Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.4003
Free first page

REFERENCES

  • Altmann E. M., Gray W. D. 2008. An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115: 602–639. Google Scholar
  • Barley S., Meyerson D., Grodal S. 2011. E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22: 887–906. Google Scholar
  • Becker W., Butts M., Boswell W. 2015. Hot buttons and time sinks: The effects of electronic communication during nonwork time on emotions and work–nonwork conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 763–788. Google Scholar
  • Chatterji A., Toffel M. 2010. How do firms respond to being rated? Strategic Management Journal, 31: 917–945. Google Scholar
  • Cohen W., Levinthal D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152. Google Scholar
  • Cummings J. N., Haas M. R. 2012. So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior (Special Issue on the Changing Ecology of Teams), 33: 316–341. Google Scholar
  • Cyert R., March J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  • Dahlander L., O’Mahony S. 2011. Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organization Science, 22: 961–979. Google Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Nijstad B. A., van Knippenberg D. 2008. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12: 22–49. Google Scholar
  • Di Stefano G., King A., Verona G. 2015. Sanctioning in the wild: Rational calculus and retributive instincts in gourmet cuisine. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 881–906. Google Scholar
  • Dioszegi B., Carnabuci G. 2015. Social networks, cognitive style and innovative performance: A contingency perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 907–931. Google Scholar
  • Firth B., Hollenbeck J., Miles J., Ilgen D., Barnes C. 2015. Same page, different books: Extending representational gaps theory to enhance performance in multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 813–835.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • George G., Haas M. R., Pentland A. 2014. Big data and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 321–326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M., Leon N., George G., Thompson P. 2015. Managing by design. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1–7.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haas M. R., Criscuolo P., George G. 2015. Which problems to solve? Online knowledge sharing and attention. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 680–711.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. 2001. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 1–28. Google Scholar
  • Hilbert M., López P. 2011. The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332: 60–65. Google Scholar
  • Howard P. N., Duffy A., Freelon D., Hussain M., Mari W., Mazaid M. 2011. Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? Project on information technology and political Islam. Working Paper 2011.1, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Google Scholar
  • Jurafsky D., Martin J. H. 2009. Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S. 2008. Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 672–695.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kean S. 2006. Scientists spend nearly half their time on administrative tasks. Chronicle of Higher Education, July 14: A23. Google Scholar
  • Lam C. K., Huang X., Chan S. C. H. 2015. The threshold effect of participative leadership and the role of leader information sharing. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 836–855.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leroy S. 2009. Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109: 168–181. Google Scholar
  • Leskovec J., Backstrom L., Kleinberg J. 2009. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Elder J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining: 497–505. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Google Scholar
  • Manyika J., Chui M., Brown B., Bughin J., Dobbs R., Roxburgh C., et al.. 2011. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity (May 2011). New York: McKinsey & Company. Google Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. 1973. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper and Row. Google Scholar
  • Nadkarni S., Chen J. 2014. Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 6: 1810–1833. Google Scholar
  • O’Leary M. B., Mortensen M., Woolley A. W. 2011. Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36: 461–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly C. A. 1980. Individuals and information overload in organizations: Is more necessarily better? Academy of Management Journal, 23: 684–686.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. 2011. Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22: 1286–1296. Google Scholar
  • Pentland A. 2014. Social physics. New York: Penguin. Google Scholar
  • Piezunka H., Dahlander L. 2015. Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 856–880.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y., Argote L. 2011. Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 189–229.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reyt J.-N., Wiesenfeld B. 2015. Seeing the forest for the trees: Exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workers’ role integration behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 739–762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ross J. M., Sharapov D. 2015. When the leader follows: Avoiding dethronement through imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 658–679.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salganik M. J., Watts D. J. 2008. Leading the herd astray: An experimental study of self-fulfilling prohecies in an artificial cultural market. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71: 338–355. Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. 1957. Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Smets M., Jarzabkowski P., Burke G., Spee P. A. 2015. Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 932–970.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stanko T. L., Beckman C. M. 2015. Watching you watching me: Boundary control and capturing attention in the context of ubiquitous technology use. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 712–738.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thau S., Lee S. Y., Pitesa M., Pillutla M. 2015. Discrimination in selection decisions: Integrating stereotype fit and interdependence theories. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 789–812. Google Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 1124–1131. Google Scholar
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013. American Time Use Survey. Retrieved April 2015 from http://www.bls.gov/tus/. Google Scholar
  • Zahra S., George G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27: 185–203.LinkGoogle Scholar