Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2021.1358

Do the clothes worn to work impact employees’ thoughts and behaviors? Despite the universal necessity of wearing clothes and the fact that employees make decisions about this daily, organizational scholars have not yet addressed this question. We integrate sociometer and enclothed cognition theories to propose that aspects of clothing—their aesthetics, conformity, and uniqueness—hold symbolic meanings that have implications for employees’ state self-esteem and subsequent task and relational behaviors (i.e., goal progress, social avoidance). We first provide evidence for the nature of the symbolic meanings associated with these three dimensions of work clothing in a set of within-person experimental studies. The results of a 10-day field study of employees from four organizations generally supported our predictions, showing that daily clothing aesthetics and uniqueness had effects on state self-esteem and downstream behavioral consequences. The effects of daily clothing conformity emerged under the condition of greater interaction frequency with others in the workplace. Our manuscript contributes to both major theories from which we draw, and further offers theoretical and practical contributions to the literature on organizational clothing.

REFERENCES

  • Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. 2012. Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48: 918–925. Google Scholar
  • Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. 2019. Reflections on enclothed cognition: Commentary on Burns et al. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83: 157–159. Google Scholar
  • Anthony, D. B., Holmes, J. G., & Wood, J. V. 2007. Social acceptance and self-esteem: Tuning the sociometer to interpersonal value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92: 1024–1039. Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. 1994. A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1: 35–67. Google Scholar
  • Bailey, E. R., Horton, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D. 2022. Enclothed harmony or enclothed dissonance? The effect of attire on the authenticity, power, and engagement of remote workers. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8: 341–356.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. 2009. What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1394–1411. Google Scholar
  • Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. 2003. Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4: 1–44. Google Scholar
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 497–529. Google Scholar
  • Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. 2014. The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41: 35–54. Google Scholar
  • Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. 2000. Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 555–577. Google Scholar
  • Berton, E. 2010, December 14. Dress to impress, UBS tells staff. Wall Street Journal. Google Scholar
  • Biecher, E., Keaton, P. N., & Pollman, A. W. 1999. Casual dress at work. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 64: 17–21. Google Scholar
  • Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. 1992. You look “marvelous”: The pursuit of beauty and the marketing concept. Psychology and Marketing, 9: 3–15. Google Scholar
  • Bonaccio, S., O’Reilly, J., O’Sullivan, S. L., & Chiocchio, F. 2016. Nonverbal behavior and communication in the workplace: A review and an agenda for research. Journal of Management, 42: 1044–1074. Google Scholar
  • Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J. G., & Pierce, C. A. 2015. Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 431–449. Google Scholar
  • Brewer, M. B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17: 475–482. Google Scholar
  • Brewer, M. B. 2003. Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self. In M. R. LearyJ. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity: 480–491. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Brislin, R. W. 1970. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1: 185–216. Google Scholar
  • Burrow, A. L., & Rainone, N. 2017. How many likes did I get?: Purpose moderates links between positive social media feedback and self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69: 232–236. Google Scholar
  • Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. 1986. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 559–570. Google Scholar
  • Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. 2004. Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 822–834. Google Scholar
  • Camilli, G., & Hopkins, K. D. 1978. Applicability of chi-square to 2 × 2 contingency tables with small expected cell frequencies. Psychological Bulletin, 85: 163–167. Google Scholar
  • Cash, T. F. 1990. The psychology of physical appearance: Aesthetics, attributes, and images. In T. F. CashT. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change: 51–79. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Chan, C., Berger, J., & Van Boven, L. 2012. Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39: 561–573. Google Scholar
  • Chen, Z. X., Aryee, S. F., & Lee, C. 2005. Test of a mediation model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66: 457–470. Google Scholar
  • Colquitt, J. A., Sabey, T. B., Rodell, J. B., & Hill, E. T. 2019. Content validation guidelines: Evaluation criteria for definitional correspondence and definitional distinctiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104: 1243–1265. Google Scholar
  • Cooley, C. H. 1967. The looking-glass self. In J. G. ManisA. N. Meitzer (Eds.), Symbolic interactions: A reader in social psychology: 169–171. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar
  • Cortina, J. M., & Landis, R.S. 2009. When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don’t. In C. E. LanceR. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences: 287–308. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. 2003. Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85: 894–908. Google Scholar
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11: 227–268. Google Scholar
  • De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. 2002. How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 858–866. Google Scholar
  • Den Hartog, D. N., De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Keegan, A. E. 2007. The interactive effects of belongingness and charisma on helping and compliance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1131–1139. Google Scholar
  • Denissen, J. J. A., Penke, L., Schmitt, D. P., & van Aken, M. A. G. 2008. Self-esteem reactions to social interactions: Evidence for sociometer mechanisms across days, people, and nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95: 181–196. Google Scholar
  • Dion, K., Berscheids, E., & Walster, E. 1972. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24: 285–290. Google Scholar
  • Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dastmalchian, A., & House, R. 2012. GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership. Journal of World Business, 47: 504–518. Google Scholar
  • Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. 1991. What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110: 109–128. Google Scholar
  • Eckman, M. 1997. Attractiveness of men’s suits: The effect of aesthetic attributes and consumer characteristics. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 15: 193–202. Google Scholar
  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. 1993. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 1577–1613.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. 2014. Color psychology: Effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 65: 95–120. Google Scholar
  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. 2007. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12: 121–138. Google Scholar
  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. 2004. Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25: 63–87. Google Scholar
  • Feinberg, R. A., Mataro, L., & Burroughs, W. J. 1992. Clothing and social identity. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 11: 18–23. Google Scholar
  • Feldman, D. C. 1984. The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9: 47–53.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Heller, D. 2009. Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 279–286. Google Scholar
  • Ferris, D. L., Spence, J. R., Brown, D. J., & Heller, D. 2012. Interpersonal injustice and workplace deviance: The role of esteem threat. Journal of Management, 38: 1788–1811. Google Scholar
  • Fischer, T., Tian, A. W., Lee, A., & Hughes, D. J. 2021. Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink. Leadership Quarterly, 32: 101540. Google Scholar
  • Ford, R. T. 2021. Dress codes: How the laws of fashion made history. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. 1997. Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21: 173–206. Google Scholar
  • Gabriel, A. S., Podsakoff, N. P., Beal, D. J., Scott, B. A., Sonnentag, S., Trougakos, J. P., & Butts, M. M. 2019. Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organizational Research Methods, 22: 969–1006. Google Scholar
  • Gabriel, A. S., Volpone, S. D., Macgowan, R. L., Butts, M. M., & Moran, C. M. 2020. When work and family blend together: Examining the daily experiences of breastfeeding mothers at work. Academy of Management Journal, 63: 1337–1369.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. 1988. Impression management in organizations. Journal of Management, 14: 321–338. Google Scholar
  • Gillath, O., Bahns, A. J., Ge, F., & Crandall, C. S. 2012. Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 46: 423–430. Google Scholar
  • Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. 2000. The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 211–222. Google Scholar
  • Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. 2010. The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science, 21: 712–720. Google Scholar
  • Greenlees, I., Leyland, A., Thelwell, R., & Filby, W. 2008. Soccer penalty takers’ uniform colour and pre-penalty kick gaze affect the impressions formed of them by opposing goalkeepers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26: 569–576. Google Scholar
  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. 2007. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 327–347.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. 2013. Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23: 372–386. Google Scholar
  • Gurel, L. M., & Gurel, L. 1979. Clothing interest: Conceptualization and measurement. Home Economics Research Journal, 7: 274–282. Google Scholar
  • Gurung, R. A. R., Kempen, L., Klemm, K., Senn, R., & Wysocki, R. 2014. Dressed to present: Ratings of classroom presentations vary with attire. Teaching of Psychology, 41: 349–353. Google Scholar
  • Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. 1991. Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 895–910. Google Scholar
  • Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. 1999. An analysis of variance approach to content validation. Organizational Research Methods, 2: 175–186. Google Scholar
  • Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. 2000. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. KleinS. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 467–511. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
  • Jennings, R. E., Lanaj, K., & Kim, Y. J. 2023. Self-compassion at work: A self-regulation perspective on its beneficial effects for work performance and wellbeing. Personnel Psychology, 76: 279–309. Google Scholar
  • Johnson, K. K. P., & Roach-Higgins, M. E. 1987. Dress and physical attractiveness of women in job interviews. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 5: 1–8. Google Scholar
  • Joung, H. M., & Miller, N. J. 2006. Factors of dress affecting self‐esteem in older females. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10: 466–478. Google Scholar
  • Kahn, W. A. 1992. To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45: 321–349. Google Scholar
  • Kerr, N. L., & Levine, J. M. 2008. The detection of social exclusion: Evolution and beyond. Group Dynamics, 12: 39–52. Google Scholar
  • Kline, R. B. 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Koopman, J., Lanaj, K., & Scott, B. A. 2016. Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 414–435.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraus, M. W., & Mendes, W. B. 2014. Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143: 2330–2340. Google Scholar
  • LaGuardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. 2000. Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 367–384. Google Scholar
  • Laitala, K., & Klepp, I. G. 2018. Motivations for and against second-hand clothing acquisition. Clothing Cultures, 5: 247–262. Google Scholar
  • Lanaj, K., & Jennings, R. E. 2020. Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105: 355–371. Google Scholar
  • Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Lee, S. M. 2016. Benefits of transformational behaviors for leaders: A daily investigation of leader behaviors and need fulfillment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101: 237–251. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R. 1990. Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9: 221–229. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R. 1999. Making sense of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8: 32–35. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R. 2003. Interpersonal aspects of optimal self-esteem and the authentic self. Psychological Inquiry, 14: 52–54. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R. 2005. Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16: 75–111. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. 2000. The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32: 1–62. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. 1995. Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem: 123–144. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R., Gallagher, B., Fors, E., Buttermore, N., Baldwin, E., Kennedy, K., & Mills, A. 2003. The invalidity of disclaimers about the effects of social feedback on self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29: 623–636. Google Scholar
  • Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. 1990. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 34–47. Google Scholar
  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. 2008. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 815–852. Google Scholar
  • López-Pérez, B., Ambrona, T., Wilson, E. L., & Khalil, M. 2016. The effect of enclothed cognition on empathic responses and helping behavior. Social Psychology, 47: 223–231. Google Scholar
  • Lyman, B., Hatlelid, D., & MacUrdy, C. 1981. Stimulus-person cues in first-impression attraction. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52: 59–66. Google Scholar
  • Maslow, A. H. 1968. Towards a psychology of being. New York, NY: Van Nostrand. Google Scholar
  • McClean, S. T., Koopman, J., Yim, J., & Klotz, A. C. 2021. Stumbling out of the gate: The energy-based implications of morning routine disruption. Personnel Psychology, 74: 411–448. Google Scholar
  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 81–90. Google Scholar
  • McFarlin, D. B., Baumeister, R. F., & Blascovich, J. 1984. On knowing when to quit: Task failure, self‐esteem, advice, and nonproductive persistence. Journal of Personality, 52: 138–155. Google Scholar
  • McNeill, L. S. 2018. Fashion and women’s self-concept: A typology for self-fashioning using clothing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22: 82–98. Google Scholar
  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. 2012. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17: 437–455. Google Scholar
  • Miller, D. T. 1976. Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34: 901–906. Google Scholar
  • Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. 2002. Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36: 147–172. Google Scholar
  • Mohajeri, K., Mesgari, M., & Lee, A. S. 2020. When statistical significance is not enough: Investigating relevance, practical significance, and statistical significance. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 44: 525–559. Google Scholar
  • Montoya, A. K., & Hayes, A. F. 2017. Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22: 6–27. Google Scholar
  • Muthén, B. 2010. Bayesian analysis in Mplus: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/IntroBayesVersion%203.pdf Google Scholar
  • Nguyen, L., & Jeng, M. 2021, August 2. A Wall Street dressing down: Always be casual. New York Times. Google Scholar
  • O’Cass, A., & Frost, H. 2002. Status brands: Examining the effects of non‐product‐related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11: 67–88. Google Scholar
  • Oostrom, J. K., Ronay, R., & van Kleef, G. A. 2021. The signaling effects of nonconforming dress style in personnel selection contexts: Do applicants’ qualifications matter? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30: 70–82. Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879–903. Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. 2009. Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 122–141. Google Scholar
  • Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. 1997. Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 862–898.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. 2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31: 437–448. Google Scholar
  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. 2004. Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130: 435–468. Google Scholar
  • Rafaeli, A., & Pratt, M. G. 1993. Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy of Management Review, 18: 32–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen, C. C., Simon, L. S., Gajendran, R. S., Johnson, R. E., Lee, H. W., & Lin, S.-H. 2019. Boxed in by your inbox: Implications of daily e-mail demands for managers’ leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104: 19–33. Google Scholar
  • Rucker, M., Taber, D., & Harrison, A. 1981. The effect of clothing variation on first impressions of female job applicants: What to wear when. Social Behavior and Personality, 9: 53–64. Google Scholar
  • Schilpzand, P., Leavitt, K., & Lim, S. 2016. Incivility hates company: Shared incivility attenuates rumination, stress, and psychological withdrawal by reducing self-blame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 133: 33–44. Google Scholar
  • Scott, B. A., & Barnes, C. M. 2011. A multilevel field investigation of emotional labor, affect, work withdrawal, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 116–136.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. 2005. Development of the levels of self-concept scale: Measuring the individual, relational, and collective levels. [Unpublished Manuscript] University of Akron, Akron, Ohio. Google Scholar
  • Seo, S., & Lang, C. 2018. Psychological antecedents to customized apparel purchases. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 23: 66–81. Google Scholar
  • Simon, L. S., Hurst, C., Kelley, K., & Judge, T. A. 2015. Understanding cycles of abuse: A multimotive approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 1798–1810. Google Scholar
  • Stuart, E. W., & Fuller, B. K. 1991. Clothing as communication in two business-to-business sales settings. Journal of Business Research, 23: 269–290. Google Scholar
  • Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. 2001. Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28: 50–66. Google Scholar
  • Venkatesh, A., Joy, A., Sherry, J. F., Jr., & Deschenes, J. 2010. The aesthetics of luxury fashion, body and identify formation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20: 459–470. Google Scholar
  • Vogel, R. M., & Mitchell, M. S. 2017. The motivational effects of diminished self-esteem for employees who experience abusive supervision. Journal of Management, 43: 2218–2251. Google Scholar
  • Vogel, R. M., Rodell, J. B., & Agolli, A. 2022. Daily engagement and productivity: The importance of the speed of engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107: 1130–1149. Google Scholar
  • Vogel, R. M., Rodell, J. B., & Sabey, T. B. 2020. Meaningfulness misfit: Consequences of daily meaningful work needs–supplies incongruence for daily engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105: 760–770. Google Scholar
  • Wanberg, C. R., Zhu, J., & Van Hooft, E. A. 2010. The job search grind: Perceived progress, self-reactions, and self-regulation of search effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 788–807.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang, X., Wang, X., Lei, J., & Chao, M. C. H. 2021. The clothes that make you eat healthy: The impact of clothes style on food choice. Journal of Business Research, 132: 787–799. Google Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld, B. M., Swann, W. B., Jr., Brockner, J., & Bartel, C. A. 2007. Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1235–1253.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Woolum, A., Foulk, T., Lanaj, K., & Erez, A. 2017. Rude color glasses: The contaminating effects of witnessed morning rudeness on perceptions and behaviors throughout the workday. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102: 1658–1672. Google Scholar
  • Workman, J. E., & Kidd, L. K. 2000. Use of the need for uniqueness scale to characterize fashion consumer groups. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 18: 227–236. Google Scholar
  • Yan, R., Yurchisin, J., & Watchravesringkan, K. 2011. Does formality matter?: Effects of employee clothing formality on consumers’ service quality expectations and store image perceptions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 39: 346–362. Google Scholar
  • Yuan, Y., & MacKinnon, D. P. 2009. Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14: 301–322. Google Scholar
  • Zyphur, M. J., & Oswald, F. L. 2015. Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41: 390–420. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900