Abstract
Considering creativity as a journey beyond idea generation, scholars have theorized that different ties are beneficial in different phases. As individuals usually possess different types of ties, selecting the optimal ties in each phase and changing ties as needed are central activities for creative success. We identify the types of ties (weak or strong) that are helpful in idea generation and idea elaboration and, given this understanding, whether individuals activate ties in each phase accordingly. In an experimental study of individuals conversing with their ties, we provide evidence of the causal effects of weak and strong ties on idea generation and idea elaboration. We also find that individuals do not always activate ties optimally and identify network size and risk as barriers. Our results in a series of studies reveal that individuals with large networks, despite providing more opportunity to activate both strong and weak ties, activate fewer weak ties and are less likely to switch ties across phases than individuals with smaller networks, particularly when creativity is perceived as a high-risk endeavor. Finally, we find that activating the wrong ties leads to either dropping creative ideas or pursuing uncreative ones.
REFERENCES
- 2016. A gentle introduction to Stata (5th ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press. Google Scholar
- 1982. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 997–1013. Google Scholar
- 1983. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 357–376. Google Scholar
- 2012, November 16. Alfred Hitchcock’s secret weapon becomes a star. New York Times: 16. Google Scholar
- 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40: 1297–1333. Google Scholar
- 2010. The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 592–601. Google Scholar
- 1997. Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- 2001. The ultimate creativity machine. How BMW turns art into profit. Harvard Business Review, 79: 47–55. Google Scholar
- 2016. Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 433–468. Google Scholar
- 2012. Closeness, loneliness, support: Core ties and significant ties in personal communities. Social Networks, 34: 206–214. Google Scholar
- 2004. Down and dirty pictures: Miramax, Sundance, and the rise of independent film. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
- 2008. Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44: 1465–1476. Google Scholar
- 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies. Google Scholar
- 2011. On network theory. Organization Science, 22: 1168–1181. Google Scholar
- 2017. Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans. Nature Communications, 8: 1–9. Google Scholar
- 2019. Gender, brokerage and performance: A construal approach. Academy of Management Journal, 62: 196–219.Link , Google Scholar
- 2013. Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34: S82–S103. Google Scholar
- 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 518–539. Google Scholar
- 2020. Dissonant ties in intraorganizational networks: Why individuals seek problem-solving assistance from difficult colleagues. Academy of Management Journal, 63: 743–778.Link , Google Scholar
- 2013. Be careful what you wish for: The effects of issue interpretation on social choices in professional networks. Organization Science, 25: 401–419. Google Scholar
- 2015. Protecting the turf: The effect of territorial marking on others’ creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 1785–1797. Google Scholar
- 2013, July 22. How criticism creates innovative teams. Harvard Business Review. Google Scholar
- 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
- 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349–399. Google Scholar
- 1960. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67: 380–400. Google Scholar
- 1986. An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12: 137–189. Google Scholar
- 1998. Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Social Networks, 20: 331–351. Google Scholar
- 2008. When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 655–684. Google Scholar
- 2014. Creativity Inc.: Overcoming the unseen forces that stand in the way of true inspiration. New York, NY: Random House. Google Scholar
- 2015. Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25: 333–358. Google Scholar
- 2012. Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118: 116–131. Google Scholar
- 1994. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6: 284–290. Google Scholar
- 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 37–46. Google Scholar
- 2013. Going underground: Bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organization Science, 25: 1287–1305. Google Scholar
- 2007. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32: 761–773.Link , Google Scholar
- 1997. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial. Google Scholar
- 2012. The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23: 988–1007. Google Scholar
- 2013. Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 69–110. Google Scholar
- 2010. Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35: 579–603.Link , Google Scholar
- 1993. The making of Reservoir Dogs. Empire, 44. Google Scholar
- 1962. The cognitive structure of a social structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64: 303–307. Google Scholar
- 1968. Balance and the grouping schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8: 1–7. Google Scholar
- 2014. One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies, 35: 703–726. Google Scholar
- 1998. The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6: 178–190. Google Scholar
- 2008. Cognitive constraints on the structure and dynamics of social networks. Group Dynamics, 12: 7–16. Google Scholar
- 1995. Social networks, support cliques, and kinship. Human Nature, 6: 273–290. Google Scholar
- 2003. Tolkien and CS Lewis: The gift of friendship. St Paul, MI: Paulist Press International. Google Scholar
- 2018. Deep help in complex project work: Guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1524–1553.Link , Google Scholar
- 2006. Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91: 1123–1137. Google Scholar
- 2010. Do you two know each other? Transitivity, homophily, and the need for (network) closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99: 855–869. Google Scholar
- 2018. Rewards for patents and inventor behaviors in industrial research and development. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 264–292.Link , Google Scholar
- 2010. First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111: 102–115. Google Scholar
- 1999. The International Personality Item Pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual difference. IPIP. Google Scholar
- 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360–1380. Google Scholar
- 2018. The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1692–1717.Link , Google Scholar
- 2017. An alter-centric perspective on employee innovation: The importance of alters’ creative self-efficacy and network structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102: 1360–1374. Google Scholar
- 2007. The illusion of knowledge: When more information reduces accuracy and increases confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103: 277–290. Google Scholar
- 2006. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17: 484–500. Google Scholar
- 2014. Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1256–1283.Link , Google Scholar
- 2015. An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 375–404.Link , Google Scholar
- 2014. Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39: 324–343.Link , Google Scholar
- 2013. Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 346–386. Google Scholar
- 1990. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16: 393–408. Google Scholar
- 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications. Google Scholar
- 2003. Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14: 53–72. Google Scholar
- 2000. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 995–1006. Google Scholar
- 2005. Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 348–364. Google Scholar
- 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- 1964. The sleepwalkers: A history of man’s changing vision of the universe. London, U.K.: Penguin. Google Scholar
- 1987. Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9: 109–134. Google Scholar
- 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342–369. Google Scholar
- 1989. Note on Cohen’s kappa. Psychological Reports, 65: 223–226. Google Scholar
- 2012. Imagine: How creativity works. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Google Scholar
- 2010. Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 47–81. Google Scholar
- 2002. There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 757–767.Link , Google Scholar
- 2010. Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35: 558–578.Link , Google Scholar
- 2021. Developing improvisation skills: The influence of individual orientations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66: 612–658. Google Scholar
- 2018. The differential impact of knowledge depth and knowledge breadth on creativity over individual careers. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1741–1763.Link , Google Scholar
- 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 735–746.Link , Google Scholar .
- 1962. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69: 220–232. Google Scholar
- 2002. From acclaim to blame: Evidence of a person sensitivity decision bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 33–42. Google Scholar
- 2009. British Modernism’s many manners. Humanities, 30: 2. Google Scholar
- 2011. Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 263–276. Google Scholar
- 2012. The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23: 13–17. Google Scholar
- 2016. Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 450–462. Google Scholar
- 2004. Alma Hitchcock: The woman behind the man. New York, NY: Berkley Trade. Google Scholar
- 2018. LARPnography: An embodied embedded cognition method to probe the future. European Journal of Marketing, 53: 1637–1664. Google Scholar
- 2017. The role of affect climate in organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 42: 334–360.Link , Google Scholar
- 2017. Spontaneous neural encoding of social network position. Nature Human Behaviour, 1. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0072. Google Scholar
- 2006. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 85–101.Link , Google Scholar
- 2014. Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: An experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 831–846. Google Scholar
- 2015.
Social networks, creativity, and entrepreneurship . In C. E. ShalleyM. A. HittJ. Zhou (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: 205–224. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar - 2017. From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42: 53–79.Link , Google Scholar
- 2020.
From ugly duckling to swan: A social networks perspective on novelty recognition and creativity . In D. J. BrassS. Borgatti (Eds.), Social networks at work. London, U.K.: Routledge. Google Scholar - 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28: 89–106.Link , Google Scholar
- 2012. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38: 1115–1166. Google Scholar
- 2001. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26: 298–310.Link , Google Scholar
- 1913. The foundations of science. New York, NY: Science Press. Google Scholar
- 2017. Situated redesign in creative occupations–An ethnography of architects. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3: 404–424.Link , Google Scholar
- 2004. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541–562. Google Scholar
- 2019. Information overload in the information age: A review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development. Business Research, 12: 479–522. Google Scholar
- 2020. Where you end and I begin: Understanding intimate co-creation. Academy of Management Review, 45: 181–204.Link , Google Scholar
- 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1: 7–59. Google Scholar
- 2011. The closeness-communication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47: 269–273. Google Scholar
- 1991. Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 179–185. Google Scholar
- 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30: 933–958. Google Scholar
- 2015. The affective antecedents of cognitive social network activation. Social Networks, 43: 91–99. Google Scholar
- 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69: 99–118. Google Scholar
- 1971.
Designing organizations for an information-rich world . In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communication, and the public interest. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press. Google Scholar - 1984. Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 1273–1286. Google Scholar
- 2003. Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129: 475–494. Google Scholar
- 2012. Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organization Science, 23: 67–82. Google Scholar
- 2016, November 2. Monsters Inc: Pete Docter dives deep into movie’s legacy and creation, 15 years later. Entertainment Weekly. Google Scholar
- 2011. Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22: 1–21. Google Scholar
- 1999. Strategy and cognition: Understanding the role of management knowledge structures, organizational memory and information overload. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8: 140–148. Google Scholar
- 1990.
An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation . In M. A. WestJ. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies: 287–308. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar - 2006. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 723–740.Link , Google Scholar
- 2002. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1137–1148.Link , Google Scholar
- 1993. The impact of task complexity on information use in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6: 95–111. Google Scholar
- 2015. The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 586–597. Google Scholar
- 2010. Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 167–181.Link , Google Scholar
- 2012. Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23: 1024–1039. Google Scholar
- 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 1124–1131. Google Scholar
- 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- 2006. Live action role-playing games: Control, communication, storytelling, and MMORPG similarities. Games and Culture, 1: 252–275. Google Scholar
- 2014. Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: Leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 966–975. Google Scholar
- 2005. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16: 203–224. Google Scholar
- 1991. Statistical principles in empirical design. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar
- 2017. Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 20: 365–377. Google Scholar
- 1998. Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 261–276. Google Scholar
- 2003. When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 413–422. Google Scholar
- 2009. Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1544–1552. Google Scholar
- 2017. Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102: 180–202. Google Scholar