Self-reliance: A Gender Perspective on its Relationship to Communality and Leadership Evaluations

REFERENCES

• Abele A. E., Wojciszke B. 2007. Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93: 751–763. Google Scholar
• Addis M. E., Mahalik J. R. 2003. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. The American Psychologist, 58: 5–14. Google Scholar
• Amanatullah E. T., Morris M. W. 2010. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98: 256–276. Google Scholar
• Anderson N., Lievens F., van Dam K., Born M. 2006. A construct-driven investigation of gender differences in a leadership-role assessment center. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 555–566. Google Scholar
• Antonakis J., House R. J. 2014. Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25: 746–771. Google Scholar
• Bakan D. 1966. The duality of human existence. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
• Barron L. G., Sackett P. R. 2008. Asian variability in performance rating modesty and leniency bias. Human Performance, 21: 277–290. Google Scholar
• Bellah R. N., Madsen R., Sullivan W. M., Swidler A., Tipton S. M. 2007. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Bem S. L. 1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42: 1S5–162. Google Scholar
• Bettencourt B. A., Dorr N., Charlton K., Hume D. L. 2001. Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127: 520–542. Google Scholar
• Biernat M., Manis M. 1994. Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 5–20. Google Scholar
• Blatt S. J., Quinlan D. M., Chevron E. S., McDonald C., Zuroff D. 1982. Dependency and self-criticism: Psychological dimensions of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50: 113–124. Google Scholar
• Blos P. 1979. The adolescent passage. Madison, CT: International Universities Press. Google Scholar
• Bowlby J. 1988. A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Bowles H. R., Babcock L., McGinn K. L. 2005. Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 51–965. Google Scholar
• Bowles H. R., Babcock L., Lai L. 2007. Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103: 84–103. Google Scholar
• Burgess D., Borgida E. 1999. Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5: 665–692. Google Scholar
• Carter D. A., Simkins B. J., Simpson W. G. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38: 33–53. Google Scholar
• Cassidy T., Lynn R. 1989. A multifactorial approach to achievement motivation: The development of a comprehensive measure. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62: 301–312. Google Scholar
• Catalyst. 2015. Women CEOs of the S&P 500. Available at: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-ceos-sp-500. Google Scholar
• Chandler J., Mueller P., Paolacci G. 2014. Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46: 112–130. Google Scholar
• Chodorow N. 1978. The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Clark D. A., Beck A. T., Brown G. K. 1992. Sociotropy, autonomy, and life event perceptions in dysphoric and nondysphoric individuals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16: 635–652. Google Scholar
• Dasgupta N., Asgari S. 2004. Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40: 642–658. Google Scholar
• Davies P. G., Spencer S. J., Quinn D. M., Gerhardstein R. 2002. Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28: 1615–1628. Google Scholar
• Den Hartog D. N., et al.. 1999. Culturally specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? The Leadership Quarterly, 10: 219–256. Google Scholar
• Ding W. W., Murray F., Stuart T. E. 2013. From bench to board: Gender differences in university scientists’ participation in corporate scientific advisory boards. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 1443–1464.Link , Google Scholar
• Eagly A. H., Karau S. J. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109: 573–598. Google Scholar
• Emerson R. W. 1993. Self-reliance and other essays. New York, NY: Dover Publications. Google Scholar
• Epitropaki O., Martin R. 2004. Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 293–310. Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J. C., Glick P., Xu J. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82: 878–902. Google Scholar
• Hansbrough T. K. 2012. The construction of a transformational leader: Follower attachment and leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42: 1533–1549. Google Scholar
• Hayes A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• Heilman M. E. 2012. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32: 113–135. Google Scholar
• Heilman M. E., Okimoto T. G. 2007. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 81–92. Google Scholar
• Heilman M. E., Wallen A. S., Fuchs D., Tamkins M. M. 2004. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 416–427. Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld R. M., Klerman G. L., Gouch H. G., Barrett J., Korchin S. J., Chodoff P. 1977. A measure of interpersonal dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41: 610–618. Google Scholar
• Hmel B. A., Pincus A. L. 2002. The meaning of autonomy: On and beyond the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 70: 277–310. Google Scholar
• Hofstadter R., Lasch C. 1989. The American political tradition and the men who made it. New York, NY: Vintage. Google Scholar
• Hogan R., Curphy G. J., Hogan J. 1994. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. The American Psychologist, 49: 493–504. Google Scholar
• Horton J. J., Rand D. G., Zeckhauser R. J. 2011. The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14: 399–425. Google Scholar
• House R. J., Aditya R. N. 1997. The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23: 409–473. Google Scholar
• Howell J. M., Avolio B. J. 1993. Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 891–902. Google Scholar
• Hsu F. L. 1972. American core values and national character. In F. L. Hsu (Ed.), Psychological anthropology: 241–262. Cambridge, MA: Shenkman. Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. 1993. r_wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 306–309. Google Scholar
• Javidan M., Dorfman P. W., De Luque M. S., House R. J. 2006. In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20: 67–90.Link , Google Scholar
• Johnson S. K., Murphy S. E., Zewdie S., Reichard R. J. 2008. The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106: 39–60. Google Scholar
• Joshi A., Son J., Roh H. 2014. When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1516–1545. Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Bono J. E. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 80–92. Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Bono J. E., Ilies R., Gerhardt M. W. 2002. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 765–780. Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Piccolo R. F., Ilies R. 2004. The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 36–51. Google Scholar
• Jussim L., Coleman L. M., Lerch L. 1987. The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 536–546. Google Scholar
• Kagitcibasi C. 1996. The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1: 180–186. Google Scholar
• Kalberg S. 2015. Searching for the spirit of American Democracy: Max Weber’s analysis of a unique political culture, past, present, and future. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Kark R., Waismel-Manor R., Shamir B. 2012. Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 23: 620–640. Google Scholar
• Kellerman B. 2004. Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
• Kling K. C., Hyde J. S., Showers C. J., Buswell B. N. 1999. Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 470–500. Google Scholar
• Koenig A. M., Eagly A. H., Mitchell A. A., Ristikari T. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137: 616–642. Google Scholar
• Lanaj K., Hollenbeck J. R. 2015. Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: The role of gender and countervailing biases. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1476–1494.Link , Google Scholar
• LeBreton J. M., Senter J. L. 2008. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 815–852. Google Scholar
• Levant R. F., Pollack W. S. 1995. A new psychology of men. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Lord R. G., Emrich C. G. 2001. Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 11: 551–579. Google Scholar
• Lord R. G., Foti R. J., De Vader C. L. 1984. A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behaviour, 34: 343–378. Google Scholar
• Meyer R. D., Mumford T. V., Burrus C. J., Campion M. A., James L. R. 2014. Selecting null distributions when calculating r_wg: A tutorial and review. Organizational Research Methods, 17: 1–22. Google Scholar
• Nichols A. L., Cottrell C. A. 2014. What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability. The Leadership Quarterly, 25: 711–729. Google Scholar
• Okimoto T. G., Brescoll V. L. 2010. The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36: 923–936. Google Scholar
• Phelan J. E., Moss‐Racusin C. A., Rudman L. A. 2008. Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32: 406–413. Google Scholar
• Phillips D. J. 2005. Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender inequality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 440–472. Google Scholar
• Popper M., Mayseless O. 2003. Back to basics: Applying a parenting perspective to transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14: 41–65. Google Scholar
• Powell G. N., Butterfield D. A., Bartol K. M. 2008. Leader evaluations: A new female advantage? Gender in Management, 23: 156–174. Google Scholar
• Powers T. A., Zuroff D. C. 1988. Interpersonal consequences of overt self-criticism : A comparison with neutral and self-enhancing presentations of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 1054–1062. Google Scholar
• Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., Hayes A. F. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42: 185–227. Google Scholar
• Prentice D. A., Carranza E. 2002. What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26: 269–281. Google Scholar
• Prentice D. A., Carranza E. 2004. Sustaining cultural beliefs in the case of their violation: The case of gender stereotypes. In M. Schaller & Crandall C.S. (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture: 259–280. London, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. 2001. Gender, status, and leadership. The Journal of Social Issues, 57: 637–655. Google Scholar
• Riley G., Etulain R. W. 1997. By grit and grace: Eleven women who shaped the American West. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing. Google Scholar
• Robins R. W., Hendin H. M., Trzesniewski K. H. 2001. Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 151–161. Google Scholar
• Rosette A. S., Tost L. P. 2010. Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 221–235. Google Scholar
• Rotter J. B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80: 1–28. Google Scholar
• Rudman L. A. 1998. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 629–645. Google Scholar
• Rudman L. A., Fairchild K. 2004. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 157–176. Google Scholar
• Rudman L. A., Glick P. 2001. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. The Journal of Social Issues, 57: 743–762. Google Scholar
• Rudman L. A., Moss-Racusin C. a., Phelan J. E., Nauts S. 2012. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48: 165–179. Google Scholar
• Schaumberg R. L., Flynn F. J. 2012. Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown: the link between guilt proneness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103: 327–342. Google Scholar
• Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., Fong G. T. 2005. Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89: 845–851. Google Scholar
• Steinberg L. 1989. Pubertal maturation and parent-adolescent distance: An evolutionary perspective. In R. Montemayor & G. R. Adams (Eds.), Biology of adolescent behavior and development: 71–97. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Steinberg L., Silverberg S. B. 1986. The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescents. Child Development, 57: 841–851. Google Scholar
• Stogdill R. M. 1948. Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25: 35–71. Google Scholar
• Swansburg J. 2014. The self-made man. Slate. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/selfmademan-slate. Google Scholar
• Triandis H. C., Gelfand M. J. 1998. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 118–128. Google Scholar
• Turner F. J. 1986. The frontier in American history. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Co. Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D., Hogg M. A. 2003. A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 243–295. Google Scholar
• Wojciszke B., Abele A. E., Baryla W. 2009. Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 973–990. Google Scholar
• Yukl G. 1998. Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar