Profitable Business Models and Market Creation in the Context of Deep Poverty: A Strategic View

    The bottom of the pyramid (BOP) in the global distribution of income has been promoted as a significant opportunity for companies to grow profitably. Under the BOP approach, poor people are identified as potential customers who can be served if companies learn to fundamentally rethink their existing strategies and business models. This involves acquiring and building new resources and capabilities and forging a multitude of local partnerships. However, current BOP literature remains relatively silent about how to actually implement such a step into the unknown. We use two BOP cases to illustrate a strategic framework that reduces managerial complexity. In our view, existing capabilities and existing local BOP models can be leveraged to build new markets that include the poor and generate sufficient financial returns for companies to justify investments.

    References

    • Arnold and Quelch, 1998 Arnold D. , Quelch J. (1998). New strategies in emerging markets. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 7–20 Google Scholar
    • Barney, 1995 Barney J. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 49–61. AbstractGoogle Scholar
    • Das and Teng, 2001 Das T. K. , Teng B. S. (2001). Trust, control and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283. Google Scholar
    • Denrell et al., 2003 Denrell J. , Fang C. , Winter S. G. (2003). The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 977–990. Google Scholar
    • Dierickx and Cool, 1989 Dierickx I. , Cool K. O. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. Google Scholar
    • Dyer and Singh, 1998 Dyer J. H. , Singh H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Hart and Sharma, 2004 Hart S. L. , Sharma S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18. AbstractGoogle Scholar
    • Helfat and Peteraf, 2003 Helfat C. E. , Peteraf M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. Google Scholar
    • Hitt et al., 2000 Hitt M. , Dacin M. , Levitas E. , Arregle J. L. , Borza A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Karnani, 2007 Karnani A. (2007). Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: A mirage. California Management Review, forthcoming. Google Scholar
    • Khanna and Palepu, 1997 Khanna T. , Palepu K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 41–51. Google Scholar
    • London and Hart, 2004 London T. , Hart S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370. Google Scholar
    • London et al., 2005 London T. , Rondinelli D. A. , O'Neill H. (2005). Strange bedfellows: Alliances between corporations and non-profits. In Shenkar O.Reuer J. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Alliances. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
    • Makadok, 2001 Makadok R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401. Google Scholar
    • Malaviya et al., 2004 Malaviya P. , Singhal A. , Svenkerud P. (2004). Telenor in Bangladesh. INSEAD Teaching Case 304–147-1. Google Scholar
    • Peng, 2003 Peng M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Prahalad, 2004 Prahalad C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing. Google Scholar
    • Prahalad and Hammond, 2002 Prahalad C. K. , Hammond A. (2002). Serving the world's poor profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57. Google Scholar
    • Prahalad and Hart, 2002 Prahalad C. K. , Hart S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy Business, 26, 54–67. Google Scholar
    • Prahalad and Lieberthal, 1998 Prahalad C. K. , Lieberthal K. (1998). The end of corporate imperialism. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 68–79. Google Scholar
    • Priem and Butler, 2001 Priem R. L. , Butler J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. AbstractGoogle Scholar
    • Reed and DeFillippi, 1990 Reed R. , DeFillippi R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Rumelt et al., 1991 Rumelt R. P. , Schendel D. , Teece D. J. (1991). Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal, 12, Winter Special Issue, 5–29. Google Scholar
    • Seelos and Mair, 2005 Seelos C. , Mair J. (2005). Entrepreneurs in service of the poor: Models for business contributions to sustainable development. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246. Google Scholar
    • Sirmon et al., 2007 Sirmon D. G. , Hitt M. A. , Ireland R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • United Nations, 2006 United Nations. (2006). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2006. New York: United Nations. Google Scholar
    • Winter and Szulanski, 2001 Winter S. G. , Szulanski G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), 730–743. Google Scholar
    • Wright et al., 2005 Wright M. , Filatotchev I. , Hoskisson R. E. , Peng M. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33. Google Scholar