Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496

To acquire resources, new ventures need to be perceived as legitimate. For this to occur, a venture must meet the expectations of various audiences with differing norms, standards, and values as the venture evolves and grows. We investigate how the organizational identity of a technology venture must adapt to meet the expectations of critical resource providers at each stage of its organizational life cycle. In so doing, we provide a temporal perspective on the interactions among identity, organizational legitimacy, institutional environments, and entrepreneurial resource acquisition for technology ventures. The core assertion from this conceptual analysis is that entrepreneurial ventures confront multiple legitimacy thresholds as they evolve and grow. We identify and discuss three key insights related to entrepreneurs’ efforts to cross those thresholds at different organizational life cycle stages: institutional pluralism, venture-identity embeddedness, and legitimacy buffering.

REFERENCES

  • Albert S., Whetten D. A. 1985. Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 263–295. Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Fiol C. M. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19: 645–670.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amburgey T. L., Kelly D., Barnett W. P. 1990. Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco. Google Scholar
  • Anderson C. R., Zeithaml C. P. 1984. Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 5–24.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson N. H. 1981. Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  • Ashforth B. E., Gibbs B. W. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1: 177–194. Google Scholar
  • Ashforth B. E., Mael F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20–39.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker T., Nelson R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 329–366. Google Scholar
  • Battilana J., Dorado S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419–1440.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C., Eisenhardt K., Kotha S., Meyer A., Rajagopalan N. 2012. Technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2): 89–93. Google Scholar
  • Berkery D. 2007. Raising venture capital for the serious entrepreneur. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  • Bhide A. 2000. The origin and evolution of new businesses. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Bitektine A. 2011. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36: 151–179.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blank S. 2013. Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5): 63–72. Google Scholar
  • Boeker W., Karichalil R. 2002. Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 818–826.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W., Wiltbank R. 2005. New venture evolution and managerial capabilities. Organization Science, 16: 123–133. Google Scholar
  • Branscomb L., Morse K., Roberts M. 2000. Managing technical risk. Report No. NIST GCR 00-797. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Google Scholar
  • Branscomb L. M., Auerswald P. E. 2002. Between invention and innovation: An analysis of early stage technical development. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce. Google Scholar
  • Brockner J. 1992. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17: 39–61.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown A. D., Starkey K. 2000. Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25: 102–120.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cardon M. S., Wincent J., Singh J., Drnovsek M. 2009. The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34: 511-532.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Swaminathan A. 2000. Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106: 715–762. Google Scholar
  • Certo S. T., Covin J. G., Daily C. M., Dalton D. R. 2001. Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 641–658. Google Scholar
  • Chandler A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  • Chen G., Hambrick D. C., Pollock T. G. 2008. Puttin’on the Ritz: Pre-IPO enlistment of prestigious affiliates as deadline-induced remediation. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 954–975.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarkson M. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92–117.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Colyvas J. A., Powell W. W. 2007. From vulnerable to venerated: The institutionalization of academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 25: 219–259. Google Scholar
  • Corley K. G., Gioia D. A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 173–208. Google Scholar
  • Corley K. G., Harquail C. V., Pratt M. G., Glynn M. A., Fiol C. M., Hatch M. J. 2006. Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15: 85–99. Google Scholar
  • Delmar F., Shane S. 2004. Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19: 385–410. Google Scholar
  • Denis D. J. 2004. Entrepreneurial finance: An overview of the issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10: 301–326. Google Scholar
  • Dodge H. R., Fullerton S., Robbins J. E. 1994. Stage of the organizational life cycle and competition as mediators of problem perception for small businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 121–134. Google Scholar
  • Dodge H. R., Robbins J. E. 1992. An empirical investigation of the organizational life cycle model for small business development and survival. Journal of Small Business Management, 30(1): 27–37. Google Scholar
  • Dosi G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11: 147–162. Google Scholar
  • Dunn M. B., Jones C. 2010. Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 114–149. Google Scholar
  • Duryee T. 2011. Groupon stock now half off. All Things D, November 28: http://allthingsd.com/20111128/groupon-stock-now-half-off-whats-the-deal/. Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 517–554.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 239–263. Google Scholar
  • Ehrenberg R. 2008. Monitor110: A post mortem. Information Arbitrage, July 18: http://informationarbitrage.com/post/698402433/monitor110-a-post-mortem. Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D. 1994. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 57–88. Google Scholar
  • Elston J. A., Audretsch D. B. 2011. Financing the entrepreneurial decision: An empirical approach using experimental data on risk attitudes. Small Business Economics, 36: 209–222. Google Scholar
  • Fauchart E., Gruber M. 2011. Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 935–957.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fini R., Lacetera N. 2010. Different yokes for different folks: Individual preferences, institutional logics, and the commercialization of academic research. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation & Economic Growth, 21: 1–25. Google Scholar
  • Fischer H. M., Pollock T. G. 2004. Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 463–481.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher G. 2012. Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36: 1019–1051. Google Scholar
  • Fiske S., Taylor S. 1991. Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  • Fiss P. C., Zajac E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1173–1193.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman R. E. 2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Gaibraith J. 1982. The stages of growth. Journal of Business Strategy, 3(1): 70–79. Google Scholar
  • Garud R., Schildt H. A., Lant T. K. 2014. Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25: 1479–1492. Google Scholar
  • Gioia D. A. 1998. From individual to organizational identity. In Whetten D. A.Godfrey P. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations, vol. 11: 17–31. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Schultz M., Corley K. G. 2000. Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25: 63–81.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Thomas J. B. 1996. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 370–403. Google Scholar
  • Glynn M. A. 2000. When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11: 285–298. Google Scholar
  • Glynn M. A. 2008. Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin-Andersson K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 413–430. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Glynn M. A., Marquis C. 2004. When good names go bad: Symbolic illegitimacy in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 22: 147–170. Google Scholar
  • Golden-Biddle K., Rao H. 1997. Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8: 593–611. Google Scholar
  • Gompers P. A. 1995. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 50: 1461–1489. Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 1420–1443. Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. 1992. Economic institutions as social constructions: A framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35: 3–11. Google Scholar
  • Gray B., Ariss S. S. 1985. Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 10: 707–723.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Raynard M., Kodeih F., Micelotta E. R., Lounsbury M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5: 317–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gross D. 2012. Zuckerberg’s hoodie rankles Wall Street. CNN Money, May 9: http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/09/tech/social-media/zuckerberg-hoodie-wall-street/. Google Scholar
  • Gulati R., Nohria N., Zaheer A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 203–215. Google Scholar
  • Haeussler C., Colyvas J. A. 2011. Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40: 41–54. Google Scholar
  • Hall J., Hofer C. W. 1993. Venture capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 25–42. Google Scholar
  • Hallen B. L. 2008. The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 685–718. Google Scholar
  • Hallen B. L., Eisenhardt K. M. 2012. Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 35–70.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanlon D., Saunders C. 2007. Marshaling resources to form small new ventures: Toward a more holistic understanding of entrepreneurial support. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31: 619–641. Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Baron J. N., Hsu G., Koçak Ö. 2006. Organizational identities and the hazard of change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15: 755–784. Google Scholar
  • Hensel N. 2005. Are Dutch auctions right for your IPO? HBS Working Knowledge, April 11: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4747.html. Google Scholar
  • Hiatt S. R., Sine W. D., Tolbert P. S. 2009. From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 635–667. Google Scholar
  • Hilts P. J. 1981. The gold rush of companies into biotechnology is waning. Washington Post, November 3: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/11/03/the-gold-rush-of-companies-into-biotechnology-is-waning/cfa840aa-e73f-4fa8-8216-38f90e9a4380/. Google Scholar
  • Hite J. M., Hesterly W. S. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 275–286. Google Scholar
  • Hsu D. H. 2007. Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy, 36: 722–741. Google Scholar
  • Hsu D. H. 2008. Technology-based entrepreneurship. In S. Shane (Ed.), Handbook of technology and innovation management: 367–388. West Sussex, UK: Wiley. Google Scholar
  • Hughes S. S. 2011. Genentech: The beginnings of biotech. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Jawahar I., McLaughlin G. L. 2001. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26: 397–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones T. M., Wicks A. C. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24: 206–221.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jonsson S., Greve H. R., Fujiwara-Greve T. 2009. Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 195–228. Google Scholar
  • Kafka P. 2008. Monitor 110 shuttered. Business Insider, July 16: http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/7/monitor-110-shuttered. Google Scholar
  • Katz J., Gartner W. B. 1988. Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13: 429–441.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kazanjian R. K. 1988. Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 257–279.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly D., Amburgey T. L. 1991. Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 591–612.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy M. T. 2008. Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. American Sociological Review, 73: 270–295. Google Scholar
  • Kennedy M. T., Lo J. Y.-C., Lounsbury M. 2010. Category currency: The changing value of conformity as a function of ongoing meaning construction. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 31: 369–397. Google Scholar
  • Kraatz M. S., Block E. S. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin-Andersson K.Suddaby R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 243–275. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Kraatz M. S., Zajac E. J. 1996. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61: 812–836. Google Scholar
  • Lee P. M., Pollock T. G., Jin K. 2011. The contingent value of venture capitalist reputation. Strategic Organization, 9: 33–69. Google Scholar
  • Levy A. 2014. Google shares took off, but the auction didn’t. CNBC, August 19: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101912149. Google Scholar
  • Lewis M. 1999. The new new thing: A Silicon Valley story. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
  • Lewis V. L., Churchill N. C. 1983. The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3): 30–50. Google Scholar
  • Libaers D., Hicks D., Porter A. L. 2010. A taxonomy of small firm technology commercialization. Industrial and Corporate Change, Advance access available at http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/citmgr?gca=indcor%3Bdtq039v1. Google Scholar
  • Lok J. 2010. Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1305–1335.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loughran T., McDonald B. 2013. IPO first-day returns, offer price revisions, volatility, and form S-1 language. Journal of Financial Economics, 109: 307–326. Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M. 2007. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 289–307.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M., Glynn M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 545–564. Google Scholar
  • MacMillan I. C., Siegel R., Narasimha P. S. 1986. Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1: 119–128. Google Scholar
  • Martens M. L., Jennings J. E., Jennings P. D. 2007. Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1107–1132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maurer I., Ebers M. 2006. Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 262–292. Google Scholar
  • Merton R. K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
  • Meyer R. E., Hammerschmid G. 2006. Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49: 1000–1014. Google Scholar
  • Miller D., Friesen P. H. 1980. Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 591–614.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milliman J., Von Glinow M. A., Nathan M. 1991. Organizational life cycles and strategic international human resource management in multinational companies: Implications for congruence theory. Academy of Management Review, 16: 318–339.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. 1984. Power and organization life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 9: 207–224.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Murray F. 2010. The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116: 341–388. Google Scholar
  • Nag R., Corley K. G., Gioia D. A. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 821–847.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Navis C., Glynn M. A. 2010. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 439–471. Google Scholar
  • Navis C., Glynn M. A. 2011. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36: 479–499.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M., Olson M. 2009. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Pache A.-C., Santos F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35: 455–476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perkmann M., King Z., Pavelin S. 2011. Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40: 539–552. Google Scholar
  • Pollock T. G., Rindova V. P. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 631–642.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porac J. F., Wade J. B., Pollock T. G. 1999. Industry categories and the politics of the comparable firm in CEO compensation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 112–144. Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Sandholtz K. W. 2012. Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6: 94–115. Google Scholar
  • Pratt M. G., Foreman P. O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25: 18–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Quinn R. E., Cameron K. 1983. Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29: 33–51. Google Scholar
  • Rajgopal S., Venkatachalam M., Kotha S. 2003. The value relevance of network advantages: The case of e-commerce firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 41: 135–162. Google Scholar
  • Rao H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Supplement 1): 29–44. Google Scholar
  • Rao H., Monin P., Durand R. 2003. Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108: 795–843. Google Scholar
  • Ravasi D., Schultz M. 2006. Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 433–458.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reese P. R., Aldrich H. E. 1995. Entrepreneurial networks and business performance. In Birley S.MacMillan I. (Eds), International entrepreneurship: 124-144. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Reynolds P., Miller B. 1992. New firm gestation: Conception, birth, and implications for research. Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 405–417. Google Scholar
  • Ridgeway C. L., Berger J. 1986. Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review, 51: 603–617. Google Scholar
  • Ries E. 2011. The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business. Google Scholar
  • Roberts M. J., Barley L. 2004. How venture capitalists evaluate potential venture opportunities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Google Scholar
  • Santos F. M., Eisenhardt K. M. 2009. Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 643–671.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sauermann H., Stephan P. 2013. Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science, 24: 889–909. Google Scholar
  • Schildt H. A., Zahra S. A., Sillanpää A. 2006. Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30: 399–415. Google Scholar
  • Sengupta S. 2012. Facebook’s ambition collides with harsh market. New York Times, August 20: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/technology/facebooks-ambition-collides-with-a-harsh-market.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Google Scholar
  • Shane S. A. 2004. Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
  • Sine W. D., David R. J., Mitsuhashi H. 2007. From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organization Science, 18: 578–594. Google Scholar
  • Slevin D. P., Covin J. G. 1997. Strategy formation patterns, performance, and the significance of context. Journal of Management, 23: 189–209. Google Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Mitchell T. R., Summer C. E. 1985. Top level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life cycle. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 799–820.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spiers E. 2013. Andrew Mason on how to deal: From founder to ex-Groupon CEO. Fast Company, April 15: http://www.fastcompany.com/3007842/andrew-mason-how-deal-founder-ex-groupon-ceo. Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H., Milliken F. J. 1988. Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks. Journal of Management Studies, 25: 319–340. Google Scholar
  • Staw B. M. 1981. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6: 577–587.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stimpert J. L., Gustafson L. T., Sarason Y. 1998. Organizational identity within the strategic management conversation: Contributions and assumptions. In Whetten D. A.Godfrey P. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations: 83–99. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In March J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations: 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 315–349. Google Scholar
  • Suchman M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton P. H., Ocasio W., Lounsbury M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S., David R. J., Sine W. D. 2011. Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organization Science, 22: 1332–1344. Google Scholar
  • Vohora A., Wright M., Lockett A. 2004. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33: 147–175. Google Scholar
  • Waldron T. L., Navis C., Fisher G. 2013. Explaining differences in firms’ responses to activism. Academy of Management Review, 38: 397–417.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N. 2003. Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14: 149–172. Google Scholar
  • Webb J. W., Tihanyi L., Ireland R. D., Sirmon D. G. 2009. You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Academy of Management Review, 34: 492–510.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber K., Glynn M. A. 2006. Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27: 1639–1660. Google Scholar
  • Weber K., Heinze K. L., DeSoucey M. 2008. Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 529–567. Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Weinberg A. 2004. IPO Dutch auctions vs. traditional allocation. Forbes, May 10: http://www.forbes.com/2004/05/10/cx_aw_0510mondaymatchup.html. Google Scholar
  • Whetten D. A. 2006. Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15: 219–234. Google Scholar
  • Woolcock M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27: 151–208. Google Scholar
  • Wry T., Lounsbury M., Glynn M. A. 2011. Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22: 449–463. Google Scholar
  • Zimmerman M. A., Zeitz G. J. 2002. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27: 414–431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zott C., Huy Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 70–105. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900