Skip main navigation
Articles

Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity

    Published Online:1 Apr 1993https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517

    Abstract

    In this article we develop a theoretical framework for understanding creativity in complex social settings. We define organizational creativity as the creation of a valuable, useful new product, service, idea, procedure, or process by individuals working together in a complex social system. The starting point for our theoretical development is provided by the interactionist model of creative behavior developed by Woodman and Schoenfeldt (1989). This model and supporting literature on creative behavior and organizational innovation are used to develop an interactional framework for organizational creativity. The theoretical framework is summarized by three propositions that can effectively guide the development of testable hypotheses.

    REFERENCES

    • Abbey A. , Dickson J. W. 1983. R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 362–368.Link , Google Scholar
    • Allen T. J. , Lee D. M. , Tushman M. L. 1980, R&D performance as a function of internal communication, project management, and the nature of the work. IEEE Transactions, 27: 2–12. Google Scholar
    • Amabile T. M. 1979. Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 221–233. Google Scholar
    • Amabile T. M. 1983. The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
    • Amabile T. M. 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In Staw B. M.Cummings L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 10: 123–167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Amabile T. M. 1990. Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity and beyond. In Runco M. A.Albert R. S. (Eds.), Theories of creativity: 61–91. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Amabile T. M. , Goldfarb P. , Brackfield S. C. 1990, Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3: 6–21. Google Scholar
    • Amabile T. M. , Gryskiewicz N. D. 1989. The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory. Creativity Research Journal. 2: 231–253. Google Scholar
    • Andrews F. M. 1979. Scientific productivity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Arieti S. 1976. Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
    • Barron F. 1969. Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
    • Barron F. B. , Harrington D. M. 1981. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology. 32: 439–476. Google Scholar
    • Basadur M. , Finkbeiner C. T. 1985. Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21: 37–49. Google Scholar
    • Basadur M. , Graen G. B. , Graen S. G. 1982. Training in creative problem-solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30: 41–70. Google Scholar
    • Basadur M. , Graen G. B. , Scandura T. A. 1986. Training effects on attitudes toward divergent-thinking among manufacturing engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 612–617. Google Scholar
    • Basadur M. , Wakabayashi M. , Graen G. B. 1990. Individual problem-solving styles and attitudes toward divergent thinking before and after training. Creativity Research journal, 3: 22–32. Google Scholar
    • Bateman T. S. , Griffin R. W. , Rubinstein D. 1987. Social information processing and group-induced shifts in response to task design. Group & Organization Studies, 12: 88–108. Google Scholar
    • Bottger P. C. , Yetton P. W. 1987. Improving group performance by training in individual problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 651–657. Google Scholar
    • Brown R. T. 1989, Creativity: What are we to measure? In Glover J. A.Ronning R. R.Reynolds C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: 3–32. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
    • Burkhardt M. E. , Brass D. J. 1990. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 104–127. Google Scholar
    • Burnside R. M. 1990. Improving corporate climates for creativity. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 265–284. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Campbell D. T. 1960. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67: 380–400. Google Scholar
    • Carrol J. B. 1985. Domains of cognitive ability, Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Los Angeles. Google Scholar
    • Cohen W. M. , Levinthal D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152. Google Scholar
    • Cummings L. L. 1965. Organizational climates for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 3: 220–227. Google Scholar
    • Cummings L. L. , O'Connell M. J. 1978. Organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 6: 33–50. Google Scholar
    • Damanpour F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 555–590.Link , Google Scholar
    • Ettlie J. E. 1983. Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing sector. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 27–44.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Farr J. L. 1990. Facilitating individual role innovation. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 207–230. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Farr J. L. , Ford C. M. 1990. Individual innovation. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 63–80, Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Galton F. 1869. Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
    • Goertzel M. G. , Goertzel V. , Goertzel T. G. 1978. Three hundred eminent personalities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
    • Golann S. E. 1963. Psychological study of creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 60: 548–565. Google Scholar
    • Griffin R. W. 1983. Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 184–200. Google Scholar
    • Griffin R. W. , Bateman T. S. , Wayne S. J. , Head T. S. 1987. Objective and social factors as determinants of task perceptions and responses: An integrative perspective and empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 501–523.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Guilford J. P. 1977. Way beyond the IQ: Guide to improving intelligence and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation. Google Scholar
    • Guilford J. P. 1983. Transformation abilities or functions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17: 75–83. Google Scholar
    • Guilford J. P. 1984. Varieties of divergent production. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18: 1–10. Google Scholar
    • Hackman J. R. , Morris C. G. 1975. Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 8: 47–99. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
    • Hammond K. R. , Stewart T. R. , Brehmer B. , Steinmann D. O. 1986. Social judgment theory. In Arkes H. R.Hammond K. R. (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader: 56–76. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Harrington D. M. 1990. The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In , Runco M. A. , Albert R. S. (Eds.), Theories of creativity: 143–169. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Hayes J. R. 1989. Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover J. A.Ronning R. R.Reynolds C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: 135–145. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
    • Hayward G. , Everett C. 1983. Adaptors and innovators: Data from the Kirton Adaptor-Inventory in a local authority setting. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56: 339–342. Google Scholar
    • Hogarth R. M. 1987. Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • James L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219–229. Google Scholar
    • Kanfer R. 1990. Motivation theory and industrial/organizational psychology. In Dunnette M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 1: 75–170. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press. Google Scholar
    • Kanfer R. , Ackerman P. L. 1989. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 74: 657–690. Google Scholar
    • Kanter R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. In Staw B. M.Cummings L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizotional behavior, vol. 10: 169–211. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Katz R. , Allen T. J. 1985. Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 87–87. Google Scholar
    • King N. 1990. Innovation at work: The research literature. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 15–59. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • King N. , Anderson N. 1990. Innovation in working groups. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 81–100. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Kirton M. J. , Pender S. 1982. The adaption-innovation continuum, occupational-type, and course-selection. Psychological Reports, 51: 882–886. Google Scholar
    • Kolb J. A. 1992. Leadership of creative teams, Journal of Creative Behavior, 26: 1–9. Google Scholar
    • Martindale C. 1989. Personality, situation, and creativity. In Glover J. A.Ronning R. R.Reynolds C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: 211–232. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
    • Michael W. B. , Wright C. R. 1989. Psychometric issues in the assessment of creativity. In Glover J. A.Ronning R. R.Reynolds C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: 33–52. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
    • Mumford M. D. , Gustafson S. B. 1988. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 27–43. Google Scholar
    • Nystrom H. 1979. Creativity and innovation. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Nystrom H. 1990. Organizational innovation. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 143–161. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Offner D. 1990. “Hitch-hiking” on creativity in nature, Journal of Creative Behavior, 24: 199–204. Google Scholar
    • Paolillo J. G. , Brown W. B. 1978. How organizational factors affect R&D innovation, Research Management, 21: 12–15. Google Scholar
    • Payne R. 1990. The effectiveness of research teams: A review. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 101–122. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Roberts K. H. , Burnstein L. 1980. New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Issues in aggregation, vol. 6. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
    • Roberts K. H. , Hulin C. L. , Rousseau D. M. 1978. Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
    • Rousseau D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In Staw B. M.Cummings L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizationai behavior, vol. 7: 1–37. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Rubinstein D. , Woodman R. W. 1984. Spiderman and the Burma raiders: Collateral organization theory in action. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20: 1–16. Google Scholar
    • Runco M. A. , Albert R. S. (Eds.), 1990. Theories of creativity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
    • Salancik G. , Pfeffer J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 224–253. Google Scholar
    • Sawyer J. E. 1990. Effects of risk and ambiguity on judgments of contingency relations and behavioral resource allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45: 85–110. Google Scholar
    • Sawyer J. E. 1991. Hypothesis sampling, construction, or adjustment: How are inferences about nonlinear monotonic contingencies developed? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49: 124–150. Google Scholar
    • Schaefer C. E. , Anastasi A. 1968. A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent boys. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52: 42–48. Google Scholar
    • Schneider B. 1983. Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In Cummings L. L.Staw B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 5: 1–31. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
    • Schneider B. 1987. The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40: 437–453. Google Scholar
    • Siegel S. M. , Kaemmerer W. F. 1978. Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 553–562. Google Scholar
    • Simon H. 1967. Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74: 29–39. Google Scholar
    • Simonton D. K. 1975. Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6: 259–277. Google Scholar
    • Simonton D. K. 1986. Biographical typicality, eminence and achievement styles, Journal of Creative Behavior, 20: 14–22. Google Scholar
    • Singh B. 1986. Role of personality versus biographical factors in creativity. Psychological Studies, 31: 90–92. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M. 1984. Organization behavior: A review and reformulation of the field's outcome variables. Annual Review of Psychology, 35: 627–666. Google Scholar
    • Staw B. M. 1990. An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 287–308. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Stein B. S. 1989. Memory and creativity. In Glover J. A.Ronning R. R.Reynolds C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: 163–176. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
    • Stein M. K. 1974. Stimulating creativity, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
    • Steiner G. A. (Ed.) 1965. The creative organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Terborg J. R. 1981. Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 6: 569–576.Abstract , Google Scholar
    • Thornburg T. H 1991. Group size and member diversity influence on creative performance. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25: 324–333. Google Scholar
    • Tushman M. L. , Nelson R. R. 1990. Introduction: Technology, organizations, and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 1–8. Google Scholar
    • West M. A. , Farr J. L. 1990. Innovation at work. In West M. A.Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: 1–13. Chichester, England: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Wheatley W. J. , Anthony W. P. , Maddox E. N. 1991. Selecting and training strategic planners with imagination and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25: 52–60. Google Scholar
    • Witkin H. A. , Dyk R. B. , Paterson H. F. , Goodenough D. R. , Karp S. A. 1962. Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Woodman R. W. 1981. Creativity as a construct in personality theory. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15: 43–66. Google Scholar
    • Woodman R. W. , Sawyer J. E. 1991. An interactionist model of organizational creativity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami. Google Scholar
    • Woodman R. W. , Schoenfeldt L. F. 1989. Individual differences in creativity: An interactionist perspective. In Glover J. A.Ronning R. R.Reynolds C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: 77–92. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar
    • Woodman R. W. , Schoenfeldt L. F. 1990. An interactionist model of creative behavior, Journal of Creative Behavior, 24: 279–290. Google Scholar
    • Yetton P. W. , Bottger P. C. 1982. Individual versus group problem solving: An empirical test of a best-member strategy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29: 307–321. Google Scholar
    • Yetton P. W. , Bottger P. C. 1983. The relationship among group size, member ability, social decision schemes, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32: 145–159. Google Scholar
    • Zaltman G. , Duncan R. , Holbek J. 1973. Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2025 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum