aesthetic design considerations from Calder and the constructivists. Organization Science, 17: 262–276. Google Scholar
  • Bartunek J. M. 1984. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 355–372. Google Scholar
  • Bartunek J. M. , Foster-Fishman P. , Keys C. 1996. Using collaborative advocacy to foster intergroup collaboration—A joint insider/outsider investigation. Human Relations, 79: 701–732. Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C. , Dahlin K. B. 2007. Aspiration performance and railroads' patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organization Science, 18: 368–385. Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C. , Ingram P. 1998. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Science, 44: 996–1016. Google Scholar
  • Beal D. J. , Weiss H. M. 2003. Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6: 440–464. Google Scholar
  • Beckman C. , Haunschild P. R. 1997. Network learning: The effects of heterogeneity of partners' experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 92–124. Google Scholar
  • Beer M. , Eisenstat R. A. , Spector B. 1990. The critical path to corporate renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Cha S. E. , Edmondson A. C. 2006. When values backfire: Leadership, attribution, and disenchantment in a values-driven organization. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 57–78. Google Scholar
  • Chatman J. A. 1991. Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 459–484. Google Scholar
  • Cohen M. D. , Bacdayan P. 1994. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory. Organization Science, 5: 554–568. Google Scholar
  • Cohen M. D. , Burkhart R. , Dosi G. , Egidi M. , Marengo L. , Warglien M. , Winter S. 1996. Contemporary issues in research on routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 653–698. Google Scholar
  • Corley K. G. , Gioia D. A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 173–208. Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M. , March J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. , Bohmer R. M. , Pisano G. P. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 685–716. Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. 1989. Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D. , Barr P. S. , Hargadon A. B. 2005. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science, 16: 422–433. Google Scholar
  • Emerson R. , Fretz R. , Shaw L. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. 1995. Strategies for interpreting qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11: 611–629. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. 2003. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 727–752. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. , Pentland B. T. 2003. Re-theorizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94–118. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. , Pentland B. T. 2008. Routine dynamics. In Barry D.Hansen H. (Eds.), The handbook of new approaches to organization studies: 302–315. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Gavetti G. , Levinthal D. , Ocasio W. 2007. Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School's past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organization Science, 18: 523–536. Google Scholar
  • Gephart R. P. 2004. Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 454–462. Google Scholar
  • Gerhart B. , Rynes S. 2003. Compensation: Theory, evidence and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Giddens A. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Gioia D. A. , Chittipeddi K. 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 433–448. Google Scholar
  • Gioia D. A. , Thomas J. B. 1996. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 370–403. Google Scholar
  • Gioia D. A. , Thomas J. B. , Clark S. M. , Chittipeddi K. 1994. Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamisc of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5: 363–383. Google Scholar
  • Glaser B. G. , Strauss A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. Google Scholar
  • Golden-Biddle K. , Locke K. 2007. Composing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Gong Y. , Baker T. , Miner A. S. 2005. Organizational routines and capabilities in new ventures. In Zahra S. A.et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research: 375–388. Wellesley, MA: Babson College. Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. 2003. Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. 2008. Organizational routines and performance feedback. In Becker M. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines: 187–204. Northampton, MA: Elgar. Google Scholar
  • Haunschild P. A. , Sullivan B. N. 2002. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airline learning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 609–643. Google Scholar
  • Hodgson G. M. , Knudsen T. 2004. The firm as an interactor: Firms as vehicles for habits and routines. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14: 281–307. Google Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J. A. 2005. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16: 618–636. Google Scholar
  • Isabella L. 1990. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 7–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski P. 2008. Shaping strategy as a structuration process. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 621–650.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen R. J. , Szulanski G. 2007. Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Science, 53: 1716–1730, Google Scholar
  • Joas H. 1996. The creativity of action. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press. Google Scholar
  • Johnson G. 1988. Rethinking incrementalism. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 75–91. Google Scholar
  • Johnson G. , Langley A , Melin L. , Whittington R. 2007. Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Kabanoff B. , Waldersee R. , Cohen M. 1995. Espoused values and organizational change themes. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1075–1104.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J. , Miner A. S. 2007. Vicarious learning from the failure and near-failure of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 687–714.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Krippendorff K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Labianca G. , Gray B. , Brass D. L. 2000. A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11: 235–257. Google Scholar
  • Langley A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24: 691–710LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A. 2007. Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5: 271–282. Google Scholar
  • Larsen B. , Aagaard P. 2003. On a wave of excitement. Copenhagen: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne. Google Scholar
  • Latour B. 1986. The powers of association. In Law J. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: 264–280. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
  • Learning Lab Denmark. 2001. From idea to reality. Copenhagen: Learning Lab Denmark. Google Scholar
  • Learning Lab Denmark. 2007. Staff handbook. Copenhagen: Learning Lab Denmark. Google Scholar
  • Levin M. 2004. Learning in Learning Lab Denmark. Evaluation of Learning Lab Denmark, 2000–2004. Copenhagen: Learning Lab Denmark. Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. , March J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95–112. Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. , Rerup C. 2006. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17: 502–513 Google Scholar
  • Levitt B. , March J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. In Scott W. R.Blake J.Elder G. H. (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, vol. 14: 319–340. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M. 2007. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalization of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 289–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacIntyre A. 2007. After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar
  • Maitlis S. , Lawrence T. 2007. Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 57–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maitlis S. , Sonenshein S. 2010. Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspirations and insights from Weick 1988. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 551–580. Google Scholar
  • March J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87. Google Scholar
  • March J. G. , Shapira Z. 1992. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review, 99: 172–183. Google Scholar
  • March J. G. , Simon H. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Mehlsen C. 2004. Learning experiments. Learning Lab Denmark's self-evaluation. Copenhagen: Learning Lab Denmark. Google Scholar
  • Michel A. A. 2007. A distributed cognition perspective on newcomers' change process: The management of cognitive uncertainty in two investment banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 507–557. Google Scholar
  • Miles M. B. , Huberman A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Miller C. C. , Cardinal. L. B. , Glick W. H. 1997. Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 189–204.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S. , Bassoff P. , Moorman C. 2001. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 304–337. Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S. , Mezias S. J. 1996. Ugly duckling no more: Past and futures of organizational learning research. Organization Science, 7: 88–99. Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24: 934–948. Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. , Waters J. A. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 257–272. Google Scholar
  • Nag R. , Corley K. G. , Gioia D. A. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 821–847.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R. , Winter S. J. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Nemeth C. , Brown K. , Rogers J. 2001. Devil's advocate versus authentic dissent: Stimulating quality and quantity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31: 707–720. Google Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A. , Bechky B. A. 2009. A new framework for coordinating work in organizations. In Walsh J. P.Brief A. P. (Eds.), Academy of Management annals, vol. 3: 463–502. Essex, U.K.: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. , Tushman M. L. 2008. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. In Brief A. P.Staw B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 28: 185–206. Greenwich, CT: JAI. Google Scholar
  • Ortner S. B. 1989. High religion: A cultural and political history of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University press. Google Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. , Feldman M. S. 2005. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 793–815. Google Scholar
  • Perlow L. 2003. When you say yes but mean no: How silencing conflict wrecks relationships and companies. New York: Crown Business. Google Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1: 267–292. Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. 2005. Producing sustainable competitive advantage though the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4): 95–106.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck N. , Weber K. 2009. CEO ambivalence and responses to strategic issues. Organization Science, 20: 993–1010. Google Scholar
  • Pratt M. G. 2009. For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 856–862.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning N. , Sterman J. 2002. Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 265–295. Google Scholar
  • Rerup C. 2006. Success, failure and the grey zone: How organizations learn (or don't) from ambiguous experience. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Google Scholar
  • Rerup C. 2009. Attentional triangulation: Learning from unexpected rare crises. Organization Science, 20: 876–893. Google Scholar
  • Rerup C. , Lafkas J. 2006. Organizing from scratch: The Learning Lab Denmark experience A and B. A-case number: 9B06C006; B-case number: 9B07C007. Ivey Publishing, Richard Ivey School of Business. Google Scholar
  • Saldaña J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Salvato C. 2009. Capabilities unveiled. The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20: 384–409. Google Scholar
  • Salvato C. , Rerup C. 2011. Beyond collective entities: Multi-level research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37: 468–490. Google Scholar
  • Sevon G. 1996. Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In Czarniawska B.Sevon G. (Eds.), Translating organizational change: 49–68. New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  • Sewell W. H. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1–29. Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N. 2002. Evolution towards fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 125–159. Google Scholar
  • Strauss A. , Corbin J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Suddaby R. 2006. What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 633–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sutcliffe K. M. , Weick K. E. 2008. Information overload revisited. Hodgkinson G. P.Starbuck W. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational decision making: 56–75. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Thorton P. H. , Ocasio W. 2008. Institutional logics. In Greenwood P.Oliver C.Sahlin K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 99–129. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. , Chia R. 2002. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13: 567–582. Google Scholar
  • Tucker A. L. , Edmondson A. C. 2003. Why hospitals don't learn from failure: Organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review, 45(2): 55–72. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. 1988. Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25: 305–317. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. 2001. Enactment processes in organizations. In Weick K. E. (Ed.), Making sense of the organization: 179–206. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. , Quinn R. E. 1999. Organizational change and development. In Spence J. T.Darley J. M.Foss D. J. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 50: 361–386. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. , Sutcliffe K. M. , Obstfeld D. 1999. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In Staw B. M.Sutton R. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 21: 81–123. Greenwich, CT: JAI. Google Scholar
  • Wetware. 2001. Preliminary study–Learning Lab Denmark. Copenhagen: Wetware. Google Scholar
  • Wittgenstein L. 1958. Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.; trans., G. E. M. Anscombe). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  • Zbaracki M. J. 1998. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 602–636. Google Scholar
  • Zbaracki M. J. , Bergen M. 2010. When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21: 955–972. Google Scholar
  • Zilber T. B. 2002. Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 234–254.LinkGoogle Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  555 Pleasantville Road, Suite N200
  Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8020, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900