Bounded Ethicality and Ethical Fading in Negotiations: Understanding Unintended Unethical Behavior

References

• Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. Google Scholar
• Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947–965. Google Scholar
• Aquino, K. (1998). The effects of ethical climate and the availability of alternatives on the use of deception during negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(3), 195–217. Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A. I. I., Lim, V. K. G., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 123–141. Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., & Reed, A. I. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440. Google Scholar
• Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–34. Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52. Google Scholar
• Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 109–126. Google Scholar
• Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., & Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. American Economic Review, 85, 1337–1343. Google Scholar
• Bandler, J., & Varchaver, N. (2009, April 24). How Bernie did it: Madoff is behind bars and isn’t talking. But a Fortune investigation uncovers secrets of his massive swindle. Fortune. Retrieved from http://archive.fortune.com/2009/04/24/news/newsmakers/madoff.fortune/index.htm Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Underwood, B., & Fromson, M. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253–269. Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B., & Wright, P. M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37, 31–46. Google Scholar
• Bart, V., Treviño, L. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (1993). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 253–263. Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279–314. Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T., & Neale, M. A. (1985). Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 294–313. Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1983). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to effective dispute resolution. In M. H. BazermanR. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 311–321). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23, 225–241.Link , Google Scholar
• Beckman, N. (1977). Negotiations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Google Scholar
• Bennett, V. M., Pierce, L., Snyder, J. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). Customer-driven misconduct: How competition corrupts business practices. Management Science, 59, 1725–1742. Google Scholar
• Biel, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93–112. Google Scholar
• Boles, T. L., Croson, R. T. A., & Murnighan, J. K. (2000). Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 235–259. Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., & Loewenstein, G. (1993). Information, fairness, and efficiency in bargaining. In B. A. MellersJ. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice (pp. 155–181). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Carr, A. Z. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review, 1, 143–153. Google Scholar
• Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. A. MooreD. M. CainG. LoewensteinM. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Problems and solutions from law, medicine and organizational settings. London: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Coffman, L. (2011). Intermediation reduces punishment (and reward). American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3, 77–106. Google Scholar
• Cohen, T. R., Gunia, B. C., Kim-Jun, S. Y., & Murnighan, J. K. (2009). Do groups lie more than individuals? Honesty and deception as a function of strategic self-interest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1321–1324. Google Scholar
• Control Risks Group. (1998). Corruption and integrity: Best business practice in an imperfect world. London: Author. Google Scholar
• Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Eisenkraft, N. (2010). The objective value of subjective value: A multi‐round negotiation study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 690–709. Google Scholar
• Curhan, J. R., Neale, M. A., & Ross, L. (2004). Dynamic valuation: Preference changes in the context of face-to-face negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 142–151. Google Scholar
• Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383. Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. Google Scholar
• DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. A., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681–689. Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W. (1996). Gain-loss frame in outcome-interdependence: Does it influence equality or equity considerations? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 315–324. Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., Beersma, B., Steinel, W., & van Kleef, G. A. (2007). The psychology of negotiation: Principles and basic processes. In A. W. KruglanskiE. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 608–629). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
• DeRue, D. S., Conlon, D. E., Moon, H., & Willaby, H. W. (2009). When is straightforwardness a liability in negotiations? The role of integrative potential and structural power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1032–1047. Google Scholar
• Diekmann, K. A., Samuels, S. M., Ross, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: Allocators versus recipients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1061–1074. Google Scholar
• Diekmann, K. A., Soderberg, A. T., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2013). Fairness and ethics in bargaining and negotiation. In M. OlekalnsW. L. Adair (Eds.), Handbook of research in negotiation (pp. 191–220). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Fraser, S. C., & Beaman, A. L. (1976). Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 178–183. Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperative behavior? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 159–171. Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Gaspar, J. P., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2013). The emotion deception model: A review of deception in negotiation and the role of emotion in deception. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6, 160–179. Google Scholar
• Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20, 393–398. Google Scholar
• Gino, F., Gu, J., & Zhong, C. B. (2009). Contagion or resolution? When bad apples can motivate ethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1299–1302. Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Margolis, J. D. (2011). Bringing ethics into focus: How regulatory focus and risk preferences influence (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 145–156. Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009). Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychological Science, 20, 1153–1160. Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2010). Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to restore equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 89–103. Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103. Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 53–107.Link , Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1994). Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organization Science, 5, 272–285. Google Scholar
• Guidice, R. M., Alder, G. S., & Phelan, S. E. (2009). Competitive bluffing: An examination of a common practice and its relationship with performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 535–553. Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. Google Scholar
• Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256. Google Scholar
• Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Dijk, E., Vermunt, R. C., Wilke, H. A. M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2008). Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1136–1149. Google Scholar
• Haran, U. (2013). A person-organization discontinuity in contract perception: Why corporations can get away with breaking contracts but individuals cannot. Management Science, 59, 2837–2853. Google Scholar
• Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 451–457. Google Scholar
• Hinshaw, A., & Alberts, J. K. (2011). Doing the right thing:An empirical study of attorney negotiation ethics. Paper presented at the CELS 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Los Angeles. Google Scholar
• Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86, 653–660. Google Scholar
• Hur, J. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2016). Paying for performance: Performance incentives increase desire for the reward object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 301–316. Google Scholar
• Jenni, K. E., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 235–258. Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. A., & Anderson, C. (2017). Hierarchical rank and principled dissent: How holding higher rank suppresses objection to unethical practices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 30–49. Google Scholar
• Kern, M. C., & Chugh, D. (2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20, 378–384. Google Scholar
• Kilduff, G. L. (2014). Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5(8), 944–952. Google Scholar
• Kivetz, Y., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 193–211. Google Scholar
• Koning, L., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., & Steinel, W. (2010). An instrumental account of deception and reactions to deceit in bargaining. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 57–73. Google Scholar
• Kouchaki, M., Smith-Crowe, K., Brief, A. P., & Sousa, C. (2013). Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 53–61. Google Scholar
• Kreye, M. (2016). Uncertainty and behavior: Perceptions, decisions and actions in business. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. Google Scholar
• Lapsley, D. K., & Lasky, B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Identity, 1, 345–363. Google Scholar
• Larrick, R. P., & Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 810–825. Google Scholar
• Larrick, R. P., Heath, C., & Wu, G. (2009). Goal-induced risk taking in negotiation and decision making. Social Cognition, 27, 342–364. Google Scholar
• Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986a). The manager as negotiator, bargaining for cooperative and competitive gain. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986b). Three ethical issues in negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 2(4), 363–370. Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Litterer, J. A. (1985). Instructor’s manual to accompany: Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. Chicago: Irwin Incorporated. Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18. Google Scholar
• Liberman, V., Samuels, S., & Ross, L. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputation vs. situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1175–1185. Google Scholar
• Lindgreen, A. (2004). Corruption and unethical behavior: Report on a Danish code. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 31–39. Google Scholar
• Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204. Google Scholar
• Malhotra, D. (2004). Trust and reciprocity decisions: The differing perspectives of trustors and trusted parties. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 61–73. Google Scholar
• Malhotra, D., & Gino, F. (2011). The pursuit of power corrupts: How investing in outside options motivates opportunism in relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 559–592. Google Scholar
• Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644. Google Scholar
• Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002). Ethics, morality, and professional responsibility in negotiation. In P. BernardB. Garth (Eds.), Dispute resolution ethics: A comprehensive guide (pp. 134–135). Chicago: American Bar Association. Google Scholar
• Messick, D. M. (1999). Dirty secrets. In L. L. ThompsonJ. M. LevineD. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 71–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Messick, D. M.Tenbrunsel, A. E. (Eds.). (1996). Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar
• Murnighan, J. K. (1991). The dynamics of bargaining games. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Neale, M. A., & Fragale, A. R. (2006). Social cognition, attribution, and perception in negotiation: The role of uncertainty in shaping negotiation processes and outcomes. In L. L. Thompson (Ed.), Negotiation theory and research (pp. 27–54). New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
• Olson, S. D. (2013). Shaping an ethical workplace culture. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Foundation. Google Scholar
• Paharia, N., Kassam, K., Greene, J., & Bazerman, M. (2009). Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 134–141. Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. R., Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Sivanathan, N. (2013). From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychological Science, 24, 1986–1994. Google Scholar
• Pillutla, M. M., & Chen, X. (1999). Social norms and cooperation in social dilemmas: The effects of context and feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 81–103. Google Scholar
• Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 208–224. Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger. Google Scholar
• Robertson, D., & Rymon, T. (2001). Purchasing agents’ deceptive behavior: A randomized response technique study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 455–479. Google Scholar
• Robinson, R. J., Lewicki, R. J., & Donahue, E. M. (2000). Extending and testing a five-factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 649–664. Google Scholar
• Rockmann, K. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2008). To be or not to be trusted: The influence of media richness on defection and deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 106–122. Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139. Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. Z., & Sander, F. E. A. (1988). When should we use agents: Direct vs. representative negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 4, 395–401. Google Scholar
• Rubin, M. H. (1995). The ethics of negotiations: Are there any? Louisiana Law Review, 447, 453–454. Google Scholar
• Sacconi, L. (2013). Ethics, economic organization and the social contract. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Handbook of economic organization: Integrating economic and organization theory. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E. (2001). Deception in negotiations. In S. Hoch & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Wharton on making decisions. Retrieved from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/how-deception-reputation-and-e-mail-can-affect-your-negotiating-strategy/ Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., & Croson, R. (1999). Curtailing deception: The impact of direct questions on lies and omissions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 225–248. Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., DeChurch, L., & Gibson, D. (2005). Conflict frames and the use of deception: Are competitive negotiators less ethical? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2123–2149. Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 422–432.Link , Google Scholar
• Shalvi, S., Eldar, O., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2012). Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Psychological Science, 23, 1264–1270. Google Scholar
• Shell, R. G. (1991). When is it legal to lie in negotiations? Sloan Management Review, 32, 93–101. Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
• Skarlicki, D. P., van Jaarsveld, D. D., & Walker, D. D. (2008). Getting even for customer mistreatment: The role of moral identity in the relationship between customer interpersonal injustice and employee sabotage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1335–1347. Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Computers, networks, and work. Scientific American, (September), 116–127. Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1998). Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 330–339.Link , Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel, A. E., Diekmann, K. A., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153–173. Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2001). Power asymmetries and ethical behavior in organizations. In J. M. DarleyD. M. Messick (Eds.), Social influences on ethical behavior in organizations (pp. 201–216). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–235. Google Scholar
• Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.Link , Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (1998). The mind and heart of the negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98–123. Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 491–515. Google Scholar
• Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Link , Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. Google Scholar
• Tyler, J. M., Feldman, R. S., & Reichert, A. (2006). The price of deceptive behavior: Disliking and lying to people who lie to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 69–77. Google Scholar
• Valley, K. L., Moag, J., & Bazerman, M. H. (1998). A matter of trust: Effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of outcomes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34, 211–238. Google Scholar
• van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 169–191. Google Scholar
• Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314, 1154–1156. Google Scholar
• Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Egocentric interpretations of fairness in asymmetric, environmental social dilemmas: Explaining harvesting behavior and the role of communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 6, 111–126. Google Scholar
• Walker, L. J., & Pitts, R. C. (1998). Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 34, 403–419. Google Scholar
• Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and application. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 443–454. Google Scholar
• Wetlaufer, G. B. (1990). The ethics of lying in negotiations. Iowa Law Review, 75, 1219–1273. Google Scholar
• Woltin, K., Corneille, O., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Förster, J. (2011). Narrowing down to open up for other individuals’ concerns: Empathic concern can be enhanced by inducing detailed processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 418–424. Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Fletcher, P. O., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2015). Reducing bounded ethicality: How to help individuals notice and avoid unethical behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 310–317. Google Scholar
• Zhong, C., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). A good lamp is the best police: Darkness increases self-interested behavior and dishonesty. Psychological Science, 21, 311–314. Google Scholar