The Ties That Unbind: Socialization and Business-Owning Family Reference Point Shift

REFERENCES

• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17–40.Link , Google Scholar
• Albert, S. 1977. Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84: 485–503. Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H., & Weiss, J. 1981. Differentiation within the U.S. capitalist class. American Sociological Review, 57: 59–72. Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. 2003. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 573–596. Google Scholar
• Amit, R., & Villalonga, B. 2014. Financial performance of family firms. In L. Melin, M. Nordqvist., & P. Sharma (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business: 157–178. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Aranda, C., Arellano, J., & Davila, A. 2017. Organizational learning in target setting. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 1189–1211.Link , Google Scholar
• Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. 2007. The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 73–95. Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. 2008. Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34: 325–374. Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. 2000. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 837–853.Link , Google Scholar
• Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. 2014. Social cognition: An integrated introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 329–366. Google Scholar
• Bamberger, P., & Fiegenbaum, A. 1996. The role of strategic reference points in explaining the nature and consequences of human resource strategy. Academy of Management Review, 21: 926–958.Link , Google Scholar
• Barthélemy, J. 2017. The impact of technical consultants on the quality of their clients’ products: Evidence from the Bordeaux wine industry. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 1174–1190. Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. 1987. First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23: 483–500. Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2004. Inherited wealth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25: 258–279. Google Scholar
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gómez-Mejía, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 82–113. Google Scholar
• Blettner, D. P., He, Z. L., Hu, S., & Bettis, R. A. 2015. Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 987–1005. Google Scholar
• Block, J. H. 2012. R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27: 248–265. Google Scholar
• Bluedorn, A. C. 2002. The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1996. On the family as a realized category. Theory, Culture & Society, 13: 19–26. Google Scholar
• Brimeyer, T. M., Miller, J., & Perrucci, R. 2006. Social class sentiments in formation: Influence of class socialization, college socialization, and class aspirations. Sociological Quarterly, 47: 471–495. Google Scholar
• Bundy, J., Shropshire, C., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2013. Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Academy of Management Review, 38: 352–376.Link , Google Scholar
• Cardinale, I. 2018. Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 43: 132–155.Link , Google Scholar
• Carley, K. 1986. An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12: 137–189. Google Scholar
• Carney, M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family‐controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29: 249–265. Google Scholar
• Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. 2002. The co-evolution of institutional environments and organizational strategies: The rise of family business groups in the ASEAN region. Organization Studies, 23: 1–29. Google Scholar
• Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Strike, V. M. 2014. Dead money: Inheritance law and the longevity of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38: 1261–1283. Google Scholar
• Carney, M., & Nason, R. S. 2018. Family business and the 1%. Business & Society, 57: 1191–1215. Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. 2012. Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family‐controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36: 1153–1173. Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. H., & Huber, G. P. 2001. Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 937–955.Link , Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. 2012. Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 976–997.Link , Google Scholar
• Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & De Massis, A. 2015. A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39: 173–182. Google Scholar
• Coté, S. 2011. How social class shapes thoughts and actions in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31: 43–71. Google Scholar
• Croce, A., & Martí, J. 2016. Productivity growth in private‐equity–backed family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40: 657–683. Google Scholar
• Cruz, C., Larraza‐Kintana, M., Garcés‐Galdeano, L., & Berrone, P. 2014. Are family firms really more socially responsible? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38: 1295–1316. Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. C., Gómez-Mejia, L. R., & Becerra, M. 2010. Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 69–89.Link , Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9: 284–295.Link , Google Scholar
• Das, T. K. 1987. Strategic planning and individual temporal orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 203–209. Google Scholar
• Delmas, M. A. 2002. Innovating against European rigidities: Institutional environment and dynamic capabilities. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13: 19–43. Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. 2008. Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21: 183–199. Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. 2016. Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30: 93–116.Link , Google Scholar
• DeTienne, D. R., & Chirico, F. 2013. Exit strategies in family firms: How socioemotional wealth drives the threshold of performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37: 1297–1318. Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. G. 1980. The family office as a coordinating mechanism within the ruling class. Insurgent Sociologist, 9: 8–23. Google Scholar
• EY. 2016. EY family office guide: Pathway to successful family and wealth management. Available at https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-family-office-guide/$FILE/1006031-family-office-guide-hr.pdf. Google Scholar
• Farber, B. 1975. Bilateral kinship: Centripetal and centrifugal types of organization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37: 871–888. Google Scholar
• Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. 2009. Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3: 127–146. Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S., & Schendel, D. 1996. Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 219–235. Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. 1991. Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
• Fogel, K. 2006. Oligarchic family control, social economic outcomes, and the quality of government. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 603–622. Google Scholar
• Garcia, P. R. J. M., Sharma, P., De Massis, A., Wright, M., & Scholes, L. 2019. Perceived parental behaviors and next-generation engagement in family firms: A social cognitive perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43: 224–243. Google Scholar
• Gavetti, G. 2012. PERSPECTIVE—Toward a behavioral theory of strategy. Organization Science, 23: 267–285. Google Scholar
• George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S. B., & Barden, J. 2006. Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31: 347–365.Link , Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, A., & Abrahamson, E. 1991. Champions of change and strategic shifts: The role of internal and external change advocates. Journal of Management Studies, 28: 173–190. Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Manz, C. C. 1985. Linking cognition and behavior: A script processing interpretation of vicarious learning. Academy of Management Review, 10: 527–539.Link , Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Campbell, J. T., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R. E., Makri, M., & Sirmon, D. G. 2014. Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38: 1351–1374. Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. 2011. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5: 653–707.Link , Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 106–137. Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. 2003. The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 226–237.Link , Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. 2010. Diversification decisions in family controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47: 223–253. Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Neacsu, I., & Martin, G. 2019. CEO risk-taking and socioemotional wealth: The behavioral agency model, family control, and CEO option wealth. Journal of Management, 45: 1713–1738. Google Scholar
• Gordon, G., & Nicholson, N. 2010. Family wars: Stories and insights from famous family business feuds. London: Kogan Page. Google Scholar
• Graffin, S. D., Bundy, J., Porac, J. F., Wade, J. B., & Quinn, D. P. 2013. Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 313–345. Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. NohriaR. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action: 25–56. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar
• Gray, B., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. 2013. Encountering social class differences at work: How “class work” perpetuates inequality. Academy of Management Review, 38: 670–699.Link , Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R. 2008. A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 476–494.Link , Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R., & Teh, D. 2018. Goal selection internally and externally: A behavioral theory of institutionalization. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20: S19–S38. Google Scholar
• Grubman, J., & Jaffe, D. 2010. Client relationships and family dynamics: Competencies and services necessary for truly integrated wealth management. Journal of Wealth Management, 13: 16–31. Google Scholar
• Habbershon, T. G., & Pistrui, J. 2002. Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15: 223–237. Google Scholar
• Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. 1999. A resource‐based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12: 1–25. Google Scholar
• Haleblian, J., & Rajagopalan, N. 2005. Top managerial cognitions, past performance, and strategic change: A theoretical framework. Strategy Process, 22: 63–91. Google Scholar
• Harrington, B. 2016. Trusts and financialization. Socio-Economic Review, 14: 1–34. Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. 2008. Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59: 387–417. Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. 2000. Where we stand: Class matters. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P., Sutcliffe, K. M., Miller, C. C., & Glick, W. H. 1993. Understanding and predicting organizational change. In G. P. HuberW. H. Glick (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance: 215–265. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Hurst, E., & Lusardi, A. 2004. Liquidity constraints, household wealth, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Political Economy, 112: 319–347. Google Scholar
• Isabella, L. A. 1990. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 7–41.Link , Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., & Rau, S. B. 2015. Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30: 29–49. Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J., Shanine, K., & Kacmar, M. 2017. Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11: 309–341.Link , Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz, P., & Dyer, W. G. 2017. Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30: 111–118. Google Scholar
• Jones, G., & Rose, M. B. 1993. Family capitalism. Business History, 35: 1–16. Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. H., & Audia, P. G. 2012. Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 37: 211–231.Link , Google Scholar
• Kacperczyk, A., Beckman, C. M., & Moliterno, T. P. 2015. Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 228–262. Google Scholar
• Kaye, K., & Hamilton, S. 2004. Roles of trust in consulting to financial families. Family Business Review, 17: 151–163. Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. 2007. Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 331–372. Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y. J., Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. J. 2015. All aspirations are not created equal: The differential effects of historical and social aspirations on acquisition behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1361–1388.Link , Google Scholar
• Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. 1997. Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48: 59–75. Google Scholar
• Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. 2002. Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12: 70–91. Google Scholar
• König, A., Kammerlander, N., & Enders, A. 2013. The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38: 418–441.Link , Google Scholar
• Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. 2013. Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family‐centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37: 1263–1288. Google Scholar
• Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Fang, H., & Frattini, F. 2014. Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics, 43: 597–619. Google Scholar
• Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Bianchi, M., & Fang, H. 2013. Technology acquisition in family and nonfamily firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30: 1073–1088. Google Scholar
• Kotlar, J., Signori, A., De Massis, A., & Vismara, S. 2018. Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1073–1099.Link , Google Scholar
• Labianca, G., Gray, B., & Brass, D. J. 2000. A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11: 235–257. Google Scholar
• Langfield‐Smith, K. 1992. Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 349–368. Google Scholar
• Lant, T. K., & Montgomery, D. B. 1987. Learning from strategic success and failure. Journal of Business Research, 15: 503–517. Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15: 222–279. Google Scholar
• Larson, M. S. 1977. The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
• Laverty, K. J. 1996. Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review, 21: 825–860.Link , Google Scholar
• Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2006. Why do some family businesses out‐compete? Governance, long‐term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30: 731–746. Google Scholar
• Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2018. Beyond the firm: Business families as entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42: 527–536. Google Scholar
• Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A. 2006. Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community‐level social capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30: 755–775. Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., & March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–338. Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1947. Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1: 5–41. Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. 2011. Long‐term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35: 1149–1169. Google Scholar
• Lyles, M. A., & Schwenk, C. R. 1992. Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 155–174. Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S. 2005. The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 21–49.Link , Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. 1980. Law in the development of dynastic families among American business elites: The domestication of capital and the capitalization of family. Law and Society Review, 14: 859–903. Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., & Hall, P. D. 1992. Lives in trust: The fortunes of dynastic families in late 20th century America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar
• Masulis, R. W., Pham, P. K., & Zein, J. 2011. Family business groups around the world: Financing advantages, control motivations, and organizational choices. Review of Financial Studies, 24: 3556–3600. Google Scholar
• Mazzelli, A., Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. 2018. Blending in while standing out: Selective conformity and new product introduction in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42: 206–230. Google Scholar
• McCall, M. W. 1977. Making sense with nonsense: Helping frames of reference clash. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Prescriptive models of organizations: 111–123. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
• McNamee, S. J., & Miller, R. K., Jr.. 2009. The meritocracy myth. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
• Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. 2007. The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: The case of the family business. Strategic Organization, 5: 321–333. Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Drori, G. S., & Hwang, H. 2006. World society and the proliferation of formal organization. In G. S. DroriJ. W. MeyerH. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change: 25–49. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• Micelotta, E. R., & Raynard, M. 2011. Concealing or revealing the family? Corporate brand identity strategies in family firms. Family Business Review, 24: 197–216. Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1993. The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 116–138.Link , Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Chen, M. J. 1994. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 1–23. Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2005. Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Le Breton‐Miller, I. 2014. Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38: 713–720. Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R. H. 2013. Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24: 189–209. Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Chen, J. 2014. Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1810–1833.Link , Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242–266.Link , Google Scholar
• Narayanan, V. K., Zane, L. J., & Kemmerer, B. 2011. The cognitive perspective in strategy: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 37: 305–351. Google Scholar
• Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., & Gras, D. 2018. A behavioral theory of social performance: Social identity and stakeholder expectations. Academy of Management Review, 43: 259–283.Link , Google Scholar
• Negro, G., Hannan, M. T., & Fassiotto, M. 2015. Category signaling and reputation. Organization Science, 26: 584–600. Google Scholar
• Palmer, D., & Barber, B. M. 2001. Challengers, elites, and owning families: A social class theory of corporate acquisitions in the 1960s. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 87–120. Google Scholar
• Patel, P. C., & Fiet, J. O. 2011. Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35: 1179–1197. Google Scholar
• Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. 2008. Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32: 949–969. Google Scholar
• Pérez, P. F., & Colli, A. 2013. The endurance of family businesses: A global overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107: 379–429. Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. 1993. Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1320–1350. Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25: 18–42.Link , Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Fisk, S. R. 2012. Class rules, status dynamics, and “gateway” interactions. In S. T. FiskeH. R. Markus (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction: 131–151. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar
• Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. 2002. Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6: 88–106. Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. 1975. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 532–547. Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. V., & Scott, W. G. 1995. Ethics and organizational reflection: The Rockefeller Foundation and postwar “moral deficits,” 1942–1954. Academy of Management Review, 20: 438–461.Link , Google Scholar
• Sacristán-Navarro, M., Gómez-Ansón, S., & Cabeza-García, L. 2011. Family ownership and control, the presence of other large shareholders, and firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 24: 71–93. Google Scholar
• Salvato, C., & Corbetta, G. 2013. Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors’ leadership construction. Family Business Review, 26: 235–255. Google Scholar
• Savage, M. 2015. Social class in the 21st century. London: Penguin. Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., & Kellermanns, F. W. 2015. Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39: 447–459. Google Scholar
• Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2001. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12: 99–116. Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. 2014. Identity switching and transnational professionals. International Political Sociology, 8: 335–337. Google Scholar
• Sharkey, A. J., & Bromley, P. 2015. Can ratings have indirect effects? Evidence from the organizational response to peers’ environmental ratings. American Sociological Review, 80: 63–91. Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. 1997. Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22: 758–798.Link , Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Jennings, P. D. 2007. The formation of opportunity beliefs: Overcoming ignorance and reducing doubt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 75–95. Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Ocasio, W. 2017. Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers’ opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 626–644. Google Scholar
• Shinkle, G. A. 2012. Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. Journal of Management, 38: 415–455. Google Scholar
• Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2009. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110: 1–22. Google Scholar
• Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. 2003. Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90: 209–224. Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27: 339–358. Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, self, culture. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2001. The transnational capitalist class. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar
• Soleimanof, S., Rutherford, M. W., & Webb, J. W. 2018. The intersection of family firms and institutional contexts: A review and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 31: 32–53. Google Scholar
• Starbuck, W. H. 1976. Organizations and their environments. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 1069–1123. Chicago: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
• Steier, L. P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. 2015. Governance challenges in family businesses and business families. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39: 1265–1280. Google Scholar
• Strike, V. 2012. Advising the family firm: Review the past to build the future. Family Business Review, 25: 156–177. Google Scholar
• Strike, V. M. 2013. The most trusted advisor and the subtle advice process in family firms. Family Business Review, 26: 293–313. Google Scholar
• Strike, V. M., Berrone, P., Sapp, S. G., & Congiu, L. 2015. A socioemotional wealth approach to CEO career horizons in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 52: 555–583. Google Scholar
• Strike, V. M., & Rerup, C. 2016. Mediated sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 880–905.Link , Google Scholar
• Strydom, P. 2006. Contemporary European cognitive social theory. In G. Delanty (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary European social theory: 218–229. New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. 2006. When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112: 97–144. Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. L., Levine, J. M., & Messick, D. M. 1999. Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211: 453–458. Google Scholar
• Useem, M. 1982. Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 199–226. Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P. 1995. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6: 280–321. Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16: 57–91.Link , Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1927. General economic history. (Translated by F. Knight.) Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 628–652. Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. 1999. Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 361–386. Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357–381. Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. M., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. 1998. A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23: 133–153.Link , Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. N. 2014. Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962–2013: What happened over the Great Recession? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 72: 151–208. Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, M. 1974. Corporate ownership and control: The large corporation and the capitalist class. American Journal of Sociology, 79: 1073–1119. Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. 2012. Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23: 851–868. Google Scholar
• Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. 2012. From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25: 136–155. Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. 1999. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 1271–1288. Google Scholar
• Zweig, M. 2004. Introduction: The challenge of working class studies. In M. Zweig (Ed.), What’s class got to do with it? American society in the twenty-first century: 1–18. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar