Reinsurance Trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing Conflicting-yet-Complementary Logics in Practice

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638

    Drawing on a yearlong ethnographic study of reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London, this paper makes three contributions to current discussions of institutional complexity. First, we shift focus away from structural and relatively static organizational responses to institutional complexity and identify three balancing mechanisms—segmenting, bridging, and demarcating—that allow individuals to manage competing logics and their shifting salience within their everyday work. Second, we integrate these mechanisms in a theoretical model that explains how individuals can continually keep coexisting logics, and their tendencies to either blend or disconnect, in a state of dynamic tension that renders them conflicting-yet-complementary logics. Our model shows how actors are able to dynamically balance coexisting logics, maintaining the distinction between them while also exploiting the benefits of their interdependence. Third, in contrast to most studies of newly formed hybrids and/or novel complexity, our focus on a long-standing context of institutional complexity shows how institutional complexity can itself become institutionalized and routinely enacted within everyday practice.

    REFERENCES

    • Adler P., Adler P. 1994. Observational techniques. In Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: 377–392. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Ahmadjian C. L., Robinson P. 2001. Safety in numbers: Downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 622–654. Google Scholar
    • Almandoz J. 2012. Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1381–1406.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Ansari S., Wijen F., Gray B. 2013. Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organization Science, 24: 1014–1040. Google Scholar
    • Barley S. R. 1990. Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1: 220–247. Google Scholar
    • Barley S. R. 2008. Coalface institutionalism. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin-Andersson K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 490–515. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Battilana J., Dorado S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419–1440.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Besharov M., Smith W. 2013. Multiple logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39: 364–381. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2011.0431. Google Scholar
    • Birkinshaw J., Gibson C. 2004. Building ambidexterity into an organization. Sloan Management Review, 45: 47–55. Google Scholar
    • Brint S. 2001. Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19: 1–23. Google Scholar
    • Covaleski M. A., Dirsmith M. W., Rittenberg L. 2003. Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: The institutionalization of the global knowledge expert. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28: 323–355. Google Scholar
    • DiMaggio P. 1997. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 263–287. Google Scholar
    • Dunn M. B., Jones C. 2010. Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 114–149. Google Scholar
    • Feldman M. S., Orlikowski W. J. 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22: 1240–1253. Google Scholar
    • Friedland R., Alford R. R. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In Powell W. W.DiMaggio P. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 232–263. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Giddens A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Google Scholar
    • Gieryn T. F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48: 781–795. Google Scholar
    • Gioia D. A., Corley K. G., Hamilton A. L. 2013. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15–31. Google Scholar
    • Goodrick E., Reay T. 2011. Constellations of institutional logics. Work and Occupations, 38: 372–416. Google Scholar
    • Greenwood R., Magàn Diaz A., Li S., Céspedes Lorente J. 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21: 521–539. Google Scholar
    • Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micellota E., Lounsbury M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 1–55. Google Scholar
    • Greenwood R., Suddaby R. 2006. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 27–48.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Grey C. 2003. The real world of Enron’s auditors. Organization, 10: 572–576. Google Scholar
    • Heimer C. A. 1999. Competing institutions: Law, medicine, and family in neonatal intensive care. Law & Society Review, 33: 17–66. Google Scholar
    • Herschaft J. A. 2005. Not your average coffee shop: Lloyd’s of London—A twenty-first-century primer on the history, structure, and future of the backbone of marine insurance. Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 29: 169–185. Google Scholar
    • Hoffman A. J. 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P. 2004. Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25: 529–560. Google Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P., Bednarek R., Cabantous L. 2015. Conducting global team-based ethnography: Methodological challenges and reflections. Human Relations, 68: 3–33. Google Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P., Lê J. K., Feldman M. 2012. Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organization Science, 23: 907–927. Google Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P., Lê J. K., Van de Ven A. H. 2013a. Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11: 245–280. Google Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P., Matthiesen J., Van de Ven A. 2009. Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In Lawrence T. B.Suddaby R.Leca B. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 284–316. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Jarzabkowski P., Smets M., Bednarek R., Burke G., Spee A. P. 2013b. Institutional ambidexterity: Leveraging institutional complexity in practice. In Lounsbury M.Boxenbaum E. (Eds.), Institutional logics in action: 37–61. Bingley, Yorkshire, England: Emerald. Google Scholar
    • Jay J. 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 137–159.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • John A. H. 1958. The London assurance company and the marine insurance market of the eighteenth century. Economica, 25: 126–141. Google Scholar
    • Kitchener M. 2002. Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: The case of academic health centre mergers. Organization Studies, 23: 391–420. Google Scholar
    • Klarner P., Raisch S. 2013. Move to the beat: Rhythms of change and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 160–184.AbstractGoogle Scholar
    • Kraatz M. S., Block E. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin-Andersson K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 243–275. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Langley A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24: 691–710.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Langley A. 2007. Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5: 271–282. Google Scholar
    • Langley A., Smallman C., Tsoukas H., Van de Ven A. H. 2013. Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1–13.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Leavitt K., Reynolds S. J., Barnes C. M., Schilpzand P., Hannah S. T. 2012. Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1316–1333.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Locke K., Golden-Biddle K., Feldman M. S. 2008. Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19: 907–918. Google Scholar
    • Lounsbury M. 2007. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 289–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Lounsbury M., Crumley E. T. 2007. New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28: 993–1012. Google Scholar
    • Lounsbury M., Ventresca M., Hirsch P. 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on U.S. recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1: 71–104. Google Scholar
    • Lüscher L. S., Lewis M. W. 2008. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 221–240.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • MacKay R. B., Chia R. 2013. Choice, chance, and unintended consequences in strategic change: A process understanding of the rise and fall of Northco Automotive. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 208–230.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Mantere S., Ketokivi M. 2013. Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38: 70–89.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Marglin S. A. 2008. The dismal science: How thinking like an economist undermines community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Marquis C., Lounsbury M. 2007. Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 799–820.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Marquis C., Lounsbury M., Greenwood R. 2011. Introduction: Community as an institutional order and a type of organizing. In Marquis C.Lounsbury M.Greenwood R. (Eds.), Communities and organizations, vol. 33: ix–xxvii. Bingley, Yorkshire, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar
    • Oliver C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145–179.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Pache A., Santos F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35: 455–476.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Pache A., Santos F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 972–1001.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Plowman D. A., Baker L. T., Beck T. E., Kulkarni M., Solansky S. T., Travis D. V. 2007. Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 515–543.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H. 1989. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14: 562–578.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Pratt M. G. 2000. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 456–493. Google Scholar
    • Purdy J. M., Gray B. 2009. Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 355–380.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Rao H., Kenney M. 2008. New forms as settlements. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin-Andersson K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 352–370. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Reay T., Hinings C. R. 2005. The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26: 351–384. Google Scholar
    • Reay T., Hinings C. R. 2009. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30: 629–652. Google Scholar
    • Rouleau L., de Rond M., Musca G. 2014. From the ethnographic turn to new forms of organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3: 2–9. Google Scholar
    • Sauermann H., Stephan P. 2013. Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science, 24: 889–909. Google Scholar
    • Saxenian A. 1990. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 33: 89–112. Google Scholar
    • Schatzki T. R. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory. In Schatzki T. R.Knorr-Cetina K.Savigny E. V. (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory: 1–14. London, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar
    • Schatzki T. R. 2002. The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. Google Scholar
    • Schatzki T. R. 2006. On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27: 1863–1873. Google Scholar
    • Schneiberg M. 2002. Organizational heterogeneity and the production of new forms: Politics, social movements and mutual companies in American fire insurance, 1900–1930. In Lounsbury M.Ventresca M. J. (Eds.), Social structure and organizations revisited: 39–89. Bingley, Yorkshire, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar
    • Scott W. R., Ruef M., Mendel P. J., Caronna C. A. 2000. Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. 2003. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14: 650–669. Google Scholar
    • Simsek Z. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 597–624. Google Scholar
    • Smets M., Burke G., Jarzabkowski P., Spee A. P. 2014. Charting new territory for organizational ethnography: Insights from a team-based video ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3: 10–26. Google Scholar
    • Smets M., Jarzabkowski P. 2013. Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66: 1279–1309. Google Scholar
    • Smets M., Morris T., Greenwood R. 2012. From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 877–904.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Smith K. K., Berg D. N. 1987. Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
    • Smith W. K. 2014. Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1592–1623. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.0932.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Smith W. K., Lewis M. W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36: 381–403.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16: 522–536. Google Scholar
    • Spradley J. P. 1979. The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
    • Suddaby R., Seidl D., Lê J. 2013. Strategy-as-practice meets neoinstitutional theory. Strategic Organization, 11: 329–344. Google Scholar
    • Thompson J. D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
    • Thornton P. H. 2002. The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 81–101.AbstractGoogle Scholar
    • Thornton P. H. 2004. Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher educational publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Thornton P. H., Ocasio W. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105: 801–844. Google Scholar
    • Thornton P. H., Jones C., Kury K. 2005. Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing. In Lounsbury M. (Ed.), Transformation in cultural industries: 125–170. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
    • Thornton P. H., Ocasio W. 2008. Institutional logics. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin-Andersson K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 99–129. London, UK: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Thornton P. H., Ocasio W., Lounsbury M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Townley B. 1997. The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18: 261–285. Google Scholar
    • Tracey P., Phillips N., Jarvis O. 2011. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22: 60–80. Google Scholar
    • Van Maanen J. 1988. Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Van Maanen J. 2010. A song for my supper: More tales of the field. Organizational Research Methods, 13: 240–255. Google Scholar
    • Van Maanen J. 2011. Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 218–234. Google Scholar
    • Whittington R. 2006. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27: 613–634. Google Scholar
    • Zilber T. B. 2002. Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 234–254.LinkGoogle Scholar