Profitable Business Models and Market Creation in the Context of Deep Poverty: A Strategic View
Abstract
The bottom of the pyramid (BOP) in the global distribution of income has been promoted as a significant opportunity for companies to grow profitably. Under the BOP approach, poor people are identified as potential customers who can be served if companies learn to fundamentally rethink their existing strategies and business models. This involves acquiring and building new resources and capabilities and forging a multitude of local partnerships. However, current BOP literature remains relatively silent about how to actually implement such a step into the unknown. We use two BOP cases to illustrate a strategic framework that reduces managerial complexity. In our view, existing capabilities and existing local BOP models can be leveraged to build new markets that include the poor and generate sufficient financial returns for companies to justify investments.
References
- Arnold and Quelch, 1998 (1998). New strategies in emerging markets. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 7–20 Google Scholar
- Barney, 1995 (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61. Abstract , Google Scholar
- Das and Teng, 2001 (2001). Trust, control and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283. Google Scholar
- Denrell et al., 2003 (2003). The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 977–990. Google Scholar
- Dierickx and Cool, 1989 (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. Google Scholar
- Dyer and Singh, 1998 (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. Link , Google Scholar
- Hart and Sharma, 2004 (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18. Abstract , Google Scholar
- Helfat and Peteraf, 2003 (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. Google Scholar
- Hitt et al., 2000 (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467. Link , Google Scholar
- Karnani, 2007 (2007). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: A mirage. California Management Review, forthcoming. Google Scholar
- Khanna and Palepu, 1997 (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 41–51. Google Scholar
- London and Hart, 2004 (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370. Google Scholar
- London et al., 2005 (2005). Strange bedfellows: Alliances between corporations and non-profits. In Shenkar O.Reuer J. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
- Makadok, 2001 (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401. Google Scholar
- Malaviya et al., 2004 (2004). Telenor in Bangladesh. INSEAD Teaching Case 304–147-1. Google Scholar
- Peng, 2003 (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296. Link , Google Scholar
- Prahalad, 2004 (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing. Google Scholar
- Prahalad and Hammond, 2002 (2002). Serving the world's poor profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57. Google Scholar
- Prahalad and Hart, 2002 (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy Business, 26, 54–67. Google Scholar
- Prahalad and Lieberthal, 1998 (1998). The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 68–79. Google Scholar
- Priem and Butler, 2001 (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. Abstract , Google Scholar
- Reed and DeFillippi, 1990 (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102. Link , Google Scholar
- Rumelt et al., 1991 (1991). Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal, 12,
Winter Special Issue, 5–29. Google Scholar - Seelos and Mair, 2005 (2005). Entrepreneurs in service of the poor: Models for business contributions to sustainable development. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246. Google Scholar
- Sirmon et al., 2007 (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. Link , Google Scholar
- United Nations, 2006
United Nations . (2006). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2006. New York: United Nations. Google Scholar - Winter and Szulanski, 2001 (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743. Google Scholar
- Wright et al., 2005 (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33. Google Scholar

