Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Articles

Management Practices Across Firms and Countries

    Published Online:30 Apr 2012https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0077

    Abstract

    For the past decade we have been using double-blind survey techniques and randomized sampling to construct management data on more than 10,000 organizations across 20 countries. On average, we find that in manufacturing American, Japanese, and German firms are the best managed. Firms in developing countries, such as Brazil, China, and India, tend to be poorly managed. American retail firms and hospitals are also well managed by international standards, although American schools are worse managed than those in several other developed countries. We also find substantial variation in management practices across organizations in every country and every sector, mirroring the wide spread of productivity and profitability within industries. One factor linked to this variation is ownership. Government and founder-owned firms are usually poorly managed, while multinational, dispersed shareholder, and private-equity-owned firms are typically well managed. Family-owned firms are badly managed if run by family members compared with similar family-owned firms run by external CEOs. Stronger product market competition and higher worker skills are associated with better management practices. Less regulated labor markets are associated with improvements in incentive management practices such as performance-based promotion.

    References

    • Appelbaum E. , Batt R. L. (1994). The new American workplace: Transforming work systems in the United States. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. , Arikan A. M. (2001). The resource-based view origins and implications. In Hitt M. A.Freeman R. E.Harrison J. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (chapter 5). Oxford, UK, and Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. , Griffin R. W. (1992). The management of organizations: Strategy, structure, behavior. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
    • Becker B. E. , Huselid M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Journal, 16(1), 53–101. Google Scholar
    • Becker M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–678. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Draca M. , Van Reenen J. (2011). Trade induced technical change? In The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity (Discussion Paper No. 1000). London: Centre for Economic Performance. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Eifert B. , Mahajan A. , McKenzie D. , Roberts J. (2011). Does management matter? In Evidence from India (Working Paper Series No. 16658). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w16658.pdf Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Genakos C. , Martin R. , Sadun R. (2010). Modern management: Good for the environment or just hot air? Economic Journal, 120(544), 551–572. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Kretschmer T. , Van Reenen J. (2011). Are family-friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource? Strategic Management Journal, 32(4), 343–367. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Liang J. , Roberts J. , Ying Z. (2012). Does working from home work? In Evidence from a corporate experiment (Stanford Mimeo). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Available from http://www.stanford.edu/∼nbloom/WFH.pdf Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Propper C. , Seiler S. , Van Reenen J. (2010). The impact of competition on management quality: Evidence from public hospitals (Working Paper Series No. 16032). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Sadun R. , Van Reenen J. (2009a). The organization of firms across countries (Working Paper Series No. 15129). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15129.pdf Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Sadun R. , Van Reenen J. (2009b). Do private equity-owned firms have better management practices? In Gurung A.Lerner J. (Eds.), The global economic impact of private equity report 2009 (pp. 1–23). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Available from http://www.weforum.org/pdf/cgi/pe/Full_Report2.pdf Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Sadun R. , Van Reenen J. (2012). Management as a technology (LSE Mimeo). London: London School of Economics. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Sadun R. , Van Reenen J. (in press). Americans do I.T. better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. American Economic Review. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Schweiger H. , Van Reenen J. (2011). The land that lean manufacturing forgot? Management practices in transition countries (Working Paper Series No. 17231). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Van Reenen J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351–1408. Google Scholar
    • Bloom N. , Van Reenen J. (2011). Human resource management and productivity. In Ashenfelter O.Card D. (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (vol. 4B, pp. 1697–1769). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
    • Boeker W. , Karichalil R. (2002). Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 818–826.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Cumming D. , Siegel D. S. , Wright M. (2007). Private equity, leveraged buyouts and governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(4), 439–460. Google Scholar
    • Davila A. , Foster G. , Jia N. (2010). Building sustainable high-growth startup companies: Management systems as an accelerator. California Management Review, 52(3), 79–105. Google Scholar
    • Delery J. E. , Doty D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835.Link , Google Scholar
    • Delfgaauw J. , Dur R. , Proper C. , Smith S. (2011). Management practices: Are not for profits different? (Working Paper 11/263). Bristol, UK: Center for Market and Public Organisation. Google Scholar
    • Dohrmann T. , Pinshaw G. (2009). The road to improved compliance: A McKinsey benchmarking study of tax administrations 2008–2009. New York: McKinsey & Company. Google Scholar
    • Eisenhardt K. M. , Martin J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121. Google Scholar
    • Foster L. , Haltiwanger J. , Krizan C. J. (2006). Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the U.S. retail trade sector in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 748–758. Google Scholar
    • Foster L. , Haltiwanger J. , Syverson C. (2008). Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection on productivity or profitability? American Economic Review, 98(1), 394–425. Google Scholar
    • Greene W. (2002). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
    • Grous A. (2011). Management practices in the UK aerospace sector (LSE Mimeo). London: London School of Economics. Google Scholar
    • Harris R. , Siegel D. S. , Wright M. (2005). Assessing the impact of management buyouts on economic efficiency: Plant-level evidence from the United Kingdom. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 148–153. Google Scholar
    • Homkes R. (2011). The missing management link: Why management matters in global public-private partnerships (LSE Mimeo). London: London School of Economics. Google Scholar
    • House R. J. , Hanges P. M. , Javidan M. , Dorfman P. , Gupta V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
    • Hoxby C. M. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209–1238. Google Scholar
    • Huselid M. A. , Becker B. E. (1996). Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-firm performance. Industrial Relations, 35(3), 400–422. Google Scholar
    • Ichniowski C. , Shaw K. , Prennushi G. (1997). The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review, 87(3), 291–313. Google Scholar
    • Javidan M. , Dorfman P. , Sully de Luque M. , House R. J. (2006). In the eye of the beholder: Cross-cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(3), 67–91.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Lengnick-Hall M. L. , Lengnick-Hall C. A. , Andrade L. S. , Drake B. (2009). Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field. Human Resource Management Review, 19(2), 64–85. Google Scholar
    • Lepak D. P. , Liao H. , Chung Y. , Harden E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. In Martocchio J. (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 217–271). Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Lichtenberg F. R. , Siegel D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(1), 165–194. Google Scholar
    • Macduffie J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197–221. Google Scholar
    • McConnell J. , Hoffman K. , Quanbeck A. , McCarty D. (2009). Management practices in substance abuse treatment programs. Journal of Substance Abuse, 37(1), 79–89. Google Scholar
    • McKinsey & Company. (2009). Management matters in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Available at http://www.delni.gov.uk/management_matters_in_ireland.pdf Google Scholar
    • McNally S. (2010). Evaluating education policies: The evidence from economic research (Paper No. CEPEA008). London: Centre for Economic Performance. Available at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/ea008.pdf Google Scholar
    • Nelson R. R. , Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Books of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Osterman P. (1994). How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(2), 173–188. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J. (1999a). Seven practices of successful organizations. Health Forum Journal, 42(1), 24–27. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J. (1999b). Seven practices of successful organizations, Part 2: Invest in training, reduce status differences, don't keep secrets. Health Forum Journal, 42(2), 55. Google Scholar
    • Pfeffer J. , Veiga J. F. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 37–48.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Siegel D. S. , Simons K. (2010). Assessing the effects of mergers and acquisitions on firm performance, plant productivity, and workers: New evidence from matched employer-employee data. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 903–916. Google Scholar
    • Skinner J. , Staiger D. (2009). Technology diffusion and productivity growth in health care (Working Paper Series No. 14865). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
    • Syverson C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–365. Google Scholar
    • Washburn N. , Waldman D. , Sully de Luque M. (2009). Agents behaving like stewards: Executive discretion and the display of steward behaviors. Paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar
    • Winter S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. Google Scholar
    • Woodward J. (1958). Management and technology. London: H. M. Stationery Office. Google Scholar