The Significance of Suffering in Organizations: Understanding Variation in Workers’ Responses to Multiple Modes of Control

REFERENCES

• Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. 1990. The sociology of the caring professions. Basingstoke, UK: Falmer Press. Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. 1988. Comments on the motivational status of self‐esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 317–334. Google Scholar
• Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. 1999. Organizational misbehaviour. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Adams, R. 2018. Universities threaten to punish striking staff over cancelled lectures. The Guardian, March 2: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/mar/02/uk-universities-threaten-punish-striking-staff-cancelled-lectures. Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S. 2011. Marxist philosophy and organization studies: Marxist contributions to the understanding of some important organizational forms. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 32: 123–153. Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. 1996. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61–89. Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. 2011. Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36: 63–85. Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., Forbes, L. C., & Willmott, H. 2007. Critical management studies. Academy of Management Annals, 1: 119–179.Link , Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. 2004. Interfaces of control: Technocratic and socio-ideological control in a global management consultancy firm. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29: 423–444. Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Thompson, P. 2006. Post-bureaucracy? In A. StephenB. RosemaryT. PaulS. T. Pamela (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization: 485–507. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. 1992. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17: 432–464.Link , Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. 2002. Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39: 619–644. Google Scholar
• Anteby, M. 2008a. Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant. Organization Science, 19: 202–220. Google Scholar
• Anteby, M. 2008b. Moral gray zones: Side productions, identity, and regulation in an aeronautic plant. Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1970. On violence. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. 1993. Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 88–115.Link , Google Scholar
• Barker, J. R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 408–437. Google Scholar
• Barker, J. R. 1999. The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. 1992. Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 363–399. Google Scholar
• Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1994. Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose. Harvard Business Review, 72(6): 79–88. Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. 1987. How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 163–176. Google Scholar
• Biggart, N. W., & Delbridge, R. 2004. Systems of exchange. Academy of Management Review, 29: 28–49.Link , Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. 1956. Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Random House. Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M., & Schoenherr, R. A. 1971. The structure of organizations. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. 1962. Formal organizations: A comparative approach. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M. 1995. Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney As “Tamara-Land.” Academy of Management Journal, 38: 997–1035.Link , Google Scholar
• Bolton, S. C. 2004. A simple matter of control? NHS hospital nurses and new management. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 317–333. Google Scholar
• Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press. Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D. 2006. A narrative approach to collective identities. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 731–753. Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 1979. Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Callaghan, G., & Thompson, P. 2001. Edwards revisited: Technical control and call centres. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 22: 13–37. Google Scholar
• Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., & Long, C. P. 2004. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15: 411–431. Google Scholar
• Casey, C. 1995. Work, self and society: After industrialism. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Casey, C. 1999. “Come, join our family”: Discipline and integration in corporate organizational culture. Human Relations, 52: 155–178. Google Scholar
• Cassell, E. J. 1982. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 306: 639–645. Google Scholar
• Cassell, E. J. 1991a. The nature of suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Cassell, E. J. 1991b. Recognizing suffering. Hastings Center Report, 21(3): 24–31. Google Scholar
• Child, J. 1972. Organization structure and strategies of control: A replication of the Aston Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 163–177. Google Scholar
• Child, J. 1984. Organization (2nd ed.). London: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. 1981. Organization and control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 545–562. Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. 2006. Power and organizations. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. L. 1992. Managing the shopfloor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. L. 1994. Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge and resistance in the workplace. In J. M. JermierD. KnightsW. R. Nord (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations: 25–68. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Colville, I., Dalton, K., & Tomkins, C. 1993. Developing and understanding cultural change in HM customs and excise: There is more to dancing than knowing the next steps. Public Administration, 71: 549–565. Google Scholar
• Contu, A. 2008. Decaf resistance: On misbehavior, cynicism, and desire in liberal workplaces. Management Communication Quarterly, 21: 364–379. Google Scholar
• Coombs, R., Knights, D., & Willmott, H. C. 1992. Culture, control and competition: Towards a conceptual framework for the study of information technology in organizations. Organization Studies, 13: 51–72. Google Scholar
• Cressey, P., & MacInnes, J. 1980. Voting for Ford: Industrial democracy and the control of labour. Capital & Class, 4(2): 5–33. Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L., & Jun, J. S. 2005. The need for reflexivity in public administration. Administration & Society, 37: 225–242. Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges, B. 1988. Ideological control in nonideological organizations. New York: Praeger. Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. 1994. Corporate culture and morality: Durkheim-inspired reflections on the limits of corporate culture. Journal of Management Studies, 31: 1–18. Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. 1995. Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Google Scholar
• Dejours, C. 2007. Subjectivity, work, and action. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R. 1998. Life on the line in contemporary manufacturing: The workplace experience of lean production and the “Japanese” model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R., & Ezzamel, M. 2005. The strength of difference: Contemporary conceptions of control. Organization, 12: 603–618. Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R., & Sallaz, J. J. 2015. Work: Four worlds and ways of seeing. Organization Studies, 36: 1449–1462. Google Scholar
• Delbridge, R., Turnbull, P., & Wilkinson, B. 1992. Pushing back the frontiers: Management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes. New Technology, Work and Employment, 7: 97–106. Google Scholar
• Drew, F. L. 1986. Suffering and autonomy. In R. DeBellisE. MarcusA. KutschnerC. Smith TorresV. BarrettM. Siegel (Eds.), Suffering: Psychological and social aspects of loss, grief, and care: 19–24. New York: Haworth Press. Google Scholar
• Driver, M. 2002. The learning organization: Foucauldian gloom or utopian sunshine? Human Relations, 55: 33–53. Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. 1996. Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. 2000. In praise of bureaucracy: Weber - organization - ethics. London: Sage. Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 2008. (First published in 1915.) The elementary forms of the religious life. (Translated by J. W. Swain.) New York: Dover Publications. Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., Collinson, D., & Della Rocca, G. 1995. Workplace resistance in Western Europe: A preliminary overview and a research agenda. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1: 283–316. Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. K. 2010. Developing labour process analysis: Themes from industrial sociology and future directions. In P. ThompsonC. Smith (Eds.), Working life: Renewing labour process analysis: 29–46. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave. Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. 1979. Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. C. 1981. The social relations of production at the point of production. In M. Zey-FerrellM. Aiken (Eds.), Complex organizations: Critical perspectives: 156–182. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1985. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31: 134–149. Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.Link , Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737–770.Link , Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1975. Comparative analysis of complex organizations. London: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. 1998. Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 358–396. Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Willmott, H., & Worthington, F. 2001. Power, control and resistance in “the factory that time forgot.” Journal of Management Studies, 38: 1053–1079. Google Scholar
• Ezzy, D. 2001. A simulacrum of workplace community: Individualism and engineered culture. Sociology, 35: 631–650. Google Scholar
• Ferner, A. 2000. The underpinnings of “bureaucratic” control systems: HRM in European multinationals. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 521–540. Google Scholar
• Fineman, S., & Sturdy, A. 1999. The emotions of control: A qualitative exploration of environmental regulation. Human Relations, 52: 631–663. Google Scholar
• Flamholtz, E. G. 1983. Accounting, budgeting and control systems in their organizational context: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8: 153–169. Google Scholar
• Fleming, P. 2005. Workers’ playtime? Boundaries and cynicism in a “culture of fun” program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41: 285–303. Google Scholar
• Fleming, P. 2009. Authenticity and the cultural politics of work: New forms of informal control. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. 2003. Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10: 157–179. Google Scholar
• Fournier, V., & Grey, C. 2000. At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53: 7–32. Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. L. 1977a. Responsible autonomy versus direct control over the labour process. Capital & Class, 1: 43–57. Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. L. 1977b. Industry and labour. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 2013. To have or to be? London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar
• Fuller, L., & Smith, V. 1991. Consumers’ reports: Management by customers in a changing economy. Work, Employment and Society, 5: 1–16. Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Y. 1999. Beyond happy families: A critical reevaluation of the control-resistance-identity triangle. Human Relations, 52: 179–203. Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Y. 2008. Spectacles of resistance and resistance of spectacles. Management Communication Quarterly, 21: 310–326. Google Scholar
• Gagnon, S., & Collinson, D. 2017. Resistance through difference: The co-constitution of dissent and inclusion. Organization Studies, 38: 1253–1276. Google Scholar
• George, G., Corbishley, C., Khayesi, J. N., Haas, M. R., & Tihanyi, L. 2016. Bringing Africa in: Promising directions for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 377–393.Link , Google Scholar
• George, J. M. 2013. Compassion and capitalism: Implications for organizational studies. Journal of Management, 40: 5–15. Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
• Gill, M. J. 2015. Elite identity and status anxiety: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of management consultants. Organization, 22: 306–325. Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. 1954. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Grey, C., & Sturdy, A. 2007. Friendship and organizational analysis: Toward a research agenda. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16: 157–172. Google Scholar
• Grugulis, I., Dundon, T., & Wilkinson, A. 2000. Cultural control and the “culture manager”: Employment practices in a consultancy. Work, Employment and Society, 14: 97–116. Google Scholar
• Hancock, P., & Tyler, M. 2004. “MOT your life”: Critical management studies and the management of everyday life. Human Relations, 57: 619–645. Google Scholar
• Harris, M. 2011. Network governance and the politics of organizational resistance in UK healthcare: The National Programme for Information Technology. In S. R. CleggM. HarrisH. Höpfl (Eds.), Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? 105–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Hennart, J.-F. 1993. Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of “market” and “hierarchy.” Organization Science, 4: 529–547. Google Scholar
• Hirst, A., & Humphreys, M. 2015. Configurable bureaucracy and the making of modular man. Organization Studies, 36: 1531–1553. Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. E. 2004. Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization, 11: 81–100. Google Scholar
• Hodson, R. 1991. Workplace behaviors. Work and Occupations, 18: 271–290. Google Scholar
• Hummel, R. P. 2007. The bureaucratic experience: The post-modern challenge. London: M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar
• Hyman, R. 1987. Strategy or structure? Capital, labour and control. Work, Employment and Society, 1: 25–55. Google Scholar
• Jaeger, A. M., & Baliga, B. R. 1985. Control systems and strategic adaptation: Lessons from the Japanese experience. Strategic Management Journal, 6: 115–134. Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S., & Delbridge, R. 2013. Context matters: Examining “soft” and “hard” approaches to employee engagement in two workplaces. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24: 2670–2691. Google Scholar
• Jennings, K., & Western, G. 1997. A right to strike? Nursing Ethics, 4: 277–282. Google Scholar
• Jermier, J., Knights, D., & Nord, W. 1994. Resistance and power in organizations. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Jermier, J. M. 1998. Introduction: Critical perspective on organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 235–256. Google Scholar
• Johns, G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31: 386–408.Link , Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L., & Griffin, L. J. 1980. Class, occupation, and inequality in job rewards. American Journal of Sociology, 85: 731–768. Google Scholar
• Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. 2004. Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47: 808–827. Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. 1972. Commitment and community: Communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Kärreman, D., & Alvesson, M. 2004. Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11: 149–175. Google Scholar
• Knights, D., & McCabe, D. 2000. Bewitched, bothered and bewildered: The meaning and experience of teamworking for employees in an automobile company. Human Relations, 53: 1481–1517. Google Scholar
• Knights, D., & Morgan, G. 1991. Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12: 251–273. Google Scholar
• Knights, D., & Willmott, H. 1982. The problem of freedom: Fromm’s contribution to a critical theory of work organisation. Praxis International, 2: 204–225. Google Scholar
• Knights, D., & Willmott, H. 1989. Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23: 535–558. Google Scholar
• Kondo, D. K. 2009. Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
• Korzybski, A. 1958. Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelean systems and general semantics (5th ed.). New York: International Non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company. Google Scholar
• Kunda, G. 1992. Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar
• Landecker, W. S. 1951. Types of integration and their measurement. American Journal of Sociology, 56: 332–340. Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. 2007. Ain’t misbehavin: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management, 33: 378–394. Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. 2001. When “silence = death,” keep talking: Trust, control and the discursive construction of identity in the Canadian HIV/AIDS treatment domain. Organization Studies, 22: 285–310. Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S. 2009. Who am I now? Sensemaking and identity in posttraumatic growth. In L. M. RobertsJ. E. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 47–76. New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S. 2017. The value of qualitative research for positive organizing. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12: 319–320. Google Scholar
• Mars, G. 1982. Cheats at work: An anthropology of workplace crime. London: Allen & Unwin. Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. 1998. A dictionary of sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Martin, J., Knopoff, K., & Beckman, C. 1998. An alternative to bureaucratic impersonality and emotional labor: Bounded emotionality at The Body Shop. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 429–469. Google Scholar
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. 2009. The economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844 and The Communist Manifesto. (Translated by M. Milligan.) New York: Prometheus Books. Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. 2015. The tyranny of distance: Kafka and the problem of distance in bureaucratic organizations. Organization, 22: 58–77. Google Scholar
• McKinney, J. C. 1969. Typification, typologies, and sociological theory. Social Forces, 48: 1–12. Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, I. P., Badham, R. J., & Palmer, G. 2005. Cultures of ambiguity. Work, Employment and Society, 19: 67–89. Google Scholar
• Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J., Thomas, R., & Davies, A. 2004. Management consultant talk: A cross-cultural comparison of normalizing discourse and resistance. Organization, 11: 539–564. Google Scholar
• Michel, A. 2011. Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 325–368. Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1989. The structuring of organizations. In D. AschC. Bowman (Eds.), Readings in strategic management: 322–352. London: Macmillan Education UK. Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1993. Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. R., & Mickel, A. E. 1999. The meaning of money: An individual-difference perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24: 568–578.Link , Google Scholar
• Morris, T., Lydka, H., & O’Creevy, M. F. 1993. Can commitment be managed? A longitudinal analysis of employee commitment and human resource policies. Human Resource Management Journal, 3: 21–42. Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. 2005. Theorizing resistance in organization studies: A dialectical approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 19: 19–44. Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., Thomas, R., Martí, I., & Seidl, D. 2017. Resistance redux. Organization Studies, 38: 1157–1183. Google Scholar
• Nemiroff, P. M., & Ford, D. L. 1976. Task effectiveness and human fulfillment in organizations: A review and development of a conceptual contingency model. Academy of Management Review, 1: 69–82.Link , Google Scholar
• Nishiyama, K., & Johnson, J. V. 1997. Karoshi—Death from overwork: Occupational health consequences of Japanese production management. International Journal of Health Services, 27: 625–641. Google Scholar
• O’Doherty, D., & Willmott, H. 2001. Debating labour process theory: The issue of subjectivity and the relevance of poststructuralism. Sociology, 35: 457–476. Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G., & Bonardi, J.-P. 2011. The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36: 6–11.Link , Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. 1991. Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1: 9–42. Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T., & Berry, A. J. 1980. Control, organization and accounting. In C. EmmanuelD. T. OtleyK. Merchant (Eds.), Readings in accounting for management control: 231–244. Boston: Springer. Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. G. 1979. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25: 833–848. Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. G., & Johnson, J. B. 1978. Types of organizational control and their relationship to emotional well being. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 293–317. Google Scholar
• Özkazanç-Pan, B. 2008. International management research meets “the rest of the world.” Academy of Management Review, 33: 964–974.Link , Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. 2018. Dying for a paycheck. New York: HarperBusiness. Google Scholar
• Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. 1998. Everyday struggles at the workplace: The nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 15: 225–257. Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, A., & Pratt, M. G. 1993. Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy of Management Review, 18: 32–55.Link , Google Scholar
• Reed, M. 2010. Control in contemporary work organizations. In P. BlytonE. HeeryP. Turnbull (Eds.), Reassessing the employment relationship: 41–70. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMilllan. Google Scholar
• Reed, M. 2011. The post-bureaucratic organization and the control revolution. In S. R. CleggM. HarrisH. Höpfl (Eds.), Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? 230–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. 2008. The McDonaldization of society. London: Pine Forge Press. Google Scholar
• Robertson, M., & Swan, J. 2003. “Control—what control?” Culture and ambiguity within a knowledge intensive firm. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 831–858. Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S. B., & Collinson, D. L. 1995. “Having fun”? Humour as resistance in Brazil. Organization Studies, 16: 739–768. Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1990. Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge. Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, P. 2004. Management control as an employee resource: The case of front‐line service workers. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 601–622. Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, P., Hill, S., & Peccei, R. 1997. Checking out service: Evaluating excellence, HRM and TQM in retailing. Work, Employment and Society, 11: 481–503. Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 141–166. Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
• Snell, S. A. 1992. Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 292–327.Link , Google Scholar
• Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. 2009. Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62: 537–560. Google Scholar
• Storey, J. 1980. The challenge to management control. London: Kogan Page. Google Scholar
• Storey, J. 1985. The means of management control. Sociology, 19: 193–211. Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A., Fleming, P., & Delbridge, R. 2010. Normative control and beyond in contemporary capitalism. In P. ThompsonC. Smith (Eds.), Working life: Renewing labour process analysis: 113–135. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave. Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. 2009. Critical management studies on identity: Mapping the terrain. In M. AlvessonT. BridgmanH. Willmott (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies: 167–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., & Davies, A. 2005. Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26: 683–706. Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., Hardy, C., Cutcher, L., & Ainsworth, S. 2014. What’s age got to do with it? On the critical analysis of age and organizations. Organization Studies, 35: 1569–1584. Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., Sargent, L. D., & Hardy, C. 2011. Managing organizational change: Negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations. Organization Science, 22: 22–41. Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. 2003. Disconnected capitalism: Or why employers can’t keep their side of the bargain. Work, Employment and Society, 17: 359–378. Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & McHugh, D. 1995. Work organisations: A critical introduction. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & van den Broek, D. 2010. Managerial control and workplace regimes: An introduction. Work, Employment and Society, 24: 1–12. Google Scholar
• Tompkins, P. K., & Cheney, G. 1985. Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. In R. D. McPheeP. K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions: 179–210. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Victor, B., & Stephens, C. 1994. The dark side of the new organizational forms: An editorial essay. Organization Science, 5: 479–482. Google Scholar
• Voronov, M. 2008. Toward engaged critical management studies. Organization, 15: 939–945. Google Scholar
• Voronov, M., & Vince, R. 2012. Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37: 58–81.Link , Google Scholar
• Walton, E. J. 2005. The persistence of bureaucracy: A meta-analysis of Weber’s model of bureaucratic control. Organization Studies, 26: 569–600. Google Scholar
• Wartenberg, T. E. 1982. “Species-being” and “human nature” in Marx. Human Studies, 5: 77–95. Google Scholar
• Watson, T. J. 1997. The labour of division: The manager as “self” and “other.” Sociological Review, 45(Supplement 1): 139–152. Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society. London: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1989. Organized improvisation: 20 years of organizing. Communication Studies, 40: 241–248. Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 1993. Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30: 515–552. Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 1997. Rethinking management and managerial work: Capitalism, control, and subjectivity. Human Relations, 50: 1329–1359. Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 2005. Theorizing contemporary control: Some post-structuralist responses to some critical realist questions. Organization, 12: 747–780. Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 2011. Back to the future: What does studying bureaucracy tell us? In S. R. CleggM. HarrisH. Höpfl (Eds.), Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? 257–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M. 2007. Minority employees engaging with (diversity) management: An analysis of control, agency, and micro-emancipation. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 1371–1397. Google Scholar
• Zaza, C., Charles, C., & Muszynski, A. 1998. The meaning of playing-related musculoskeletal disorders to classical musicians. Social Science & Medicine, 47: 2013–2023. Google Scholar